exm7.memo

[Clearing Archive Roboposter]

THE SOUL: WHETHER YOU WANT ONE OR NOT

EXM - 7
ca. 1992

Copyright (C) 1982 Geoffrey C. Filbert

Editor's Copyright (C) 1992 A Voice of the Free Zone (Electra)
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.

(Editor's comments in parentheses - Electra)

A person is the soul. If they feel they have a soul, that is
probably the body talking. If they want to argue about it, it is
definitely the mind that is talking. Until a person is processed above
the cycle, they will continue on this silly treadmill of growing up a
little body, rattling their little rattle in their little cage, going to
school, learning to read, and so forth. With (Scientology) processing,
a person can rise above the cycle, to where they can occupy any body
they want at will. If they want to occupy President Johnson and decide
not to run again, or President Nixon and take us off the Gold Standard,
or a Russian technician and blow up a Siberian Nuclear Complex, then
they can do that. Then they can come back and be "themselves" in their
"normal" body.

Until a person is processed up to that particular state they are
either going to play see-the-movies (between lives implants) or go
straight to the hospital, get a new meat body, go through the whole
experience of being raised, and pick up more engrams. They do this
over, and over, and over. It is a very wild order of experience. Its
bizarre, in fact, but the folks don't know any other way to live.
Personally, it remains personally unbelievable that people do that, but
they do. They do, do that, everyone of them. The evidence is beyond
refutation.

The Soul has come a long way.

Geoffrey C. Filbert

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Mar 21 18:06:01 EDT 2023
FTP://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/electra/exm7.memo
WWW://www.clearing.org
BLOG://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
Send mail to arc...@lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.