First successful laser beam teleportation experiment
curiosus
On June 18, 2002, for the first time in history, Australian scientists
successfully teleported a laser beam.
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,4529984%5e15841%5e%5enbv%5e,00.html
Moreover, it seems that the teleportation is instantaneous (faster
than the light).
The teleportation technique is using the entanglement effect,
predicted by quantum mechanics: when you produce a pair of entangled
photons, traveling in different directions, every modification of one
photon is instantaneously influencing the other photon of the pair.
As Einstein did not accept phenomena faster than the light, he was
calling this effect: "spooky action at a distance".
Probably the ears of M. Spock were ringing :)
The next step is the teleportation of atoms. Scientists say it should
be achieved by 2006. There are now 40 labs around the world involved
in quantum mechanics in teleporting atoms.
Sci-fi is prophecy!
Curiosus
curiosus
> Moreover, it seems that the teleportation is instantaneous (faster
> than the light).
After posting this, I realized that I was off topic.
Why did I post scientific data on a.c.t.?
Then I realized why this topic has for me some relationship with
clearing.
I consider as suppressive our confinement on this small pebble
named Earth.
And I feel as suppressive any consideration stating that we will
never escape.
So Einstein is suppressive, as he declared that we cannot move faster
than the light, thus killing any hope of reaching someday the stars.
Einstein was a genie, but a suppressive genie.
As faster than the light technologies are removing this particular
suppression, that is some form of clearing after all.
Curiosus
Şn
"curiosus" <curi...@fastmail.fm> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:69c9b8ed.02072...@posting.google.com...
> I wrote:
>
> > Moreover, it seems that the teleportation is instantaneous (faster
> > than the light).
>
> After posting this, I realized that I was off topic.
>
> Why did I post scientific data on a.c.t.?
>
> Then I realized why this topic has for me some relationship with
> clearing.
>
> I consider as suppressive our confinement on this small pebble
> named Earth.
>
> And I feel as suppressive any consideration stating that we will
> never escape.
>
> So Einstein is suppressive, as he declared that we cannot move faster
> than the light, thus killing any hope of reaching someday the stars.
He derived this law from mathematical equation,
it has nothing to to with suppression.
Ted Crammer
curi...@fastmail.fm (curiosus) wrote:
> I consider as suppressive our confinement on this small pebble
> named Earth.
If you think Earth is suppressive you should habitate Pluto for a while.
:)
--
Ted
Ralph Hilton
<69c9b8ed.02072...@posting.google.com>, :
>So Einstein is suppressive, as he declared that we cannot move faster
>than the light, thus killing any hope of reaching someday the stars.
>
>Einstein was a genie, but a suppressive genie.
>
>As faster than the light technologies are removing this particular
>suppression, that is some form of clearing after all.
Do zou have a quote from Eistein where he says that you can~t travel faster
than light?
--
Ralph Hilton
http://www.ralphhilton.org
Freezone International: http://www.fzint.org
FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.org
C-Meter: http://www.inquisitive-instruments.co.uk/
KONCHOK PENDAY
DATE: 28 Jul 2002 05:12:51 -0700
MESSAGE ID: <69c9b8ed.02072...@posting.google.com>
NEWSGROUP: alt.clearing.technology
THREAD: Re: First successful laser beam teleportation experiment
POSTER: curi...@fastmail.fm (curiosus)
Curiosus:
>I wrote:
>
>> Moreover, it seems that the teleportation is instantaneous (faster
>> than the light).
>
>After posting this, I realized that I was off topic.
>
>Why did I post scientific data on a.c.t.?
>
>Then I realized why this topic has for me some relationship with
>clearing.
>
>I consider as suppressive our confinement on this small pebble
>named Earth.
Being HERE and NOW is "suppressive"?
I consider your consideration as silly.
>And I feel as suppressive any consideration stating that we will
>never escape.
I feel as "suppressive" any consideration
that you must escape from here and now.
>So Einstein is suppressive, as he declared that we cannot move faster
>than the light, thus killing any hope of reaching someday the stars.
That's a theory.
>Einstein was a genie, but a suppressive genie.
Einstein was a PLAGARIST who
made up insane theory to explain
an equation he simply STOLE.
>As faster than the light technologies are removing this particular
>suppression, that is some form of clearing after all.
>
>
>
>Curiosus
I am NOT at all convinced there are any FTL technologies.
Best Wishes for a
Speedy Recovery
from $pyontology!
WE'LCOME TO
*ACTUALLITY!*
THANK YOU FORECHOOSING YOUR
ROLE IN THE COSMIC DRAMA NOW!
RESET YOUR SELF!
REBOOT YOUR MIND!
RECOMPILE YOUR BIOS
REINSTALL RATIONALITY
DEBUG AND UPGRADE
YOUR OWN OPE'RA'TING
SYSTEM . . . RIGHT! NOW!
N-LIGHTENMENT *NOW!*
YOU'RE JUST TH'OU'GHT AWAY
FROM COMING UP Y'OUR WAY.
FIND OUT HOW
TO *FIND OUT!*
WHAT YOU DO
IS UP TO YOU!
THE WAY
TO *SEE*
*IS* UCP!
*DO* UCP
AND SEE!
O
--- )
\
Konchok Penday
<K...@net-prophet.net>
Research & Technical W'RIghT'ER
Integrator: Universal Consciousness Plot
http://net-prophet.net/ucp/chart.htm
Formulator and Disseminator of the
Universal Conscious Practice:
http://net-prophet.net/ucp/
Recipient of the Alex Yakovlev
Technical hExcellence Award :-)
Flounder & Prophet Gods Church:
http://net-prophet.net/gc/
Philosophy & Holistic Health eBook:
http://net-prophet.net/tddup/
REvolutionary Architectural System:
http://net-prophet.net/subs/
Better Banjo Bureau
http://net-prophet.net/bbb/
Cottage Industries
http://net-prophet.net/ci/
###########################################
N-LIGHTENMENT! . . . RIGHT! . . . NOW!
WHAT THE BUDDHA SOUGHT IS FOUND!
YOU CAN LEARN IT FREE TODAY!
http://net-prophet.net/ucp/
*DO* THE UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUS PRACTICE!
*COMPARE* PAST AND FUTURE TO PRESENT!
YOU CAN RAISE YOUR OWN AWARENESS NOW!
USE THE FREE VIRTUAL WITNESS ONLINE NOW!
UCP: TRANSFORMING AWARENESS
SINCE THE SECOND MILLENNIUM,
ONE BODHISATTVA AT A TIME!
###########################################
Your KosmiK KicKbacK to K...@net-prophet.net via
paypal.com helps others Find, Learn and DO UCP!
GET YOUR DUCKS IN A ROW! http://net-prophet.net
RE-EVALUATION COUNSELORS: RE-EVALUATE!
EXIT COUNSELORS: UCP CURES $CIENTOLOGY!
UU + SOMinisters: UCP *IS* THE RATIONAL MIND!
UCP NEWS @ alt.ucp and alt.clearing.technology
ANONYMOUS POSTS *WELCOME!* USE A NICK!
Newsreader = http://forteinc.com/agent/freagent.htm
KP is currently posting via teranews.com FREE news.
UCP USENET POSTS PARTIAL ARCHIVE AT:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ucplist/files/
"UCP EMAIL LIST" <ucp...@yahoogroups.com>
To subscribe, email: ucplist-...@yahoogroups.com
UCP SITE PARTIAL MIRROR:
http://www.universalconsciouspractice.bravepages.com/
oo
> Einstein was a PLAGARIST who
> made up insane theory to explain
> an equation he simply STOLE.
An article by Marjorie Knoller:
Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who drastically changed
the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is made an idol to young people and his very
name has become synonymous with genius. The truth, however, is very different. The reality
is that Einstein was an inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he
contributed nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics or any other science, but
on the contrary he stole the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only brilliance
lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other people's ideas, passing them off as his
own.
Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story. The
Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little
scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history,
geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a
school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed
a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich. This exam consisted mainly of
mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this
exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the
engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not
get a position at the engineering school! Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he
got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a
technical expert third class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher
qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called groundbreaking papers of 1905 and
after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class
standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only
rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing
technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a
position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins
the Jewish myth. Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university
colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally
associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking
essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in
1905. Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein
himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to
him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of
how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without
any real education. However, a simpler explanation exists: he stole the ideas and
plagiarized the papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should
be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshippers as totally new and
completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four
papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:
1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4. The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps
the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt
with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come
in 1915). This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon
two premises: 1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all
observers; and 2) since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source,
then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of
reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of
reference the events occur in the same place. This is basically the idea that time passes
more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities
where time would pass faster.
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics.
But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's. First of all, the idea
that the speed of light was a constant and was independent of the motion of its source was
not Einstein's at all, but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James Maxwell. Maxwell
studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic
in nature. He wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia
Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the
ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley
reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the
observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before
Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important
experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They
observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity. They
had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought
to be necessary for the propagation of light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George FitzGerald, who had also
first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the
results of the Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained if,
"... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving through the ether
or across it, by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to
that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed the same solution
and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and
FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's
Special Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In 1898,
the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald
contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904,
Lorentz transformations, the series of equations explaining relativity, were published by
Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time
dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904,
everything in Einstein's paper regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been
published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He
stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The
simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of
two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws
be as simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and
the lack of originality on the part of Einstein. Thus we see that the only thing original
about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of Relativity.' Everything else was
plagiarized. Over the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most important lecturers
and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches,
mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic
world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office in
Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much credence or
mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another of Einstein's
1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising from the
thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The
movement had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The
explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the
American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this
occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion
contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by
the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper published
by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc^2. Einstein's
biographers categorize this as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even
though this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was
not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still,
the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the laboratory in
the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900,
Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just
electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was
Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era.
Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous
for a variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy
for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal
which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in
this area, Hasenörhl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of
Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple deduction from
the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long
understood that the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc^2 was the
logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it. Thus, the experiments of
Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally, and most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work.
It is ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this postulate, particularly in light
of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the appropriate
experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific community,
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is
variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little
Einstein understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying
this, Einstein showed that he really did not understand basic scientific principles and
that he was writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in response to this
article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible
experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of the photon
theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect
is the release of electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of light.
This area of research is particularly important to the Einstein myth because it was for
this topic that he unjustly received his 1922 Nobel Prize.
But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who deserve the credit. The
main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he is given credit, is that light
is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the
photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in
1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon.
Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in the
photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency
of the light. This was an important breakthrough.
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day quantum theory. By
1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was
absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of
1900 and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one
particular type of energy - light energy. But the principles and equations governing the
process in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the
obvious conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete packets of
energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community took little
notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909 when it was arranged
for him to take a position at a school by World Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919
newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position where he could
begin to use other people's work as his own more openly. He engaged many of his students
to look for ways to prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those
theories, and then he could present the research as his own or at least take partial
credit. In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in
terms of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding
relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he would
publish in 1915. But the mathematical work was not done by Einstein - he was incapable of
it. Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the
mathematical principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a sound
non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the universe;
that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits, and the general principle
that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper
in 1913 based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to
Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect. It
appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was
forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his correct
General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he,
"...completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David
Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein,
another mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area of calculus
that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe that Einstein
had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he had
influenced them in their thinking. However, the exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the
majority of his General Relativity work from these two men, the rest being taken from
Grossmann. Hilbert submitted for publication, a week before Einstein completed his work, a
paper which contained the correct field equations of General Relativity. What this means
is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same conclusions, before
Einstein did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along,
because there were Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not
necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own. Both of
these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his
paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein
thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th.
So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein
before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert
an advance copy of his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that Einstein
quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to beat Hilbert to the punch.
Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle Hilbert, even though in the
previous summer he had praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him.
Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his
work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher quality than
Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with assumptions made in
Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth.
Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and
electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is the basis of all
modern day quantum mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by
Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German
physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like
Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory of
relativity..."
However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not
promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert
Einstein. As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and
in plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass
by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars
passing close to the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence
supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media immediately
seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true
genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of which proclaimed,
"Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This
was the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the
following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was
heralded as the originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the
Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received the Nobel Prize for the work he had stolen in
1905 regarding the photoelectric effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an important coup for
world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the
popular masses of England and America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he
is erroneously believed to be today. As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for
World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to
change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to
his opinions regarding political and social issues. This is exactly what World Jewry
wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering. They certainly did not
want someone like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist
had come from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle names
were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934, the day before
a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich,
Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading German
scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not
want David Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either. This German's
grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German theologians, and during World
War II he would stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he
could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be heralded as a
genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler
University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing his support for the Third
Reich. This Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern
physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not
understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius, even though he
would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as develop
his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus
and the binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry. No, the Jews did not want
Heisenberg promoted as a genius because he would go on to head the German atomic bomb
project and serve prison time after the war for his involvement with the Third Reich.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white Germans, Austrians,
Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the
body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work.
Instead, they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and
often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work
he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page
article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical
applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will
someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to drive a great steamship across the
ocean on a pint of water, for instance-then, according to Einstein, you are wrong..."
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had supposedly
founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical research was underway that
would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god
in 1919, he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real
purpose - evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish
other articles after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one other person,
and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led to
the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their
work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World
Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a fund-raising tour for the
Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his
status to gain membership in a Commission of the League of Nations. In February of 1923,
Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he becomes a founding member of
the Association of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his
Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by
criticizing the work of Schrödinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumes
his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World
Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he would reverse
this position during World War II when he advocated war against Germany and the creation
of the atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein,
at the request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to
develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not Japan. Einstein would have no part in
the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the
skills for either.
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World Government, with Israel
apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continues through the rest of the
1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of
Israel, both politically and economically, is offered the presidency of Israel. He
declines. In 1953, he spends his time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supports
Communists such as J. Robert Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to
the McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue dies.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid statements. His death
was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled
media continued to promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more
and more of the men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and more able to
aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew
controlled Time magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century" at the close of 1999.
It may be demonstrated that the Jewish lies have become more bold with the passage of time
because Einstein was never named "Man of the Year" while he was alive, but now, over forty
years after his death, he is named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the "Person of the
Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year" while he was still
living by Time magazine, and according to a December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today,
Einstein was chosen over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations
fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler
finished third and was the top serious candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine
dedicated to Einstein, which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein,
Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary to
include an article rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler.
But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of
the theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the things in this article, such
as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before Einstein and
that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of relativity long before Einstein.
Hawking also writes,
"Einstein...was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul
Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality
called quantum mechanics. ... Einstein was horrified by this ... Most scientists, however,
accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with
observations ... They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology
and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the
past half-century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of the modern
developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so stupid as to be vehemently
against the most important idea of modern science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work
in unified field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that
"success eluded" Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity
and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified field
theory, but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th
century scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field
theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most ludicrous and absurd
lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein,
Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time magazine. If the Jews at Time
wanted to give the title to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice would
have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the
scientist who most fundamentally changed the landscape of 20th century science, then the
obvious choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the
transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and computers, everything
from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and watches, to the amazing computers which have
allowed incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without the transistor, all
forms of science today would be basically in the same place that they were in the late
1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley because he spent
the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of
non-whites and arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews
to financially destroy Shockley who founded the first company in the Silicon Valley, his
hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used them to
start Fairchild semiconductor, the company that today is known as Intel.
No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be recognized, not
the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German scientists who helped the National
Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist
causes, and certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and
geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert
Einstein who hated everything white.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and of the Germans
in particular in the following statements. He was asked what he thought about Germany and
about re-educating the Germans after the war and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870...Behind the Nazi
party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his
speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding.
... The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated
to a democratic way of thinking and acting..."
curiosus
> He derived this law from mathematical equation, it has nothing
> to do with suppression.
Maybe that was not intentional, but the result is here: almost
everybody on Earth believes that deep space travel is impossible,
as, according to Einstein, nothing can move faster than light.
I agree that the speed limit is derived from mathematical equations.
But the entanglement effect from quantum mechanics, which is allowing
faster than light speeds, is also derived from mathematical equations,
and Einstein was quite engaged in trying to invalidate quantum
mechanics.
So Einstein was not quite impartial: by supporting one theory, and
fighting another theory, which were both validated by real world
experiments, he was is fact manifesting his faith in an arbitrary
belief.
But back to suppression: when we look at two major suppression items
here on Earth, what do we find?
1. The atomic bomb, this sword of Damocles hanging above our heads
2. The apathy about real space travel (no hope to escape)
Maybe that is a coincidence and has nothing to do with the real
intentions of Einstein, but these two items were originated by
Einstein: his letter to Roosevelt launched the production of the
first atomic bomb in history, and his speed of light limit is
quite disheartening to space travel amateurs.
For many things I admire Einstein. He was also a humanist.
But for one thing I feel suppressed by Einstein. I do not mean that
he was suppressive, but that he had a suppressive influence.
That is mathematical suppression, and that is a terrible suppression,
as these mighty equations hanging in the sky do seem untouchable.
Curiosus
curiosus
> If you think Earth is suppressive you should habitate Pluto for
> a while.
> :)
I agree that compared to Pluto, Earth is a paradise.
However that is a cage, as we cannot escape out of it.
Maybe there is some hope to colonize the Moon and Mars, but these
places are not very friendly.
Anyway, according to current science, there is no hope for man
to reach the stars.
So the solar system is a cage.
A golden cage maybe, but a cage.
Curiosus
curiosus
> Do you have a quote from Einstein where he says that you can't
> travel faster than light?
Yes:
"The velocity must therefore always remain less than c"
From http://www.bartleby.com/173/15.html
The basic problem is that for speeds faster than light, you have
to calculate the square root of a negative number, which is
impossible in the real world.
Curiosus
curiosus
> Being HERE and NOW is "suppressive"?
Space denial is suppressive.
When I am looking at the stars (which are part of my here and now
perceptions), I feel quite limited as I cannot reach these stars.
> I feel as "suppressive" any consideration that you must escape
> from here and now.
I feel like a prisoner in jail, who can see the street full of life
through the window, but is not allowed to go out (that is a
comparison UCP style).
Would you say that a prisoner has to be happy to be here and now in
his jail?
> Einstein was a PLAGARIST who made up insane theory to explain
> an equation he simply STOLE.
Einstein was doing like every other scientist or philosopher: he
was using the works of others, and adding his own contribution.
Science is a cumulative process and cooperation.
He was always quoting his sources, so I do not think that he was
trying to steal something.
He his not responsible for his celebrity. Newspapers are.
There is a reason why he gained celebrity, more than others:
he made a lot of predictions, which were all verified.
Man is impressed by people who do accurate predictions, so
Einstein became famous for this reason.
He was made famous for the first time by the 1919 eclipse,
which had confirmed that light rays from distant stars were deflected
by the gravity of the Sun in just the amount he had predicted in his
theory of gravity, General Relativity.
For example, on November 10, 1919, the New York Times' headlines read:
"Lights All Askew In The Heavens. Men Of Science More Or Less Agog
Over Results Of Eclipse Observations. Einstein Theory Triumphs."
And every newspaper in the world had similar headlines.
Apparently, when you are able to do successful predictions about
an eclipse, you become a hero.
However I disagree about the speed of light limit. I feel that
space travel should exist. Maybe there are new theories to come.
Curiosus
Ralph Hilton
<69c9b8ed.0207...@posting.google.com>, :
The velocity is less than C for the equations, not for what happens.
All he is saying is that the equations dont work for above relative light
speed.
JJ
"curiosus" <curi...@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:69c9b8ed.0207...@posting.google.com...
You can read about the drive system of alien spacecraft in some books.
In Alien Liaison by Timothy Good, I've only read this year, there is a
description by a controversial figure, Bob Lazar, of how the spaceships
create their own gravity. They move through space by
'aiming gravity' at a spot and then arrive there by something like space
bending.
Enormous speeds are possible and the problems of time dilation don't seem to
occur,
a kind of hyperspace because they subvert aspects of motion by artificial
gravity.
johnj
> Curiosus
KONCHOK PENDAY
DATE: 28 Jul 2002 16:02:37 -0700THREAD: Re: First successful laser beam teleportation experiment
POSTER: curi...@fastmail.fm (curiosus)
KONCHOK PENDAY wrote:
>> Being HERE and NOW is "suppressive"?
Curiosus replies:
>Space denial is suppressive.
Are you being DENIED space because your body is HERE?
No matter where you are,
almost ALL of the universe is
. . . somewhere else!
>When I am looking at the stars (which are part of my here and now
>perceptions), I feel quite limited as I cannot reach these stars.
You would NOT want to be in or on a star!
You CAN SEE them . . . from here!
>> I feel as "suppressive" any consideration that you must escape
>> from here and now.
>I feel like a prisoner in jail, who can see the street full of life
>through the window, but is not allowed to go out (that is a
>comparison UCP style).
Excellent!
HOW MIGHT YOU FEEL?
>Would you say that a prisoner has to be
>happy to be here and now in his jail?
IF you ARE a prisoner, you
BETTER be happy in jail!
However, FEELING LIKE a
prisoner is not necessarily
the only way to feel?
What if the bars are there
to keep others OUT?
If you can go to other stars,
maybe their inhabitants can
come here to . . . EAT YOU!
>> Einstein was a PLAGARIST who made up insane theory to explain
>> an equation he simply STOLE.
>Einstein was doing like every other scientist or philosopher: he
>was using the works of others, and adding his own contribution.
Einstein STOLE the works of others, and claimed them as his own!
>Science is a cumulative process and cooperation.
NOT PLAGARISM!
>He was always quoting his sources,
NOT TRUE!
>so I do not think that he was
>trying to steal something.
What you think is propaganda, not facts.
>He his not responsible for his celebrity. Newspapers are.
OK.
I didn't blame him for being famous.
I blamed him for STEALING ideas
and passing them of as his own.
>There is a reason why he gained celebrity, more than others:
>he made a lot of predictions, which were all verified.
>Man is impressed by people who do accurate predictions, so
>Einstein became famous for this reason.
He was famous because the press lied about him.
>He was made famous for the first time by the 1919 eclipse,
>which had confirmed that light rays from distant stars were deflected
>by the gravity of the Sun in just the amount he had predicted in his
>theory of gravity, General Relativity.
He was made famous by the press,
which IGNORED the people who
actually made all the discoveries.
>For example, on November 10, 1919, the New York Times' headlines read:
>"Lights All Askew In The Heavens. Men Of Science More Or Less Agog
>Over Results Of Eclipse Observations. Einstein Theory Triumphs."
But it was NOT Einstein's theory.
He STOLE it from others.
>And every newspaper in the world had similar headlines.
More or less, yes.
>Apparently, when you are able to do successful predictions about
>an eclipse, you become a hero.
NO.
You become a hero when the press SAYS you are a hero.
>However I disagree about the speed of light limit. I feel that
>space travel should exist. Maybe there are new theories to come.
>
>
>Curiosus
What you FEEL may not determine
how the universe actually operates.
Best Wishes,
KONCHOK PENDAY
DATE: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 21:26:16 GMT
MESSAGE ID: <YjZ09.12421$n04.3...@twister2.libero.it>
NEWSGROUP: alt.clearing.technology
THREAD: Re: First successful laser beam teleportation experiment
Good Lord!
Einstein was MUCH STUPIDER than I ever thought before!
I didn't know about all those academic failures previously.
I have heard it said that his biggest assets were
that he was a Jew, a Communist, and a Liar, but
I didn't have any idea how true it was before.
He's a MUCH bigger fraud than I had known before.
In fact, he's much like Helle Rum $cumbug!
Both PRETENDED to be physicists,
but neither of them could even make
the grade in school. Hubbard flunked
out . . . Einstein couldn't even get in!
Thank glob Hubbard wasn't a Jew and
a Communist . . . they might be teaching
$pyontology in the public schools now! :-)
However, I DID know about Olinto De Pretto,
ANOTHER person who published E=MC^2
*BEFORE* Einstein, which he knew about!
Note carefully, his equation was
derived from AETHER THEORY!
For a thorough dissection of Einstein's psychotic
pathological fraud, read Steven Rado's books.
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com
============= start De Pretto article==================
Einstein's E=mc2 'was Italian's idea'
Rory Carroll in Rome
Thursday November 11, 1999
The mathematical equation that ushered in the atomic age was discovered by
an unknown Italian dilettante two years before Albert Einstein used it in
developing the theory of relativity, it was claimed yesterday.
Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation
E=mc2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903, said Umberto Bartocci, a
mathematical historian.
Einstein allegedly used De Pretto's insight in a major paper published in
1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed, said Professor Bartocci of the
University of Perugia.
De Pretto had stumbled on the equation, but not the theory of relativity,
while speculating about ether in the life of the universe, said Prof
Bartocci. It was republished in 1904 by Veneto's Royal Science Institute,
but the equation's significance was not understood.
A Swiss Italian named Michele Besso alerted Einstein to the research and in
1905 Einstein published his own work, said Prof Bartocci. It took years for
his breakthrough to be grasped. When the penny finally dropped, De Pretto's
contribution was overlooked while Einstein went on to become the century's
most famous scientist. De Pretto died in 1921.
"De Pretto did not discover relativity but there is no doubt that he was the
first to use the equation. That is hugely significant. I also believe,
though it's impossible to prove, that Einstein used De Pretto's research,"
said Prof Bartocci, who has written a book on the subject.
Einstein's theory held that time and motion are relative to the observer if
the speed of light is constant and if all natural laws are the same. A
footnote established the equivalence of mass and energy, according to which
the energy (E) of a quantity of matter (m) is equal to the product of the
mass and the square of the velocity of light (c). Now known as: E=mc2 .
The influence of work by other physicists on Einstein's theory is also
controversial. A German, David Hilbert, is thought by some to have been
decisive.
Edmund Robertson, professor of mathematics at St Andrew's University, said:
"An awful lot of mathematics was done by people who have never been
credited - Arabs in the middle ages, for example. Einstein may have got the
idea from someone else, but ideas come from all sorts of places.
"De Pretto deserves credit if his contribution can be proven. Even so, it
should not detract from Einstein."
============= end De Pretto article==================
WE'LCOME TO
*ACTUALLITY!*
*DO* UCP
AND SEE!
O
--- )
\
###########################################
###########################################
====================================
KP:
>> Einstein was a PLAGARIST who
>> made up insane theory to explain
>> an equation he simply STOLE.
============ article posted by "oo" below ============
KONCHOK PENDAY
DATE: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:04:16 GMT
MESSAGE ID: <3d4655c1...@news.inet.tele.dk>
NEWSGROUP: alt.ucp
THREAD: Re: First successful laser beam teleportation experiment
Alexander K:
>I've ordered the book now...
I hope you are talking about Steven Rado's book Aethro-Kinematics!
>This is just too important not to make it
>part of my knowledge!
If you have ANY interest
in physics and cosmology,
HIS ARE *THE* BOOKS!
>I'm especially interested in photon energy as I have read about a
>vision that it is the energy source of the future.
His books are the best education I know of
on the fundamentals of physical energy as
well as being a superb history of physics!
>Does anyone have any knowledge or comments to these regards?
>
>BW,
>
>AK
Fantastic!
WE'LCOME TO
*ACTUALLITY!*
*DO* UCP
AND SEE!
O
--- )
\
###########################################
###########################################
[Distribution:
[emailist: "UCP-list" <ucp...@yahoogroups.com>
[newsgroups: alt.ucp,alt.clearing.technology