The On-Source Excalibur Course - The Organized Excalibur Case - Plugs and Stacks
Mike McClaughry
R - Factor
You are about to read excerpts from lectures by Captain Bill Robertson
wherein he relays data about the composite case. Certain key LRH data on the
composite case, as relayed by Captain Bill, are completely validated by LRH
tape lectures and we have included excerpts from those LRH lectures.
Herein you will learn that the composite case is organized. In other words,
the individual BTs and clusters are formed up into groups that comprise an
organization. Any one of these organizations of BTs and clusters is called a
plug. These organizations follow the pattern of any organization - with
juniors and seniors and hats. The seniors are called holders because they
hold onto the BTs and clusters who are junior to them in the plug.
There is a reason for calling these organizations plugs. The word plug was
chosen because it acts like a plug in a bathtub drain. The plug holds the
water in place in the bathtub. When you remove the plug, all the water is
then free to leave the bathtub. A similar action occurs when you audit a
plug and handle a holder in that plug, all the Beings that holder was
hanging on to, are then free to leave.
Several plugs can be related to one aberrated area, for example sex, and
that is called a stack. The reason for the word stack is that the related
plugs are arranged or stacked up in a certain order and when you audit them,
they present themselves and come off the case in that certain order.
See the Diagram of a Plug and the Diagram of a Stack.
LRH tape lectures on Plugs and Stacks
Excerpts from LRH tape lecture 16 April 1952 HCL 21-Anatomy of the Theta
Body:
"Now, let's call the third order - these are the ones that are supposed to
be there. This would include the theta being and then six entities - and
then the remaining ones, let's call them idle entities, or some such word.
These idle ones, then, are very idle. They are actually theta beings which
have run downhill to the point where they're practically out the bottom.
They couldn't have a body if - by the way, that's where all these beings go
eventually. They just peel off downhill until they suddenly no longer are
capable of having bodies, they're so thoroughly stuck on the track. Well,
there's these idle beings."
"Now those come in on the individual - they come in on the individual, but
not unbidden. He asked for them. Or one of his entities asked for them,
authorizedly or unauthorizedly, out of a compulsion to join up.
Therefore, you have this stack that looks like this. First there's the theta
being. Now, it has co-mingled in company, but hasn't co-mingled in identity,
with a second being. Now, this other being is pretty senior and probably
won't leave.
These two then have added to them these entities, one after the other. And
these entities, in turn, have enough compulsion on them to add in even more
beings, so that you eventually wind up with a very large number.
Now, an entity, then, is classifiable to the degree that any entity may have
an elsewhere body - for a homo sapiens at the present time - any entity may
have an elsewhere body. These idle ones generally don't.
The theta being may himself have another body - may have.
There's no reason to be very complex about this. We could actually go
through and number them on their positions, and you would know exactly where
they are."
Chapter 8 of LRH Book History of Man -
"Each entity claims to have had a function that was very specialized."
Excerpts from LRH tape lecture 16 April 1952 HCL 21-Anatomy of the Theta
Body:
"Now, it has some specific obsessions with which you should be very well
familiar, and these obsessions are these:
1. It has to have a body.
2. It has to be - these are plants by the way; they were planted.
There are points on the track where they've agreed to this. But these are
mostly implanted into the theta body to get it into order. Has to have a
body, and (2) it cannot perceive without looking through a body's perceptic
channels."
Excerpts from LRH tape lecture 16 April 1952 HCL 21-Anatomy of the Theta
Body:
"Let's call the theta being - let's say theta being would be the central
senior person, the one that your preclear would be if he were entirely
cleared up on his way to a Theta Clear and this would be the last entity you
would be addressing. That's the top senior entity and the one which will
preserve as the preclear. Let's call that a theta being, or his theta being.
Now, let's call the remaining theta bodies, souls. And not call this - you
don't like that word? Alright, what do you want for words? Let's call them,
then, entities - let's call them entities. Hm? Alright.
You've got a whole series of these now, because these, by the way, have not
walked in - these have not walked in unbidden. They are actually - have been
gathered up in groups. Some of them are there under compulsion from
elsewhere."
"Some of these entities are or have been theta beings, and as such are
accompanied by their own sub-order. But you find them all in the same
location - all in the same location so don't be surprised.
This is why I say it takes an E-Meter to keep track of all these, because
any one of them - and this is a rule of the road on this - any one of these
can take over and invest the entire body, can operate solely with its own
data bank and can create a somatic anywhere in the body."
Excerpts from LRH tape lecture 16 April 1952 HCL 21-Anatomy of the Theta
Body:
"It's pretty hard to keep a tab on what it's going to be, a boy or a girl.
So you get this package of theta beings all advised as to the fact they're
supposed to go down there and be a good fellow this time, and it's a woman's
body. That's very complex."
Excerpts from LRH tape lecture 4 March 1952 HCL-4 Thought, Emotion and
Effort:
"Now, this state of beingness: If you tell a person to sit still and go up
in this state of beingness, you're more likely to get them cold. They start
up, up, up, up. They're being; they're going to be, they're going to be. Of
course, unfortunately something else happens to them - they hit Facsimile
One if they keep this up. All you have to do is postulate "Now I'm going to
be," "Now I am going to know," "Now I am fully responsible," "Now I am
cause," and you just concentrate on this for a while, and if you're lucky
you stay sane for hours! "
"So that you could concentrate a person out up through the top of the
stack."
Excerpts from LRH lecture 16 April 1952 HCL-21 Anatomy of the Theta Body
"There are usually three specific incidents on the track which are additive
incidents - call them in slang, "joiners." And these lines come together
then. First, they suddenly appear as two - there are two theta bodies which
become a composite of one theta body."
"Now, this is more or less an average number of standard lines that make up
the composite which is referred to as homo sapiens. It's interesting - and
extremely interesting - that none of these lines need any of the other of
these lines to be a complete entity, but they are joined together. They are
under compulsion and they are under duress, because they have been used,
they have been abused and they have been united for other purposes than
those in the best interest of self-determinism. Self-determinism has been
led, however, all down the line, to slightly aid and abet and help out this
composite state."
"Now, here you have, then - here you have unnecessary additives all the way
down the line."
"The anatomy, then, of a composite theta body which is you, is traceable
back down this minimum - minimum as far as I've been able to determine (and
my figures are - the number of cases is not as large as I would like to have
it) is seven; the minimum is seven.
Now, why do I say minimum? It's because every one of those joiners has put
into every one of these theta bodies the compulsion to pick up more theta
bodies. And it does so automatically, so that somebody comes along and he
commits an overt act - he kills our old friend Bill or something of the
sort, and then he says, "Gee, this is too bad, I've killed Bill." He's got
Bill - he's got the composite Bill - he's got all of Bill. And it actually
can get down to a point where the composite you - fortunately, very lightly
so - can actually be influenced by thousands and thousands and thousands and
thousands of theta lines which you've picked up, but which aren't your theta
lines. You're just sort of holding them trapped. And they've tried to go
back and go where they're supposed to go between lives, and they try to do
this and they try to do that. Maybe they're so groggy they don't know enough
to do this, and so on. You take somebody who is really sick, and you run out
an overt act, if you get a grief charge on it or if you reduce this overt
act, you have probably also jettisoned a captured theta body, just like
that."
Definition from the Admin Dictionary:
Organization - A number of persons or groups having specific
responsibilities and united for some purpose or work. An organization is
composed of terminals and communication lines related by a common purpose.
It is made up of associated individuals who have an agreed upon goal or
intention. The purpose associates and keeps in contact with one another the
terminals and the lines.
Excerpts from HASI transcripts of Tech Briefing 4 and 7 by Captain Bill
Robertson
Excerpts from HASI transcript of Tech Briefing 4:
"OK, so, let's take point one: Point one in NOTs, is, the organization, of
these guys. It's a very interesting fact, that, run properly - if you're
approaching the NOTs case properly - I'll tell you how, that's done, also -
but if you approach it properly, you'll find that the thing is organized. It
has an organization to it.
Now, it's the craziest organization you may have ever, come across, but
you'll find a stable datum of LRH's coming out of it. And the stable datum
is: "The point, where a thetan goes crazy, is where he can not work, or
conceives that he can not work or do a useful job.." And it's pitiful but we
find, EVERY GUY, who is, in there - whether he is a good guy, bad guy, SP,
so on.. - when you wake him up and get him talking, in communication, you
find out, that he is holding onto whatever SANITY he has, by performing a
duty.
He actually needs to be acknowledged for that, duty. No matter how crazy it
is. To YOU - but to HIM it's a VERY SERIOUS - because if he couldn't do that
he would be, totally insane. You see what I mean?
So, if he's being, a spot on the bottom of the coffee cup - "Somebody has to
do it." You know? (unintelligible)....really good, I'm a GOOD spot. It's a..
It's an incredible thing that these guys are holding on to their sanity,
because of the fact that they've been doing something. And neither were they
acked for that - you know - that's why you have to acknowledge very well
when they give you a valence back to: "What are you?" See? Yeah? It's almost
like: "Hey, fantastic! You've been doing that!" "Long time..yeah..long
time..." You see? And they think they're performing a useful, action. No
matter whether they're doing evil or good.- We haven't got to that part yet.
Of what and how are we gonna blow them. What you ask, to handle them.- But,
the guy, reckons he is, doing that - and boy if he didn't believe that - at
that point he would be sane.. (correcting himself) he would be insane. If
you invalidate him, or if you, uh, totally, not-is it or, don't believe what
he tells you... - OOH!...(grumpy sound) you know? OK?
So I just wanted to point that out to you: There is an organization there,
and no matter how crazy it is - like uh, (referring to the table by him at
the lecture) these cups and saucers, and things on the table - and say this
might be a whole, NOTs setting - a"tableau" - that you come across. You know
you, you're asked the question and - BUM! - first thing you see a table with
candles and so on. On this..in an office, and there's a desk there and so
on. And there's a chair - waiting for somebody."
"But THAT WHOLE THING! Whole..that.. (lowers voice) is an org board. You
see? That's the key. If you just run a little piece of it, you're not
handling this -schoop! - this whole thing. (normal voice) That's an org
board. All the way from this guy who has a evil intention to get that guy.
You know?"
"In other words: There is some kind of, crazy illogical A=A=A=A=A holding
this whole, Cluster, mess, of BTs and Clusters and solids, all together.
Yeah? And so, if you, run it, knowing that, and you sort of poke into it at
the level of, the "flame on the candle", where you're not getting any
as-is-ness and can't get these guys, to sort of, "break up" or to, get a
little or.. the mock up to dissolve, or them to realize who they are - Then
you must suspect that somebody's holding them. "Is somebody, higher up the
org board here holding you?" See? So that's one way to look at it - right?
"Is somebody holding you?" And if you have a spokesman -there's only two,
about two things that can be, once you get the thing talking - in
communication - wherever it is - wherever you hit this thing- when you get
him in communication. You're not getting any, blowdown. You're not getting
any reads. Your guy's telling you his story but nothing's happening. You get
a "what?" you get a "who?" - uhhhhhh - it's "icky". You know? So the guy,
either is not really what he tells you he is...eh? - It says in the NOTS
materials it could be a picture you're talking to or it's only a via -
another guy back in the back - that's possible - but also it could be that
you're talking to a Cluster instead of an individual.
So if you're not handling the mutual incident, yet. You see? And therefore,
if the mutual incident occurred, before - so it's earlier - so it's holding
this guy together so he can't, open up, and let go of the rest. But then
it's also possible, that he's being held, by somebody else. Even if he is a
cluster. So even if Cluster doesn't read and you can't get a mutual
incident, going.."Is somebody ELSE holding?".
Now this is the key thing: That..that there IS an organization to this
stuff. No matter how crazy. And it occurs in the body, around the body -
wherever you have this stuff. It's there. And a lot of it is by-passed."
"If you're not getting a result when first you contact him - you find out
who's holding him. That's all. Or if he's a Cluster, then: "Who's the
spokesman for the Cluster?", or "What's the Mutual Incident of the
Cluster?". If you can't get it that way then: "Who's holding the Cluster?",
and so on."
"Don't be amazed at anything you find, There's a total - where, you're
starting into the, awareness of incredibles, on this.. this level already.
Now. The thing I want to - that's.. first thing was the org..organization
for it. All right? (drawing) It's organized."
Proper Sequence for Handling Excalibur Case
Excerpts from HASI transcript of Tech Briefing 4:
"The second thing is: Therefore, it's organized, it also comes off in a
certain, sequence."
Proper Sequence for Handling Excalibur Case
Excerpts from HASI transcript of Tech Briefing 7:
"However, most people do arrive, at the beginning of NOT's with several...
plugs in restimulation, from different stacks. But that the procedure
remains the same. It is: To assess...uh... in a D of P Interview, what the
persons' most attention, is on by reads, measuring up all the reads, LF's,
F's, SF's, B/D's, on certain... areas, and... it is very important, it has
been determined, that you don't just take what he said in the D of P
Interview, or what the auditor, asked the question about, you... take the
most reading one, and you list them in order of reads - these different
areas and so on - but THEN, you also get... the pre-OT, to make his own
wording of this. This is very important that the wording, that he makes will
read VERY, very well, and it will also read when the auditor says it."
Excerpts from HASI transcript of Tech Briefing 4:
"It was very interesting. We found out in the D of P interview, that there
were certain things that read. You know your.. "So, what is your attention
on?" "What's your, attention ..." "Do you have any body problems?" "Any
mental problems?" "Vitamin deficiencies?" Uh.."Any auditing you have your
attention on, from the past?" You know, you're just doing it
(unintelligible) quick - like a D of P interview.
And...lot of reads! On this stuff and stuff, and not so much on others.
Yes - hmm - well, by Tech we should put these in order of reads." So
we..MEASURED UP EXACTLY on the needle at that sensitivity, how much charge
that was, for a small fall, a long fall, a fall, at that sensitivity, we
were running, plus the blowdowns. Add them all together and put them in a
sequence."
"...we said: "OK, we should handle the most charge first." That's obvious.
Most real. Most charge. And then all of a sudden we realized that by doing
exactly that - No matter what it was that came out as the top item - IT WAS
THE TOP ITEM!"
"So, very interesting. It's a very interesting, thing. There's One: the
organization. And the next is... It's organized, and it's STACKED UP in a
certain way. OK? You might say: "This is the organization and sequence of
the case, left, to the guy.""
"And each session when you end up with a FTA. I..what I.. wanted to say..
you get, a nice Floating TA when you pull out one of these Orgs. And you get
another FTA, on when you handle the subject. (or a "broader" FTA at the end
of that subject, when the Pre-OT is no longer troubled by that thought.
Added by Capt. Bill)
Not..maybe looked.. maybe the same one..you handled the last lot, and plus
any copies and stuff. You get this FTA, on the guy, but this time he
goes..."And that's totally gone." "Voices in there?" Nothing there. You
know? It's totally gone. I mean there's.. nothing. So, we find out that -
when you do that - and then the NEXT ITEM, on the stack - which may have
been "BTs with Out-Int" or something - that is really right there. No matter
what the guy says. Whether I.... He.. comes in with a TA high at 4.5 or he
says: "I have a problem" or "I have an ARC Break..." (laugh) It doesn't
matter what he says. It..it really doesn't matter.
We found out that, when you start the session, even if you check a rud, even
if you just ask him "What's your attention on?", even if you just say "have
you had a good night's sleep?", It doesn't matter! Because he's gonna bring
up "Well I think there's something there..." - You're going to find out that
that bloody, thing, is the first entrance point to another one of these,
things, and when you pull that little wedge apart you find out it was
connected, to the next thing on the stack. It's almost like you're changing
the valence of the body every day! Hmm? You see?"
Excerpts from HASI transcript of Tech Briefing 7:
"As LRH stated on the "Assists" tape, of Class VIII: "You are in the major
action, when you're dealing with a...engram that the Preclear has recently
had." "So don't expect the Ruds to fly. You can.. get in what you can." If
the person has attention on something, ARC-Break, PTP, MWH and so on, you
handle it. But don't expect the needle to fly, when you're in the middle of
handling one of these.. uh... stacks, because you are presented with the
major action. This is something the Preclear has, had on his case for
many, many, many, many... long eons, or has picked it up here on Planet
Earth but nevertheless it is a very old piece of... case. And therefore it
is the major action at that time.
Uh....a person who has...uh.. shall we say, no confront and not
really...uh... able to... have reality on these things and so on, first of
all should not have been on the level, and.... but the second of all you
have to handle them very delicately, per... the earlier Bulletins, and
Technology on handling a "stress case". But even in that - when you... pick
up a Rudiment realize that you are going to...run right into the first
plug, that is, live on that, persons case, or one of the ca...(correcting
himself) plugs that he has in restimulation, and the procedure is the same.
You go... on a gradient, you can handle THAT plug. And then on a gradient
you handle the next one and so on, and so on, and so on. The key on NOT's is
handling the whole plug. That's what takes the masses of charge off the
case."
Excerpts from HASI transcript of Tech Briefing 4:
"Now any..any questions about that stuff? Because you can also find this
stuff by doing a little, interview on yourself or, down the list of NOTS 27
to find out, what is reading the best if you've run out of stuff to.."What
next to handle?" It's almost comes after a while as easy as: "what's my
attention on?". Or "What's my attention avoiding?". You see? So I just want
you to know there IS a sequence. And, it is vital to..not leave BPC on this
or you get this, "build up of the charge". We didn't have that. Because - if
you don't pull a whole plug (drawing) - this is the whole plug - and you,
contact the top of the Org Board, and you're working till this is all out,
and you get the F/N TA. OK? Bumm. But if you just cut the top off, just
handle the top few guys, now you have an org without a head."
"So, when you see the thing blow down and you get the.. Floating.. TA you
just have the guy spot: "Anything left there?" "Any copies left?" "Tell
anybody else that's, started up on this or got restimulated by it that it's
not their item, or it's..it will be handled later." Or.."this does not apply
to them." Whatever the, statement is in there - ffff - quiets down. And the
guy either says "Yea! My attention's on that one." Or "I see one guy left
there and he wanted to say something." Whatever. "Last call." Back into PT -
fffft - and then his TA is just floating and he says: "OK. Bum! There." You
know."
Definitions of Plug and Stack
Definitions from the Glossary in the Rons Org Super Static C/S Course -
Note: these are not verified to be CBR definitions:
Plug - An organized part of the case on Excalibur. Consists of several
"terminals" having a function to perform on a case connected by holding
lines. Each "terminal" may be very complex, and consist of many thetans,
with various functions as a unit. Holding means "suppression carried out
through time" or "constant suppression".
Stack - It is other-determined charge in a certain area. There may be
several plugs on one stack because they are related by thought.
It is a built up area of charge on a person's Excalibur case which makes him
act or think in an irrational, non-survival, non-expanding way or monitors
him in a direction of shrinking his KRC and ARC and drives him downscale as
a thetan. If a person has accepted or agreed to it, he may believe it is his
own thoughts!
Stack wording - The stack wording is how the Pre-OT "thinks" of the area
that is troubling him. It is not a message or words or intention coming from
a plug or plugs.
Definitions from HASI transcript of Technical Briefing 7 by Captain Bill
Robertson -
Note: Observe the difference between the below CBR definitions and the above
later definitions issued by unnamed Rons Org terminals.
"Well, all right let's start off with..uh...uh.. Plug. You understand Plug.
That is an organized group of.... BTs and Clusters, which were...uh... put
together by, either impact, injury or.. etc. or intention, of an
implanter, to operate, as a sort of combined unit, or an org-board, and it
has holders at the top and sort of junior thetans at the bottom who are just
being something to do with it or just... being even mass or weight, (laughs)
in a bag or being a cell or whatever. Ok.
Now the stack, of course, is the way this is "stacked up" on the Preclear's
case, and that means that it has to do with... the...the Pre-OT sorry,
(correcting himself) has been having trouble with this area, or has wondered
about it, and therefore to him it appears like a stack of charge. But it
could consist of several plugs....."
The Missing Datum in Rons Org Materials
There is a key datum that is missing from Rons Org materials on the
composite case. The datum has to do with the fact that the Excalibur solo
auditor, aka the main Being, is the senior top holder for the plugs and
stacks. There is an incorrect viewpoint and auditor attitude that stems from
not having this missing datum.
The incorrect viewpoint is this idea - the main Being is the victim of the
plugs and stacks and the BTs and clusters in the composite case. This false
idea has come across in further numerous communications with Rons Org
terminals. The false idea is stated in the above definition of a stack given
in the Glossary in the Super Static C/S Course.
It has not yet been fully determined whether CBR himself had this incorrect
viewpoint, or whether his materials have been altered in such a way as to
forward the incorrect "victim" viewpoint. Either way, the fact remains that
it is an incorrect viewpoint.
Take another look at the Diagram of a Plug. The line between the holder in
the plug and the BTs and clusters in the plug who are connected to that
holder - represents constant suppression. The line is representing constant
suppression through time. Holding another Being down in a trapped and
aberrated state is suppression.
Take another look at the Diagram of a Stack. The main Being, the Excalibur
solo auditor, is the circle with the word "you" in it. Notice the line from
"you" to the stacks. That is a holding line. That line represents constant
suppression from you to all of the plugs in the stacks. That line extends
down to the holders in the plugs and even to individual BTs and clusters in
the plugs. You are holding all of the Beings in the composite case in a
trapped and aberrated state, as LRH states in the above tape Anatomy of the
Theta Body.
Let's take a look at what is actually taking place between the main Being
and the Beings in his composite case. There is a mutual aberrated
relationship between them. The main Being has his own self-determined
aberrations. He has those aberrations exclusive of the composite case. Rid
the main Being of his composite case and he will still have self-created
aberrations left to handle. The Beings in the composite case are
complimenting the main Being's aberrations and compounding the charge in
that area of aberration.
The main Being is not a victim of the Beings in the composite case. He is in
control of them. He is their top senior, he is the one in ultimate control.
The definition of a BT is -
"A Body Thetan is a thetan who is stuck to another thetan or body but is not
in control."
Since the main Being is the top holder and in control over the Beings in the
composite case, that now makes sense out of the fact that it is the main
Being's own "think" that primarily activates the plugs and stacks. What
actually happens is the main Being puts one of his self-determined
aberrations into play and in so doing, intentionally activates the stack
related to this particular self-created aberration.
The stack that is related to that particular aberration then goes into
action and does whatever it has been pre-arranged to do with regards that
aberrated subject or area.
Thetans are amazing with the mental gymnastics they can perform. The main
Being kicks the dog that he has chained up, and the dog barks - and then the
main Being acts like he doesn't know why the dog is there or why it is
barking at him.
Per 8-8008 : "The keynote of responsibility is the willingness to handle
energy. The rehabilitation of the thetan in the handling of energy brings
about a rise in responsibility."
Also in 8-8008, Ron covers the idea that a Being has to shed all
responsibility for something before he can get into the state where he is
creating energy and not know he's doing it.
- - - - -
What is the main Being doing with this composite case? Well, like a service
facsimile, it serves him. He has found uses for it. One of the primary uses
he has for it, is that it helps him to not-is, and continue to take no
responsibility for, his own self-created aberrations.
Another use is to provide a justifier for his overts - "my "case" made me do
it".
One Rons Org C/S, Marianne Hagen, expresses the concept that you can't hold
a person responsible for their actions because the Excalibur case can
overwhelm a Thetan. Well, that false idea will destroy anyone's chance of
handling his case and going OT.
That idea says it is impossible for a Being to keep his ethics in and that
the main Being is totally the effect of his composite case. An OT is Cause.
Responsibility is directly related to the rehabilitation of the thetan to
OT. You cannot make an OT by preaching and practicing a philosophy of
irresponsibility - because that makes the thetan into an effect.
The false idea that one is overwhelmed by and the victim of his composite
case is suppressive. It is working for the Enslavers because it will prevent
anyone going OT.
Another false idea peddled by current Rons Org terminals is that all of this
came about as a result of the work of the Implanters. That false idea has
got to go if one wishes to really handle the composite case and reach the
end phenomena of the level. While it has been a popular viewpoint by some to
shift all of the cause for this setup onto the Implanters, that is
definitely not the whole truth. The Implanters definitely have their cause
in this matter, but the main Being is holding other beings trapped in the
composite case through eons of time, and has his own self-created aberrated
reasons for doing so.
This pretended lack of responsibility extends down to all levels of Beings
in the plugs and stacks. They each have their own self-created postulates
that they are carrying through time as to why they are in the composite
case. But the truth is they are not the total effect of some other thetan,
other than by their own decision.
Thus the BTs and clusters in the composite case are not victims of the
Implanters or the main Being or any other junior holder in the plug. They
have to agree to being held down in a trapped and aberrated state within the
composite case for this to work. And they have their own self-created
aberrated reasons as to why they are cooperating with the main Being and the
other holders in the plugs, in allowing this suppression of themselves to
continue on through endless time.
The main Being and the Beings in the composite case like to pretend that
they are in an effect-effect relationship with each other. But the truth is
that they are in a Cause-Cause relationship. But they like to be
irresponsible and not-is that, which is exactly what makes it persist. When
the main Being is willing to confront his own Cause in this aberrated
relationship, a session can then occur in which the BTs are then granted the
beingness to confront their own cause as well, which is what sets them free.
- - - - -
The "wall" that every Excalibur solo auditor eventually runs into during the
course of auditing on the level, is when he hits those areas of his
self-determined aberrations that he strongly agrees with and therefore does
not want to get rid of them. In other words, "the wall" consists of those
areas of his own out-ethics and irresponsibility that he does not want to
confront and handle.
Agents of the Enslavers who pose as "auditors" love to spread the fatuitous
belief that you can go OT without using the tool of ethics. Ethics is
required to breach "the wall" of one's own not-is and shedding of
responsibility for energy that he is using.
Ethics is a valuable tool, in fact it is the main and very important action
for the main Being, ie: confronting his lower condition in the matter, if he
truly wishes to turn around and face what he has a hand in creating. The way
out is the way through. The way out is not by going around what needs to be
confronted, sorted out, and taken responsibility for.
Thus by breaking the logjam of mutual out-ethics, the main Being leads the
way, and then grants beingness to the other Beings involved, of being able
to do the same.
People like Marianne Hagen and Ralph Hilton have hit "the wall" in their own
case. But instead of getting their ethics in, they have elected to run from
it and dramatize it. Worse yet, they hand out false information in the hope
that others will follow their bad example and end up not handling "the wall"
also. Thus they are not freeing all the Beings in their composite case and
wish to drag you into committing the same overt on the Beings in your
composite case.
Thus they turn over their "hat on how to lose while telling yourself you are
winning" to you. This "hat" consists of suppressive false ideas that
guarantee you will continue to be out ethics and irresponsible and fail.
As their ethics are out and responsibility is low to non-existent, people
who follow the bad example of Ralph and Marianne, effectively block
themselves off from ever being able to address and handle fully their own
self-created aberrations. And that results in a failure to rise back up the
tone scale to full OT.
HCOB 28 January 1960 The Key To All Cases -Responsibility
"He will not let himself be more powerful than he believes he can use
power."
"Fortunately for this universe, no thetan will let himself go free unless he
can operate without danger to others and the responsibility factor is way up
on all dynamics."
- - - - -
All of the above is why ethics is so important. The main Being must be the
first to get his own ethics in and change the way he is relating to and
using the Beings in the composite case. And to the degree he does this will
determine his access of the case. To the degree he does not get his ethics
in determines those areas that he won't access as he doesn't want to change
it and be responsible for the mess he has a large hand in creating.
The main Being must lead the way despite the fact that he has his own
self-determined aberrations in these stack areas, which is why he wants to
keep them there. To train the main Being and let him audit with this sort of
total irresponsibility towards his own cause in the matter, is how you get
an "OT" with low perception and responsibility level.
And that is how Flag and the vast majority of auditors in the Freezone
approach the case. They prefer to sabotage the level by not teaching
auditors that the main Being is the senior top holder, and in this role he
is literally acting as an Implanter and Enslaver.
Those that sabotage the level like this are themselves dramatizing being the
top holder. That means they are in agreement with holding Beings down in a
state of suppression in certain areas because they don't want to take
responsibility for their self-determined aberrations in those areas. That
fact then guarantees that they have areas of composite case that are
unbreached and unsolved, and will not be solved, until the main Being truly
takes responsibility for his own cause in the matter.
So why would they teach the level correctly? The fact is - they don't.
Enslavers are not about to correctly teach anyone how to go free, regardless
of their glib PR to the contrary.
There exists a mutual out ethics situation that is a common denominator with
humanity. There is a tacit (unspoken) agreement on keeping Beings held down
in a trapped state. Each man is keeping himself held down in an enslaved
state and will not allow himself to go free. And he extends that out to
other Beings, such as those he is holding within the composite case, and he
won't let them go free either, especially when he hits "the wall".
For those in the Church who have altered LRH issues - that is part of their
dramatization to keep themselves and other Beings trapped. For those in the
Church who tolerate the upper management doing that, that is part of their
dramatization to keep themselves and other Beings trapped. And there are
thousands of other examples of this dramatization.
You can get your ethics in and thereby restore your self-respect, your
self-pride, your faith and your trust in yourself - resulting in your
freedom. Or you can continue your current dramatization and stay trapped.
And there you have the make-break point on whether you will ever be a free
Being again - will you handle your lower ethics condition on being in the
role of an Enslaver with regards yourself and other Beings, or not? That
pins the tail on the donkey.
- - - - -
Corrected definition of a Plug:
Definition from the Admin Dictionary:
"Organization - A number of persons or groups having specific
responsibilities and united for some purpose or work. An organization is
composed of terminals and communication lines related by a common purpose.
It is made up of associated individuals who have an agreed upon goal or
intention. The purpose associates and keeps in contact with one another the
terminals and the lines."
Plug - An organized group of BTs and Clusters. It has holders at the top,
and sort of junior thetans at the bottom, who are just being something to do
with its function, being even mass or being a cell or whatever.
Due to identity thinking A=A, the organization does not have to be logical.
They have been gathered up in groups by the main Being or one of his junior
entities in the composite case, out of a compulsion to join up. Some of them
are there under compulsion from elsewhere. These entities in turn have
enough compulsion on them to add in even more beings, so that you eventually
wind up with a very large number.
The holders in any given plug are holding the "junior" BTs and clusters in
the plug. Holding means "suppression carried out through time" or "constant
suppression". The main Being is holding all the Beings in the composite
case. That means he is keeping them trapped.
Corrected definition of Stack:
Stack - A set of plugs that are related to an area of self-created
aberration of the main Being. This is why the main Being's think, is what is
worded. His "think" is primarily what activates the related set of plugs
that comprise that stack. It is a co-built up area of charge on a certain
subject. After the main Being activates the stack with his think, the
responses of thoughts, emotions and efforts generated from Beings in the
related plugs, are usually misowned as "mine" by the main Being.
========
Posted by Virginia - taken from www.ronsorgusa.org
Ed
Mike McClaughry wrote:
>
> The Organized Excalibur Case - Plugs and Stacks
>
> R - Factor
[snip all]
I like this. Of course I am no expert in these things, but I
think you are on to something right with the distinction between your
view [self as the top holder in place of all the BTs, plugs, etc.] and
the other, C of $, Ron's Org view [self as at effect of all these
other beings]. From the passion of your writing here, I would have to
take your side vs. that of your altered-tech enemies if I had to
choose. But I am not convinced that this applies to me, or to lots of
other people, or that there might not be vastly simpler wholesale ways
by which people could clear these things.
Ed
Ralph Hilton
<402FAE76...@aol.com>, :
A person generally has to come to the realization themself that they hold the
bt case in place. The CofS C/Ses are quite aware of the datum as it is covered
in current cl. 8 training.
--
Ralph Hilton
http://www.ralphhilton.org
Freezone Directory: http://www.freescientology.org
FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.org
C-Meter: http://www.cmeter.org
Mike McClaughry
working on these writings with Mike.
Virginia
Ed <met...@aol.com> wrote in message news:402FAE76...@aol.com...
Mike McClaughry
"current cl. 8 training"?
Since when...
;-)
Virginia
Ralph Hilton <ra...@cmeter.org> wrote in message
news:q4dv20939k3i8evtu...@4ax.com...
Mike McClaughry
Where you said "your view"?
If you read all the materials posted so far, I'm sure it will be clear to
you that we are discussing directly from the point of LRH's view on the
matter. (of which point is documented several times in several places by LRH
materials, quoted.)
Albeit true, we have put it together with his help, (in a way no-one has
done before), and we certainly did provide in-depth discussion of certain
points.
Nevertheless, the "your view" as you put it, is not an accurate as-is-ness.
Also FYI, the Excalibur Course offered by Erica Hauri (senior Rons Org C/S
who c/ses the Frankfurt RO where Otfried Krumpholz is, as well as others),
does not in ANY way address the most salient points by LRH, or even include
the LRH references on the matter - LRH being of course senior to CBR on the
subject.
See the checksheets sent to us by Otfried Krumpholz, as being the ones they
wanted us to train on, at:
http://www.ronsorgusa.org/index.php?page=excalchecknonconf
http://www.ronsorgusa.org/index.php?page=excalcheckconf
From what I gather, I believe that Ronsorg Netherlands is somehow on Erica
Hauri's C/Sing lines as well.
Erica, senior tech terminal to her husband Max, is who defended Max's demo
to us during their visit of that basically a clear is some arbitrary BT that
just pops up and that's your clear. It was not an opinion that was being
expressed. This was demoed several times in an attempt to gain agreement
with this as a technical datum/view espoused by Erica as well as Max. Erica,
at one point, even said : "What makes you think it isn't this way?"
Peter Steenkamp's posted unverified as being from Edwin post, makes an
attempt to defend against this very damaging exposure of Erica, as that it
was an "opinion".
That was really weak, but it shows they are having trouble from this being
exposed, and that's a good thing. They should have trouble from trying to
forward such an insane degraded view of the central senior soul.
There's a lot more coming. That was only the tip of the iceberg.
The Church, in all three versions of the Solo Nots Course I did, (including
my completing the full Golden Age of Tech version), also did not provide the
actual, non-David Mayo, LRH references that are senior on how to address
the composite case that LRH made public in 1952.
Two Class VIII's that I personally know of, also can not verify that these
materials were addressed or trained on, in the Class VIII course up to and
including 2002.
So if as Ralph apparently inadvertently revealed, these are NOW on the Class
VIII Course?
It would be because of what Mike and I, (as part of the Team of LRH),
presented to the world, for free - already.
Damage control, and as thought to be the case more often than not?
We lead, they follow.
Now it should be pointed out as well, that Rey Robles, in his Excalibur, or
OT 8, also did not offer or train on that the central senior soul, is
senior, etc. even after completion and when I requested to see what are the
materials as to the EP etc., he did not produce these very key references.
In fact, quite the opposite, he simply gave some explanation that was pretty
vague, and as well seemed to operate on some total arbitrary as to
determining the completion or not of the pre-OT. Greg, Deb, and I all had
very different EP's, and as it turns out - mine was the only one that was
straight out of LRH materials. Erica, when questioned later during their
visit here on this point of where's the reference for the EP that I got,
gave a very interesting answer that was, shall we say, self-serving from the
viewpoint of an enslaver. To put it mildly.
Just thought I'd mention these points in passing, until the full
documentation of all these events makes it's way into the Time Tracks, which
is not as far off as some would probably prefer.
Best,
Virginia
Ed <met...@aol.com> wrote in message news:402FAE76...@aol.com...
>
>
Ed
Mike McClaughry wrote:
>
> Ed,
>
> Where you said "your view"?
>
> If you read all the materials posted so far, I'm sure it will be clear to
> you that we are discussing directly from the point of LRH's view on the
> matter. (of which point is documented several times in several places by LRH
> materials, quoted.)
>
> Albeit true, we have put it together with his help, (in a way no-one has
> done before), and we certainly did provide in-depth discussion of certain
> points.
>
> Nevertheless, the "your view" as you put it, is not an accurate as-is-ness.
Okay, whatever. I am not arguing or trying to put you down. My
only familiarity with these things is from reading what you have
posted over the years.
Ed
Mike McClaughry
Virginia
Ed <met...@aol.com> wrote in message news:4030210A...@aol.com...
Rogers. D.Scn.
> > A person generally has to come to the realization themself that they
hold
> the
> > bt case in place. The CofS C/Ses are quite aware of the datum as it is
> covered
> > in current cl. 8 training.
Virginia wrote in message
> What are you trying to cover up Ralph?
>
> "current cl. 8 training"?
>
> Since when...
In the second VIII lecture of September 25, 1968, Ron states:
"Now this guy is thinking a mass, or he's thinking a thought which keeps a
body thetan mass connected to him. That's the exact mechanic of this."
In the sixth VIII lecture of September 29, 1968, Ron jokes:
"He hasn't yet found out that he's the one that grabs hold of body thetans.
They really don't grab hold of him. They basically don't have enough reach.
(laughter)"
Les.
Mike McClaughry
Rogers. D.Scn. <The_...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4034...@news2.lightlink.com...
The following basic concepts concerning the Organized Excalibur Case
comprise some of what is not used in the Church on the Class VIII course
(per sources), not used in the Church on the Solo Nots course up through and
including 2002, not used on the Nots Auditor course (per sources), not used
by Rey Robles, not used by Ron's orgs (at the time I was associated with
either), and not used properly anywhere else in the "freezone" that I am
aware of:
Excerpts from LRH tape lecture 16 April 1952 HCL 21-Anatomy of the Theta
Body:
"Now, let's call the third order - these are the ones that are supposed to
be there. This would include the theta being and then six entities - and
then the remaining ones, let's call them idle entities, or some such word."
"Now those come in on the individual - they come in on the individual, but
not unbidden. He asked for them. Or one of his entities asked for them,
authorizedly or unauthorizedly, out of a compulsion to join up.
Therefore, you have this stack that looks like this. First there's the theta
being. Now, it has co-mingled in company, but hasn't co-mingled in identity,
with a second being. Now, this other being is pretty senior and probably
won't leave.
These two then have added to them these entities, one after the other. And
these entities, in turn, have enough compulsion on them to add in even more
beings, so that you eventually wind up with a very large number."
"Let's call the theta being - let's say theta being would be the central
senior person, the one that your preclear would be if he were entirely
cleared up on his way to a Theta Clear and this would be the last entity you
would be addressing. That's the top senior entity and the one which will
preserve as the preclear. Let's call that a theta being, or his theta being.
Now, let's call the remaining theta bodies, souls. And not call this - you
don't like that word? Alright, what do you want for words? Let's call them,
then, entities - let's call them entities. Hm? Alright.
You've got a whole series of these now, because these, by the way, have not
walked in - these have not walked in unbidden. They are actually - have been
gathered up in groups. Some of them are there under compulsion from
elsewhere."
"Some of these entities are or have been theta beings, and as such are
accompanied by their own sub-order. But you find them all in the same
location - all in the same location so don't be surprised."
"Now, this is more or less an average number of standard lines that make up
the composite which is referred to as homo sapiens. It's interesting - and
extremely interesting - that none of these lines need any of the other of
these lines to be a complete entity, but they are joined together. They are
under compulsion and they are under duress, because they have been used,
they have been abused and they have been united for other purposes than
those in the best interest of self-determinism. Self-determinism has been
led, however, all down the line, to slightly aid and abet and help out this
composite state."
"Now, why do I say minimum? It's because every one of those joiners has put
into every one of these theta bodies the compulsion to pick up more theta
bodies."
"Now, riding over the top of this whole line all the way down through the
universes to now, evidently, is this first duo. The first double, the basic
unit, two. And one of these theta lines is slightly senior to the other. And
that, you will find, as the others peel off, is the native, controlling,
natural you, and that's what you recognize as you.
You say, "Who am I?" well, it is the senior of the first duo. And the
conduct of the senior of the first duo is modified by the junior of those
two, and is then modified by the additive lines on and on and on and on,
until the senior of those is quite normally asleep - gone. As far as he's
concerned, he believes he's dead, or he has strange ideas about himself. His
ideas of awareness - he's sort of delegated everything to everything else.
He's in apathy, really - Homo sapiens."
"The central senior soul, the central senior theta line, is itself
completely capable of doing the entire job. And the person could be
considered a Clear only if he were monitored and governed solely from this
unity of one. And your second one might still remain, but it would be a
junior position."
"And it actually can get down to a point where the composite you -
fortunately, very lightly so - can actually be influenced by thousands and
thousands and thousands and thousands of theta lines which you've picked up,
but which aren't your theta lines. You're just sort of holding them
trapped."
LRH lecture 16 April 1952 HCL-22 How To Audit a Theta Line, Parts I and II
"Now, therefore, auditing procedure as I would recommend it at this time -
which is subject to change - auditing procedure would be simply this; You
clean up theta lines only to the point where you can handily and easily
reach the center. And then you clean up its line as far back as is necessary
to keep it from holding on to other entities."
"... so the other procedure is to clean up the lines which are keeping it
from happening, and then just to the point where you can clean it up, and so
you get the person up the line on that.
Now, theoretically all the other beings ought to blow immediately that this
thing decides - this center being, you, which is really you, by the way -
will decide."
LRH lecture The Role of Earth
Dated Nov 1952 in R&D Volumes and 30 Oct 52 priorly
"You can get it to alter its concept of beingness, really. And if you can
get
it to alter its concept of beingness, then it'll keep on holding these silly
ridges all around itself with facsimiles on them. And the ridges keep going
into stimulus-response. And because your thetan did not know the mechanism -
he actually lacked knowledge of it - he couldn't beat it. He couldn't beat
this game, so he'd stay at a low level.
Now, possessing knowledge of this is not really the same thing as being a
Theta Clear. I wish to impress that upon you."
Virginia McClaughry
Rogers. D.Scn.
> The following basic concepts concerning the Organized Excalibur Case
> comprise some of what is not used in the Church on the Class VIII course
> (per sources), not used in the Church on the Solo Nots course up through
and
> including 2002, not used on the Nots Auditor course (per sources), not
used
> by Rey Robles, not used by Ron's orgs (at the time I was associated with
> either), and not used properly anywhere else in the "freezone" that I am
> aware of:
Just to clarify. Are you then saying this stuff isn't in use and ain't been
used ANYWHERE?
And, rough question, since you and Mike offer no auditing services, this
stuff ain't EVER gonna be audited anywhere?
What leads you to believe this stuff should be given special address and is
there special new tech for these and where is it? I mean, is it in this
group of posts you made?
Les.
Mike McClaughry
Curtis <crt...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:2cfad879.04021...@posting.google.com...
> Virginia said:
>
> The following basic concepts concerning the Organized Excalibur Case
> comprise some of what is not used in the Church on the Class VIII
> course
> (per sources)
>
I assume - judging from your 1.1 comment of "...by god you do have friends"
(obviously implying a view that I have no friends" - I assume that the word
"sources" above bothered you in some way Curtis?
>
> .......I'm doing my best to have fun, thanks for asking. It's sort of
> like throwing lots.
You're welcome. Maybe you should try Bunko.I hear it's a fun game - never
tried it myself though.
Virginia