The person has claimed he is John Wagner. Yes, John Wagner. For what
it's worth, I was 90 percent sure the IMDB poster called Sauchieboy
was John Wagner. I tried to trick him into posting and revealing who
he was and it worked. I started a thread about Origins where I
mentioned the Cal Files/Origins contradiction. Anyway, to cut to the
chase, Wagner replied:
------------------------------------------
Who Is The Dead Man?
by sauchieboy 5 hours ago (Mon Dec 5 2011 02:18:59) Ignore this
User | Report Abuse
Alright, Scott; I admit it. I should have known you were wise to me-
after all; we go back a long way, you and me, Son. Was it my use of
the Scottish vernacular that gave me away? At any rate, you've
cleverly seized upon the one glaring anomaly in thirty-odd years of
Dredd continuity- the Polders/Tell anachronism- and I have to admit
that this was an embarrassing error of judgement on my part. I'm not a
young man anymore, Scott; the strain on me has been heavy and I wish,
perhaps, that my resolve had been a little greater when I made the
decision to step away from my writing commitments in the Nineties.
That's no excuse for short-changing loyal readers like yourself
though, Scott, and damaging my reputation for absolute probity. I did
something I should not have done and in desperation I thought it was
better to conceal the truth concerning my moment of human frailty. I
tried to deny it, but I didn't believe in myself anymore- I kept
asking myself, 'have I done the right thing?'. The readers believe in
me, but therein lay the key- one step over the line and the whole
edifice crumbles. I had deadlines to meet and who knows how much
longer is left to me ...?
Acknowledging that mistake is what has made me break cover, Scott.
This is a perilous step to take, but I feel I must try to persuade you
to overlook our past differences and get behind the new Dredd (2012)
film. We've all got a lot invested (literally and metaphorically) in
this film being a success, but you've done a hell of a job convincing
everyone on the internet that it's a fundamentally flawed enterprise.
You've distinguished yourself despite your young age, in a way a
lesser man could never have achieved.
It's too late now to address the problems I referred to in Dundee;
many of which emanate from Garland's flawed script, as you've
correctly identified in previous posts. What's done is done, Scott:
what good purpose is served by exposing our mistakes now? What message
would that send to our enemies? Aren't we in danger of shooting
ourselves in the foot? You never heard this from me, you understand-
I'll delete this post forthwith- but I need you beside me on this one,
Scott: I call on you to pledge your allegiance to the new film. I'm
asking you, begging you; it's not too late ... we can fix this.
To this end, I have initiated discussions with Rebellion and the movie
people to involve you in future projects and bring this disastrous
parting of the ways to a fair and just conclusion. To see the truth of
my words and claim what is yours by right, simply contact me through
my Facebook page, Son.
-----------
Now I know the likes of Eldospinks will say "it's not Wagner, it's
someone tricking you!" but I'm not so sure. I think it is John Wagner.
I did consider Andy Diggle (because this Sauchieboy has extensive
knowledge of Dredd, Wagner's old quotes etc) but the comment
"Alright, Scott; I admit it. I should have known you were wise to me-
after all; we go back a long way, you and me, Son. Was it my use of
the Scottish vernacular that gave me away? At any rate, you've
cleverly seized upon the one glaring anomaly in thirty-odd years of
Dredd continuity- the Polders/Tell anachronism- and I have to admit
that this was an embarrassing error of judgement on my part. I'm not a
young man anymore, Scott; the strain on me has been heavy and I wish,
perhaps, that my resolve had been a little greater when I made the
decision to step away from my writing commitments in the Nineties. "
would suggest it is John Wagner. He's been posting for months and
there are loads of clues it is John Wagner. Here is another huge clue
Sauchieboy is John Wagner:
Sauchieboy posted this:
"The one thing you can say for the version of Dredd's screen
adventures BURLEARTH was kind enough to share with us, is that it
implies a sense of scale (from the opening shot, to the warring gangs
contesting control of the streets of Megacity One) that was noticeably
absent from the version that slunk apologetically onto screens in
1995. It's in the extremes, the contrasts and the exaggerations of
life in Megacity One that the unique value of the best Dredd strips
can be found. It would have been good to see that Statue of Judgement
standing there, towering over Liberty. Kind of a symbol."
--------------
The last line is a Judge Dredd quote from America!(I think it was from
the story America). Sauchieboy stuck an actual bit of Dredd dialogue -
with a slight alteration - into one of his posts. That is the sort of
thing John Wagner would do, I reckon.
If you read a lot of his posts it sounds like it's Wagner pretending
to be a regular IMDB user. His posts do go on and on - he does waffle
on and is a tad pretentious but every now and then he gives away his
true identity. I am 95 percent sure it is John Wagner. If not him it's
Andy Diggle. But I'm going with John Wagner. When someone writes:
""Alright, Scott; I admit it. I should have known you were wise to me-
after all; we go back a long way, you and me, Son. Was it my use of
the Scottish vernacular that gave me away? At any rate, you've
cleverly seized upon the one glaring anomaly in thirty-odd years of
Dredd continuity- the Polders/Tell anachronism- and I have to admit
that this was an embarrassing error of judgement on my part."
I am going to take it at face value. I may be naive or foolish to
think that's genuine but I think it is.
scojo