Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Firefox improvements.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Skybuck Flying
Oct 8, 2015, 1:55:52 AM10/8/15
to
1. No pop-ups what's so ever: meaning: no fokking confirmation windows for
fullscreen, resend info, no asking if I want to remember e-mail address
and/or passwords.
2. No remembering of login names and/or addresses... too dangerous that
similar look websites try to confuse you and get your password by you
accidently entering it.
fullscreen, resend info, no asking if I want to remember e-mail address
and/or passwords.
2. No remembering of login names and/or addresses... too dangerous that
similar look websites try to confuse you and get your password by you
accidently entering it.
Skybuck Flying
Oct 8, 2015, 1:57:00 AM10/8/15
to
Example of this:
Intel's shitty website looks exactly like hotmail login screen... only
slight different... same colors, same organization.
Intel is clearly trying to hack hotmail accounts.
Intel's shitty website looks exactly like hotmail login screen... only
slight different... same colors, same organization.
Intel is clearly trying to hack hotmail accounts.
Skybuck Flying
Oct 8, 2015, 2:01:26 AM10/8/15
to
There ya go for evidence...
http://www.skybuck.org/TooSimilar/TooSimilar.png
Cut and paste together... in reality... it's more white space around it....
Combined with firefox and same account names... it's easy to make this
mistake... and enter hotmail password into intel site or vice versa !
Dangerous !
http://www.skybuck.org/TooSimilar/TooSimilar.png
Cut and paste together... in reality... it's more white space around it....
Combined with firefox and same account names... it's easy to make this
mistake... and enter hotmail password into intel site or vice versa !
Dangerous !
Robert Baer
Oct 9, 2015, 4:08:14 AM10/9/15
to
Skybuck Flying
Oct 10, 2015, 7:08:49 AM10/10/15
to
"Robert Baer" wrote in message news:LBKRx.82288$3T2....@fx29.iad...
on center parts of the screen... and certain items I don't even notice
anymore... like blind spots...
I just see: "blue" and "white boxes".
Bye,
Skybuck.
Skybuck Flying
Oct 10, 2015, 7:09:52 AM10/10/15
to
Perhaps lack of sleep and/or tiredness also plays a roll.
Perhaps part of the visual cortex of the brain shuts down :)
Bye,
Skybuck =D
Perhaps part of the visual cortex of the brain shuts down :)
Bye,
Skybuck =D
Skybuck Flying
Oct 11, 2015, 1:03:54 PM10/11/15
to
Oh and by the way...
The intel community website... has the most annoying password requirements
ever !!!
It must be 8 to 15 characters..
must contain lower and upper and a fokking digit or something and/or a
special character ?!
wtf ?!
This will not make it more secure at all... because people will probably put
the special requirements at the back !
It's fokking stupid !
Bye,
Skybuck.
The intel community website... has the most annoying password requirements
ever !!!
It must be 8 to 15 characters..
must contain lower and upper and a fokking digit or something and/or a
special character ?!
wtf ?!
This will not make it more secure at all... because people will probably put
the special requirements at the back !
It's fokking stupid !
Bye,
Skybuck.
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
Oct 11, 2015, 1:13:10 PM10/11/15
to
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:03:56 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
<skybu...@hotmail.com> Gave us:
>Oh and by the way...
>
>The intel community website... has the most annoying password requirements
>ever !!!
You're a goddamned idiot, child.
secure login crypto. More folks use the site for real business purpose,
and only childish idiots like you are too stupid to know what is going
on.
better.
Grow the fuck up, you cross-posting retarded little piece of Usenet
troll dumbfuck.
<skybu...@hotmail.com> Gave us:
>Oh and by the way...
>
>The intel community website... has the most annoying password requirements
>ever !!!
>
>It must be 8 to 15 characters..
>must contain lower and upper and a fokking digit or something and/or a
>special character ?!
>
>wtf ?!
And now you show just how stupid you really are as it relates to
>It must be 8 to 15 characters..
>must contain lower and upper and a fokking digit or something and/or a
>special character ?!
>
>wtf ?!
secure login crypto. More folks use the site for real business purpose,
and only childish idiots like you are too stupid to know what is going
on.
>
>This will not make it more secure at all... because people will probably put
>the special requirements at the back !
It doesn't matter, idiot. It still foils brute force search hacking
>This will not make it more secure at all... because people will probably put
>the special requirements at the back !
better.
Grow the fuck up, you cross-posting retarded little piece of Usenet
troll dumbfuck.
D. Aaron Sawyer
Oct 12, 2015, 4:21:50 PM10/12/15
to
Skybuck Flying
Oct 21, 2015, 2:47:21 AM10/21/15
to
I think the problem here with this "out of control" thread as some have
called it is that "Brute Force" does not exist on a sequential computer.
"Brute Force" can only truely exist on a parallel computer that can try all
passwords at the same time.
A sequential computer will have to start somewhere.
And whereever somebody or something starts another person could accuse that
of having "pre-knowledge" or assuming a "direction expectation", a bias.
Start Up, Start Down, Start in the Middle it all has a certain bias when it
comes to sequential computers ! ;)
That's kind of a funny finding ! ;)
I will leave it at that for now ! ;)
At least when it comes to the start and search direction.
Though brute force could also be defined differently as in terms of
"passwords tried per second" or ammount of computations needed per password
etc.
So bottom line brute force as same said is a weakly defined term... to weak
really ! ;)
So want to call it dumb search, but then others object to it saying their
brute force is kinda smarter haha ! :)
Perhaps one nice definition of brute force could be to:
"Spent huge ammounts of cpu time and real time on trying to find the
password, relatively to the password length/number of possibilities"
or
"Eventually trying out all possible passwords where the starting point and
direction is biased but not necessarily pre-known or whatever" ;)
Bye,
Skybuck =D
called it is that "Brute Force" does not exist on a sequential computer.
"Brute Force" can only truely exist on a parallel computer that can try all
passwords at the same time.
A sequential computer will have to start somewhere.
And whereever somebody or something starts another person could accuse that
of having "pre-knowledge" or assuming a "direction expectation", a bias.
Start Up, Start Down, Start in the Middle it all has a certain bias when it
comes to sequential computers ! ;)
That's kind of a funny finding ! ;)
I will leave it at that for now ! ;)
At least when it comes to the start and search direction.
Though brute force could also be defined differently as in terms of
"passwords tried per second" or ammount of computations needed per password
etc.
So bottom line brute force as same said is a weakly defined term... to weak
really ! ;)
So want to call it dumb search, but then others object to it saying their
brute force is kinda smarter haha ! :)
Perhaps one nice definition of brute force could be to:
"Spent huge ammounts of cpu time and real time on trying to find the
password, relatively to the password length/number of possibilities"
or
"Eventually trying out all possible passwords where the starting point and
direction is biased but not necessarily pre-known or whatever" ;)
Bye,
Skybuck =D
Skybuck Flying
Oct 21, 2015, 3:17:35 AM10/21/15
to
For the true password-freakers out there a document just arrived by France
Researchers the title of the document louds (lol):
"
Monte Carlo Strength Evaluation:
Fast and Reliable Password Checking
"
http://www.eurecom.fr/en/publication/4711/download/rs-publi-4711.pdf
According to a newssite this document also claims that adding password rules
is not sufficient (and weakens passwords it was claimed by news site).
I scanned over this document there is some mention of these rules... and
that it is indeed weak against modern attacks.
Anyway... not going to spent too much time on it further... but it is a nice
coincidence ?! ;) :) =D
There ya go.
Bye,
Skybuck.
Researchers the title of the document louds (lol):
"
Monte Carlo Strength Evaluation:
Fast and Reliable Password Checking
"
http://www.eurecom.fr/en/publication/4711/download/rs-publi-4711.pdf
According to a newssite this document also claims that adding password rules
is not sufficient (and weakens passwords it was claimed by news site).
I scanned over this document there is some mention of these rules... and
that it is indeed weak against modern attacks.
Anyway... not going to spent too much time on it further... but it is a nice
coincidence ?! ;) :) =D
There ya go.
Bye,
Skybuck.
Skybuck Flying
Oct 21, 2015, 3:36:21 AM10/21/15
to
Oh yeah... by the way... now that the thruth is kinda out... lol...
I'll add my own little bit of advice... and a little funny part
toooooooooooooooo hihihihihi.
My advice is:
1. Don't ever pick a very cooooooooooooool password because of 2.
2. In the event of a database leak... //////// STEAL/// RAAAAPPPPPE then
refer to 3.
3. The rapist/stealer may want to fok around with an account and guess which
account it is going to pick, refer to 4.
4. The account with the cooooooooolest password ! LOL... (Hmmmm could
actually be a honey trap ! ;) :)) not refer to 5 for the most funny part.
5. The most funny part was refer to 6:
6. The coolest password I found was: "Deathbringer" ! ;) =D
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Now refer to 7.
7. That *ERHM* person's account... got fokked with by.... *you know who*
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. refer to 8 for further clearification.
8. I am sorry.
9. I knew you.
10. I was at your house
11. You copied software for me.
12. Your dog humped me ! LOL.
13. *erhm there was something with animal XXXX* in your drawyer.
14. IT was cold
15. My feet got cold.
16. I wear your ? or daddies slippers LOLOLOL.
17. Don't worry... your account was in good hands...
18. It survived it's purpose.
19. I am sorry, but it was necessary, CENSORED had to for school.
20. They made me ! LOLOLOLOL.
21. CONFESSSION !
=DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
22. Fortunately not prosecutable... IT WAS WAY AHEAD OF ITS TIME ! ;) =D
23. Never TRUST NOVEL SOFTWARE LOL.
24. Superuser anybody ?
25. Secondary Bindery.
26. slist all ?!
27. OH SHIT LOL somebody walks in.
28. lol... ms-dos prompt: cls
29. pipe it to file: slist all > fun.txt
30. copy to disk...
31... Oh shit smart ass walk in on me..
32. copy crap over fun.txt
33. FAGGGYCROLLYBOY asks what you overwriting huh ?
34. Oh nothing...
35. He: "Oh gjez... you using copy for that ? Pheheheheh he says... I wrote
a whole prune tool for that lol"
36. Me thinking: "Whatever motherfokker/crullyboy... " me says: "copy gets
the job done".... hihihihih no traces....
37. Me walks out and escapes from Fox Mulder... like the cancer man !
HAHAHGAHGASH.. I hope I dont get cancer though lolololololol.
37. Once home type: type fun.txt | more.
38. Watch the fun in action.
39. Notice how some motherfokka changed his password back after it was
already stolen by a keylogger and everybody knew it lol.. <- hihihihi he a
funny guy.
Oh yeah... stealing a password database can be alot of fun... watching them
fokkers going at it ! LOLOL.
40. Psssssst I had a little bit of help of invisible devils looking like
innocent bussiness clueless folks... who's daddy new: flag command of novel
software to get rid of file protection read only or so.
41. Never connect your novel to the internetzz... wazzz there that login.exe
with correct crc32 and file size and file data and file time was found but
still contained a hack to create a secondary bindery.
42. All your passwordz are belung TO MEEEEEEE and UUUZZZZZ ! ;) =D
OHHHHHBBOOYYY I hope people who know me don't find this posting ! LOLOLOLOL.
No just kidding... thiz waz a long time ago... in a galazy far far away...
and it doez not conzern anybody anymore !
Enjoy this somewhat cryptic and fokked up tex for what it was worth...
simply some or a lot of funnnn...
Waz it thruth... or waz it the drivel of some crazy mother fokker.
I'll let you be the judge of thatz.
But as Foz Mulderz woulz zzzayz.... thez Thruth... iZ out there ! ;) =D
Byyyyyzzzzz,
ZZZZZZkybuck ! ;) =D
I'll add my own little bit of advice... and a little funny part
toooooooooooooooo hihihihihi.
My advice is:
1. Don't ever pick a very cooooooooooooool password because of 2.
2. In the event of a database leak... //////// STEAL/// RAAAAPPPPPE then
refer to 3.
3. The rapist/stealer may want to fok around with an account and guess which
account it is going to pick, refer to 4.
4. The account with the cooooooooolest password ! LOL... (Hmmmm could
actually be a honey trap ! ;) :)) not refer to 5 for the most funny part.
5. The most funny part was refer to 6:
6. The coolest password I found was: "Deathbringer" ! ;) =D
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Now refer to 7.
7. That *ERHM* person's account... got fokked with by.... *you know who*
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. refer to 8 for further clearification.
8. I am sorry.
9. I knew you.
10. I was at your house
11. You copied software for me.
12. Your dog humped me ! LOL.
13. *erhm there was something with animal XXXX* in your drawyer.
14. IT was cold
15. My feet got cold.
16. I wear your ? or daddies slippers LOLOLOL.
17. Don't worry... your account was in good hands...
18. It survived it's purpose.
19. I am sorry, but it was necessary, CENSORED had to for school.
20. They made me ! LOLOLOLOL.
21. CONFESSSION !
=DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
22. Fortunately not prosecutable... IT WAS WAY AHEAD OF ITS TIME ! ;) =D
23. Never TRUST NOVEL SOFTWARE LOL.
24. Superuser anybody ?
25. Secondary Bindery.
26. slist all ?!
27. OH SHIT LOL somebody walks in.
28. lol... ms-dos prompt: cls
29. pipe it to file: slist all > fun.txt
30. copy to disk...
31... Oh shit smart ass walk in on me..
32. copy crap over fun.txt
33. FAGGGYCROLLYBOY asks what you overwriting huh ?
34. Oh nothing...
35. He: "Oh gjez... you using copy for that ? Pheheheheh he says... I wrote
a whole prune tool for that lol"
36. Me thinking: "Whatever motherfokker/crullyboy... " me says: "copy gets
the job done".... hihihihih no traces....
37. Me walks out and escapes from Fox Mulder... like the cancer man !
HAHAHGAHGASH.. I hope I dont get cancer though lolololololol.
37. Once home type: type fun.txt | more.
38. Watch the fun in action.
39. Notice how some motherfokka changed his password back after it was
already stolen by a keylogger and everybody knew it lol.. <- hihihihi he a
funny guy.
Oh yeah... stealing a password database can be alot of fun... watching them
fokkers going at it ! LOLOL.
40. Psssssst I had a little bit of help of invisible devils looking like
innocent bussiness clueless folks... who's daddy new: flag command of novel
software to get rid of file protection read only or so.
41. Never connect your novel to the internetzz... wazzz there that login.exe
with correct crc32 and file size and file data and file time was found but
still contained a hack to create a secondary bindery.
42. All your passwordz are belung TO MEEEEEEE and UUUZZZZZ ! ;) =D
OHHHHHBBOOYYY I hope people who know me don't find this posting ! LOLOLOLOL.
No just kidding... thiz waz a long time ago... in a galazy far far away...
and it doez not conzern anybody anymore !
Enjoy this somewhat cryptic and fokked up tex for what it was worth...
simply some or a lot of funnnn...
Waz it thruth... or waz it the drivel of some crazy mother fokker.
I'll let you be the judge of thatz.
But as Foz Mulderz woulz zzzayz.... thez Thruth... iZ out there ! ;) =D
Byyyyyzzzzz,
ZZZZZZkybuck ! ;) =D
0 new messages