Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: It's a dumb idea not matter who came up with it
0 views
Skip to first unread message
binologics
Oct 18, 2023, 2:59:07 PM10/18/23
to
On 18 Oct 2023, bigdog <geowri...@gmail.com> posted some
news:c559e49e-1c52-443d...@googlegroups.com:
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-now-want-us-split-int
> o-blue-states-and-red-states/ar-AA1irrvA?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=170
> 6467d35584c088940e958ed8a07fb&ei=6
>
> A few months ago, ditzy Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested splitting the
> US into two countries of red state and blue states. First of all, what
> is the criteria for determining if a state belongs with the red states
> or the blue states. What are we to do with the purple states. There
> are lots of those. If we look at reliably blue states, we're talking
> all of New England with the exception of purple New Hampshire, New
> York, Illinois, and the left coast. That creates three non-contiguous
> pockets of blue states. What could go wrong with that? What do we do
> with the five states that flipped from red to blue in the last
> presidential election and might flip back again in 2024.
>
> Now if all the aforementioned blue states did want to break off and
> form their own country, I wouldn't stand in their way, but
> realistically, it's not going to happen.
Blue states and cities have created their own non-sustainable problems.
They've loaded up with unemployable homeless criminals and drug addicts.
The job providing and revenue producing businesses are leaving in droves
because of the crime increases and refusal of Democrats to do anything
about it. When blue rots, it first turns brown, then black as it dies.
news:c559e49e-1c52-443d...@googlegroups.com:
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-now-want-us-split-int
> o-blue-states-and-red-states/ar-AA1irrvA?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=170
> 6467d35584c088940e958ed8a07fb&ei=6
>
> A few months ago, ditzy Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested splitting the
> US into two countries of red state and blue states. First of all, what
> is the criteria for determining if a state belongs with the red states
> or the blue states. What are we to do with the purple states. There
> are lots of those. If we look at reliably blue states, we're talking
> all of New England with the exception of purple New Hampshire, New
> York, Illinois, and the left coast. That creates three non-contiguous
> pockets of blue states. What could go wrong with that? What do we do
> with the five states that flipped from red to blue in the last
> presidential election and might flip back again in 2024.
>
> Now if all the aforementioned blue states did want to break off and
> form their own country, I wouldn't stand in their way, but
> realistically, it's not going to happen.
Blue states and cities have created their own non-sustainable problems.
They've loaded up with unemployable homeless criminals and drug addicts.
The job providing and revenue producing businesses are leaving in droves
because of the crime increases and refusal of Democrats to do anything
about it. When blue rots, it first turns brown, then black as it dies.
0 new messages