Thanks,
Craig
>and I'm still getting a really annoying pop-up from a site
>whose URL is www.superslots.com. Any ideas how to get rid
>of this pop-up or where it's coming from? I use IE 6.
Use Firefox. I didn't see any pop-up with it. And the security is
better. Use IE only if you want to live dangerously.
--
G.
Welcome back ! I haven't seen you post in a while.
What happened with the court case you had to deal with ?
What was the outcome ?
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
For non-viral malware...
Please download, install and update the following software...
Ad-aware SE v1.06
http://www.lavasoft.de/
http://www.lavasoftusa.com/
SpyBot Search and Destroy v1.4
http://security.kolla.de/
After the software is updated, I suggest scanning the system in Safe Mode.
I also suggest downloading, installing and updating BHODemon for any Browser Helper Objects
that may be on the PC.
BHODemon
http://www.definitivesolutions.com/bhodemon.htm
For viral malware...
Download MULTI_AV.EXE from the URL --
http://www.ik-cs.com/programs/virtools/Multi_AV.exe
It is a self-extracting ZIP file that contains the Kixtart Script Interpreter {
http://kixtart.org Kixtart is CareWare } three batch files, five Kixtart scripts, one Link
(.LNK) file, a PDF instruction file and two utilities; UNZIP.EXE and WGET.EXE. It will
simplify the process of using; Sophos, Trend and McAfee Anti Virus Command Line Scanners to
remove viruses, Trojans and various other malware.
C:\AV-CLS\StartMenu.BAT -- { or Double-click on 'Start Menu' in C:\AV-CLS}
This will bring up the initial menu of choices and should be executed in Normal Mode. This
way all the components can be downloaded from each AV vendor’s web site.
The choices are; Sophos, Trend, McAfee, Exit the menu and Reboot the PC.
You can choose to go to each menu item and just download the needed files or you can
download the files and perform a scan in Normal Mode. Once you have downloaded the files
needed for each scanner you want to use, you should reboot the PC into Safe Mode [F8 key
during boot] and re-run the menu again and choose which scanner you want to run in Safe
Mode. It is suggested to run the scanners in both Safe Mode and Normal Mode.
When the menu is displayed hitting 'H' or 'h' will bring up a more comprehensive PDF help
file.
To use this utility, perform the following...
Execute; Multi_AV.exe { Note: You must use the default folder C:\AV-CLS }
Choose; Unzip
Choose; Close
Execute; C:\AV-CLS\StartMenu.BAT
{ or Double-click on 'Start Menu' in C:\AV-CLS }
NOTE: You may have to disable your software FireWall or allow WGET.EXE to go through your
FireWall to allow it to download the needed AV vendor related files.
* * * Please report back your results * * *
If you can't be persuaded to use a alternate and far better and safer
browser, you can use something like Proxomitron to block ads and other
annoyances:
http://www.proxomitron.info/files/
Art
>From: "Guillermito" <guill...@pipo.com>
>
>| In article <g4rZe.3660$G64....@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>,
>| sa...@yahoo.com says...
>|
>>> and I'm still getting a really annoying pop-up from a site
>>> whose URL is www.superslots.com. Any ideas how to get rid
>>> of this pop-up or where it's coming from? I use IE 6.
>|
>| Use Firefox. I didn't see any pop-up with it. And the security is
>| better. Use IE only if you want to live dangerously.
>|
>| --
>| G.
>
>Welcome back ! I haven't seen you post in a while.
>
>What happened with the court case you had to deal with ?
>What was the outcome ?
http://www.guillermito2.net/archives/2004_12_28.html
--
Clay mania dot com
|
| http://www.guillermito2.net/archives/2004_12_28.html
|
| --
| Clay mania dot com
No capice !
>From: "Clay" <one.ste...@intentionally.invalid>
>
>
>|
>| http://www.guillermito2.net/archives/2004_12_28.html
>|
>
>No capice !
Huh? :)
|
| Huh? :)
|
| <http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=fr_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
| guillermito2.net%2Farchives%2F2004_12_28.html>
|
| --
| Clay mania dot com
Hey its legible now :-)
Gratzi !
--
G.
____________________________-
I did use Firefox for awhile but it's such a memory hog that it would slow
down my computer and I'd have to constantly close down the program and start
it again to clear up the memory. I'd love to use a good alternative
browser but don't know of one.
Craig
I see no pop up using the latest version of IE, so either you have yours
misconfigured or you are a troll or shill for the web page.
--
From the Desk of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]::::::Dino-Soft Software::::::>
\}
>IE is for those that *know* how to secure their systems, don't get me wrong
>I do like Firefox's tabbed browser for ease of use; but I hear tell that the
>next incarnation of IE will also have the tabbed browser.
It does have a tabbed browser, well the BETA 7 does. I think the next
rendition of IE looks terrible and for me Opera is and always has been
the best and most secure, functional browser out there for Win32
without exception.
> Shoot I also
>wrote a tabbed browser using the IE engine and had I know it would be so
>popular I would have put it out on the web for a nominal fee of say a dollar
>and made a fortune, lol.
Why? How? Opera and Firefox are free - why would anyone pay even this
nominal fee for what they can get for free. I haven't seen this
program so I dare not say the likes of even Opera is superior even
though I have a hunch :)
> In any even IE is just a secure as any other
>browser if you know what you are doing and Firefox is sort of like AOL,
I guess if I was from the US I would say that your statement was
balony or something like that. But since I'm Irish I will say it's
bullshit. Firefox is nothing like AOL. AOL uses IE to render webpages.
>if you don't know how to protect your system let someone that does know how
>do it for you.
...or try and get involved and learn a little about safe-hex yourself.
--
Ian Kenefick
http://www.ik-cs.com
http://antivirus.ik-cs.com
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:12:14 -0400, "Sugien"
<sug...@horizonview.net> wrote in post:
>...Shoot I also wrote a tabbed browser using the IE engine and
>had I know it would be so popular I would have put it out on
>the web for a nominal fee of say a dollar and made a fortune,
>lol.
Liar.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQzcHhqRseRzHUwOaEQIsbACgzePIEfOBjm6wpGfO1MKk8Dx5NqYAnjkd
rx8nLmucwHoh0sg4X6A9JxjH
=C8KM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Laura Fredericks
PGP key ID - DH/DSS 2048/1024: 0xC753039A
alt.comp.virus photo gallery:
http://www.queenofcyberspace.com/acvgallery/
usenet flamewars:
http://www.queenofcyberspace.com/usenet/
Remove CLOTHES to reply.
>Hmmm, why would you post back the *exact* same post David H. LIpman? with
>absolutely NO additions?
I guess he excercised his right to [snip] your post. As he should,
since they contain 33% extra BS.
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:12:14 -0400, "Sugien"
> <sug...@horizonview.net> wrote in post:
> >...Shoot I also wrote a tabbed browser using the IE engine and
> >had I know it would be so popular I would have put it out on
> >the web for a nominal fee of say a dollar and made a fortune,
> >lol.
>
> Liar.
*HAHAHAHAHAHA*
I haven't read VX/AV news for a few days. So today I just
fancied looking up my old mhate Dimbulb, to see if I could
tag him lying again! Laura you beat me to it! *ROFL*
http://fourq.host.sk/ACV/Liar/
4Q
It is like AOL in as much as you are letting some other then your self be
responsable for your security
>
>>if you don't know how to protect your system let someone that does know
>>how
>>do it for you.
>
> ...or try and get involved and learn a little about safe-hex yourself.
>
My point exactly, why let the browser be responsible for your security? I
can take the most hole riddled browser and still be secure; but then maybe
that is just me; but I rather like being able to be responsible for my own
security, and to date I have never repeat never been unknowingly infected
with any virus/malware/bug/ hole or what have you. The only time I have
ever been infected with such is on my pig machine while testing the efficacy
of my security procedures.
ROFL!! And just when I thought he had run out of whoppers, he comes up with
this one.
"Mr. Mom" spends his days watching cartoons, not writing tabbed
browsers.....lol.
And speaking of the subject line....Sooooge is an Annoying Popup!!
XX Heather
Just an observation....
Shane
Hopefully feedback will improve it, eh?
>
> I guess if I was from the US I would say that your statement was
> balony or something like that. But since I'm Irish I will say it's
> bullshit. Firefox is nothing like AOL. AOL uses IE to render webpages.
You could say 'feckin' eedjit'!
Shane
Hi Puss.....
Finally got the new computer almost 2 weeks ago and having fun learning all
the new XP stuff, and loading all the programs and data. Still considering
getting a router (wired) and using the old WinME as well.
XX Figgs
> IE is for those that *know* how to secure their systems, don't get me
> wrong I do like Firefox's tabbed browser for ease of use; but I hear tell
> that the next incarnation of IE will also have the tabbed browser. Shoot
> I also wrote a tabbed browser using the IE engine and had I know it would
Dude..... you're borderline retarded trailer trash. You can barely manage
to string together enough one syllable words to form a readable sentence.
You probably couldn't write your NAME six times in a row without spelling
errors, and you honestly expect anyone to believe you wrote a web browser?
<whistles>
When the nice ladies in the white smocks stop by to change your underpants
next, mention to them that you might need your meds adjusted. Ok?
> say a dollar and made a fortune, lol. In any even IE is just a secure
Really now! So regale us with your superior knowledge and explain in
detail how you're locking IE down against its continuing site
traversal vulnerabilities? We'd really appreciate all the sage advice I'm
sure a top notch coder like you can offer us mere mortals.
<snicker>
This should be REAL good..........
>On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:12:14 -0400, Sugien wrote:
>
>> IE is for those that *know* how to secure their systems, don't get me
>> wrong I do like Firefox's tabbed browser for ease of use; but I hear tell
>> that the next incarnation of IE will also have the tabbed browser. Shoot
>> I also wrote a tabbed browser using the IE engine and had I know it would
>
>Dude..... you're borderline retarded trailer trash. You can barely manage
>to string together enough one syllable words to form a readable sentence.
>You probably couldn't write your NAME six times in a row without spelling
>errors, and you honestly expect anyone to believe you wrote a web browser?
Sooge's enormous creative talent and ingenuity extends far beyond
that. Rumor has it that Sooge is actually the original inventor of the
Write Only Memory (WOM). This remarkable device is said to be able to
store data in such a way that it is impossible to read it by any known
means. When asked about it, it's said that Sooge just smiles sagely
while pointing out that he invented the first perfect data security
device known to mankind.
His detractors claim that he stole the idea from a April 1 article in
a old IEEE journal that he found in a dumpster. Personally, I think
that's cruel and unjustified.
Art
> I did use Firefox for awhile but it's such a memory hog that it would slow
> down my computer and I'd have to constantly close down the program and start
> it again to clear up the memory. I'd love to use a good alternative
> browser but don't know of one.
>
> Craig
Ahem.
That version had a bug. The newer versions probably have it
fixed.
You can still fix old versions of Firefox by creating
user.js in your profile directory and putting this line
in it:
user_pref("browser.cache.memory.capacity", 500);
> IE is for those that *know* how to secure their systems, don't get me
That should surely read - IE should ONLY be used by those who know how to
secure their systems.
> wrong I do like Firefox's tabbed browser for ease of use; but I hear
> tell that the next incarnation of IE will also have the tabbed browser.
Many alternate browsers use tabs, it's no wonder that IE is following
where others have already lead.
> In any even IE is just a
> secure as any other browser if you know what you are doing and Firefox
> is sort of like AOL, iow, if you don't know how to protect your system
> let someone that does know how do it for you.
Apart from the inherent security vulnerabilities which need a code
re-write, if you can do this yourself then you are one up on most of us.
The rest have to wait for updates from Microsoft, which unlike the
Mozilla camp, they are very slow to do. The following was taken from a
recent post to a Mozilla forum which highlights my point.
"the press thinks Firefox is unsafe
get the facts (source Secunia), Firefox vulnerabilities since 20041109:
grand total: 61 Vulnerabilities
fixed: 56 = 91.8 %
workaround: 2 = 3.3 % ,moderately critical
unfixed: 3 = 4.9 % ,less critical
get the facts (source Secunia), IE vulnerabilities since 20041109:
grand total: 31 Vulnerabilities
fixed: 16 = 51.6 %
workaround: 1 = 3.2 % , moderately critical
workaround: 3 = 9.7 % , not critical
unfixed: 5 = 16.1 % ,moderately critical
unfixed: 2 = 6.5 % ,less critical
unfixed: 4 = 12.9 % ,not critical
Yes, IE has fewer vulnerabilities reported, and of those fewer, they patched a lot less.
If we look at the grand total for IE6 the picture isn't much better.
Is FF safer than IE ? Draw your own conclusion ...."
--
Steve.
>Welcome back ! I haven't seen you post in a while.
Thanks for the welcome :) Yes, I keep quiet on usenet now. I have
seen so many of my usenet posts printed and ending up on a judge
or police desk. Not fun anymore to say what you think about a
product.
>What happened with the court case you had to deal with ?
>What was the outcome ?
I was condamned. On the penal side, I had a 5000 euros suspended
sentence (so I don't have to pay anything unless I have other
troubles with french law, which is unlikely as I don't even live
there). On the civil side, I was condamned to pay a total of
14.300 euros to the (now bankrupted) company and the programmer of
the anti-virus. They had asked for 900.000 euros, so I guess it's
kind of light. I appealed all of these sentences anyway.
So the new trial is on november 29th in Paris. That will be my 4th
trip from Boston to Paris for this stuff. Almost three years of
trouble for a few flaws in an anti-virus, that was probably not
worth it. So now I focus on my job instead of posting on usenet :)
--
Guillermito
http://www.guillermito2.net
My sincerest and best wishes for a positive outcome for you !
Keep us posted.
> Still considering
> getting a router (wired) and using the old WinME as well.
Do it, the NAT will help keeping all these nasty XP service busters
(Blaster, Sasser, and now the PnP attack) out. I first used ME and XP
side by side, but my XP machine is so stable (and safe, as I learnt a
lot about safer hex, and a good deal from this group), I nearly ditched
the older ME. By now it is only running for some networked gaming.
The only problem is, I don't know whether you can stioll obtain a wire-
only broadband router, as I did. The are all with WLAn inclusive, which
i hate, because it allows drive-by-surfing, if you don't activate the
WEP/WPA encryption. And one of them is rather weak, I think it is the
WEP.
Gabriele Neukam
--
Ah, Information. A property, too valuable these days, to give it away,
just so, at no cost.
>On that special day, Heather, (fi...@nospam.invalid) said...
>
>> Still considering
>> getting a router (wired) and using the old WinME as well.
>
>Do it, the NAT will help keeping all these nasty XP service busters
>(Blaster, Sasser, and now the PnP attack) out. I first used ME and XP
>side by side, but my XP machine is so stable (and safe, as I learnt a
>lot about safer hex, and a good deal from this group), I nearly ditched
>the older ME. By now it is only running for some networked gaming.
>
>The only problem is, I don't know whether you can stioll obtain a wire-
>only broadband router, as I did. The are all with WLAn inclusive, which
>i hate, because it allows drive-by-surfing, if you don't activate the
>WEP/WPA encryption. And one of them is rather weak, I think it is the
>WEP.
WEP is insecure even with 128 bit encryption:
http://seclists.org/lists/risks/2001/Jul-Sep/0007.html
http://www.tomsnetworking.com/Sections-article118.php
XP users have the far more secure WPA available (apparently):
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=815485
Art
I might put my tabbed IE engine browser up for download, as for my security
measures, you should be so lucky that I would consider teaching you security
, I have never been infected with any malware of any type can you say the
same? btw, you are a new comer, wanna be *anything*, Even your so called
trailer trash has more sense then you and I dare say better morals as well
http://www.dino-soft.org/programs/downlaod/dstssetup.exe
It is NOT finished; but it is my tabbed browser, this version of which
is made into a way to search at various search engines all at the same time,
you put what you are looking for into the box up next to the buttons then
click the button next to it and wa la, TABS open up with what you are
looking for each in it's OWN TAB.
I had told myself that I wasn't going to prove anything to you ass
holes; because you don't deserve my time; but just so as the newer people
will know that you and Lara, and heather, and the puff twit and the rest are
full of hot air, here is my tabbed browser, well a version of it at least
that I never finished. I have bunches of projects all in varying degrees of
incompleteness, simply because I get board with them and switch to something
new.
btw, at least I don't try and trick people into using AV software that is
suppose to be *free* for home use, knowing all the while that if people get
use to using it at home they will most likely try and talk their companies
into *buying* the version for commercial use and that the companies will buy
it because they don't have to teach their employees how to use it because
they already use it at home. ALL my software is FREE supported by donation
and if they don't want to give any money for it then fine, they can use it
any way.
oh and before you try and say I stole this from Microsoft, the browser
engine comes with Visual Basic and is FREE to use in any way shape or form
the programmer wants to, I simply added a way to add tabs into the
interface, which btw, M$ is also going to do in their next version of IE,
hmmm, wonder if they got the idea from me, after all I had the idea and a
*working* POC several years ago, but of course you won't believe that either
seeing as how you won't believe I wrote a tabbed browser ever after you
download and install and use it you still won't believe it, will you, but
guess what?
I *don't care*; because I know what I know, what I know and you all can bite
me; but on second thought don't bite me because you are stupid ignorant
people and if you bite me it may be contagious.
>ha ha, bite on this buck wheat
>
>http://www.dino-soft.org/programs/downlaod/dstssetup.exe
404 Dimbulb. LOL!
Art
http://www.dino-soft.org/programs/download/dstssetup.exe
http://www.opera.com/
http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/
http://www.opera.com/support/search/supsearch.dml?index=791
Casey
>> Thanks for the welcome :) Yes, I keep quiet on usenet now. I have
>> seen so many of my usenet posts printed and ending up on a judge
>> or police desk. Not fun anymore to say what you think about a
>> product.
>> I was condamned. On the penal side, I had a 5000 euros suspended
>> sentence (so I don't have to pay anything unless I have other
>> troubles with french law, which is unlikely as I don't even live
>> there). On the civil side, I was condamned to pay a total of
>> 14.300 euros to the (now bankrupted) company and the programmer of
>> the anti-virus. They had asked for 900.000 euros, so I guess it's
>> kind of light. I appealed all of these sentences anyway.
>>
>> So the new trial is on november 29th in Paris. That will be my 4th
>> trip from Boston to Paris for this stuff. Almost three years of
>> trouble for a few flaws in an anti-virus, that was probably not
>> worth it. So now I focus on my job instead of posting on usenet :)
>>
>>> I hope they throw the book at you, if the prosecution needs a witness
> attesting to your stupidly and your arrogance I will volunteer. Hmm how
> does it feel? you deserve what you get and much more.
>it is very satisfying for me to sit and laugh at you knowing that you have
> >been hoisted on the petard you tried to reserve for me.<<<<
A fine example of the Christian ethics and morals you profess to have. As
in 'turn the other cheek, judge not lest ye be judged", etc. You won't be
going to Heaven with that vengeful attitude!!
>>>Do you find it strange that more then not of those that have given me
the hardest time have either died, committed suicide or have had trouble
with the law? <<<<
Total bullshit!! Name one. Are you now claiming to have evil, witchcraft
powers? Oooohhh, your God is going to be some ticked off with your
two-faced attitudes. Your trashy trailer is going to be hit with a huge
bolt of lightning!! Bwa ha ha.
HF
There are those of which you seem to be one, that never read their bible;
but only know what others have told them is in it. You most likely would be
very surprised at how much you have been told that is in error. I but you
even think that there were only 2 of every kind of animal taken into the
ark; because that is what you have been *told*, but you never checked it out
for your self. There are quite a few common misconceptions that have been
taught by tradition instead of people actually reading the Bible for their
self and seeing what the Bible *really* says.
>
> >>>Do you find it strange that more then not of those that have given me
> the hardest time have either died, committed suicide or have had trouble
> with the law? <<<<
>
> Total bullshit!! Name one. Are you now claiming to have evil, witchcraft
Not at all, I have never said any such thing or even hinted at such. You
should learn to read for content; because I did NOT say I had anything to
do with it, I only said and I quote "Do you find it strange" now you can
read just about anything into that you want, and you most likely will just
as you always have.
Surely you can name them your self? how about the one in the wheelchair
that was willing to trade his "rolls Royce" wheel chair to put a hit on me?
or was that someone else in the thread and he only said about someone with a
high powered rifle sitting up on a hill by my house could take me out? and
then he died? how about the writer that liked to degrade me? did she not
die of what was it? a self inflected over dose of drugs and alcohol? or
some other form of suicide. Then there is of course Gutter man in this very
thread whom has had and *is* having trouble with the law. I am surely not
saying I have any powers, not even God given powers I only find it strange
that not long after several people made remarks about me or said that I
should die, that they them selves died.
> powers? Oooohhh, your God is going to be some ticked off with your
The bible says to "touch not my onited" and that coals of fire will be
heaped upon the head of those that harm my onited. I am also not saying I
am one of Gods anointed; I am only a true believer that studies my Bible
*every* day and guess what? I find out something just about ever day that
has been taught by tradition that just is *not* in the Bible the way they
say it is or was.
> two-faced attitudes. Your trashy trailer is going to be hit with a huge
> bolt of lightning!! Bwa ha ha.
I don't live in a trailer, so if someone is going to get hit by a huge bolt
of lightning it most likely would be you for lying!
I downloaded Opera 8.5 yesterday and so far so good. It's very good about
not hogging memory and I've not found any pages that it won't show properly.
Also, it seems quite good about blocking pop-ups. I'm going to give it a
few weeks and if it holds up, I'll definitely keep it.
Craig
> Hmmm, why would you post back the *exact* same post David H. LIpman?
> with absolutely NO additions?
_____________________
Sorry. Just a mistake.
Craig
> I might put my tabbed IE engine browser up for download, as for my
You mean your attempted ripoff? <laughing>
> security measures, you should be so lucky that I would consider teaching
> you security , I have never been infected with any malware of any type
You couldn't teach a dog to scratch fleas, you moron. Couldn't poor piss
out of your shoe if the instructions were written on the heel. And you
CERTAINLY couldn't teach ME anything about security. I've been playing
this game since before YOU ever knew there was an "internet". That's how I
spotted your thievery so quickly an easily.
By the way, coward, you failed to even attempt to answer the question.
What are you doing to harden IE against it's long running and current
directory traversal problems?
> can you say the same? btw, you are a new comer, wanna be *anything*,
I assure you I've been here far longer than you, and will remain long
after you're gone. Someone with the self proclaimed savvy of a seasoned
netizen and coder might realize that "Clandestiny" may not be a real name.
Everything you do, and everything you type, shows the world what a little
twat you are. How much you yearn for some sort of recognition, even if
it's ridicule. Your life is so pathetic and depressing you welcome the
pain, isn't that right? It's a welcome break from the emptiness of your
filthy four walls, Stoogien, and everyone here can see that clearly.
> Even your so called trailer trash has more sense then you and I dare say
> better morals as well
You, preaching morals? ROTFLMAO!
>I hope they throw the book at you, if the prosecution needs a witness
>attesting to your stupidly and your arrogance I will volunteer.
First you would have to be able to speak another language, which is
unlikely. Second, I think that you wouldn't be a very credible witness,
as a mumbling old delusional hillbilly whose top job in his career was
to "separate infected cows" and who spends his life on usenet because he
has nothing more interesting to do, except gobling mind-altering pills
by the dozen.
> Hmm how does it feel?
Good, thank you. I like to fight. It's a bit new that I have to fight in
a court, which is a place I am not used to.
>how you have been found guilty of some of what you accused me of
The difference is that people generally take me seriously when I present
some code or computer-related work. Seriously enough to sue me,
unfortunately. The only consequence of you trying to show anything
related to coding, as far as I remember, is accusations of plagiarism
and laughs.
But thanks for your support anyway :)
--
Guillermito
http://www.guillermito2.net
I see you still believe the lie posted by Laura, or have you not figured out
that , that resume was posted just to show someone how to do so, and has
long since been removed; because of it not being a *real* resume. as for my
being a mumbling old delusional hillbilly, firstly you have never listened
to me speak so you are for sure lying about that as anyone with a brain can
ascertain. as for old hillbilly, yep and *proud* of it, so what's your point
in saying that? as for delusional about the only thing I *may* be delusional
about, would be in my thinking you are worth the time to try and save from
an eternity in hell. But what the hey, I think just about everyone is worth
saving that is why I pray for them, even imo, a thieving code stealer like
you, or did you not get found guilty of reverse engineering and then
publishing code that you agreed not to by your downloading it? I hope they
throw the book at you , if for no other reason, well then you will have to
quit posting lies about me, well unless they have the net in the prison you
might go to, oh and I know they won't send you to prison for this, but there
are always other things you have done that they can find out about isn't
there.
>
>> Hmm how does it feel?
>
> Good, thank you. I like to fight. It's a bit new that I have to fight in
> a court, which is a place I am not used to.
>
Get use to it; because you troubles in court are just getting started, this
one little battle is only a teaser of what is to come, or have you forgotten
about the other things you can be hauled into court over?
>>how you have been found guilty of some of what you accused me of
>
> The difference is that people generally take me seriously when I present
> some code or computer-related work. Seriously enough to sue me,
I am taken seriously by everyone that *matters*, and those that don't take
me seriously are only idiots and fools which I could care less about
anything they think.
Hmmm, well guess what, I haven't been sued over any of the code I am suppose
to have stolen? Now I wonder why that is that you have and I haven't? Maybe
because I haven't stolen any code and you *have* broke the law concerning
the code you pilfered
> unfortunately. The only consequence of you trying to show anything
> related to coding, as far as I remember, is accusations of plagiarism
> and laughs.
I wasn't hauled into court over my coding was I? even though you and others
tried , repeat *TRIED* to say I stole, so whom should people believe about
code you whom have been found *GUILTY* of doing ILLEGAL things with code, or
I whom hasn't?, the later to be sure
>
> But thanks for your support anyway :)
>
The only thing I support you in, is a speedy execution of the court order
against you.
>I am taken seriously by everyone that *matters*,
Yes, we know that your wife loves you.
Anyway, I would love to continue this pleasant conversation, Genius, but
I have some work to do. Don't worry, someone else is going to play with
you now.
Have a nice delusional day !
--
Guillermito
http://www.guillermito2.net
>
> Anyway, I would love to continue this pleasant conversation, Genius, but
> I have some work to do. Don't worry, someone else is going to play with
> you now.
yadda , yadda, yadda
>
> Have a nice delusional day !
>
Now why would I want to have one of your days? after all you would had to
have been delusional to think you could get away with what you tried to do.
>The only problem is, I don't know whether you can stioll obtain a wire-
>only broadband router, as I did. The are all with WLAn inclusive, which
>i hate, because it allows drive-by-surfing, if you don't activate the
>WEP/WPA encryption. And one of them is rather weak, I think it is the
>WEP.
Despite the weak encryption, you can still turn off the wireless side
of the routher. I picked up a 2 different Linksys routers in the past
3 weeks and both were able to disable the wireless aspect.
Depending on where you live, drive by surfing may not be a problem
anyway :)
tim
Careful there "Clandestiny" - the "force" is strong with this one - - be
careful not to make him too angry or he'll move to France and use their
stupid laws to sue you for exposing him for what he is (surely there are
french laws against this).
Those aren't allowed in here! Try news:alt.mistakes
Hmmm, I wonder why I didn't see this post and only saw it when; you quoted
it? I wonder if it is because it is well, something, ah well doesn't mater
his little tirade shows him for the wanna be he claims not to be; but I
laugh at his insignificance, rofl
It's not finished because you ripped off a VB tutorial example
and probably tried to tag on some stolen code, pinched from
'Planet Source Code' (again)
Hey people don't forget this is the guy that tried to steal
example code from finjan software then change all their
references to his to try and con us into believing he authored
it.[ check the archives of ACV if you want to read this episode ]
It was Guilleminto that reported to us that his "DinoStat" program
was an exact ripoff from code found at 'Planet Source code' all
he did was change the original authors name and identifiers to
his own retarded DimbulbSoft company.
It'll only be a matter of time before someone finds the original
code he's ripped off. Then we'll all be laughing at his expense
(again)
Goto http://fourq.host.sk follow the links and read about
ACV/ACAV favourite coderipper retard liar, Dimbulb(Sugien)Bryant.
Yours SINcerely
4Q
>I think just about everyone is worth
>saving that is why I pray for them, even imo, a thieving code stealer like
>you
lol. Why don't you post the proof on your website like he did with
you? That should be entertaining.
Jim.
>The bible says to "touch not my onited"
If you're referring to Manchester Onited the Glazers could be in deep
shit.
Jim. :)
and again saying the same thing in the new testament
1 Chronicles 16:22 Saying, Touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no
harm.
Or are you also one of those that believe what you are *told* is in the
Bible instead of reading it for your self? do you think that only 2 of each
kind of animals went into the arc? or did you read it for your self and find
out otherwise?
if that's how you look at it then i suppose...
personally, though, i think doing the right thing is always worth it...
--
"they threw a rope around yer neck to watch you dance the jig of death
then left ya for the starvin' crows, hoverin' like hungry whores
one flew down plucked out yer eye, the other he had in his sights
ya snarled at him, said leave me be - i need the bugger so i can see"
"Sugien" <sug...@horizonview.net> wrote in message
news:ibKdnTBc65R...@bright.net...
>
> "James Egan" <je...@jegan.com> wrote in message
> news:g81hj1ppapjkmhls3...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:26:34 -0400, "Sugien" <sug...@horizonview.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>The bible says to "touch not my onited"
>>
>> If you're referring to Manchester Onited the Glazers could be in deep
>> shit.
LOL....went right over his pointy little head, didn't it!!
He is one of those Merkins that are not aware that any other country or
sport exists other than the US. Pity!! But not uncommon in the hillbilly
parts, lol.
Actually I don't follow any sports; because it is barbaric and a waste of
time and money that could be spent on starving children. Do you realize
that if just 10% of what is spent on sports world wide were to be spend on
hungry children we could wipe out child hunger? But of course you would
rather spend your money to watch a team as watch a child get fed and not
starve. For just 5% of what is wasted on sports you could wipe out
homelessness. For 2% of what is wasted on sports world wide you could
immunize every child on earth that can't afford it. For a small percentage
of the money that is wasted on sports world wide you could wipe out cancer,
or AIDS or any number of diseases. You see I don't drink, I don't do drugs,
and I don't waste my money on watching a useless endeavor that the masses
find entertaining; because I spend my time learning things and trying to
make the world a better place, which the world would be considerable better
if all the money wasted on sports were used to better the population.
Haha! I think they are anyway!
Shane
>>> Oh and I can admit that I don't know what the "Manchester Onited the
>>> Glazers " was suppose to refer to; because I can guess it has something
>>> to do with something that is a complete waste of time and money. <<<
Yeah sure!! For your edification, Manchester United (not Onited) is what
the British call a 'football' team......but it is really soccer. And if you
don't know what soccer is, then you are even dumber than I thought.
On second thought, you have the IQ of a 'gnat', so it doesn't surprise me.
Get your bushy eyebrows out of cartoons and watch something a little more
mature!!
HF
And then snipped his boring rant, wherein he was trying to make himself look
important, I suppose. Too bad....he failed.
Code-ripper!!
HF
That's what Sugien is.
Shane
Nothing, they just like to take any opportunity to *try* with *try* being
the operative word, to take the as they say piss out of me; but, they can
only spout lies which they can not prove.
Pop up and kiss my butt you little wanna be anything, I have probably
forgotten more about computers then you will ever learn. I use to work on
main frames when you were a disgusted look in your daddies eye when he was
looking to score with your mom.
> dimmest bulb, I didn't say I don't know what sports are only that I don't
> follow what is happening with them and could care less who calls what what
> parts, lol.
LIAR.....
quote.....
Geee, seeing as how the British are as nuts about soccer as we Americans are
about football, don't ya think a person would guess it would have to be a
soccer team? Besides not knowing that Manchester and the Glazers were a
soccer team is not the point, but seeing as how you still can't read for
content let me point it out to you, not knowing they were a soccer team and
not knowing they are a sports team in general are two entirely *different*
things, I said , oh forget it, why should I take the time to try and explain
something to you that you won't believe any way, oh btw, I was referring to
*Onited* and my still not knowing what it is; because it doesn't show up in
my dictionary, and I can't be bothered to look it up on the web any longer
because all that ever comes up is "United", I guess it is just one of those
obscure British ways of saying something and I could care less what it
means.
btw, you sure read a lot of my posts for someone that is suppose to have me
plonked, te he he
I had no opinion about you one way or the other before you started posting
this drivel.
Now fuck off you pathetic little turd.
Shane
Google is your friend.....
> btw, you sure read a lot of my posts for someone that is suppose to have
> me plonked, te he he
You were.....on my old computer. But I would be most happy to oblige you,
coz your lies, rants and ramblings are enough to gag a maggot!!
Bye bye!! Plonk!!
Yeah, I've plonked the retard, Figgs. What a graphic illustration of what
you older hands have been saying all this time!
You probably don't know about 'The Mary Whitehouse Experience' or 'Newman
and Baddiel'. Rob Newman and David Baddiel (who were half the MWE team) used
to have these characters - a couple of elderly professors - in a running
sketch called 'History Today'. I suppose the idea was something about
senility and reverting to childhood. Here's an example (though the
spellchecker seems to have balked at 'emeritus'). Remind you of anyone?
http://www.angelfire.com/ok/marywhitehouse/history1.html
Shane
>I was referring to
>*Onited* and my still not knowing what it is; because it doesn't show up in
>my dictionary
I'll try to explain. Stop me if it gets too confusing...
I was making a joke around your misspelling of "anointed". You posted
>The bible says to "touch not my onited"
which made me laugh since your spelling looks more like "united" than
"anointed".
The US businessman, Malcolm Glazer and his family (who already own the
Tampa Bay Buccaneers) have recently bought out Manchester United (over
in the UK) for a lot more than the stock exchange value and delisted
the company leaving the football club with a very large debt. This has
opened up a hornets nest with some of the supporters (not me though
because like all good Mancunians, I'm from the blue side).
If the bible were to say "touch not my United" then the Glazers could
be in deep shit. That was the joke. Not very funny, I know. But the
whoosh!! that took place when it all went over your head was
hilarious.
Jim.
I see you learned from Laura how to forge a post, or don't you consider
adding dots and then putting in something I did *not* say as forgery? That
is the worst sort of lie. Personally I would expect such a low life trick
from Laura; but I had thought it beneath you to do such; but I see it isn't
and that now I will need to put you down a notch to Laura's despicable
capable of any lie level.
>
> Google is your friend.....
>
>> btw, you sure read a lot of my posts for someone that is suppose to have
>> me plonked, te he he
>
> You were.....on my old computer. But I would be most happy to oblige you,
> coz your lies, rants and ramblings are enough to gag a maggot!!
>
> Bye bye!! Plonk!!
>
hmmm, let me see that is what now? hmmm about 25 plonks since you said you
already had and you also said (which was a lie of course) that you could
only read my posts when some else quoted them, sure, sure,
AOhelL Me Too!
Goodonya!! It sure is pleasant not to have to see his childish *nyah nyah*
posts......flippin' dimbulb!!
Cheers.....another Canuck
You said the exact same thing for some time until I caught you replying to
my post which NO ONE had quoted, it may take a tad longer this time to catch
you at it, but I am sure I will, and then when I do, I am sure going to rub
your nose in it this time, and you know what? seeing as how you have said
you have plonked me so many times, I may just give you the dubious honor of
being the 2nd person I have ever plonked, just as soon as I catch you I
might, yep I just might plonk you just for lying so much about plonking me,
and then you sure won't see my posts; because I will not see yours nor post
to you.; because everyone already knows you are a lier about plonking me all
the other times, and you are just to stuck up and full of your self to admit
it, but every one knows.
:-)
Shane
It's the don of a new error! :))
>Actually. I've unplonked Spooge as I'm going to take the piss out of the
>half-witted little wanker instead.
Since you were quick to point it out to someone else, you could start
with his "wa la" (s) lol
Jim.
ROFL!! That was painful to see!! Not about to put "mater" in a Google
search, because he spells it wrong in EVERY post!! But he will probably
come up with some *dimbulb* explanation as to the *deep psychological
reasons* on why he misspells it. (snicker cuz I won't see it....LOL)
Cheers, Heather
And I didn't even use my spielchucker.
>
>
> Jim.
>
I had seen the same misapprehension in a previous post on XP General and
ignored it, though whether it was Plato then I don't recall. Plato's one of
the better regulars on XP General so I don't really want to rip into him (in
the modern or indeed the Ancient Grecian sense), but on the off-chance that
his name isn't really Plato, nor is he president of the Sal Mineo fan-club,
I felt I had to say *something*.
> you could start
> with his "wa la" (s) lol
I can't get past thinking *Et voila, "wa la"* - ROFL, but not really what I
had in mind!
Shane
Well, I got past that!.........Now I'm stuck on *Whatever will be, will be.*
Shane
>> I can't get past thinking *Et voila, "wa la"* - ROFL, but not really
>> what I had in mind!
>
> Well, I got past that!.........Now I'm stuck on *Whatever will be, will be.*
Que sera, sera.
Yep Doris Day will get dweebs every time; because of Rock, lol