MORE LIES FROM KONCHOK PENDAY
Robert D.
KP replied from my first message with this:
Return-path: <net-p...@net-prophet.net>
X-Sender: net-p...@net-prophet.net
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:24:54 -0800
To: Vo...@ctinet.net (Robert D.)
From: Net Prophet <net-p...@net-prophet.net>
Subject: Re: MARTIN CORNELIUS III: TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST
>I DON'T HAVE A MAILING LIST.
>
>I JUST REPLY TO WHAT SHOWS UP IN MY IN BOX.
IMPOSSIBLE!!!! I NEVER WROTE TO YOU. YOURS WAS THE FIRST MESSAGE I
EVER RECEIVED FROM THAT LIST. IT WAS DIRECTLY FROM YOU, NOT ANYBODY
ELSE.
>IF YOU DON'T WANT ME TO REPLY TO *YOU*
>
>.. . THEN DON'T WRITE ME!
I DIDN'T! WHY WOULD I EVER WANT TO WRITE TO YOU BACKCHANNEL,, YOU
PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
YOU ARE A LIBEL SPREADING CRIMINAL.
RD
>
>THANKS FOR THE WANKS!
>
>
>KP
===================================================
At 18:01 12/9/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>TO MARTIN CORNELIUS III A.K.A. KONCHOK PENDAY A.K.A. NEAL PARDOE.
>
>TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST.
>
>INSTEAD, ADD THE E-MAIL ADDRESS THAT YOU DIDN'T SEEM TO THINK WAS IMPORTANT
>ENOUGH TO INCLUDE: <neal....@clara.co.uk> - MAYBE BECAUSE HE DOESN'T
EXIST?
>
>RD.
>
>At 11:12 10/12/01 -0800, "Net Prophet" Konchok Penday KONCHOK LOCATION:
>Martin Cornellius III, <Net-Nut>,
>posing as Konchok Penday, <net-prophet>,
>a.c.t.'s very own psychomaniac.
>Former staff at Pubs DK.
>Sometimes resident of beds in pickup trucks.
>Last known address:
>
>A back room at 25217 Lawrence Rd.
>Junction City, OR 97448-8530
>Phone: 541-998-8227 (Not in his name)
>
>Also known to use 541-998-3660 (Not in his name)
>
>Traced to 810 Vine St.
>Junction City, OR 97448
>
>wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>Dear Hunter:
>>
>>I like your metaphor.
>>
>>UCP is the comprehensive meta-process
>>of analyzing what to turp and what to paint!
>>
>>I think your fine writing skills would be better
>>displayed in public on alt.clearing.technology
>>than hidden away in private email.
>>
>>
>>At 04:59 12/10/2001 -0800, Jonnie Onthe Spot wrote:
>>>(This material was written by Hunter Barnes December 9, 2001AD - Feel
>>>free to distribute.)
>>>
>>>
>>>I have come to a conclusion on a matter, after many eons of contemplation
>>>and various trials of theory.
>>>
>>>Each person is an artist. Each artist has a canvas.
>>>The canvas is what the person calls their reality.
>>>
>>>As we go through existence, we paint on the canvas.
>>>After a while we notice that we have too much paint in one area or
>>>another and we don't like the way it looks.
>>>We then try to paint over, but the old paint bleeds through.
>>>We notice it is bleeding through and apply more paint.
>>>After so many layers, the paint chips..
>>>We then repaint over it.
>>>
>>>Q: How do we apply the paint?
>>>A: By intention
>>>
>>>There is a balance to all contrasts...
>>>and each side of a contrast has a counterpart.
>>>
>>>There is a material that dissolves paint called turpentine.
>>>
>>>Q: How is it applied?
>>>A: The same way we apply the paint.
>>>
>>>Q: What are we really talking about here?
>>>A: Out-creation
>>>
>>>Q: So then, if we could apply turpentine to the whole canvas, why don't
>>>we?
>>>A: Because, we like various aspects of the painting we have created and
>>>want to keep those.
>>>
>>>Q: So then, if we could apply turpentine to a small part of the canvas,
>>>why don't we?
>>>A: Because we are usually to busy painting to even consider it possible.
>>>
>>>The paint is Expression.
>>>The turpentine is the dissolvement of Expression.
>>>
>>>Only the Artist can decide where and what to paint.
>>>Only the Artist can decide where and what paint to remove.
>>>Too many artists are waiting for a cosmic bucket of turpentine to come
>>>flying
>>> from somewhere else, perfectly touching up the painting.
>>>That fact remains, It's your painting, and you are the artist.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, there is a balance...
>>>Too much paint, makes a mess, not a pretty picture.
>>>Too much Turpentine, and you don't have much of a picture.
>>>
>>>Every artist has used both paint and turpentine.
>>>If this were not true, the painting would be pitch black from all the
>>>paint.
>>>
>>>Both of these tools are available to us via intention.
>>>
>>>Q: Ok, by intention, can you give an applicable example?
>>>A: Consider something you can live without and are willing to do away
>>>with.
>>>
>>>Poof... you just applied turpentine.
>>>Amazing how it vanishes without a trace.
>>>You just out-created something from your reality.
>>>
>>>Q: How to you keep from painting it back in?
>>>A: Paint something else.
>>>
>>>Q: Why did I paint it back in at first?
>>>A: Some other paint on the canvas.
>>>
>>>
>>>It takes some practice to get good at, that's why art requires skill.
>>
>>UCP is the fastest known method of enhancing skill.
>>
>>>Q: Ok, I get the drift, but it seems like it will take a long time to get
>>>the painting perfect.
>>>A: You have an unlimited amount of time, an unlimited amount of paint,
>>>and an unlimited amount of turpentine.
>>>
>>>And it gets easier as you use it.
>>>
>>>See, having the power to decide what to create and out-create gives you
>>>the freedom to continue using the same canvas.
>>>That way, instead of seeing the Freddy Kruger you flash painted when you
>>>open your eyelids, the patch of
>>>paint you created to have you see your room will still be in operation
>>>until you are ready to get rid of that too.
>>>
>>>Yes, everything contained within your experience you have painted, it's
>>>all yours.
>>>If you had never painted anything, there would be no picture to call your
>>>experience.
>>>
>>>Q: So how do other people fit in? Did I paint them too?
>>>A: Well, I can safely say that you didn't paint me.
>>> But I assume that we paint even our interactions with one another.
>>> (plug A fits into outlet B) kind of thing.
>>> There is a lot of paint out here.
>>>
>>>Q: Is this message turpentine?
>>>A: No just paint. We can view one another's artistry.
>>> I only painted a small how-to picture.
>>>
>>>Q: Are you saying that I can create my own perfect eden?
>>>A: Why did you start painting in the first place?
>>>
>>>
>>>(I mentioned before that time cannot be stopped or reversed.
>>
>>To the best of my knowledge that is true.
>>
>>>But that it can be looped. This is how.)
>>
>>I either don't follow or don't agree with that statement.
>>
>>There are always similarities between any two times you can recall.
>>
>>> (Let the reader understand.)
>>
>>Or disagree?
>>
>>WELCOME TO
>>*ACTUALITY!*
>>
>>THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING YOUR
>>ROLE IN THE COSMIC DRAMA NOW!
>>
>>REBOOT YOUR MIND!
>>UPGRADE YOUR OS!
>>DO UCP AND SEE!
>>
>>
>> O
>> --- )
>> \
>>
>>
>>Konchok Penday
>><K...@net-prophet.net>
>>Research & Technical Writer
>>Recipient of the Alex Yakovlev
>>Technical hExcellence Award :-)
>>Flounder & Prophet Gods Church
>>
>>
>>===========================================
>>
>> WHAT THE BUDDHA SOUGHT IS FOUND!
>> YOU CAN LEARN IT RIGHT NOW FREE!
>> http://net-prophet.net/ucp/
>>
>> TEST THE UNIVERSAL CLEARING PROCESS:
>> COMPARE PAST AND FUTURE TO PRESENT!
>>
>> DOWNLOAD THE FREE UCP VIRTUAL WITNESS:
>> YOU CAN RAISE YOUR OWN AWARENESS NOW!
>>
>> UCP: TRANSFORMING AWARENESS
>> SINCE THE SECOND MILLENNIUM,
>> ONE BODHISATTVA AT A TIME!
>>
>>============================================
>>
>>
>>Your generous donation to K...@net-prophet.net
>>thru paypal.com helps many others Find, Learn
>>and *DO* UCP! "No Gift Too Large . . . or Small!"
>>
>>GET YOUR DUCKS IN A ROW AT net-prophet.net
>>THE UCP WITNESS SCHOOL IS NOW OPEN!
>>GLOBAL SERVICE AT REASONABLE RATES:
>>DO A 24-HOUR APPRENTICESHIP BY PHONE!
>>RE-EVALUATION COUNSELORS: RE-EVALUATE!
>>EXIT COUNSELORS: UCP CURES $CIENTOLOGY!
>>
>>UCP *USENET* POSTS @ alt.clearing.technology
>>Thanks to ho...@lightlink.com for ISP support plus
>>ACT + ARS Free News: Server = news2.lightlink.com
>>Newsreader = http://forteinc.com/agent/freagent.htm
>>
>>
>>
>
Konchok Penday
DATE: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 23:55:40 GMT
MESSAGE ID: <3c13f7f0...@news.ctinet.net>
NEWSGROUP: alt.clearing.technology
THREAD: MORE LIES FROM KONCHOK PENDAY
POSTER: Vo...@ctinet.net (Robert D.)
Dingbat DuCharMe:
>KP replied from my first message with this:
>
>
>Return-path: <net-p...@net-prophet.net>
>X-Sender: net-p...@net-prophet.net
>Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:24:54 -0800
>To: Vo...@ctinet.net (Robert D.)
>From: Net Prophet <net-p...@net-prophet.net>
>Subject: Re: MARTIN CORNELIUS III: TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST
[kp:]
>>I DON'T HAVE A MAILING LIST.
>>
>>I JUST REPLY TO WHAT SHOWS UP IN MY IN BOX.
Fuck-Wank IdiOT Rubbard Ducharme replies to my email to him,
responding to his emial to me, which he refers to above:
>IMPOSSIBLE!!!! I NEVER WROTE TO YOU.
Oooooops!
WHAT about THIS message that you sent me today:
============== start DuCharMe's email to KP ===============
X-Sender: Vo...@mailhost.ctinet.net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 18:01:50 -0500
To: Net Prophet <net-p...@net-prophet.net>,
Jonnie Onthe Spot <cyberg...@juno.com>, exs...@freeatlast.com,
ddg...@aol.com, K...@net-prophet.net, hug...@pop.ihug.co.nz,
Andrea...@csi.com, ho...@lightlink.com, skau...@inil.com,
arc...@lightlink.com, bba...@hotmail.com, phils...@hotmail.com,
lr2...@techie.com, lumni...@excite.com, nob...@paranoici.org,
s...@sorceryn.com, anm...@freedom.gmsociety.org, gold...@yahoo.com,
war...@entheta.net, kathi...@home.com
From: Vo...@ctinet.net (Robert D.)
Subject: MARTIN CORNELIUS III: TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST
TO MARTIN CORNELIUS III A.K.A. KONCHOK PENDAY A.K.A. NEAL PARDOE.
TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST.
INSTEAD, ADD THE E-MAIL ADDRESS THAT YOU DIDN'T SEEM TO THINK WAS IMPORTANT
ENOUGH TO INCLUDE: <neal....@clara.co.uk> - MAYBE BECAUSE HE DOESN'T EXIST?
RD.
At 11:12 10/12/01 -0800, "Net Prophet" Konchok Penday KONCHOK LOCATION:
Martin Cornellius III, <Net-Nut>,
posing as Konchok Penday, <net-prophet>,
a.c.t.'s very own psychomaniac.
Former staff at Pubs DK.
Sometimes resident of beds in pickup trucks.
Last known address:
A back room at 25217 Lawrence Rd.
Junction City, OR 97448-8530
Phone: 541-998-8227 (Not in his name)
Also known to use 541-998-3660 (Not in his name)
Traced to 810 Vine St.
Junction City, OR 97448
wrote:
..............................kp snips more stuff idiOT sent TO THE LIST
.................
=======================================
THAT would be the email from you to me which
you referred to in your VERY FIRST LINE ABOVE:
"KP replied from my first message with this:"
>YOURS WAS THE FIRST MESSAGE I
>EVER RECEIVED FROM THAT LIST.
Gosh!
I never got anything from that list before today either.
Someone put you on a mailing list.
Not me.
They put me on it too.
I didn't ask them too.
Don't blame me for your
problems, or your pathetic
inability to figure out what
they are and DO something
besides WANK ON.
>IT WAS DIRECTLY FROM YOU, NOT ANYBODY ELSE.
YES!
As I said before, I REPLIED to the list,
*AND* TO YOUR PERSONAL EMAIL
TO ME, just EXACTLY as I said I did.
MORON!
From your headers above, it appears that you posted
your FAIR GAME IDIOCY about me, to the entire list,
as well as posting it to usenet.
WHAT A WORLD CLASS WANKER!
Here is my reply to your email to me,
complaining about my reply to the list:
>>IF YOU DON'T WANT ME TO REPLY TO *YOU*
>>
>>.. . THEN DON'T WRITE ME!
>I DIDN'T!
BUT YOU JUST *ADMITTED* YOU DID, AND
I QUOTED YOUR EMAIL, WITH HEADERS!
>WHY WOULD I EVER WANT TO WRITE TO YOU BACKCHANNEL,,
Who knows why you do the stupid things you do?
Because you are a pathological moron?
>YOU PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
I couldn't have said it better myself!
>YOU ARE A LIBEL SPREADING CRIMINAL.
WHAT libel is that?
>RD
FAIR GAMED anyone lately?
PUBLISHED any confidential
preclear information today?
...............snip the rest...........
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LOVE THOSE *OT POWERZ!*
++++++++++++++++++++++++++