Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

MOTION and NO MOTION

0 views
Skip to first unread message

ho...@lightlink.com

unread,
Sep 10, 2000, 3:54:11 PM9/10/00
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


MOTION AND NO MOTION

The physical universe consists entirely of games of problems of
motion and no motion with solutions of motion and no motion.

Nazi's coming over the hill with tanks, that's a problem of
motion. If one runs or fights, that is a solution of motion, if one
hides and is very still while they pass, that is a solution of no
motion.

Mother is dead on the bed in a valium stupor. That's a problem
of no motion. Baby is screaming and wailing away trying to wake
mother, that is a solution of motion.

The state of the universe is entirely described by the state of
its motion and no motion.

Goals are an intention to create or rearrange the present state
of motion and no motion in the universe, it is what the being has 'set
out to accomplish'.

In the process of striving to attain a goal, one may run into
states of counter motion and no motion that thwart one. They provide
further problems in motion and no motion that the being must solve
with his own motion and no motion.

Sometimes the being will come up against a counter motion or no
motion that he can not surmount. He has a number of choices at this
point.

1.) He can exteriorize from the universe, rearrange the rules a
bit, reassign power and allocations, in such a way that when he comes
back in on the goal, he can best it.

2.) He can say "Ok this one is too big for me, I will choose to
do something else", make a clean break with the original goal and
start a new one.

3.) He can continue to strive against the barrier like a pit bull
never letting go and never getting anywhere.

4.) He can say "Oh I didn't want this goal anyway, only fools and
stupid people seek such things, its much smarter to do this other
thing, I wasn't ever really interested in that goal anyway." This is
pulling a sour grapes on the original goal resulting in a going off
course into a substitute. This is not the same thing as a clean break
because he still has attention on the original goal.

In fact not only does he have attention on the original goal, he
has attention on NOT having attention on the original goal, pretending
that he never had attention on the original goal. Thus one finds him
a long time later with 50 percent of his attention on some cute bunny
that scorned him ages ago, and 50 percent of his attention on
pretending he has no attention there. That leaves him squat to run
his present life.

Worse when he failed, it made a mark on himself. It made him
feel small, it was a surprise, it killed his pride and put him in an
incredibility "This can't be happening, but it is!" He never gets over
that indecision, "Did this happen or didn't it? It COULDN'T have,
but it DID!"

It remains an unresolvable maybe to the end of time, and that is
part of why he has no much attention on making sure he doesn't have
any attention on it and that it never happened in the first place.

The one thing a thetan can not stand is an incredibility.

The anatomy of an incredibility is,

"Certainty that something is true.
Certainty that something is impossible."

Now the guy who made the clean break with the gaol, or
exteriorized from the universe and rearranged the rules a bit so he
could win, doesn't get stuck with this charge.

He's the game writer, if his game kicks his butt he thinks "Wow
there is going to be LOTS of money in this game!"

Since he knows he wrote the game, he can feel proud that he lost,
he was sick of winning, too easy, no money in selling games that any 3
year old can win, so now he has a winner game because he is a loser!

So he says "Cool, I can't win here, so let's try something a
little lighter, maybe it will kick my butt too, and I can charge twice
as much for this game when it goes to market."

Do you have any idea how hard it is to write a game that the
writer can not win but is constantly tempted to keep trying?

This is the Nightmare of No Nightmares.

This is very different than the guy who took the loss personally,
he didn't feel PROUD he lost, he didn't see it as a WIN that he lost,
he just felt like he didn't want to be him any more, and that's the
beginning of the downfall.

He felt there was something wrong with *HIM* for not being able
to win his own game. He says to himself, "Wait a minute, you mean I
am stuck being a second rate loser for the rest of time" and all his
BT's in grand choral unison go "YES!", and he buys into it, and that's
the end of him, he's a marble rolling around the drain.

He has a vision of SELF that is unworthy and unacceptable, and he
begins to lay in the mass and force that you are trying to audit out
in the preclear in front of you.

You have a being that wrote a game, lost playing against his own
creations, and now wants to die because he consisders he is 'inferior'
and 'unworthy of being'. Surely there is some humor to be had in here
somewhere.

One has to be careful though about the "Nightmare of No
Nightmares",

You find some guy who just can't win any games no matter how much
he tries, well he's looking at total doom if he were to ever get
better again.

Total Sovereignty has become a problem to him.

Talk about yuks.

So this all comes from the Static creating a universe of relative
Kinetics. These are the motions and no motions of the masses and
energies in the universe. Nothing is ever absolutely still except for
the static, but there is an optimum motion/no motion balance that
produces the most amount of 'accomplishment' for those who have set
out to do such things.

When the motion and no motion becomes non optimum, the being
tries to restore equilibrium by the creation of his own motion and no
motion to balance and 'solve' the motion and no motion the universe is
throwing at him.

To the degree that he is successful, he will accomplish what he
set out to accomplish, otherwise he will fall into the dwindling
spiral of aberration laid out above.

Lies can be a tricky subject. The only truth there is, is the
static, total unmanifestation. Anything created is a kinetic and is
thus a lie. However there is the FIRST lie, the TRUE-LIE of Adore.
And then there are the second and further lies that obscure the first
lie and cause its persistence.

"You seek the Grand Spring Phases,
And so shall you find,
For the TRUE-LIES will free you,
To Operate as you kind."

"As you kind" means "As you wish, are kind to, etc."

So the truth is the guy sat in the Saddle of Soveriengty AS an
orientation point, no mass, no meaning and no mobility, and from there
he cast a whole universe of symbols, all having mass, meaning and
mobility. That includes space and time and all the masses and
energies in it. Notice that time is just another form of motion/no
motion and needs to be audited when you approach this stuff.

Then as an orientation point, once he had all this universe of
symbols set up, he chose to BECOME one of those symbols (a game
player), and assigned orientation points to other symbols in the game
bigger than him.

Notice this action kind of defines the static out of existence,
its just not part of his "What is" any more.

So all of this creation is the first lie, the true lie, notice he
can do all this and still retain some awareness that he did it,
although not too much lest he wake up and have to do it all over
again.

But then he loses a game, and postulates that this is not
something RIGHT with him and the AllThatIs, but something WRONG with
him and the AllThatIs, something he didn't INTENED or EXPECT or
DESIGN. He considers that Sovereignty is flawed, that he is flawed,
and now we can see him building a citadel of second lies around
himself after the first lie of Perfect Sovereign Creation.

The day he curses his original Sovereingty, or doubts it, or
regrets it, he's had it, his destiny is to become a marble rolling
around the drain.

So when looking for the incident 'where in it first all went
wrong', you want the original intended motion and no motion that he
had set out to accomplish, the counter motion and no motion that he
ran into, the various motion and no motion solutions he came up with
that didn't work, and the LIE-LIE that he accepted that led to his
final demise into self deprecation and substitute.

Most of the inaccesible mass you will find on your pc will be
those areas where his attention is on pretending there is no
attention.

Thus when you free one of these up, you will get twice the
attention units back!

But earlier than that you have the Saddle of Sovereignty and the
Nightmare of No Nightmares. One handles that by rehabilitating the
ability to create nightmares and ludicrous demise at will.

This is a *MAJOR* step not to be belittled, as it produces a God
that is no longer human, as it has recovered its divine sense of humor,
and with that Absolute Fearless Sovereignty.

"Get the idea of absolute fearlessness."

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
ho...@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Sun Sep 10 15:53:48 EDT 2000
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/sessio15.memo
Send mail to arc...@lightlink.com saying help


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQBVAwUBObvmzD4RxM7qO/z1AQG13AIAuAx9Wq1ld1z3Fcxke7OwfPTxX9vjNRuE
e3UtatEV0V60gEAAQAKOrOkPdOIZ835ZRXhpL9Xo0rGx/JdPDdsInA==
=9WD0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

CB Willis

unread,
Sep 10, 2000, 5:19:20 PM9/10/00
to
ho...@lightlink.com wrote:
> In fact not only does he have attention on the original goal, he
>has attention on NOT having attention on the original goal, pretending
>that he never had attention on the original goal. Thus one finds him
>a long time later with 50 percent of his attention on some cute bunny
>that scorned him ages ago, and 50 percent of his attention on
>pretending he has no attention there. That leaves him squat to run
>his present life.

Yeah. Until he gets that his entanglement and subsequent agony was part or
a larger purgatory (purification), that he was actually saved if not FROM
something, saved TO something better, and that the purification is not the
substitute for the chick, the chick was a substitute for the purification,
can be used as part of the purification that puts the person on much more
solid ground in a way that he knows and deeply feels it than he could have
had with the chick. At that point he is actually done with it, but not
before. It's also useful to see where his attention was hijacked into
certain preoccupations that he wasn't interested in before, was it someone
he met and it was a subtle or blatant bad influence that subsequently
affected other situations in a kind of chain reaction, or was it cultural
programming, or ?? In other words, what set him up for the entrancement,
the entanglement. Been there done that.


- CBW


AMI

unread,
Sep 11, 2000, 2:20:33 PM9/11/00
to
Presumably there is a chain of MEST GPM's related to this stuff.

MEST apparently has the goal of no-change, and the thetan has the goal of
change. This is a problem, and leads to a GPM.

In fact, MEST has the goal of CONTINUOUS-CHANGE, and the thetan has the goal
of DIFFERENT_CHANGE. So they still have a GPM.

It is interesting to look at this GPM from the viewpoint of MEST. In
general, I think the problem with GPM running is the single viewpoint
tradtionaly taken - a GPMXD per Robert's R3XD might be a way through.

FWIW

ami


CB Willis

unread,
Sep 11, 2000, 3:31:20 PM9/11/00
to
AMI (am...@gte.net) wrote:
>MEST apparently has the goal of no-change, and the thetan has the goal of
>change.

It could be argued that just the reverse is true:
The physical world is changing and dynamic,
and the spiritual world is unchanging and static.

The embodied spirit sometimes has goals of change:
growth, achievement, realization, creation, discovery, etc.

Even the body has a goal of growth, then we'd like things to level off
indefinitely and just maintain, but it doesn't seem to work that way for
most people.

- CBW

AMI

unread,
Sep 11, 2000, 3:20:30 PM9/11/00
to
> >MEST apparently has the goal of no-change, and the thetan has the goal of
> >change.
>
> It could be argued that just the reverse is true:
> The physical world is changing and dynamic,
> and the spiritual world is unchanging and static.
>
That is ture in fact, I was talking about goals. Also I meant, the thetan
has a goal to change MEST (or other thetans), not change as such.

> The embodied spirit sometimes has goals of change:
> growth, achievement, realization, creation, discovery, etc.
>

True, but these would not be MEST GPM material.

> Even the body has a goal of growth, then we'd like things to level off
> indefinitely and just maintain, but it doesn't seem to work that way for
> most people.
>

Exactly. The body as MEST seems to have the goal of no-change, but in fact,
it changes.

Thanks for your response.

ami


CB Willis

unread,
Sep 11, 2000, 7:53:29 PM9/11/00
to
AMI (am...@gte.net) wrote:
[cbw:]

>> The embodied spirit sometimes has goals of change:
>> growth, achievement, realization, creation, discovery, etc.
>>
>True, but these would not be MEST GPM material.

No they certainly wouldn't.
Do you think we could ever live without GPMs? <g>
Do you think the clearing field would survive without them?


>> Even the body has a goal of growth, then we'd like things to level off
>> indefinitely and just maintain, but it doesn't seem to work that way for
>> most people.
>>
>Exactly. The body as MEST seems to have the goal of no-change, but in fact,
>it changes.

We are not yet in sync with this.

The body may not in fact have a goal of no-change. It is US who owns our
bodies who may have a goal that the body does not change after it has
reached its point of adult flourishing.

- CBW

AMI

unread,
Sep 12, 2000, 1:58:44 PM9/12/00
to
<snip>

> Do you think we could ever live without GPMs? <g>
> Do you think the clearing field would survive without them?
>
Good points! Of course, if it wasn't for GPM's a nd such like, half our
economy would run out of gas!

>
> >> Even the body has a goal of growth, then we'd like things to level off
> >> indefinitely and just maintain, but it doesn't seem to work that way
for
> >> most people.
> >>
> >Exactly. The body as MEST seems to have the goal of no-change, but in
fact,
> >it changes.
>
> We are not yet in sync with this.
>
> The body may not in fact have a goal of no-change. It is US who owns our
> bodies who may have a goal that the body does not change after it has
> reached its point of adult flourishing.
>
> - CBW

Yes, that's fine. So far as MEST itself is concerned, at a lower level than
that of a body, I was meaning that MEST appears to consist of an ongoing
oscillation (or rather, a huge number of them) - which is a continuous
change. It seems to want to continue as a no-change, but in fact it
continues as a change-change-change. I suspect that this is the source of a
fair amount of confusion for thetans - they are used to masses as being a
solid thing that stays where you put it, not as being a collection of
oscillating nothingness made of so many parts that you can't easily as-is
it.

ami


0 new messages