Dustin Cook - 5428 Fort Henry Drive - Kingsport, TN
George Orwell
Dustin J. Cook, Kingsport, TN
Norman E Cook (55), New Gloucester, ME
Donna E Cook (51), New Gloucestr, ME
DUSTIN J COOK
5428 FORT HENRY DR
KINGSPORT, TN 37663
============================
http://www.spywarebanter.co.uk/23442-re-bughunter-site-update.html
Dustin Cook
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Dustin Cook
Find all threads started by Dustin Cook
#8 (permalink)
Old July 18th 06, 04:58 PM posted to 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus
bughunte...@gmail.com
wrote:
snipped
I'm originally from Maine myself, born and raised. I don't
usually encounter a Mainer who isn't able to answer a few
simple questions. Especially when said Mainer raised them
in the first place... Please don't make my home state look
foolish, just answer my question if you don't mind. It's
not difficult. I'm really not trying to make you look silly
or anything, I just want to know what made you think
BugHunter was a trojan. That's all.
--
Dustin
Author of BugHunter Malware Removal Tool
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
~BD~
"George Orwell" <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
news:172d094adf202e1a...@mixmaster.it...
joe?
@news.eternal-september.org:
> A picture, here!
>
> http://tinyurl.com/377qnoq
If you're going to give a url on such a touchy subject, you should have
made it a 'preview' one. In this group as of late, I don't trust much
of anything or anybody or any link.
Dustin Cook
> Dustin J. Cook, Kingsport, TN
> Norman E Cook (55), New Gloucester, ME
> Donna E Cook (51), New Gloucestr, ME
>
>
> DUSTIN J COOK
> 5428 FORT HENRY DR
> KINGSPORT, TN 37663
Wrong address. That's my old job address. :) But! Thanks for confirming
that I was telling the truth about who I am this entire time. :)
I don't live far from it tho, in Kingsport, TN; where I said I lived the
entire time.. thanks. and yes, I did live in Maine. I've never met Donna (I
moved away long before her and my dad got married)...
Thanks for showing me what a crazy ass stalker fuck you are tho. Sorry your
not quite right on the address; but your close. :)
--
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject
-Winston Churchill
Dustin Cook
september.org:
> A picture, here!
>
> http://tinyurl.com/377qnoq
Sure is. It's a map to.. (ready?) an old computer repair shop I worked at
for 10 years, just like I said. *grin*.
Wonder if anyone can get what my middle initial stands for? hehehe.
Gotta love usenet stalkers who think they're doing something new with doc
dropping.
Dustin Cook
207.246.207.163:
> "~BD~" <.Boate...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:hv8qi0$val$1
> @news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> A picture, here!
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/377qnoq
>
> If you're going to give a url on such a touchy subject, you should have
> made it a 'preview' one. In this group as of late, I don't trust much
> of anything or anybody or any link.
It's a link to a map which will take you to a computer shop (right down the
road from me, actually) where I worked as a certified (Comptia A+)
technician for 10 years, like I originally said. The fellow even included
the fact I come from Maine, by listing my dad and a stepmom I never
actually met. Dad still lives in Maine, but.. not in new gloucester
anymore.
Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
tennesee where guns are legal and using force to protect yourself and your
property is legal as well; so I'm not worried that I've been "outed".
Dustin Cook
news:e13g165i4iv2jud6i...@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:21:13 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"~BD~" <.Boate...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
>>news:hv8qi0$val$1...@news.eternal-
>
>
>
>>
>>Wonder if anyone can get what my middle initial stands for? hehehe.
>>
> Jagoff?
>
Nope.. gotta do better man.. better I says.
Leythos
.Boate...@hotmail.co.uk says...
> A picture, here!
>
Many places would terminate your account for harassing someone on
Usenet, and to post their public identity can get your account yanked by
many providers.
--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam9...@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
Dustin Cook
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>
>>Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
>>tennesee where guns are legal and using force to protect yourself and
>>your property is legal as well; so I'm not worried that I've been
>>"outed".
>
> Spell checkers are also legal (but not mandatory).
> When I lived in the "volunteer" we used two of the letter S
> to spell our state.
Typo on my part. I don't much care for the state overall. I suppose that
might be different if I was nearly as religious as many of my neighbors. We
have more churchs up here than we do gas stations... :(
@nomail.afraid.org FromTheRafters
news:Xns9D98C566C42...@69.16.185.247...
> "joe?" <J...@blow.com> wrote in news:Xns9D98A23F5C67samnonenet@
> 207.246.207.163:
>
>> "~BD~" <.Boate...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:hv8qi0$val$1
>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> A picture, here!
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/377qnoq
>>
>> If you're going to give a url on such a touchy subject, you should have
>> made it a 'preview' one. In this group as of late, I don't trust much
>> of anything or anybody or any link.
>
> It's a link to a map which will take you to a computer shop (right down
> the
> road from me, actually) where I worked as a certified (Comptia A+)
> technician for 10 years, like I originally said.
Is that "Google Street View"? That's pretty cool - could quite get "Google
Dumpster Diving View" to work on that trash can though. :oD
[...]
@nomail.afraid.org FromTheRafters
> "~BD~" <.Boate...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
> news:hv8qi0$val$1...@news.eternal-
> september.org:
>
>> A picture, here!
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/377qnoq
>
> Sure is. It's a map to.. (ready?) an old computer repair shop I worked at
> for 10 years, just like I said. *grin*.
>
> Wonder if anyone can get what my middle initial stands for? hehehe.
Joseph?
The Real Truth MVP
Jerk
Jism suck master (that was given to you after you blew that horse)
--
The Real Truth http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspot.com/
*WARNING* Please Do NOT follow any advice given by the Trolls listed
below. Trolls CAN NOT help you. They latch on to my posts like leeches.
David H Lipman, Peter Foldes, Barry Schwarz, PA Bear, Leythos.
"Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9D98C51AA8D...@69.16.185.247...
Heather
"FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:hv9dpf$jju$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9D98C51AA8D...@69.16.185.247...
>>
>
> Joseph?
Jeremiah? Jumpin' Jehosaphat?? Joshua?? Jacob??
(had to throw a few *bible-belt* names at you, lol)
Heather
>
>
Peter Foldes
description about yourself Chris. Proud of you for admitting it.
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
"The Real Truth MVP" <t...@void.com> wrote in message
news:hv9e33$kni$1...@leythos.motzarella.org...
~BD~
> George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote in
> news:172d094adf202e1a...@mixmaster.it:
>
>> Dustin J. Cook, Kingsport, TN
>> Norman E Cook (55), New Gloucester, ME
>> Donna E Cook (51), New Gloucestr, ME
>>
>>
>> DUSTIN J COOK
>> 5428 FORT HENRY DR
>> KINGSPORT, TN 37663
>
> Wrong address. That's my old job address. :) But! Thanks for
> confirming
> that I was telling the truth about who I am this entire time. :)
>
> I don't live far from it tho, in Kingsport, TN; where I said I lived
> the
> entire time.. thanks. and yes, I did live in Maine. I've never met
> Donna (I
> moved away long before her and my dad got married)...
Remember when 'Ant' said...
" Is he going to be stuck in time? Hang on a minute, are you saying he
was only 8 or 9 years old when you were born?"
and you replied ...
"No. He passed away at age 40. I'm almost 33 now. So in 8 years, I will
be
older than him; as he's dead and isn't aging anymore...It's just one of
those things you don't expect, then one day.. it happens."
In this current post you appear to be suggesting that your dad is still
alive and living with 'Donna' - I'm so easily confused!
Please clarify matters for all reading here.
--
Dave
FromTheRafters
news:hv9er2$o7j$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
He may have been named as a 'downeaster' (resident of Maine - aka
'mainiac') and somewhat north of the bible-belt (further north than your
location even). A freethinking person could suffer from culture shock
being suddenly immersed in bible country.
Dustin Cook
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>
> RE: Tennessee
>
>>Typo on my part. I don't much care for the state overall. I suppose
>>that might be different if I was nearly as religious as many of my
>>neighbors. We have more churchs up here than we do gas stations... :(
>
> I was living there (TN) when I first came to visit SoCal and like a
> country boy's first glimpse of big city lights I was rurnt (ruined)
> not by the lights but the laid back lifestyle of the late 70s. There
> are churches around here too, but I haven't been in one since my first
> days of poverty and the free food giveaways.
The last time I entered a church building of any sort was to fix an issue
on the network server. The place I worked is on the religious side and
they do most of the church computer work contracts here. Some of the
insides of these churchs are nicer than multi million dollar homes I've
been in.
The place is still very much laid back, still has the volunteer state
style to it.
> I'll always remember hiking the Appalachian trail on the TN/NC border
> and my friend's mom's house (our base camp) in Greeneville TN and that
> church with the huge uplifted finger, like a monument to proctology.
I was out on Roan mountain for the last few weeks helping a friend with
some electrical work; nice view.. I'm certain at one point, I pissed on
North Carolina. <G>
Dustin Cook
Haha. Yea, google street view. I took a drive to the house pictured
yesterday in the middle of one of those wonderful thundershowers we've
been getting here. It's a few more miles down the road than I had
thought.
The information on me that was posted is the same information I've found
on myself by using those peoplesearch engines and checking out the free
offerings. I'm too cheap to pay to dig up the dirt on myself. I guess
this guy is too. :)
Dustin Cook
Nah.. James.. actually. Like Jesse James.
Dustin Cook
@news.eternal-september.org:
:)
Dustin Cook
september.org:
> In this current post you appear to be suggesting that your dad is still
> alive and living with 'Donna' - I'm so easily confused!
Step parents isn't something you've heard of eh? My real dad as I said is
very much dead, yes. He was killed in a car accident on a bridge a few
miles from where I live.
> Please clarify matters for all reading here.
I honestly didn't think I had to clarify that aspect. Norman is a step dad,
not my biological father. Is that clarified enough for you, Dave?
And what about the google map to the address? Just how do you defend doing
that?
~BD~
> "~BD~" <.Boate...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
> news:hv9rpg$8j4$1...@news.eternal-
> september.org:
>
>> In this current post you appear to be suggesting that your dad is
>> still
>> alive and living with 'Donna' - I'm so easily confused!
>
> Step parents isn't something you've heard of eh? My real dad as I said
> is
> very much dead, yes. He was killed in a car accident on a bridge a few
> miles from where I live.
>
>> Please clarify matters for all reading here.
>
> I honestly didn't think I had to clarify that aspect. Norman is a step
> dad,
> not my biological father. Is that clarified enough for you, Dave?
Yup - that's OK with me. Thank you.
> And what about the google map to the address? Just how do you defend
> doing
> that?
I don't feel any need to 'defend' anything. Anyone could have plugged
the posted address into Google!
At least you now know that I have *some* computing ability! ;-)
--
Dave
tom
than what's poluting this NG......and I've seen some real idiots. Wish you
guys could find a playground some where and just duke it out and leave this
NG to people that might need AV help. Man...............GROW UP or just go
away!!!!!!!
Dave U. Random
Dustin Cook <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>And what about the google map to the address? Just how do
>you defend doing that?
>
For this asshole to ask someone to defend themselves
against outing a piece of shit like himself when he did
worse to some women, shows what a cowardly hypocrite he is.
He posted a woman's addy in a sex group, proclaiming she
was a whore, welcoming everyone, including groups of
degenerates, to visit her. Compared with that, his outing
is nothing. Did you notice his first reaction? Guns. Yeah,
more threats of killing someone if they bothered him. You
know, I think it's time for someone to gather up all those
posts I have made and email them to the Tennessee State
Police, questioning whether this sick bastard should
continue to have a gun carry permit.
Dustin Cook
september.org:
> Yup - that's OK with me. Thank you.
Are you sure, Dave? I mean, you seem to have this need to know everything
you possibly can about a person. So, again, your sure you don't have any
more assinine questions to ask of me?
> I don't feel any need to 'defend' anything. Anyone could have plugged
> the posted address into Google!
Fair enough. However, that being said, not everyone (besides numbnuts
anonymous remailer coward) bothered to do so, or create a fresh thread to
discuss it. Now, don't get me wrong, the guys funny as hell for doing the
very things he claimed I was a sociopath for doing, but that's beside the
point. You didn't have to add to the fuss.
> At least you now know that I have *some* computing ability! ;-)
hahah, right. I expect anyone could do what you did.
Dustin Cook
news:672987b1879c856a...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net:
> In article <Xns9D9980B9A63...@69.16.185.247>
> Dustin Cook <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>And what about the google map to the address? Just how do
>>you defend doing that?
>>
>
> For this asshole to ask someone to defend themselves
> against outing a piece of shit like himself when he did
> worse to some women, shows what a cowardly hypocrite he is.
Hahaha.. I figured you try to defend this work of yours. You hide behind
a remailer, reposting posts which aren't accurate; outright lieing on
another (misattributions my ass), and then you actually post an address
you mistakenly thought was mine here. You've done several things by doing
that. Allow me to list a few for my own amusement.
1. You have proven that I am Dustin Cook and that I do reside in
kingsport, tn; you have previously denied that and tried to convince
others I was lieing.
2. You have proven that your no better than I was years ago by "outing"
or doc dropping me.
> He posted a woman's addy in a sex group, proclaiming she
> was a whore, welcoming everyone, including groups of
> degenerates, to visit her. Compared with that, his outing
> is nothing. Did you notice his first reaction? Guns. Yeah,
An outing is an outing; your efforts to spin it just won't cut what you
did. You simply dropped to that of my former self, all with a single
post. I knew you were a troll from the getgo, but you did have a little
support from some people here. Until.. you stooped to my level a few
years ago, that is.
Now then, in so far as threatening someone with Guns, I know you think if
you claim that for long enough somebody will believe you, true enough,
somebody might; but.. alas, facts just don't support you. Case in point,
I haven't threatened anybody; but you have certainly tried to place
myself and that of my family in danger by "outing" me. I don't think it's
unreasonable for me or anyone else placed in such a position to have a
means in which to defend his or herself.
> more threats of killing someone if they bothered him. You
> know, I think it's time for someone to gather up all those
Well, lets call it for what it is. You posted an address you think is
mine; You know as well as I do what the idea was behind that. You can't
spin that. The police would know easily as well, and might even ask if
I'd like to investigate the internet stalking (not a joke, I kid you not,
look it up; it's a federal thing) which is clearly taking place here, by
you. You've moved it up a notch well into the realm of legal issues when
you posted the address as a topic here, so do feel free to make contact
with the state police here.
> posts I have made and email them to the Tennessee State
> Police, questioning whether this sick bastard should
> continue to have a gun carry permit.
As I said above, you've opened a fresh can of worms for yourself, and
investigations are a two way street. :)
Dustin Cook
Hi Tom.
Unfortunatly,
the anonymous remailer feels a need to hide from me (He actually wrote the
reason he uses the remailer is to protect himself from me) so I don't think
for even a second he'd ever want to just deal with me in person. It's
pretty obvious he's scared of me, and needs someone else to deal with me
instead.
CiderScratter
<bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>An outing is an outing; your efforts to spin it just won't cut what you
>did. You simply dropped to that of my former self, all with a single
>post. I knew you were a troll from the getgo, but you did have a little
>support from some people here. Until.. you stooped to my level a few
>years ago, that is.
You have no idea if this is the same person or not (or do you?).
I do not know who posted the address, whether it was your friend, foe or
even yourself. Nothing would surprise me.
If a foe then I for one do not agree with it but it has not changed my
opinion on any of the other stuff.
You certainly have no idea if "support from some people here" has
changed as a result of it.
Yes there was one misattribution in a post but the rest of it was 100%
correct from how I read it.
I am bored of reading it all now though.
I thought you said you were going to stop replying to it.
~BD~
> Are you sure, Dave? I mean, you seem to have this need to know
> everything
> you possibly can about a person. So, again, your sure you don't have
> any
> more assinine questions to ask of me?
Hmmm!
OK - just one more! ;-)
Why were you frightened to log on to Annexcafe (User2User) and/or
Dogagent.com and search for what you call 'code'?
Perhaps guys there could trash even *your* machine, eh?!!!
Hey - no worries! The truth *will* out!
--
Dave (enjoying a lovely summer day!)
Dustin Cook
@news.eternal-september.org:
> "Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9D99C967450...@69.16.185.250...
>
>> Are you sure, Dave? I mean, you seem to have this need to know
>> everything
>> you possibly can about a person. So, again, your sure you don't have
>> any
>> more assinine questions to ask of me?
>
> Hmmm!
>
> OK - just one more! ;-)
Sarcasm isn't something you were provided with eh?
> Why were you frightened to log on to Annexcafe (User2User) and/or
> Dogagent.com and search for what you call 'code'?
Frightened? how and why would I be frightened to log on someplace?
Your question isn't phrased properly. What you meant to ask is why won't
I do your dirty work for you?
> Perhaps guys there could trash even *your* machine, eh?!!!
Trash a machine? Please, enlighten me.. exactly how would that occur?
> Hey - no worries! The truth *will* out!
BD, the truth already has; your not the good guy you'd like people to
believe you are. Not much your going to be able to do to fix that, I'm
afraid.
Dustin Cook
news:9dcj169duldad9m60...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:54:12 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>An outing is an outing; your efforts to spin it just won't cut what you
>>did. You simply dropped to that of my former self, all with a single
>>post. I knew you were a troll from the getgo, but you did have a little
>>support from some people here. Until.. you stooped to my level a few
>>years ago, that is.
>
> You have no idea if this is the same person or not (or do you?).
If you think proper headers are required to identify someone, you're way
off the mark and behind the times. :)
> You certainly have no idea if "support from some people here" has
> changed as a result of it.
Again, you don't know what emails/IMs I get on a daily basis; so really,
your a bit out of the loop.
> Yes there was one misattribution in a post but the rest of it was 100%
> correct from how I read it.
Hahaha. Well, then I would say you have reading comprehension issues. Or
in other words, you don't understand what your reading and are unable to
seperate fact from fiction in the contents of my old posts. It's okay,
the OP couldn't do it either.
CiderScratter
<bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes there was one misattribution in a post but the rest of it was 100%
>> correct from how I read it.
>
>Hahaha. Well, then I would say you have reading comprehension issues. Or
>in other words, you don't understand what your reading and are unable to
>seperate fact from fiction in the contents of my old posts. It's okay,
>the OP couldn't do it either.
I do not care much for your stupidity and my comprehension is 100%
correct. Whether you claim them as fiction or not, was not and is not
the issue. The point is you did write them. So glad you have admitted to
that.
The only remaining issue is whether or not you were lying intentionally
to mislead or whether you were just full of shit. I go with the latter
and you have done nothing to convince me otherwise.
Dustin Cook
news:e7lk16p21oiut5rp3...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:17:36 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Yes there was one misattribution in a post but the rest of it was
100%
>>> correct from how I read it.
>>
>>Hahaha. Well, then I would say you have reading comprehension issues.
Or
>>in other words, you don't understand what your reading and are unable
to
>>seperate fact from fiction in the contents of my old posts. It's okay,
>>the OP couldn't do it either.
>
> I do not care much for your stupidity and my comprehension is 100%
> correct. Whether you claim them as fiction or not, was not and is not
> the issue. The point is you did write them. So glad you have admitted
to
> that.
I have not stated the posts weren't mine. That was never even brought up,
either by myself or the OP flooding. What I have stated from the
beginning was that not all of the information I provided in the posts
should be taken at face value. It's clearly a comprehension issue on your
part if you think anything else has been going on. Don't be so quick with
the word stupid next time. I suppose you think everything.. say, Eminem
says in his songs is the truth and should be taken seriously as well.
/joking.
I don't think I need to dedicate any time to convincing someone I don't
know? anything. Please see my signature for further questions concerning
that.
David Kaye
>Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
>tennesee where guns are legal and using force to protect yourself and your
>property is legal as well; so I'm not worried that I've been "outed".
Regardless, the more you respond to these posts the more they're going to
post.
Dustin Cook
news:hve161$3kc$2...@news.eternal-september.org:
David,
They are going to post irregardless of whether or not I respond to it. He's
already made that clear. I'm not going to duck and run away because someone
who just recently learned how to use a remailer has a childish score to
settle.
Besides, aside from his.. somewhat amusing posts; there really isn't much
else going on these days here.
Dustin Cook
news:l72l16hoogf0b26o6...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:27:05 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>I have not stated the posts weren't mine. That was never even brought
>>up, either by myself or the OP flooding. What I have stated from the
>>beginning was that not all of the information I provided in the posts
>>should be taken at face value.
>
> What this jerk is saying is the same thing the anon poster is saying -
> and proving, that Dustin Cook is a lying s.ob. who can never be
> believed. He just said it himself.
>
Damnit... Are people really getting dumber as the years go on or what?
FromTheRafters
news:l72l16hoogf0b26o6...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:27:05 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>I have not stated the posts weren't mine. That was never even brought
>>up,
>>either by myself or the OP flooding. What I have stated from the
>>beginning was that not all of the information I provided in the posts
>>should be taken at face value.
>
> and proving, that Dustin Cook is a lying s.ob. who can never be
> believed. He just said it himself.
...and *you* believed him? :oD
Dustin Cook
@news.eternal-september.org:
I bet I could sell both of them an ocean liner docked at an Arizona
Beachport. *grin*. They're so confused and misguided they don't know which
way is up or down. Despite my best efforts to push them in the right
direction. Just can't help some people...
CiderScratter
<bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>"FromTheRafters" <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:hve2ed$rv2$1
>@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> <to...@ewrweq.com> wrote in message
>> news:l72l16hoogf0b26o6...@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:27:05 GMT, Dustin Cook
>>> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I have not stated the posts weren't mine. That was never even brought
>>>>up,
>>>>either by myself or the OP flooding. What I have stated from the
>>>>beginning was that not all of the information I provided in the posts
>>>>should be taken at face value.
>>>
>>> What this jerk is saying is the same thing the anon poster is saying -
>>> and proving, that Dustin Cook is a lying s.ob. who can never be
>>> believed. He just said it himself.
>>
>> ...and *you* believed him? :oD
>
>I bet I could sell both of them an ocean liner docked at an Arizona
>Beachport. *grin*. They're so confused and misguided they don't know which
>way is up or down. Despite my best efforts to push them in the right
>direction. Just can't help some people...
You think you are smart but you are fooling no-one. No-one is confused.
No-one is misguided. Plenty of people have posted shit they should not
have and maybe now regret. They may apologies and move on, they may not.
But your attempts to make out you were posting as some big bluff is 100%
bullshit. You know it, and so does everyone else with even half a brain.
Personally I don't give a shit about you being an arse then and
continuing to be one now.
But your continued attempts to bullshit are not being believed by
anyone. They are taken as face value as that is how you intended them.
Dustin Cook
news:t69l16t3ohjtku2b2...@4ax.com:
Well, thats good news. As I'm not trying to fool anybody.
> But your attempts to make out you were posting as some
> big bluff is 100% bullshit. You know it, and so does everyone else
> with even half a brain. Personally I don't give a shit about you being
> an arse then and continuing to be one now.
Again, demonstrating your reading problems for us all. Sad ...I know you
aren't going to get it, but it was still funny to type.
> But your continued attempts to bullshit are not being believed by
> anyone. They are taken as face value as that is how you intended them.
Great, as again, I'm not trying to bullshit anybody here. The original OP
has spent a few weeks now? trying to do that, tho.
--
The bear went over the mountain to see what he could see. Hey! The other
side of the mountain was all that he could see! So he went back over the
mountain to see what he could see. Hey! The other side of the mountain
was all that he could see! - Green Jelly The Bear Song
CiderScratter
<bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Again, demonstrating your reading problems for us all. Sad ...I know you
>aren't going to get it, but it was still funny to type.
No, not for "us all". You are all on your own here.
I have no reading problem but you have a problem. Look up. See them pink
elephants. You know, it is just you that sees them. Right?
Dustin Cook
news:s8al16hjsg96items...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:59:17 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Again, demonstrating your reading problems for us all. Sad ...I know you
>>aren't going to get it, but it was still funny to type.
>
> No, not for "us all". You are all on your own here.
I realize you wish that was the case. :)
> I have no reading problem but you have a problem. Look up. See them pink
Sure you do. You thought that I had denied any of the posts were mine. I
didn't. My argument has always been that the posts didn't always contain
correct information. You and your OP posting friend just ran with it from
there.
David Kaye
>They are going to post irregardless of whether or not I respond to it.
No, that is not the case. Notice that people don't hassle me, and I'm a
radical gay political activist whose opinions and politics are at odds with a
lot of people. And while people had fun with my feather duster and furniture
polish thing and blowing into laptop air vents to clear them of dust, even
those posts went away.
>Besides, aside from his.. somewhat amusing posts; there really isn't much
>else going on these days here.
In that case I feel sorry for you that you have to resort to such pettiness in
lieu of a life. That's sad, actually. As for me, I'm here to get information
and the longer you yokels keep your bitchfest going on, the fewer people are
going to want to post questions and answers about viruses.
FromTheRafters
news:hvecd1$e5k$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> Dustin Cook <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>They are going to post irregardless of whether or not I respond to it.
>
> No, that is not the case. Notice that people don't hassle me, and I'm
> a
> radical gay political activist whose opinions and politics are at odds
> with a
> lot of people. And while people had fun with my feather duster and
> furniture
> polish thing and blowing into laptop air vents to clear them of dust,
> even
> those posts went away.
I suggested feather dusters for the NASA cometary dust collection
missions, but they opted for aerogel instead.
...go figure.
--
In space, nobody can hear you sneeze.
CiderScratter
<bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>CiderScratter <cider-s...@hotmail.invalid> wrote in
>news:s8al16hjsg96items...@4ax.com:
>
>> I have no reading problem but you have a problem. Look up. See them pink
>
>Sure you do. You thought that I had denied any of the posts were mine. I
>didn't. My argument has always been that the posts didn't always contain
>correct information. You and your OP posting friend just ran with it from
>there.
What is it with you and the bullshit? You just cannot stop yourself.
Not once have I said I though you denied any of the posts were yours.
All you have denied is the manner in which they were posted. Pretending
they were some kind of smokescreen to cover your sorry arse.
No matter how you try to spin it. You meant every word in those earlier
posts, just like you do now. 10 years from now I am sure you will be
trying the same tactic to cover up for your bullshit. It is not believed
now and it wont be then.
For the record. The OP is not my "friend". So stop trying to fake
conspiracy where there is none. The fact is a lot on 'individuals' know
you are a cock. Simple as. But you are aware of this and are just trying
to add your spin to it to gain sympathy. It ain't happening.
Nomen Nescio
You are falling for this sociopath's bullshit.
It is amazing how many educated and smart people try arguing
with this looney tunes sociopath. He has an extreme case of
diarrhea of the mouth. An endless stream of illogical,
nonsensical shit spews from him, illustrating his sick dementia.
It seems beyond the ken of ordinary sane persons to realize the
evil inside this person which twists every truth 180 degrees
from its true polarity. No wonder he snickers and sneers at
them. They are incredibly naive.
He is using you. It's what he does. And his lies as to what you
posted and as to what he said and what he didn't say are all
contrived to keep you frustrated and angry and tickle his ego.
You flail about in a frenzy, wondering what's wrong with this
guy? He's nuts. He's evil. He's a piece of shit. You're wasting
your time speaking with him. An old adage: When you wrestle with
a pig in the mud, he enjoys it, and you just get dirty.
Bullwinkle
protect property?
"Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9D98C566C42...@69.16.185.247...
Bullwinkle
He is an American version of BD
"David Kaye" <sfdavi...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hve161$3kc$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
(William Regal)
So it must be assumed you lied about the Tennessee law.
"Bullwinkle" <BD...@loa.mo> wrote in message
news:4c1b...@news.x-privat.org...
SeaNymph
"(William Regal)" <v...@il.co> wrote in message
news:4c2b...@news.x-privat.org...
> Say Dustin, you have not answered this.
>
> So it must be assumed you lied about the Tennessee law.
>
>
force in a person's home, on their property and including their car. The
law in Tennessee does not require the owner or any person legally on the
property to retreat before threatening or using deadly force, if that person
believes the force in necessary. The law, and it's subsequent amendments
lean heavily in favor of the lawful owner of a property, much like the
castle laws in Texas.
http://state.tn.us/sos/acts/105/pub/pc0210.pdf
Dustin Cook
> Say Dustin, you have not answered this.
I didn't think it was necessary, as google could easily find the answer.
Plus, I have bullwinkle killfiled so I didn't see this particular question.
> So it must be assumed you lied about the Tennessee law.
Well, you know what they say about assuming things, right?
http://state.tn.us/sos/acts/105/pub/pc0210.pdf
--
I hate when I just miss a call by the last ring (Hello? Hello?
Damn it!), but when I immediately call back, it rings nine times and
goes to voicemail. What did you do after I didn't answer? Drop the
phone and run away?
Dustin Cook
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>
>>http://state.tn.us/sos/acts/105/pub/pc0210.pdf
>
> That all sounds reasonable for the average citizen fearing a threat,
> but you've indicated yourself to be somewhat fearless, and that would
> eliminate the option of acting in 'fear' of your life etc. wouldn't it?
Nice try.. :)
Someone thought I was bsing about that law, so I did the google work they
could have done for themselves. It's pretty simple english, really. If you
come to my home with the intent of doing harm to myself or my family
members, or even my van; Your fair game for target practice. Which, is as
it should be. A person should always have the right to use lethal force if
necessary. You shouldn't have to go and cower and let the "bad guy" have
his way with your home or your possesions or your friends/family members
who might be visiting when the bad guy comes to play.
You should try trolling when you have a better clue or understanding of the
topic at hand. As it is now, your comment is weak.
Bullwinkle
property is legal as well;
Where does it say what you say it said?
Show where it says deadly force can be used to
protect property?
"Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DA8A2B3D74...@69.16.185.250...
Bullwinkle
Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
tennesee where guns are legal and using force to protect yourself and your
property is legal as well; so I'm not worried that I've been "outed".
Where does it say you can use deadly force to
protect property?
"SeaNymph" <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in message
news:i0fj91$vf2$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
(William Regal)
You said:
Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
tennesee where guns are legal and using force to protect yourself and your
property is legal as well; so I'm not worried that I've been "outed".
That is not in there.
"Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DA8A2B3D74...@69.16.185.250...
(William Regal)
Cook said:
Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
tennesee where guns are legal and using force to protect yourself and your
property is legal as well; so I'm not worried that I've been "outed".
"SeaNymph" <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in message
news:i0fj91$vf2$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
"(William Regal)" <v...@il.co> wrote in message
SeaNymph
Wow, that looks familiar <g>
>
>
Bullwinkle
(William Regal)
SeaNymph
(William Regal)
>
>Try reading the link. Page 2 is a good place to start.
Follow your own advice.
No where there does it say deadly force can be used
to protect property.
Now to support Cookie show where it say you can use deadly force to protect
property?
SeaNymph
>
> "SeaNymph" <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in message
> news:i0skmu$lkj$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>>
>>Try reading the link. Page 2 is a good place to start.
>
> Follow your own advice.
>
> No where there does it say deadly force can be used
> to protect property.
The word "deadly" is not used. If you actually read the law, which it
appears you did not, the implications are clear in that the legal resident
may use force, deadly or otherwise, to protect life and property. Prior to
this statement, the case for property is made, with the use of the word
"curtilage" which refers to the area surrounding a dwelling. IOW, life,
property and vehicles are all covered under this law. Don't be such a tard.
(c) Any person using force intended or likely to cause death or serious
bodily injury within a residence, dwelling or vehicle is presumed to have
held a reasonable belief of imminent death or serious bodily injury to self,
family, a member of the household or a person visiting as an invited guest
when that force is used against another person, who unlawfully and forcibly
enters or has unlawfully and forcibly entered the residence, dwelling or
vehicle, and the person using defensive force knew or had reason to believe
that an unlawful and forcible entry occurred.
Dustin Cook
> "SeaNymph" <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in message
> news:i0qq48$tmh$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> Where does it say you can use deadly force to protect property?
Do you have a reading comprehension problem? I'm guesssing so.
You may continue to ask like a broken record, the law I was referring as
been provided via myself and SeaNymph; and again, a simple google search
would have found it as well. At this point, you're just trolling and may
now go fuck yourself.
SeaNymph
> "\(William Regal\)" <v...@il.co> wrote in
> news:4c31...@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> "SeaNymph" <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in message
>> news:i0qq48$tmh$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> Where does it say you can use deadly force to protect property?
>
> Do you have a reading comprehension problem? I'm guesssing so.
>
> You may continue to ask like a broken record, the law I was referring as
> been provided via myself and SeaNymph; and again, a simple google search
> would have found it as well. At this point, you're just trolling and may
> now go fuck yourself.
LOL, I tried to be a bit more diplomatic, but this works as well.
FromTheRafters
> Where does it say you can use deadly force to protect property?
>
> Cookie said:
> Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
> tennesee where guns are legal and using force to protect yourself and
> your
> property is legal as well; so I'm not worried that I've been "outed".
Find a better quote. This one says nothing about "deadly force".
While you're at it, look up statistics on how many gun owners have been
killed by intruders using the property owner's own gun. Have you ever
been the victim of a home invasion? I'll tell you what, intruders can
have my gun - but they'll be getting all of the bullets first.
(William Regal)
As bd sucked jenn in to do his bidding
cookie has sucked you in to do his bidding.
One of many which you and your leader
could have found with a simple Google search.
Same info in on an official Tenn. Web site.
The use of deadly force
Here is the Tennessee law on using deadly force in self-defense. The full
statute can be found in the Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39-11-611. The
critical elements of this law are that:
a.. You CANNOT use deadly force to protect property because there is no
danger of death or serious bodily injury: the threat has to be against a
person, not a thing
"SeaNymph" <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in message
news:i0t5f0$ce$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
(William Regal)
You are a Liar.
"Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DAC72259E6...@69.16.185.247...
Bullwinkle
You two are clueless.
Anyways, it's all good. I live in the miserable assbackwoods state of
Dustin Cook
> You two are clueless.
>
> As bd sucked jenn in to do his bidding
> cookie has sucked you in to do his bidding.
>
> One of many which you and your leader
> could have found with a simple Google search.
>
> http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/handgun-carry-self-defense/15780-le
> gal-perspectives-use-deadly-force.html
Of course you can site an outdated article. We both sited a tn
government website, which clearly defines when you can/cannot apply
lethal force.
It should be said, I don't advocate just willy nilly shooting a person.
I believe that in most cases, non lethal (less than outright lethal)
can accomplish the intended effect. In rare cases only, imho, is lethal
force required.
> Same info in on an official Tenn. Web site.
We provided the tn law concerning the issue.
> a.. You CANNOT use deadly force to protect property because there
You are gravely mistaken. This entire discussion is rather pointless
tho, as nowhere in my post did I say lethal force; I simply stated that
I would if required use force. As the law states, upto and including
lethal if required; but as I previously stated, I don't believe in most
cases that is required. Aside from civil lawsuits and potential for
loss of income arguments aside; I'm well aware of thiefs and criminals
suing property owners due to injuries sustained during a failed robbery
attempt, AND actually winning.. It truely sickens me.
Dustin Cook
> Looks like the others are correct.
>
> You are a Liar.
It's easy to say something, much more difficult to back it up with
factual evidence tho.
(William Regal)
You lied to try and make yourself look
like a tough guy.
SeaNymph jumped up to defend your lie,
two peas in a post thing.
There is no difference in you and boaterdave
except davey can not get a gun.
Spin away cookie, it is what you do.
"Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DADBFBDCD9...@69.16.185.247...
Dustin
> Spin it however you wish.
Funny, I'm not spinning anything.
> You lied to try and make yourself look
> like a tough guy.
I haven't lied about anything.
> SeaNymph jumped up to defend your lie,
> two peas in a post thing.
SeaNymph just did what anybody with half a brain could do, googled it.
> There is no difference in you and boaterdave
> except davey can not get a gun.
Well, if that's how you feel; I can't help your ignorance.
> Spin away cookie, it is what you do.
It's "Cook" fuckwit, but thanks for your concern.
~BD~
"Dustin" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DAE711625A...@69.16.185.250...
>
> SeaNymph just did what anybody with half a brain could do, googled it.
>
When did you discover that SeaNymph had only half a brain? <vbg>
You are right, of course! :)
Dustin
@news.eternal-september.org:
That isn't what I said, BD.
Bullwinkle
"Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DADBFD107E...@69.16.185.247...
Heather
"Bullwinkle" <BD...@loa.mo> wrote in message
news:4c35...@news.x-privat.org...
Dustin
> Why do you still post in hacker groups?
Why shouldn't I? Just because I quit writing viruses doesn't mean I'm
turning my back on the scene which is my home.
(William Regal)
So now you are a hacker.
Spin it away cookie.
"Dustin" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DAF985ED97...@69.16.185.247...
Dustin
> A criminal never reforms.
Sure we do. Ever seen tv?
> So now you are a hacker.
I never claimed I wasn't. Doh! All I've claimed, and proven is that I'm
retired vx.. nothing more, nothing less.
> Spin it away cookie.
Nothing here to spin.
Bullwinkle
(William Regal)
You have proved nothing, except that you spin and lie.
"Bullwinkle" <BD...@loa.mo> wrote in message
news:4c37...@news.x-privat.org...
Bullwinkle
I bet you Plonk little boys also.
"Bill" <wsbl...@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:i17v1...@drn.newsguy.com...
In article <4c37...@news.x-privat.org>, William Regal\ says...
>
>Oh dear.
Fuck off. No one wants to read your drivel.
*Plonk*
The Chief Instigator
> George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote in
> news:172d094adf202e1a...@mixmaster.it:
>
>> Dustin J. Cook, Kingsport, TN
>> Norman E Cook (55), New Gloucester, ME
>> Donna E Cook (51), New Gloucestr, ME
>>
>>
>> DUSTIN J COOK
>> 5428 FORT HENRY DR
>> KINGSPORT, TN 37663
>
> Wrong address. That's my old job address. :) But! Thanks for confirming
> that I was telling the truth about who I am this entire time. :)
>
> I don't live far from it tho, in Kingsport, TN; where I said I lived the
> entire time.. thanks. and yes, I did live in Maine. I've never met Donna (I
> moved away long before her and my dad got married)...
>
> Thanks for showing me what a crazy ass stalker fuck you are tho. Sorry your
> not quite right on the address; but your close. :)
I got to go through Kingsport damned near every summer, when I was a lot
younger and Fort Henry Drive was still US 23, long before anyone suspected
there'd be an I-26 not far away to the west. My father's family live in
northeast Georgia (in White County), and my mother's were in the Kentucky
coal camp I was born in 24 years after she was born there.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, TX
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 3, Houston 2 (April 11)
NEXT GAME: The 2010-11 opener vs. TBA, October 8
Dustin
news:slrni56s2h....@fnord.io.com:
I don't think it's changed much... this place seems behind the times to
me.
--
"I like your Christ. I don't like your Christians. They are so unlike
your Christ." - author unknown.