John Grahms/Raid/Dustin Cook Splits Hairs On Virus Passing On Internet
Dave U. Random
psychopath/sociopath. They will argue the most futile of points in the
loudest manner possible, as if their rage is the defining point of logic
in the argument. Read this idiocy as John Grahms/Raid/Dustin Cook
splits hairs into micron sections to evade responsibility for passing
viruses into the Internet. I'll say it again, if it were not for this
idiot from sophos, and others like him who should have known better, the
turd known as John Grahms/Raid/Dustin Cook would today be unknown, just
another two-bit virus writer/passer whom no one ever heard of, killfiled
by all; heard by none.)
(The wrapped URL if copy/pasted into the addy window of FireFox, will
unwrap itself and take you to the page.)
or
http://preview.tinyurl.com/28e65o9
Raid
View profile
More options Apr 23 2002, 7:45 am
Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus
From: raids...@yahoo.com (Raid)
Date: 22 Apr 2002 14:45:38 -0700
Local: Tues, Apr 23 2002 7:45 am
Subject: Re: Attn Jiz Condom
sop...@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote in message
<news:aa0koq$2tp$1...@thorium.cix.co.uk>...
>Depends what you call spreading really doesn't it? I mean, I
>know of the Austrian headquarters of a large multinational
>organisation which got
No, actually it doesn't. Sophos and yourself (well, sophos with
your help really) told people I was maliciously spreading the
virus. Offering a virus on a virus oriented website is hardly
malicious spreading of said virus.
You do not differeiate this in your descriptions. This isn't
right, and it's misleading; Fucking intentional misleading.
Posting a virus on a virus website is not maliciously spreading
the virus into the wild; But you have made NO effort to
distinguish between the two. You'd rather people mistakenly
believe I posted the virus to the web in an effort to infect
persons.
>infected by it, and were less than happy. And I know that
>you've said before that you have made your virus binaries
>available for anyone to download from one of your websites "as
>long as they obey the disclaimer", and I know that you've said
>that you share viruses with your virus-writing
And none of this is malicious spreading Graham. None of it. I
did not spread the Toadie virus in any way shape or form; I
offered it on a ProVx website for others to examine. No
spreading by my part. Let's clear that up shall we? I asked you
for the proof you touted as having; I asked for the proof Sophos
touted as having. You *still* have not provided it.
I indeed question your integrity Graham, and those of your
employer.
>had been hit by Toadie whether it was from the cell cracking
>program that was posted on usenet, and I know that you have
>used the pseudonym John
you basically have nothing, no concrete evidence ever linking me
to the malicious spread of Toadie. Quiet the opposite of what
you were quoted as saying. "He is actively distributing it in
the form of a cell phone cloning application and an adult sex
crack". I want you to provide evidence to support this
outlandish and outright BULLSHIT claim you made on Sophos
behalf.
You can claim the reporters twisted your words all you like
Graham, but now it's time to put up that evidence you were going
to fork to the authorities. Time to say which authorities
contacted you about Toadie and myself (again, I maintain
according to FBI contacts I have, none were interested in me or
Toadie).
Yep, it's time to admit how much of a fat fucking liar you
really are Graham ol pal. :) And Sophos long thought of as an
honest company; Woops. Not so honest are we gents? :)
>And I know that you posted in public on 13 January 2000
>announcing your plan to release the virus you wrote after
>Toadie (IrOk) in the wild:
Yep; and so? Irok isn't toadie. We're talking about Toadie
Graham, let's not try to defray from the attack. Laugh. I
realize you can't answer the questions I've asked you; but you
could atleast try. Your only going to dig a deeper hole for
yourself.
I will not let you ignore your lies Graham, I promise your lies
and the lies of Sophos (you do represent them) will not go
un-noticed. It's time you bastards became a little bit honest
for once.
>"In a few weeks, IrOk (which is based off of Toadie) is going
>to be completed. And I am going to lose it into the wild, on
>purpose. YOu can quote me on that one this time Graham."
That's great and all; But a person can change his/her opinion.
Which I did.
Unless you can provide this proof you long talked about in our
emails; then you will have to accept the fact that YOU AND
SOPHOS ARE LIARS.
Hard pill to swallow? Maybe you should "turn yourself in" for
lieing to reporters so much, before somebody at Sophos decides
to check into my posts for themselves, you fat prick.
Regards, Raid [slam]