Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

FACEBOOK REASONLESS DISABLED ACCOUNTS - LBTR

4 views

Skip to first unread message

¡Gölök Z.L.F Buday AKA Humpme Braggard™, AKA Ian Flaming™, AKA etc....™

unread,

May 22, 2008, 11:33:13 PM5/22/08

X-Body

Never a straight reason, just some robot found something some may or may not like and now I can't rebuttle bad mouthing of me there
when I welcomed the right of anyone to do so with regards to me.
Ahhhh, usenet your freedom is greater than all.

FWD:
ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:59:53 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com

ĄNow it's disabled? Why?
ĄYou don't know specifics, no evidence of a wrong doing or quotable complaint.
ĄYour violating the constitution and human rights. You can't do business without the protection of the laws,
Ąand by violating them you deny yourself them.

ĄBlame (fluff)friends, they have these e-mail reminder things, it looks legit.

ĄGoing to be fascist pigs or prove some thing, I am going to the FTC with this.

ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄYou received this warning because you took repeated actions that could be construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms of Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.
Ą
ĄFacebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure to adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your account. We appreciate your cooperation going forward.

ĄThanks for your understanding,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

Ą-----Original Message to Facebook-----
ĄFrom: GĂślĂśkBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
ĄTo: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
ĄArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.

ĄAt 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
Ą>Hi GĂ ÂślĂ Âśk,
Ą>
Ą>One of your posts in a group was removed because
Ą>it attacked an individual or group. Content
Ą>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
Ą>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
Ą>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.
Ą>
Ą>In order to prevent this from happening in the
Ą>future, please refrain from posting any
Ą>objectionable material and remove all
Ą>outstanding offensive content. For more
Ą>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
Ą>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
Ą>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook page.
Ą>
Ą>Thanks for your understanding,
Ą>
Ą>Riley
Ą>User Operations
Ą>Facebook
Ą>
Ą>
Ą>
Ą>-----Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
Ą>
Ą>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą>
Ą>As long as it's not hard core porn, child rape
Ą>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
Ą>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
Ą>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
Ą>
Ą>Thanks.
Ą>
Ą>Admin: G
Ą>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----

ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:03:35 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com

ĄTry relying on human thought and complaints not just mindless arbtrary computer programing with no judicious judgement.
ĄAlso look at app admin and creator policies and make sure they do not promote crap that entraps or conflicts, all I know is you
Ąaccept them. Frankly I think the "reminders" should be to notice or updates.

ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄThanks for your understanding,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.

ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:35:09 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com

ĄBy the way someone's messed around with the profile organization and no one delt with the odd re-organization of that,
Ąwhen I complained, what do you have to say about that?

ĄKeep in mind how many Libertarians use this service. Including Libertarian lawyers. A huge market for you. Free speech advocates in general.

ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄThanks for your understanding,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.

ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:00:06 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com

ĄInappropriate Content

ĄWhile we believe users should be able to express themselves and their point of view, certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a community like Facebook. Therefore, you may not post or share Content that:
Ąis obscene, pornographic or sexually explicit
Ądepicts graphic or gratuitous violence
Ąmakes threats of any kind or that intimidates, harasses, or bullies anyone
Ąis derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive or hateful

ĄI do none of that, I can be a bit funny, and have a strange sense of humor to some, but who's to judge. I defend hate speech, because suppressing it
Ąis dangerous, while people vent they are less likely to harm others on the street, especially venting from home on a computer.

ĄAccording to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate speech.

ĄNothing I say defames since at worse I speak of suspicion, I think of this:
ĄAll posts have signatures added, all claims are alledged and not prosecutions, all based on opinions and observations and all views are the legal responsibility of
Ąthe poster.
ĄWhy would you be?
ĄYour censorship is your fault.

ĄUnlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct

ĄAlthough as an online service provider, we are not responsible for the conduct of our users, we want Facebook to be a safe place on the internet. Therefore, in using Facebook, you may not:
Ąviolate any local, state, national or international law or post any Content that would encourage or provide instructions for a criminal offense
Ąimpersonate any person or entity or otherwise misrepresent yourself, your age or your affiliation with any person or entity
Ąuse Facebook to send or make available any unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, solicitations, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation
Ąpost or share any personally identifiable or private information of any third party
Ąsolicit passwords or personal information from anyone, including those under 18
Ąuse information or content you obtained on the Facebook website or service in any manner not authorized by the Facebook Code of Conduct or Terms of Use
Ąpost any material that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment
Ąregister for more than one account or use or attempt to use another's account, service or system without authorization or create a false identity on the Service or the Site
Ąengage in any predatory or stalking conduct

ĄThis Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at Facebook's sole discretion.

ĄWhy not blame apps sometimes for misleading, I never sent out spam. For instance I never send mass e-mails, I use inconvieniences of one at a time.
ĄI never did any of that. At most I asked some Vancouver Centre residents for signatures which I won't happen if nomination reform happens, I hate doing it,
ĄI rather be polite about it. Complain to Eections Canada and related orgs that force this on Candidate to be's.
ĄEither way I stopped when the pink pop up annoyed me, I didn't think this was wrong since it was a legal action, legally required, and more polite than
Ąstopping someone on the street. I only sent the e-mail once and never again. So at worse I promoted liberty and ballot access not spam

ĄLegally defined by ftc: If you have a specific complaint about unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam), use the form below. You can forward spam directly to the Commission at SPAM#UCE.GOV without using the complaint form.
Ąhttps://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01

ĄNothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.

ĄAll-In-All, depending on specific chips on shoulders (care to libel or slander me, and be at risk). This is a slander or libel to cast me
Ąout as well as a constitutional infraction by a collective or regulated militia (which suggests individual responsibility for posts a better idea
Ąand more civil).

ĄCan I see the content that got me disabled?
ĄUnfortunately, for technical and security reasons, Facebook cannot provide you with a description or copy of the removed content.
ĄDoes Facebook remove everything that gets reported?
ĄFacebook reviews every report we receive to determine whether or not the content violates our Terms of Use. Any content that is considered obscene, violent, malicious or otherwise offensive will be removed. If you received a warning about an item that was taken down, then we have established that it violated these terms.

ĄAll illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as well. Not just the usuall.

ĄYou have no grounds to condemn anyone with no evidence to provide, this is slander and possible libel; and information sharing wise, a
Ątheft of property (even time wise) without due process. Who's to know what you consider any of this and if that's legal when you will not
Ąback it up with complaints, posts, and reasons. Persecution.

ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄThanks for your understanding,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.

ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:16:14 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com

ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.

ĄAt 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄOne of your posts in a group was removed because it attacked an individual or group. Content that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons, we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.

ĄIn order to prevent this from happening in the future, please refrain from posting any objectionable material and remove all outstanding offensive content. For more information on conduct prohibited by Facebook, please read our Terms of Use, which can be accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook page.
Ą
ĄThanks for your understanding,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

Ą-----Original Message to Facebook-----
ĄFrom: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
ĄTo: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
ĄSubject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

ĄThe e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.

ĄAs long as it's not hard core porn, child rape exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.

ĄThanks.

ĄAdmin: G
Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----

ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:53:35 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook <warning#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄAt 13:16 5/6/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi,

ĄOur systems indicate that you've been misusing certain features on the site. This email serves as a warning. Misuse of Facebook's features or violating Facebook's terms of use may result in your account being disabled . Thanks in advance for your understanding and cooperation.

ĄIf you have any questions, please contact warning#facebook.com from your login email address.

ĄThe Facebook Team

ĄExplain, there are a lot of functions.

ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Sat, 17 May 2008 08:00:57 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com

ĄAt 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

ĄSo you just defamed my character? You slandered me, then violated the US Constitution and Censored me? Spoken to a lawyer about this?
ĄI may not always be or considered right, but I am not in anyway like this, this is as bad as being blamed for an image someone else put up in a group
Ąthat I accidentally adminned on Hermaphrodyte civil rights.
ĄIf it was some thing regarding homophobia, I have been a target of this and am a satitirist, I deal with it I fear no words.

ĄAnti-USAns?

Ą-----Original Message to Facebook-----
ĄFrom: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
ĄTo: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
ĄSubject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

ĄThe e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.

ĄThanks.

ĄAdmin: G
Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----

ĄTo: information#eff.org
ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account

ĄDate: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:05:51 -0800
ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com

ĄNow I am getting crap about too many messages? All to different people, with different titles and variations; no one making a complaint,
Ąas polite as possible the last one very different on my list and after clicking a link on (fluff)friends.

ĄAt 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

ĄAnti-USAns?

Ą-----Original Message to Facebook-----
ĄFrom: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
ĄTo: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
ĄSubject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

ĄThe e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.

ĄThanks.

ĄAdmin: G
Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----

ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
ĄBcc: Many

ĄIt's confusing because you didn't delete or remove specifics or make claims; people show me things. This is why I know.

ĄMy groups sent similar messages some members belong to multiples, no one complained, and no one complained to me, in fact
ĄI got only support. From 2 people vs. 0 bitching or opposing.
ĄNow they can't make a rebuttle because you shut the message out. You defame me and them this way. It's refusing someone the
Ąright to rebuttle that makes it so aweful, it should be their choice to disagree publically or via messages.
ĄEasily deleted ones. I even helped people learn how to block things like causes and groups and events with links to the app pages
Ąbecause they said they didn't want them and I didn't want to accidentally send them anything they didn't want.
ĄPeople can be stupid, but even idiots of the moment aren't lacking in the common view of the conscientious individual.

ĄFREEDOM NOW! Damn well tell me all the details of yours and a user's complaint, I demand to know, I can only guess the pettiness.
ĄI make commentaries and have suspicions, some blue humor and I expect parents to be parents and keep an eye on their kids. Don't you,
Ąyour business is in California and subject to the US Constitution and the laws within. Do not forget this. You can't silence anyone everywhere.
ĄIf this is cleared up, I will publically compliment what is done right, your doing wrong and I don't know why, I need reason, reason is a founding
Ąfather favored concept you know, in fact put the bill of rights and US Constitution in your

ĄOkay at first I thought it was that but all comments were removed.
ĄHow would anyone correct or know anything with a policy this stupid, it's speach genocide (think in context and hyperbole before
Ąassuming I called you a mass murderer, although in intellectual terms, not far off.).

ĄWhat would happen with a Libertarian boycott? There's still usenet to get the message.

ĄMaybe someone like me can work with the EFF and LP to build my recent concept LibertyBook to challenge.

ĄHey Search NAMBLA under groups and then judge me you monsters. Pedophile propaganda can
Ąget accross but I am attacked over some commentary or (fluff) reminders that make you think that's legit to send out.
ĄBut that example aside, your insane, by removing all including admin status; who complained, Patrick Mahlia is the
Ąonly NPA Member I know is on my list.

ĄI never lied about anyone, there was nothing hateful back to sexually explicit. The shin chan group I took over didn't even (you'd think the groups I created and admined would be inaccessible not de-admined, like my posts.).

ĄFASCISM ALERT!

ĄYou censored: "Sulltan of the Sulliban Bans Liberty"
ĄIt was a harmless commentary and I have never banned or deleted a rebuttle or would.
Ąhttp://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=4364&uid=10166022979
Ą"Displaying all 4 posts by 2 people.

ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 4:24 PM.

ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM.

ĄPost #3
Ą1 reply
ĄJohn C. Turner replied to Gölök's post
Ą19 hours ago
ĄHear, Hear, I second you on that line of thought, or at least most of it, I should know seeing as I collected around 180 signatures recently. I could tell you many, many stories (such as putting Joy McPhail on the run, but I digress) and as you know Golok, it was no picnic."

ĄI know some people.

ĄAppeared in many groups or sent from (not with the same members in all), most primarily in my ballot access advocasy group, like my letter to
Ąthe Vancouver Courier:

Ą"http://www.groups.to/ballotaccess

ĄWENDYTHIRTEEN IS RIGHT! (Wed May 14th www.vancourier.com)

ĄPolitically elitist fearing people like me scaring up their little world, I am a libertarian I feel it's
Ąan afront to liberty and even I think this is also an enviromental waste, maybe an attempt to get
ĄBetty K out of it, run and hug the trees the petition form will be made of instead of run for office.
ĄNo! We need in all levels of government and offices to require no filing fee and a dual signature,
Ąokay maybe ask for three to five issue stances for equal debate access and equal televised time.
ĄTo be taken seriously a monolithic platform is useless. However most of the Candidates, and unlike
ĄSam Sullivan, I took the time to talk to and were not there for the food alone and the guy he talked
Ąto may have been joking. So is Sam Sullivan and NPA-Vision on the side of the Greens when
Ąhe supports wasting paper for nomination forms to fill 20-25 signatures?
ĄOne to nominate, and another to second it, this is a great concept. If someone requests a financial
Ądeadline extention for their paper work charge them a filing fee. Not before running, bring on
Ąa write in vote space as well. Ballot would be less cluttered if we had Wards as well. One set of
Ącouncil candidates for one seat, sounds alright to me, maybe a borrough councillor.
ĄThis is a plan made in the Vancouver Club, not in the real world. Won't it take a year to make it law?

ĄThank you,

ĄGölök Z Buday
ĄWriter and Artist and Candidate for Vancouver Mayor and Nomination Reform Advocate."

ĄInappropriate Content

ĄAccording to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate speech.

ĄUnlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct

ĄThis Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at Facebook's sole discretion.

ĄNothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.

ĄAll illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as well. Not just the usuall.

ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄThanks for your understanding,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.

ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
ĄBcc: Many

ĄYou stole my time as well.

ĄIt's confusing because you didn't delete or remove specifics or make claims; people show me things. This is why I know.

ĄWhat would happen with a Libertarian boycott? There's still usenet to get the message.

ĄMaybe someone like me can work with the EFF and LP to build my recent concept LibertyBook to challenge.

ĄFASCISM ALERT!

ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 4:24 PM.

ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM.

ĄI know some people.

ĄAppeared in many groups or sent from (not with the same members in all), most primarily in my ballot access advocasy group, like my letter to
Ąthe Vancouver Courier:

Ą"http://www.groups.to/ballotaccess

ĄWENDYTHIRTEEN IS RIGHT! (Wed May 14th www.vancourier.com)

ĄThank you,

ĄGölök Z Buday
ĄWriter and Artist and Candidate for Vancouver Mayor and Nomination Reform Advocate."

ĄInappropriate Content

ĄAccording to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate speech.

ĄUnlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct

ĄThis Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at Facebook's sole discretion.

ĄNothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.

ĄAll illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as well. Not just the usuall.

ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
ĄHi GĂślĂśk,

ĄThanks for your understanding,

ĄRiley
ĄUser Operations
ĄFacebook

ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.

Best

Got Payraise? http://www.elections.bc.ca/rcl/recall.new.htm

Gölök Z. L. F. Buday
Three Time Mayoral Candidate (96, 02, 05) and Editor-Aat-Large/Owner of "The My Ego Times." and "The Official Black Jester Web Site" and Who.
Likely 2008 Mayoral Candidate http://www.squidoo.com/vancouver2008/ .
http://www.tmetonline.net/ (www.being-ones-self.org) (www.myegotimes.com /net /org) (www.philotician.net) (www.thevoltairian.com) (www.gzlfb.com)
http://www.blackjeszter.com/ (www.openlyambiguous.com) (www.tobj.ws) (www.blackjester.net) (www.feketeudvaribolond.com) (www.snuze.net)
Libertarian Party of Canada; British Columbia; East Vancouver
http://www.velpc.org/ - http://www.lpedia.chronicerudite.com - http://www.squidoo.com/VEL/ - http://www.vclpc.org/ - http://profile.to/gzlfb/
http://www.freedom.being-ones-self.org/
Squidoo: http://www.squidoo.itemshop.com/ - http://www.squidoo.com/golok/ - http://www.squidoo.com/vancouverfootballer/
More.... http://www.opera.itemshop.org/ ; http://www.majorwhorefarer.com/ ; http://www.squidoo.com/majorwhorefarer/
http://www.bcindividualist.org/ -- http://www.republican-liberty.org/ - http://www.squidoo.com/humpmebraggard/
news:van.general -- news:bc.politics -- news:alt.freedom -- news:alt.mindcontrol -- news:can.politics -- news:alt.politics.libertarian
Swagtervism/Art/Gags (All Government Grant Free): http://www.cp.itemshop.org/ - http://www.7thdaystrippist.org/ - http://www.hypospade.com/
"Border security is homeland security."-- Patrick J Buchanan (2006), "State Of Emergency" Pg. 14, Ch. 2
"Delusion has been defined by some as a strongly held belief not held in popular thought, so essentially we have pollsters and pop-culture marketeers deciding
what is delusional and what is clear thinking, not [even] psychiatrists." -- Black Jester, aka Gölök Z. L. F. Buday.
http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/
More Quotations: http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/ -- Portal/Dictionary: http://w3.TerranTula.com/ ; NOW Mag: http://www.7thday.bjsgirls.com/

Cherry Picker Block: http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.zip -- Readme: http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.txt
Store(s): http://w3.itemshop.org/ ; Mobile: http://www.cel.itemshop.org/ ; Philosophy Books: http://www.dr.being-ones-self.org/

Other: Did The Clocks Stop At 1984: http://www.911.pornstitution.com/ ; Downloads http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/ ;
Ego Drive: http://www.egodrive.chronicerudite.com/ ; Hep-Cats: http://www.hepcats.chronicerudite.com/ ; Grudge Report: http://en.ratgrudge.com/

The Metal Plate Stuck In My Head: http://www.firstpatriotact.dubya3c.com

General Articles: Welfare Switcheroo Response....http://www.aletta.org/indi.shtml#Golok%20Buday
Repost: Repost-from-emailfwd: FWD-USENET: Welfare State Woes.... . ...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/browse_thread/thread/d056cee149b9ac0/5ad86bf27d35e71f?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=2&hl=en#5ad86bf27d35e71f&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-2&oe=ISO-8859-2&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&qt_s=Search&num=100&scoring=d&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comedy.standup/browse_thread/thread/4a89e429d4720d2c/06c8cf33e5293331?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=1&hl=en#06c8cf33e5293331&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
2010 Olympic Bid Lobby (Vancouver): http://w3.chronicerudite.com/n-t/response_to_2010_bid_lobby/
Legislated Poverty: http://w3.thevoltairian.com/h-m/legislatedpoverty/

Download Free Agent: http://www.dl.myegotimes.com/freeagent.32bit-1.21/fa32-121.exe
Free Agent Product PageFree Agent Product Page: http://www.forteinc.com/agent/freagent.htm
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/

Now the non-media members Bcc: copy/paste or non-formal list I am happy to remove you, frankly the press should know more than
hollywood and public figure private lives so they'd need a much better reason; the rest is a witness list. Well politicians should know
what people are talking about, oh anyone who wants on the formal update list can add themself via the website form or by e-mail request.

Related Links: Libertarian Party Statement of Principles (Not Anarcian, Libertarian)
We, the members of the Libertarian Party, support the following principles:
http://www.libertarian.ca/english/libertarian-party-join.html

Nonews

unread,

May 23, 2008, 1:21:59 AM5/23/08

You are a freak and they tossed you. What's the problem?

When someone else complains let us know, OK?

"ĄGölök Z.L.F Buday AKA Humpme BraggardT, AKA Ian FlamingT, AKA etc....T"
<mentalmid...@slave.stopnwo.gubnah.state.us.wa.gov> wrote in message
news:48363ae5...@news.iready.ca...

> Ą>Hi GĂfÂślĂfÂśk,

¡Gölök Z.L.F Buday AKA Ian Flaming™, AKA etc....™

unread,

Jul 3, 2008, 12:19:27 PM7/3/08

On Fri, 23 May 2008 05:21:59 GMT, in alt.freedom "Nonews" <non...@news.com> wrote:

ĄYou are a freak and they tossed you. What's the problem?
Ą
ĄWhen someone else complains let us know, OK?
Ą

I'm eccentric, freak is a bit much, that wasn't ever there claim or reasoning, facebook is full
of eccentrics and freaks.
Some "so normal must be a serial killer or worse," what I consider a freak, types; what would you prefer.

Ą
Ą"ĄGölök Z.L.F Buday AKA Humpme BraggardT, AKA Ian FlamingT, AKA etc....T"
Ą<mentalmid...@slave.stopnwo.gubnah.state.us.wa.gov> wrote in message
Ąnews:48363ae5...@news.iready.ca...
Ą> X-Body
Ą>
Ą> Never a straight reason, just some robot found something some may or may
Ą> not like and now I can't rebuttle bad mouthing of me there
Ą> when I welcomed the right of anyone to do so with regards to me.
Ą> Ahhhh, usenet your freedom is greater than all.
Ą>
Ą> FWD:
Ą> ĄTo: information#eff.org
Ą> ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄDate: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:59:53 -0800
Ą> ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
Ą> ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą> ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
Ą>
Ą> ĄNow it's disabled? Why?
Ą> ĄYou don't know specifics, no evidence of a wrong doing or quotable
Ą> complaint.
Ą> ĄYour violating the constitution and human rights. You can't do business
Ą> without the protection of the laws,
Ą> Ąand by violating them you deny yourself them.
Ą>
Ą> ĄBlame (fluff)friends, they have these e-mail reminder things, it looks
Ą> legit.
Ą>
Ą> ĄGoing to be fascist pigs or prove some thing, I am going to the FTC with
Ą> this.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
Ą> ĄHi GĂślĂśk,
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou received this warning because you took repeated actions that could be
Ą> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms of
Ą> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.

Ą> Ą
Ą> ĄFacebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this

Ą> standard very seriously. Please refrain from sending messages or making
Ą> posts with the same or similar content. If you continue to take actions
Ą> that could be considered spam, a warning message will appear. Failure to
Ą> adhere to this warning will result in the permanent loss of your account.
Ą> We appreciate your cooperation going forward.
Ą>

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> ĄRiley
Ą> ĄUser Operations
Ą> ĄFacebook
Ą>
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> Ą-----Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> ĄFrom: GĂślĂśkBuday - The Black Jester (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> ĄTo: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> ĄArrayCC: warning#facebook.com
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą>
Ą> ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
Ą> Ą>Hi GĂfÂślĂfÂśk,

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>One of your posts in a group was removed because

Ą> Ą>it attacked an individual or group. Content
Ą> Ą>that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
Ą> Ą>removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons,
Ą> Ą>we are unable to provide details regarding the removed content.

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>In order to prevent this from happening in the

Ą> Ą>future, please refrain from posting any
Ą> Ą>objectionable material and remove all
Ą> Ą>outstanding offensive content. For more
Ą> Ą>information on conduct prohibited by Facebook,
Ą> Ą>please read our Terms of Use, which can be
Ą> Ą>accessed by clicking on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook
Ą> page.
Ą> Ą>

Ą> Ą>Thanks for your understanding,
Ą> Ą>

Ą> Ą>Riley
Ą> Ą>User Operations
Ą> Ą>Facebook

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>-----Original Message to Facebook-----

Ą> Ą>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> Ą>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> Ą>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>As long as it's not hard core porn, child rape

Ą> Ą>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
Ą> Ą>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
Ą> Ą>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Thanks.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Admin: G

Ą> Ą
Ą> ĄFacebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>One of your posts in a group was removed because

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>In order to prevent this from happening in the

Ą> Ą>Thanks for your understanding,
Ą> Ą>

Ą> Ą>Riley
Ą> Ą>User Operations
Ą> Ą>Facebook

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>-----Original Message to Facebook-----

Ą> Ą>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> Ą>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> Ą>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>As long as it's not hard core porn, child rape

Ą> Ą>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
Ą> Ą>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
Ą> Ą>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Thanks.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Admin: G

Ą> Ą
Ą> ĄFacebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>One of your posts in a group was removed because

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>In order to prevent this from happening in the

Ą> Ą>Thanks for your understanding,
Ą> Ą>

Ą> Ą>Riley
Ą> Ą>User Operations
Ą> Ą>Facebook

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>-----Original Message to Facebook-----

Ą> Ą>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> Ą>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> Ą>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>As long as it's not hard core porn, child rape

Ą> Ą>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
Ą> Ą>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
Ą> Ą>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Thanks.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Admin: G

Ą> Ą>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄTo: information#eff.org
Ą> ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄDate: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:00:06 -0800
Ą> ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
Ą> ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą> ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
Ą>
Ą> ĄInappropriate Content
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhile we believe users should be able to express themselves and their
Ą> point of view, certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a community
Ą> like Facebook. Therefore, you may not post or share Content that:
Ą> Ąis obscene, pornographic or sexually explicit
Ą> Ądepicts graphic or gratuitous violence
Ą> Ąmakes threats of any kind or that intimidates, harasses, or bullies
Ą> anyone
Ą> Ąis derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive or
Ą> hateful
Ą>
Ą> ĄI do none of that, I can be a bit funny, and have a strange sense of
Ą> humor to some, but who's to judge. I defend hate speech, because
Ą> suppressing it
Ą> Ąis dangerous, while people vent they are less likely to harm others on
Ą> the street, especially venting from home on a computer.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAccording to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate
Ą> speech.
Ą>
Ą> ĄNothing I say defames since at worse I speak of suspicion, I think of
Ą> this:
Ą> ĄAll posts have signatures added, all claims are alledged and not
Ą> prosecutions, all based on opinions and observations and all views are the
Ą> legal responsibility of
Ą> Ąthe poster.
Ą> ĄWhy would you be?
Ą> ĄYour censorship is your fault.
Ą>
Ą> ĄUnlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct
Ą>
Ą> ĄAlthough as an online service provider, we are not responsible for the
Ą> conduct of our users, we want Facebook to be a safe place on the internet.
Ą> Therefore, in using Facebook, you may not:
Ą> Ąviolate any local, state, national or international law or post any
Ą> Content that would encourage or provide instructions for a criminal
Ą> offense
Ą> Ąimpersonate any person or entity or otherwise misrepresent yourself, your
Ą> age or your affiliation with any person or entity
Ą> Ąuse Facebook to send or make available any unsolicited or unauthorized
Ą> advertising, solicitations, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam,"
Ą> "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation
Ą> Ąpost or share any personally identifiable or private information of any
Ą> third party
Ą> Ąsolicit passwords or personal information from anyone, including those
Ą> under 18
Ą> Ąuse information or content you obtained on the Facebook website or
Ą> service in any manner not authorized by the Facebook Code of Conduct or
Ą> Terms of Use
Ą> Ąpost any material that contains software viruses or any other computer
Ą> code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the
Ą> functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications
Ą> equipment
Ą> Ąregister for more than one account or use or attempt to use another's
Ą> account, service or system without authorization or create a false
Ą> identity on the Service or the Site
Ą> Ąengage in any predatory or stalking conduct
Ą>
Ą> ĄThis Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at
Ą> Facebook's sole discretion.
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhy not blame apps sometimes for misleading, I never sent out spam. For
Ą> instance I never send mass e-mails, I use inconvieniences of one at a
Ą> time.
Ą> ĄI never did any of that. At most I asked some Vancouver Centre residents
Ą> for signatures which I won't happen if nomination reform happens, I hate
Ą> doing it,
Ą> ĄI rather be polite about it. Complain to Eections Canada and related
Ą> orgs that force this on Candidate to be's.
Ą> ĄEither way I stopped when the pink pop up annoyed me, I didn't think this
Ą> was wrong since it was a legal action, legally required, and more polite
Ą> than
Ą> Ąstopping someone on the street. I only sent the e-mail once and never
Ą> again. So at worse I promoted liberty and ballot access not spam
Ą>
Ą> ĄLegally defined by ftc: If you have a specific complaint about
Ą> unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam), use the form below. You can forward
Ą> spam directly to the Commission at SPAM#UCE.GOV without using the
Ą> complaint form.
Ą> Ąhttps://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
Ą>
Ą> ĄNothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAll-In-All, depending on specific chips on shoulders (care to libel or
Ą> slander me, and be at risk). This is a slander or libel to cast me
Ą> Ąout as well as a constitutional infraction by a collective or regulated
Ą> militia (which suggests individual responsibility for posts a better idea
Ą> Ąand more civil).
Ą>
Ą> ĄCan I see the content that got me disabled?
Ą> ĄUnfortunately, for technical and security reasons, Facebook cannot
Ą> provide you with a description or copy of the removed content.
Ą> ĄDoes Facebook remove everything that gets reported?
Ą> ĄFacebook reviews every report we receive to determine whether or not the
Ą> content violates our Terms of Use. Any content that is considered obscene,
Ą> violent, malicious or otherwise offensive will be removed. If you received
Ą> a warning about an item that was taken down, then we have established that
Ą> it violated these terms.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAll illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as
Ą> well. Not just the usuall.
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou have no grounds to condemn anyone with no evidence to provide, this
Ą> is slander and possible libel; and information sharing wise, a
Ą> Ątheft of property (even time wise) without due process. Who's to know
Ą> what you consider any of this and if that's legal when you will not
Ą> Ąback it up with complaints, posts, and reasons. Persecution.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
Ą> ĄHi GĂślĂśk,
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou received this warning because you took repeated actions that could be
Ą> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms of
Ą> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.

Ą> Ą
Ą> ĄFacebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>One of your posts in a group was removed because

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>In order to prevent this from happening in the

Ą> Ą>Thanks for your understanding,
Ą> Ą>

Ą> Ą>Riley
Ą> Ą>User Operations
Ą> Ą>Facebook

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>-----Original Message to Facebook-----

Ą> Ą>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> Ą>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> Ą>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>As long as it's not hard core porn, child rape

Ą> Ą>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
Ą> Ą>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
Ą> Ą>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Thanks.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Admin: G

Ą> Ą>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą>
Ą> ĄTo: information#eff.org
Ą> ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄDate: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:16:14 -0800
Ą> ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
Ą> ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą> ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
Ą>
Ą> ĄTrust computer judgement a bit much.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
Ą> ĄHi GĂślĂśk,
Ą>
Ą> ĄOne of your posts in a group was removed because it attacked an
Ą> individual or group. Content that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
Ą> removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons, we are unable to provide
Ą> details regarding the removed content.
Ą>
Ą> ĄIn order to prevent this from happening in the future, please refrain
Ą> from posting any objectionable material and remove all outstanding
Ą> offensive content. For more information on conduct prohibited by
Ą> Facebook, please read our Terms of Use, which can be accessed by clicking
Ą> on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook page.
Ą> Ą

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> ĄRiley
Ą> ĄUser Operations
Ą> ĄFacebook
Ą>
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> Ą-----Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> ĄFrom: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> ĄTo: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
Ą>
Ą> ĄThe e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAs long as it's not hard core porn, child rape exploitation, general
Ą> rape, gambling, stock trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass e-mailling
Ą> of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
Ą>
Ą> ĄThanks.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAdmin: G
Ą> Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą>
Ą> ĄTo: information#eff.org
Ą> ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄDate: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:53:35 -0800
Ą> ĄTo: Facebook <warning#facebook.com>
Ą> ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <faced#blackjeszter.com>
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 13:16 5/6/2008, you wrote:
Ą> ĄHi,
Ą>
Ą> ĄOur systems indicate that you've been misusing certain features on the
Ą> site. This email serves as a warning. Misuse of Facebook's features or
Ą> violating Facebook's terms of use may result in your account being
Ą> disabled . Thanks in advance for your understanding and cooperation.
Ą>
Ą> ĄIf you have any questions, please contact warning#facebook.com from your
Ą> login email address.
Ą>
Ą> ĄThe Facebook Team
Ą>
Ą> ĄExplain, there are a lot of functions.
Ą>
Ą> ĄTo: information#eff.org
Ą> ĄSubject: Fwd: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄDate: Sat, 17 May 2008 08:00:57 -0800
Ą> ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
Ą> ĄFrom: Gölök Buday - The Black Jester <bj#blackjeszter.com>
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą> ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 13:25 5/16/2008, you wrote:
Ą> ĄHi GĂślĂśk,
Ą>
Ą> ĄOne of your posts in a group was removed because it attacked an
Ą> individual or group. Content that is abusive, defamatory, or hateful is
Ą> removed. Unfortunately, for technical reasons, we are unable to provide
Ą> details regarding the removed content.
Ą>
Ą> ĄIn order to prevent this from happening in the future, please refrain
Ą> from posting any objectionable material and remove all outstanding
Ą> offensive content. For more information on conduct prohibited by
Ą> Facebook, please read our Terms of Use, which can be accessed by clicking
Ą> on the "terms" link at the bottom of any Facebook page.
Ą> Ą

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> ĄRiley
Ą> ĄUser Operations
Ą> ĄFacebook
Ą>
Ą> ĄSo you just defamed my character? You slandered me, then violated the US
Ą> Constitution and Censored me? Spoken to a lawyer about this?
Ą> ĄI may not always be or considered right, but I am not in anyway like
Ą> this, this is as bad as being blamed for an image someone else put up in a
Ą> group
Ą> Ąthat I accidentally adminned on Hermaphrodyte civil rights.
Ą> ĄIf it was some thing regarding homophobia, I have been a target of this
Ą> and am a satitirist, I deal with it I fear no words.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAnti-USAns?
Ą>
Ą> Ą-----Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> ĄFrom: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> ĄTo: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com
Ą>
Ą> ĄThe e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAs long as it's not hard core porn, child rape exploitation, general
Ą> rape, gambling, stock trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass e-mailling
Ą> of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.
Ą>
Ą> ĄThanks.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAdmin: G
Ą> Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą>
Ą> ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą> ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
Ą> ĄBcc: Many
Ą>
Ą> ĄIt's confusing because you didn't delete or remove specifics or make
Ą> claims; people show me things. This is why I know.
Ą>
Ą> ĄMy groups sent similar messages some members belong to multiples, no one
Ą> complained, and no one complained to me, in fact
Ą> ĄI got only support. From 2 people vs. 0 bitching or opposing.
Ą> ĄNow they can't make a rebuttle because you shut the message out. You
Ą> defame me and them this way. It's refusing someone the
Ą> Ąright to rebuttle that makes it so aweful, it should be their choice to
Ą> disagree publically or via messages.
Ą> ĄEasily deleted ones. I even helped people learn how to block things like
Ą> causes and groups and events with links to the app pages
Ą> Ąbecause they said they didn't want them and I didn't want to accidentally
Ą> send them anything they didn't want.
Ą> ĄPeople can be stupid, but even idiots of the moment aren't lacking in the
Ą> common view of the conscientious individual.
Ą>
Ą> ĄFREEDOM NOW! Damn well tell me all the details of yours and a user's
Ą> complaint, I demand to know, I can only guess the pettiness.
Ą> ĄI make commentaries and have suspicions, some blue humor and I expect
Ą> parents to be parents and keep an eye on their kids. Don't you,
Ą> Ąyour business is in California and subject to the US Constitution and the
Ą> laws within. Do not forget this. You can't silence anyone everywhere.
Ą> ĄIf this is cleared up, I will publically compliment what is done right,
Ą> your doing wrong and I don't know why, I need reason, reason is a founding
Ą> Ąfather favored concept you know, in fact put the bill of rights and US
Ą> Constitution in your
Ą>
Ą> ĄOkay at first I thought it was that but all comments were removed.
Ą> ĄHow would anyone correct or know anything with a policy this stupid, it's
Ą> speach genocide (think in context and hyperbole before
Ą> Ąassuming I called you a mass murderer, although in intellectual terms,
Ą> not far off.).
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhat would happen with a Libertarian boycott? There's still usenet to
Ą> get the message.
Ą>
Ą> ĄMaybe someone like me can work with the EFF and LP to build my recent
Ą> concept LibertyBook to challenge.
Ą>
Ą> ĄHey Search NAMBLA under groups and then judge me you monsters. Pedophile
Ą> propaganda can
Ą> Ąget accross but I am attacked over some commentary or (fluff) reminders
Ą> that make you think that's legit to send out.
Ą> ĄBut that example aside, your insane, by removing all including admin
Ą> status; who complained, Patrick Mahlia is the
Ą> Ąonly NPA Member I know is on my list.
Ą>
Ą> ĄI never lied about anyone, there was nothing hateful back to sexually
Ą> explicit. The shin chan group I took over didn't even (you'd think the
Ą> groups I created and admined would be inaccessible not de-admined, like my
Ą> posts.).
Ą>
Ą> ĄFASCISM ALERT!
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou censored: "Sulltan of the Sulliban Bans Liberty"
Ą> ĄIt was a harmless commentary and I have never banned or deleted a
Ą> rebuttle or would.
Ą> Ąhttp://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=4364&uid=10166022979
Ą> Ą"Displaying all 4 posts by 2 people.
Ą>
Ą> ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 4:24 PM.
Ą>
Ą> ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM.
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄPost #3
Ą> Ą1 reply
Ą> ĄJohn C. Turner replied to Gölök's post
Ą> Ą19 hours ago
Ą> ĄHear, Hear, I second you on that line of thought, or at least most of it,
Ą> I should know seeing as I collected around 180 signatures recently. I
Ą> could tell you many, many stories (such as putting Joy McPhail on the run,
Ą> but I digress) and as you know Golok, it was no picnic."
Ą>
Ą> ĄI know some people.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAppeared in many groups or sent from (not with the same members in all),
Ą> most primarily in my ballot access advocasy group, like my letter to
Ą> Ąthe Vancouver Courier:
Ą>
Ą> Ą"http://www.groups.to/ballotaccess
Ą>
Ą> ĄWENDYTHIRTEEN IS RIGHT! (Wed May 14th www.vancourier.com)
Ą>
Ą> ĄPolitically elitist fearing people like me scaring up their little world,
Ą> I am a libertarian I feel it's
Ą> Ąan afront to liberty and even I think this is also an enviromental waste,
Ą> maybe an attempt to get
Ą> ĄBetty K out of it, run and hug the trees the petition form will be made
Ą> of instead of run for office.
Ą> ĄNo! We need in all levels of government and offices to require no filing
Ą> fee and a dual signature,
Ą> Ąokay maybe ask for three to five issue stances for equal debate access
Ą> and equal televised time.
Ą> ĄTo be taken seriously a monolithic platform is useless. However most of
Ą> the Candidates, and unlike
Ą> ĄSam Sullivan, I took the time to talk to and were not there for the food
Ą> alone and the guy he talked
Ą> Ąto may have been joking. So is Sam Sullivan and NPA-Vision on the side
Ą> of the Greens when
Ą> Ąhe supports wasting paper for nomination forms to fill 20-25 signatures?
Ą> ĄOne to nominate, and another to second it, this is a great concept. If
Ą> someone requests a financial
Ą> Ądeadline extention for their paper work charge them a filing fee. Not
Ą> before running, bring on
Ą> Ąa write in vote space as well. Ballot would be less cluttered if we had
Ą> Wards as well. One set of
Ą> Ącouncil candidates for one seat, sounds alright to me, maybe a borrough
Ą> councillor.
Ą> ĄThis is a plan made in the Vancouver Club, not in the real world. Won't
Ą> it take a year to make it law?
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄThank you,
Ą>
Ą> ĄGölök Z Buday
Ą> ĄWriter and Artist and Candidate for Vancouver Mayor and Nomination Reform
Ą> Advocate."
Ą>
Ą> ĄInappropriate Content
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhile we believe users should be able to express themselves and their
Ą> point of view, certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a community
Ą> like Facebook. Therefore, you may not post or share Content that:
Ą> Ąis obscene, pornographic or sexually explicit
Ą> Ądepicts graphic or gratuitous violence
Ą> Ąmakes threats of any kind or that intimidates, harasses, or bullies
Ą> anyone
Ą> Ąis derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive or
Ą> hateful
Ą>
Ą> ĄI do none of that, I can be a bit funny, and have a strange sense of
Ą> humor to some, but who's to judge. I defend hate speech, because
Ą> suppressing it
Ą> Ąis dangerous, while people vent they are less likely to harm others on
Ą> the street, especially venting from home on a computer.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAccording to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate
Ą> speech.
Ą>
Ą> ĄNothing I say defames since at worse I speak of suspicion, I think of
Ą> this:
Ą> ĄAll posts have signatures added, all claims are alledged and not
Ą> prosecutions, all based on opinions and observations and all views are the
Ą> legal responsibility of
Ą> Ąthe poster.
Ą> ĄWhy would you be?
Ą> ĄYour censorship is your fault.
Ą>
Ą> ĄUnlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct
Ą>
Ą> ĄAlthough as an online service provider, we are not responsible for the
Ą> conduct of our users, we want Facebook to be a safe place on the internet.
Ą> Therefore, in using Facebook, you may not:
Ą> Ąviolate any local, state, national or international law or post any
Ą> Content that would encourage or provide instructions for a criminal
Ą> offense
Ą> Ąimpersonate any person or entity or otherwise misrepresent yourself, your
Ą> age or your affiliation with any person or entity
Ą> Ąuse Facebook to send or make available any unsolicited or unauthorized
Ą> advertising, solicitations, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam,"
Ą> "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation
Ą> Ąpost or share any personally identifiable or private information of any
Ą> third party
Ą> Ąsolicit passwords or personal information from anyone, including those
Ą> under 18
Ą> Ąuse information or content you obtained on the Facebook website or
Ą> service in any manner not authorized by the Facebook Code of Conduct or
Ą> Terms of Use
Ą> Ąpost any material that contains software viruses or any other computer
Ą> code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the
Ą> functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications
Ą> equipment
Ą> Ąregister for more than one account or use or attempt to use another's
Ą> account, service or system without authorization or create a false
Ą> identity on the Service or the Site
Ą> Ąengage in any predatory or stalking conduct
Ą>
Ą> ĄThis Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at
Ą> Facebook's sole discretion.
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhy not blame apps sometimes for misleading, I never sent out spam. For
Ą> instance I never send mass e-mails, I use inconvieniences of one at a
Ą> time.
Ą> ĄI never did any of that. At most I asked some Vancouver Centre residents
Ą> for signatures which I won't happen if nomination reform happens, I hate
Ą> doing it,
Ą> ĄI rather be polite about it. Complain to Eections Canada and related
Ą> orgs that force this on Candidate to be's.
Ą> ĄEither way I stopped when the pink pop up annoyed me, I didn't think this
Ą> was wrong since it was a legal action, legally required, and more polite
Ą> than
Ą> Ąstopping someone on the street. I only sent the e-mail once and never
Ą> again. So at worse I promoted liberty and ballot access not spam
Ą>
Ą> ĄLegally defined by ftc: If you have a specific complaint about
Ą> unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam), use the form below. You can forward
Ą> spam directly to the Commission at SPAM#UCE.GOV without using the
Ą> complaint form.
Ą> Ąhttps://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
Ą>
Ą> ĄNothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAll-In-All, depending on specific chips on shoulders (care to libel or
Ą> slander me, and be at risk). This is a slander or libel to cast me
Ą> Ąout as well as a constitutional infraction by a collective or regulated
Ą> militia (which suggests individual responsibility for posts a better idea
Ą> Ąand more civil).
Ą>
Ą> ĄCan I see the content that got me disabled?
Ą> ĄUnfortunately, for technical and security reasons, Facebook cannot
Ą> provide you with a description or copy of the removed content.
Ą> ĄDoes Facebook remove everything that gets reported?
Ą> ĄFacebook reviews every report we receive to determine whether or not the
Ą> content violates our Terms of Use. Any content that is considered obscene,
Ą> violent, malicious or otherwise offensive will be removed. If you received
Ą> a warning about an item that was taken down, then we have established that
Ą> it violated these terms.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAll illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as
Ą> well. Not just the usuall.
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou have no grounds to condemn anyone with no evidence to provide, this
Ą> is slander and possible libel; and information sharing wise, a
Ą> Ątheft of property (even time wise) without due process. Who's to know
Ą> what you consider any of this and if that's legal when you will not
Ą> Ąback it up with complaints, posts, and reasons. Persecution.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
Ą> ĄHi GĂślĂśk,
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou received this warning because you took repeated actions that could be
Ą> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms of
Ą> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.

Ą> Ą
Ą> ĄFacebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>One of your posts in a group was removed because

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>In order to prevent this from happening in the

Ą> Ą>Thanks for your understanding,
Ą> Ą>

Ą> Ą>Riley
Ą> Ą>User Operations
Ą> Ą>Facebook

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>-----Original Message to Facebook-----

Ą> Ą>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> Ą>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> Ą>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>As long as it's not hard core porn, child rape

Ą> Ą>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
Ą> Ą>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
Ą> Ą>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Thanks.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Admin: G

Ą> Ą>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą>
Ą> ĄTo: Facebook Support <appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com>
Ą> ĄSubject: Re: Re: Warning: Your Facebook Account
Ą> ĄCc: warning#facebook.com
Ą> ĄBcc: Many
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou stole my time as well.
Ą>
Ą> ĄIt's confusing because you didn't delete or remove specifics or make
Ą> claims; people show me things. This is why I know.
Ą>
Ą> ĄMy groups sent similar messages some members belong to multiples, no one
Ą> complained, and no one complained to me, in fact
Ą> ĄI got only support. From 2 people vs. 0 bitching or opposing.
Ą> ĄNow they can't make a rebuttle because you shut the message out. You
Ą> defame me and them this way. It's refusing someone the
Ą> Ąright to rebuttle that makes it so aweful, it should be their choice to
Ą> disagree publically or via messages.
Ą> ĄEasily deleted ones. I even helped people learn how to block things like
Ą> causes and groups and events with links to the app pages
Ą> Ąbecause they said they didn't want them and I didn't want to accidentally
Ą> send them anything they didn't want.
Ą> ĄPeople can be stupid, but even idiots of the moment aren't lacking in the
Ą> common view of the conscientious individual.
Ą>
Ą> ĄFREEDOM NOW! Damn well tell me all the details of yours and a user's
Ą> complaint, I demand to know, I can only guess the pettiness.
Ą> ĄI make commentaries and have suspicions, some blue humor and I expect
Ą> parents to be parents and keep an eye on their kids. Don't you,
Ą> Ąyour business is in California and subject to the US Constitution and the
Ą> laws within. Do not forget this. You can't silence anyone everywhere.
Ą> ĄIf this is cleared up, I will publically compliment what is done right,
Ą> your doing wrong and I don't know why, I need reason, reason is a founding
Ą> Ąfather favored concept you know, in fact put the bill of rights and US
Ą> Constitution in your
Ą>
Ą> ĄOkay at first I thought it was that but all comments were removed.
Ą> ĄHow would anyone correct or know anything with a policy this stupid, it's
Ą> speach genocide (think in context and hyperbole before
Ą> Ąassuming I called you a mass murderer, although in intellectual terms,
Ą> not far off.).
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhat would happen with a Libertarian boycott? There's still usenet to
Ą> get the message.
Ą>
Ą> ĄMaybe someone like me can work with the EFF and LP to build my recent
Ą> concept LibertyBook to challenge.
Ą>
Ą> ĄHey Search NAMBLA under groups and then judge me you monsters. Pedophile
Ą> propaganda can
Ą> Ąget accross but I am attacked over some commentary or (fluff) reminders
Ą> that make you think that's legit to send out.
Ą> ĄBut that example aside, your insane, by removing all including admin
Ą> status; who complained, Patrick Mahlia is the
Ą> Ąonly NPA Member I know is on my list.
Ą>
Ą> ĄI never lied about anyone, there was nothing hateful back to sexually
Ą> explicit. The shin chan group I took over didn't even (you'd think the
Ą> groups I created and admined would be inaccessible not de-admined, like my
Ą> posts.).
Ą>
Ą> ĄFASCISM ALERT!
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou censored: "Sulltan of the Sulliban Bans Liberty"
Ą> ĄIt was a harmless commentary and I have never banned or deleted a
Ą> rebuttle or would.
Ą> Ąhttp://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=4364&uid=10166022979
Ą> Ą"Displaying all 4 posts by 2 people.
Ą>
Ą> ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 4:24 PM.
Ą>
Ą> ĄPost deleted on May 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM.
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄPost #3
Ą> Ą1 reply
Ą> ĄJohn C. Turner replied to Gölök's post
Ą> Ą19 hours ago
Ą> ĄHear, Hear, I second you on that line of thought, or at least most of it,
Ą> I should know seeing as I collected around 180 signatures recently. I
Ą> could tell you many, many stories (such as putting Joy McPhail on the run,
Ą> but I digress) and as you know Golok, it was no picnic."
Ą>
Ą> ĄI know some people.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAppeared in many groups or sent from (not with the same members in all),
Ą> most primarily in my ballot access advocasy group, like my letter to
Ą> Ąthe Vancouver Courier:
Ą>
Ą> Ą"http://www.groups.to/ballotaccess
Ą>
Ą> ĄWENDYTHIRTEEN IS RIGHT! (Wed May 14th www.vancourier.com)
Ą>
Ą> ĄPolitically elitist fearing people like me scaring up their little world,
Ą> I am a libertarian I feel it's
Ą> Ąan afront to liberty and even I think this is also an enviromental waste,
Ą> maybe an attempt to get
Ą> ĄBetty K out of it, run and hug the trees the petition form will be made
Ą> of instead of run for office.
Ą> ĄNo! We need in all levels of government and offices to require no filing
Ą> fee and a dual signature,
Ą> Ąokay maybe ask for three to five issue stances for equal debate access
Ą> and equal televised time.
Ą> ĄTo be taken seriously a monolithic platform is useless. However most of
Ą> the Candidates, and unlike
Ą> ĄSam Sullivan, I took the time to talk to and were not there for the food
Ą> alone and the guy he talked
Ą> Ąto may have been joking. So is Sam Sullivan and NPA-Vision on the side
Ą> of the Greens when
Ą> Ąhe supports wasting paper for nomination forms to fill 20-25 signatures?
Ą> ĄOne to nominate, and another to second it, this is a great concept. If
Ą> someone requests a financial
Ą> Ądeadline extention for their paper work charge them a filing fee. Not
Ą> before running, bring on
Ą> Ąa write in vote space as well. Ballot would be less cluttered if we had
Ą> Wards as well. One set of
Ą> Ącouncil candidates for one seat, sounds alright to me, maybe a borrough
Ą> councillor.
Ą> ĄThis is a plan made in the Vancouver Club, not in the real world. Won't
Ą> it take a year to make it law?
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> ĄThank you,
Ą>
Ą> ĄGölök Z Buday
Ą> ĄWriter and Artist and Candidate for Vancouver Mayor and Nomination Reform
Ą> Advocate."
Ą>
Ą> ĄInappropriate Content
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhile we believe users should be able to express themselves and their
Ą> point of view, certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a community
Ą> like Facebook. Therefore, you may not post or share Content that:
Ą> Ąis obscene, pornographic or sexually explicit
Ą> Ądepicts graphic or gratuitous violence
Ą> Ąmakes threats of any kind or that intimidates, harasses, or bullies
Ą> anyone
Ą> Ąis derogatory, demeaning, malicious, defamatory, abusive, offensive or
Ą> hateful
Ą>
Ą> ĄI do none of that, I can be a bit funny, and have a strange sense of
Ą> humor to some, but who's to judge. I defend hate speech, because
Ą> suppressing it
Ą> Ąis dangerous, while people vent they are less likely to harm others on
Ą> the street, especially venting from home on a computer.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAccording to my location, those defending Levant are defending hate
Ą> speech.
Ą>
Ą> ĄNothing I say defames since at worse I speak of suspicion, I think of
Ą> this:
Ą> ĄAll posts have signatures added, all claims are alledged and not
Ą> prosecutions, all based on opinions and observations and all views are the
Ą> legal responsibility of
Ą> Ąthe poster.
Ą> ĄWhy would you be?
Ą> ĄYour censorship is your fault.
Ą>
Ą> ĄUnlawful or Harmful Content or Conduct
Ą>
Ą> ĄAlthough as an online service provider, we are not responsible for the
Ą> conduct of our users, we want Facebook to be a safe place on the internet.
Ą> Therefore, in using Facebook, you may not:
Ą> Ąviolate any local, state, national or international law or post any
Ą> Content that would encourage or provide instructions for a criminal
Ą> offense
Ą> Ąimpersonate any person or entity or otherwise misrepresent yourself, your
Ą> age or your affiliation with any person or entity
Ą> Ąuse Facebook to send or make available any unsolicited or unauthorized
Ą> advertising, solicitations, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam,"
Ą> "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation
Ą> Ąpost or share any personally identifiable or private information of any
Ą> third party
Ą> Ąsolicit passwords or personal information from anyone, including those
Ą> under 18
Ą> Ąuse information or content you obtained on the Facebook website or
Ą> service in any manner not authorized by the Facebook Code of Conduct or
Ą> Terms of Use
Ą> Ąpost any material that contains software viruses or any other computer
Ą> code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the
Ą> functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications
Ą> equipment
Ą> Ąregister for more than one account or use or attempt to use another's
Ą> account, service or system without authorization or create a false
Ą> identity on the Service or the Site
Ą> Ąengage in any predatory or stalking conduct
Ą>
Ą> ĄThis Content Code of Conduct is subject to change at any time at
Ą> Facebook's sole discretion.
Ą>
Ą> ĄWhy not blame apps sometimes for misleading, I never sent out spam. For
Ą> instance I never send mass e-mails, I use inconvieniences of one at a
Ą> time.
Ą> ĄI never did any of that. At most I asked some Vancouver Centre residents
Ą> for signatures which I won't happen if nomination reform happens, I hate
Ą> doing it,
Ą> ĄI rather be polite about it. Complain to Eections Canada and related
Ą> orgs that force this on Candidate to be's.
Ą> ĄEither way I stopped when the pink pop up annoyed me, I didn't think this
Ą> was wrong since it was a legal action, legally required, and more polite
Ą> than
Ą> Ąstopping someone on the street. I only sent the e-mail once and never
Ą> again. So at worse I promoted liberty and ballot access not spam
Ą>
Ą> ĄLegally defined by ftc: If you have a specific complaint about
Ą> unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam), use the form below. You can forward
Ą> spam directly to the Commission at SPAM#UCE.GOV without using the
Ą> complaint form.
Ą> Ąhttps://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
Ą>
Ą> ĄNothing I sent was commercial. So I am in the clear.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAll-In-All, depending on specific chips on shoulders (care to libel or
Ą> slander me, and be at risk). This is a slander or libel to cast me
Ą> Ąout as well as a constitutional infraction by a collective or regulated
Ą> militia (which suggests individual responsibility for posts a better idea
Ą> Ąand more civil).
Ą>
Ą> ĄCan I see the content that got me disabled?
Ą> ĄUnfortunately, for technical and security reasons, Facebook cannot
Ą> provide you with a description or copy of the removed content.
Ą> ĄDoes Facebook remove everything that gets reported?
Ą> ĄFacebook reviews every report we receive to determine whether or not the
Ą> content violates our Terms of Use. Any content that is considered obscene,
Ą> violent, malicious or otherwise offensive will be removed. If you received
Ą> a warning about an item that was taken down, then we have established that
Ą> it violated these terms.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAll illegal. Have lawyers? Constructionist Constitutional Lawyers as
Ą> well. Not just the usuall.
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou have no grounds to condemn anyone with no evidence to provide, this
Ą> is slander and possible libel; and information sharing wise, a
Ą> Ątheft of property (even time wise) without due process. Who's to know
Ą> what you consider any of this and if that's legal when you will not
Ą> Ąback it up with complaints, posts, and reasons. Persecution.
Ą>
Ą> ĄAt 12:23 5/21/2008, you wrote:
Ą> ĄHi GĂślĂśk,
Ą>
Ą> ĄYou received this warning because you took repeated actions that could be
Ą> construed as spam. For instance, it is a violation of Facebook's Terms of
Ą> Use to repeatedly send the same message or to make the same post.

Ą> Ą
Ą> ĄFacebook prides itself in protecting users from spam, and we take this

Ą> ĄThanks for your understanding,
Ą>

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>One of your posts in a group was removed because

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>In order to prevent this from happening in the

Ą> Ą>Thanks for your understanding,
Ą> Ą>

Ą> Ą>Riley
Ą> Ą>User Operations
Ą> Ą>Facebook

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>-----Original Message to Facebook-----

Ą> Ą>From: bj#blackjeszter.com (bj#blackjeszter.com)
Ą> Ą>To: appeals+nlrr8nq#facebook.com
Ą> Ą>Subject: Re: Your mail to bj#blackjeszter.com

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>The e-mail has arrived on the server, thanks for keeping in touch.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>As long as it's not hard core porn, child rape

Ą> Ą>exploitation, general rape, gambling, stock
Ą> Ą>trading, or suspicious sales and/or mass
Ą> Ą>e-mailling of course; and possibly political pragmatism, AKA PoliSci.

Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Thanks.
Ą> Ą>
Ą> Ą>Admin: G

Ą> Ą>-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> Ą-----End Original Message to Facebook-----
Ą> Ą
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> Best
Ą>
Ą> Got Payraise? http://www.elections.bc.ca/rcl/recall.new.htm
Ą>
Ą>
Ą> Gölök Z. L. F. Buday
Ą> Three Time Mayoral Candidate (96, 02, 05) and Editor-Aat-Large/Owner of
Ą> "The My Ego Times." and "The Official Black Jester Web Site" and Who.
Ą> Likely 2008 Mayoral Candidate http://www.squidoo.com/vancouver2008/ .
Ą> http://www.tmetonline.net/ (www.being-ones-self.org) (www.myegotimes.com
Ą> /net /org) (www.philotician.net) (www.thevoltairian.com) (www.gzlfb.com)
Ą> http://www.blackjeszter.com/ (www.openlyambiguous.com) (www.tobj.ws)
Ą> (www.blackjester.net) (www.feketeudvaribolond.com) (www.snuze.net)
Ą> Libertarian Party of Canada; British Columbia; East Vancouver
Ą> http://www.velpc.org/ - http://www.lpedia.chronicerudite.com -
Ą> http://www.squidoo.com/VEL/ - http://www.vclpc.org/ -
Ą> http://profile.to/gzlfb/
Ą> http://www.freedom.being-ones-self.org/
Ą> Squidoo: http://www.squidoo.itemshop.com/ -
Ą> http://www.squidoo.com/golok/ -
Ą> http://www.squidoo.com/vancouverfootballer/
Ą> More.... http://www.opera.itemshop.org/ ; http://www.majorwhorefarer.com/
Ą> ; http://www.squidoo.com/majorwhorefarer/
Ą> http://www.bcindividualist.org/ -- http://www.republican-liberty.org/ -
Ą> http://www.squidoo.com/humpmebraggard/
Ą> news:van.general -- news:bc.politics -- news:alt.freedom --
Ą> news:alt.mindcontrol -- news:can.politics -- news:alt.politics.libertarian
Ą> Swagtervism/Art/Gags (All Government Grant Free):
Ą> http://www.cp.itemshop.org/ - http://www.7thdaystrippist.org/ -
Ą> http://www.hypospade.com/
Ą> "Border security is homeland security."-- Patrick J Buchanan (2006),
Ą> "State Of Emergency" Pg. 14, Ch. 2
Ą> "Delusion has been defined by some as a strongly held belief not held in
Ą> popular thought, so essentially we have pollsters and pop-culture
Ą> marketeers deciding
Ą> what is delusional and what is clear thinking, not [even]
Ą> psychiatrists." -- Black Jester, aka Gölök Z. L. F. Buday.
Ą> http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/
Ą> More Quotations: http://en.wiquo.myegopedia.com/ -- Portal/Dictionary:
Ą> http://w3.TerranTula.com/ ; NOW Mag: http://www.7thday.bjsgirls.com/
Ą>
Ą> Cherry Picker Block:
Ą> http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.zip -- Readme:
Ą> http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/script/cgi/emp.txt
Ą> Store(s): http://w3.itemshop.org/ ; Mobile: http://www.cel.itemshop.org/ ;
Ą> Philosophy Books: http://www.dr.being-ones-self.org/
Ą>
Ą> Other: Did The Clocks Stop At 1984: http://www.911.pornstitution.com/ ;
Ą> Downloads http://www.dl.being-ones-self.org/ ;
Ą> Ego Drive: http://www.egodrive.chronicerudite.com/ ; Hep-Cats:
Ą> http://www.hepcats.chronicerudite.com/ ; Grudge Report:
Ą> http://en.ratgrudge.com/
Ą>
Ą> The Metal Plate Stuck In My Head: http://www.firstpatriotact.dubya3c.com
Ą>
Ą> General Articles: Welfare Switcheroo
Ą> Response....http://www.aletta.org/indi.shtml#Golok%20Buday
Ą> Repost: Repost-from-emailfwd: FWD-USENET: Welfare State Woes.... . ...
Ą> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.libertarian/browse_thread/thread/d056cee149b9ac0/5ad86bf27d35e71f?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=2&hl=en#5ad86bf27d35e71f&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
Ą> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-2&oe=ISO-8859-2&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&qt_s=Search&num=100&scoring=d&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
Ą> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comedy.standup/browse_thread/thread/4a89e429d4720d2c/06c8cf33e5293331?lnk=st&q=%22Fiscal+Implosion%22+Buday&rnum=1&hl=en#06c8cf33e5293331&sourceid=contact.myegotimes,com
Ą> 2010 Olympic Bid Lobby (Vancouver):
Ą> http://w3.chronicerudite.com/n-t/response_to_2010_bid_lobby/
Ą> Legislated Poverty: http://w3.thevoltairian.com/h-m/legislatedpoverty/
Ą>
Ą> Download Free Agent:
Ą> http://www.dl.myegotimes.com/freeagent.32bit-1.21/fa32-121.exe
Ą> Free Agent Product PageFree Agent Product Page:
Ą> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/freagent.htm
Ą> Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/
Ą>
Ą> Now the non-media members Bcc: copy/paste or non-formal list I am happy to
Ą> remove you, frankly the press should know more than
Ą> hollywood and public figure private lives so they'd need a much better
Ą> reason; the rest is a witness list. Well politicians should know
Ą> what people are talking about, oh anyone who wants on the formal update
Ą> list can add themself via the website form or by e-mail request.
Ą>
Ą> Related Links: Libertarian Party Statement of Principles (Not Anarcian,
Ą> Libertarian)
Ą> We, the members of the Libertarian Party, support the following
Ą> principles:
Ą> http://www.libertarian.ca/english/libertarian-party-join.html
Ą
Ą

0 new messages