Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Jung vs. The Application of Reason

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Day Brown

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 9:31:13 AM7/7/11
to
On 07/06/2011 11:34 AM, Kevin wrote:
> Does Jung say that we are all connected? The application of reason
> would lead us to believe that it shouldn't be relevant that we are all
> connected since there is no way to prove the nature of the
> connectedness between us... but what should be all too apparently
> clear at this point is that Jung exists in contempt of reason... What
> is Jung's method, therefore? Assumption that we are all connected
> leads to the great imperative of proving the dis-connectedness between
> us... so it must be true that my psychological method is Jungian in
> nature.
Jung was aware of Oriental cosmologies claiming we exist in a connected
projected matrix, but also that his readership was socialized as
Christian, and therefore pulled his punch.

Saint Ramprasad said the "dis-connectedness" is a delusion.

Kevin

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 1:59:02 PM7/7/11
to

Considering the fact that admitting otherwise would cost psychologists
a lot of money... The notion that we are all connected is too
dogmatically expressed to be credible.

Day Brown

unread,
Jul 8, 2011, 12:23:32 PM7/8/11
to
The profession never had the balls to challenge Christian dogma even tho
the guilt tripping is obviously neurotic. Of the lot, Jung is the only
one I came across that at least understood Oriental cosmologies.

Dunno if he knew a lot more than he dared to express. His sexual
practices were notorious, but entirely consistent with many of the
Oriental traditions.

0 new messages