Circ and Guns
Doggy Dicks For All
a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
painful assualt at birth.
Atomic Punk
Wonder if Corvettes have a similar appeal
Atomic Punk
The Boy From Oz
"Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
> I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
> a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
> ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> painful assualt at birth.
You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
The country's basically fucked.
Serge.
Doggy Dicks For All
I'll crosspost this to that other group where all the circumcision
discussion was going on and we'll see what it picks up. Someone was
criticising liberals for their derogetory language like "mutilator" and
"gun nut".
Dan Bollinger
the US. In order to prove your hypothesis you need to show a link besides
the statistical correlation. The only thing that comes to mind is that in
R. Goldman's book "Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma," p.122, there is a list
of potential long-term effects of circumcision. It includes 'distrust.'
I've also heard the circed men have beliefs of 'powerlessness' that can
negatively effect their lives. Both of these would be reasons to buy a
gun. After all they are the great equalizers, and for someone feeling
distrust and unsafe a gun makes sense. That doesn't make them 'nuts'
though, merely adults who are compensating for a childhood trauma.
Doggy Dicks For All wrote in message
<395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid>...
da...@pacbell.net
I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid wrote:
> I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is
there
> a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun
could
> ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> painful assualt at birth.
Notice how Israeli men are always carrying around machine
guns...Hmmm...;-)
Actually a major character trait I've noticed among some circumcised
men is the utter resentment of the subject of circumcision being
brought up, and anger that questions about the validity of the practice
can even be raised, the realization that what was done to them was not
actually medically necessary and in fact was a harmful procedure hits
them pretty hard. For great examples of this check out the huge amount
of circumcision discussions now occuring at the forum:
alt.tv.real-world
It would be nice to have some of you participate and have a more
balanced discussion, the old wive's tales being floated as
justifications for circumcision in that forum will make your head spin.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
ann...@numserver.net
a country.
You can say what you want about gun ownership, but hot burglaries in
the U.K. are higher than they are in the U.S. Those are robberies
that are committed while the home is occupied by its' residents.
You assholes rag on the U.S. until it comes to groveling for the
allmighty dollar.....just like Sweden and Denmark did for the FOUR
BILLION U.S. DOLLARS that it took to build the bridge that makes it
possible to drive between the two countries.
The Boy From Oz wrote:
>
> "Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
> > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> > painful assualt at birth.
>
> You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
> of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
> That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
> circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
> The country's basically fucked.
>
> Serge.
ann...@numserver.net
ann...@numserver.net
ann...@numserver.net
ann...@numserver.net
nyms...@hotmail.com
What a piece of shit that place is!!!
Dr. Coonie Street
I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid wrote:
> I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is
there
> a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun
could
> ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> painful assualt at birth.
Both of the Columbine gunman were circumcised.
So is Kip Kinkle
So is Solomon in Georgia
That's three killers , three circumcised men. Or is it just that
circumcision is America is prevalent?
--
Circumcision is the largest scale medical and ethics fraud of all time.
Dr. Coonie Street
>
> >I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is
there
> >a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> >subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> >question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down,
even
> >if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun
could
> >ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> >painful assualt at birth.
>
>
> Atomic Punk
I once read in a psychology text book that circumcised early teens
were always nervous and anxious about their status with the opposite
sex. It was for them almost an obsession. Ages 12 to 14
Dr. Coonie Street
ann...@numserver.net wrote:
> I don't see millions of people trying to sneak into your shithole of
> a country.
> You can say what you want about gun ownership, but hot burglaries in
> the U.K. are higher than they are in the U.S. Those are robberies
> that are committed while the home is occupied by its' residents.
> You assholes rag on the U.S. until it comes to groveling for the
> allmighty dollar.....just like Sweden and Denmark did for the FOUR
> BILLION U.S. DOLLARS that it took to build the bridge that makes it
> possible to drive between the two countries.
>
Perhaps not allies in foreskin, but allies in dollars?
And speaking of money, that is at least one of the factors that keeps
newborn circumcision popular in the USA.
In Canada they have to pay for it and the circ rate is about 25
percent or less now. It was 75 percent only a generation ago.
Doggy Dicks For All
Would you care to explain?
(alt.tv.real-world added to the headers because I don't know what group
you come from, that or alt.circumcision.)
The Boy From Oz
<ann...@numserver.net> wrote in message
news:395FCC05...@nymserver.org...
> I don't see millions of people trying to sneak into your shithole of
> a country.
> You can say what you want about gun ownership, but hot burglaries in
> the U.K. are higher than they are in the U.S. Those are robberies
> that are committed while the home is occupied by its' residents.
> You assholes rag on the U.S. until it comes to groveling for the
> allmighty dollar.....just like Sweden and Denmark did for the FOUR
> BILLION U.S. DOLLARS that it took to build the bridge that makes it
> possible to drive between the two countries.
>
(sigh)
Do you see what I mean about fruitcakes Doggy, this idiot thought his post
so impressive that he sent it FOUR times, and to compound his stupidity he
thinks I'm English.
Serge.
The Boy From Oz
<ann...@numserver.net> wrote in message
news:395FCC40...@hotmail.com...
> I don't see millions of people trying to sneak into your shithole of
> a country.
> You can say what you want about gun ownership, but hot burglaries in
> the U.K. are higher than they are in the U.S. Those are robberies
> that are committed while the home is occupied by its' residents.
> You assholes rag on the U.S. until it comes to groveling for the
> allmighty dollar.....just like Sweden and Denmark did for the FOUR
> BILLION U.S. DOLLARS that it took to build the bridge that makes it
> possible to drive between the two countries.
>
>
>
> >
message
> > news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
> > > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is
there
> > > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> > > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> > > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> > > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun
could
> > > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> > > painful assualt at birth.
> >
type
> > of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
> > That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to
botched
> > circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
> > The country's basically fucked.
> >
> > Serge.
My mistake, make that five times.
Serge.
ano...@nymserver.net
The Boy From Oz wrote:
>
> <ann...@numserver.net> wrote in message
> news:395FCC05...@nymserver.org...
> > I don't see millions of people trying to sneak into your shithole of
> > a country.
> > You can say what you want about gun ownership, but hot burglaries in
> > the U.K. are higher than they are in the U.S. Those are robberies
> > that are committed while the home is occupied by its' residents.
> > You assholes rag on the U.S. until it comes to groveling for the
> > allmighty dollar.....just like Sweden and Denmark did for the FOUR
> > BILLION U.S. DOLLARS that it took to build the bridge that makes it
> > possible to drive between the two countries.
> >
>
> (sigh)
>
> Do you see what I mean about fruitcakes Doggy, this idiot thought his post
> so impressive that he sent it FOUR times, and to compound his stupidity he
> thinks I'm English.
>
> Serge.
No, I didn't say that you were English, it's just that you are too
stupid to realize that I'm making a comparison that when you have a
government that fears your gun so much that it doesn't allow anyone
to own one, then you are going to have the type of crime preying on
citizens that there is in the U.K.
There are more guns being smuggled into the U.K. and Australia than
ever.....and they're all going to be used on YOU!!! Heh heh heh....
Australians are as stupid as the Brits.
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: The Boy From Oz wrote:
:>
:> "Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
:> news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
:> > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
:> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
:> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
:> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
:> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
:> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
:> > painful assualt at birth.
:>
:> You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
:> of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
:> That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
:> circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
:> The country's basically fucked.
Did you ever stop to think that maybe those people DESERVED to die? THose
pretty boys at Columbine are a good example of this.
: I'll crosspost this to that other group where all the circumcision
: discussion was going on and we'll see what it picks up. Someone was
: criticising liberals for their derogetory language like "mutilator" and
: "gun nut".
--
Y2Kevin
AOL IM: Ogyu Sorai
"I don't like things with gills" - Julie
"Bu huan ren zhi bu ji zhi, huan bu zhi ren ye" - Confucius, Lun Yu 1:16
"Fools that will laugh on earth must weep in hell" - Mephistophilis
"Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you mad" - Aldous Huxley
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: The Boy From Oz wrote:
:>
:> "Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
:> news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
:> > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
:> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
:> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
:> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
:> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
:> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
:> > painful assualt at birth.
:>
:> You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
:> of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
:> That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
:> circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
:> The country's basically fucked.
The correlation is very clear. Just as I have a right to a aerodynamic
penis, I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
at my handcrafted penis, I am reminded of my beautiful handcrafted Sig
Sauer, and how they both impress the ladies with their sexy BANG!!!
ALso, it's in the Constitution and if it weren't for American guns you
Kiwis would be Torimoto prefecture of the Japanese Empire.
Dr. Coonie Street
Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com wrote:
Wasn't it John Lennon who sang about the penis being a warm gun?
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: In article <8ju20h$6u4$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu>,
: Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com wrote:
: Wasn't it John Lennon who sang about the penis being a warm gun?
I don't like John Lennon because he sang the communist song "Imagine".
: --
: Circumcision is the largest scale medical and ethics fraud of all time.
: Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
: Before you buy.
--
DAVIDHERO
<Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
news:8jvjaq$ep5$3...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
> Dr. Coonie Street <coon...@my-deja.com> saw fit to say:
> : In article <8ju20h$6u4$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu>,
> : Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com wrote:
>
> : Wasn't it John Lennon who sang about the penis being a warm gun?
>
> I don't like John Lennon because he sang the communist song "Imagine".
Yeah, "Imagine no possessions". Ok, I'd like that psychodelic Rolls of his,
since he doesn't want it.
Paul Hagen
I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid wrote:
> I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
> a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
> ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> painful assualt at birth.
The right to own and bear arms was written into the U.S. Constitution by
men with foreskins. Our foreskinned American forefathers were apparently
reacting to the oppressive nature of the foreskinned governments they'd
left behind across The Big Pond. Could there be a relationship between
foreskins and oppressive governments that limit personal freedom? (I doubt
it, but couldn't resist following one ridiculous assertion with another.)
OK, so now "Doggie Dicks For All" (who has a foreskin) has blamed the
perennial love affair between Americans and guns (which I personally do
not share) on American circs. Others here have blamed circ for high school
shootings, global warming, and a diminished capacity to be a "fit husbnd,
father, and member of society." And **ALL** of these assertions have come
from U.S. guys who have foreskins (and grew up surrounded by mostly circ'd
peers). Maybe it is the subconscious trying to compensate for feeling left
out. Even if the guys in question seem to think they enjoy their
foreskins, deep down, even if they can't admit it to themselves, they
might not be as happy as they INSIST (and relentlessly keep INSISTING)
that they are.
Most circ'd guys don't seem to have a problem with the presence of
foreskins in their midst, or with parents who choose foreskin over circ
for their boys, so why do these foreskinned guys have such a problem with
circ?
As for the handful of circ'd guys here who are mad at mommy and daddy
about the (well-intended) decision they made, I'm betting that if they
still had their foreskins, they'd have found something alse to be mad at
mommy and daddy about - and (cruel irony) some of them might be even be
writing in with questions about painful foreskin retraction, phimosis,
tearing and bleeding, or recurring irritation and infections.
The good news is that, outside of this contentious little backwater of the
Internet, MOST guys, both circ'd and with foreskins, are happy with the
status their parents chose for them, and they assume that guys with the
opposite status are happy too. Just another individual difference, and a
minor one at that.
Davsum11
>Internet, MOST guys, both circ'd and with foreskins, are happy with the
>status their parents chose for them, and they assume that guys with the
>opposite status are happy too. Just another individual difference, and a
>minor one at that.
><
The point that needs to be made is that the choice to be circumcised should be
left to the individual being circumcised, not forced upon him against his will.
Circumcision at birth is not done to correct a medical problem, and since it is
painful and traumatic, constitutes child abuse. The bottom line is that there
is no logical or medial argument for the practice of infant circumcison for any
other purpose that the correction of a medical problem.
stev...@my-deja.com
> : The Boy From Oz wrote:
> :>
> :> "Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
> :> news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
> :> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> :> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> :> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> :> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
> :> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> :> > painful assualt at birth.
> :> You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
> :> of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
> :> That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
> :> circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
> :> The country's basically fucked.
>
> The correlation is very clear. Just as I have a right to a aerodynamic
> penis,
Aerodynamic?! A cut dick lacks the smooth gliding action of an uncut dick and
tends to chafe the female partner a bit more (that's why cut guys need to use
so much lube!)
A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
>I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
> at my handcrafted penis,
You call an ugly scar from a 5 minute chop job hand crafted?!
I am reminded of my beautiful handcrafted Sig
> Sauer, and how they both impress the ladies with their sexy BANG!!!
The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat, white-trash,
trailer park redneck chicks!
>
> ALso, it's in the Constitution
Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's" right to
keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right to
keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was the
first U.S. President born in a hospital and therefore probably the first U.S.
President who had his dick cut!
and if it weren't for American guns you
> Kiwis would be Torimoto prefecture of the Japanese Empire.
>
Nah, the Brits would have made it down eventually. And even if they didn't
the local Maowries would have eaten the Jap invaders.
BTW back then the majority of Americans were still un-cut and less
politically correct. Nowadays you'd get some faggot loving, circumcised, new
age type wanting to "compromise" with the Japs and practice "reconciliation"
rather than nuke their sorry fascist asses!
> : I'll crosspost this to that other group where all the circumcision
> : discussion was going on and we'll see what it picks up. Someone was
> : criticising liberals for their derogetory language like "mutilator" and
> : "gun nut".
>
>
DAVIDHERO
<stev...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8kilsi$4jv$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
>
> Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's" right
to
> keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right to
> keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
>
The 2nd Amendment is an INDIVIDUAL right, not a collective right. The
phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" means exactly that:
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. If you actually ever read
the Amendments, in order, you would clearly see the pattern and reason why
it follows the First Amendment.
You need to read a little more about the anti-Federalist influences on the
Constitution, which you speak so dearly of. Might I recommend "What the
anti-Federalists were For", or "The Origins of the Bill of Rights", or
"Constitutional Thought: Original Meaning and Current Understanding", and
Amar's "Bill of Rights".
> Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was
the
> first U.S. President born in a hospital and therefore probably the first
U.S.
> President who had his dick cut!
Marilyn Monroe claimed BOTH Kennedys were circumsized!!! And so was Nixon
and Ike, but that fscking FDR was an uncut barbarian.
>
> BTW back then the majority of Americans were still un-cut and less
> politically correct. Nowadays you'd get some faggot loving, circumcised,
new
> age type wanting to "compromise" with the Japs and practice
"reconciliation"
> rather than nuke their sorry fascist asses!
You need to talk to your root brothers (Daxo, craig, etc) because they are
claiming the circumcision is causing violent and barbaric behavior in
Americans. Typical liberal, you can't even get your arguments straight.
Oh god I love you. Where have you been hiding???
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: In article <8ju20h$6u4$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu>,
: Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com wrote:
:> Doggy Dicks For All <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> saw fit to say:
:> : The Boy From Oz wrote:
:> :>
:> :> "Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
:> :> news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
:> :> > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
:> :> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
:> :> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
:> :> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
:> :> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
:> :> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
:> :> > painful assualt at birth.
:> :>
:> :> You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
:> :> of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
:> :> That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
:> :> circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
:> :> The country's basically fucked.
:>
:> The correlation is very clear. Just as I have a right to a aerodynamic
:> penis,
: Aerodynamic?! A cut dick lacks the smooth gliding action of an uncut dick and
: tends to chafe the female partner a bit more (that's why cut guys need to use
: so much lube!)
If you doubt me, take a look at any airplane. I have never seen a jet with
a ridiculous foreskin-type structure draped over the cockpit, flapping in
the breeze making a hilarious FLAPPETTYFLAPPYFLOPFLOPFLARP! sound. My cut
penis is aerodynamic like a jumbo jet. It is aerodynamic like NASA.
: A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
: providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
I have never seen a tank fly. Perhaps they are not as aerodynamic as you
think.
:>I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
:> at my handcrafted penis,
: You call an ugly scar from a 5 minute chop job hand crafted?!
Not only that, but my penis has increased in value, as this hand-crafted
product was limited to a run of 180 firing days.
: I am reminded of my beautiful handcrafted Sig
:> Sauer, and how they both impress the ladies with their sexy BANG!!!
: The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat, white-trash,
: trailer park redneck chicks!
So your sisters are the only gun enthusiasts you have ever met?
:>
:> ALso, it's in the Constitution
: Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's" right to
: keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right to
: keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
Funny, I was ready the part where it mentions the "people's right to keep
and bear arms". Re: the militia, please read US Code Title 10, Subtitle A,
Part I, Chapter 13, Section 311, Subsection a which states:
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at
least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32,
under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention
to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the
United States who are members of the National Guard.
I have click your head like MOE! I DARE you to respond!
*CLICK!*
: Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was the
: first U.S. President born in a hospital and therefore probably the first U.S.
: President who had his dick cut!
Monica?
: and if it weren't for American guns you
:> Kiwis would be Torimoto prefecture of the Japanese Empire.
:>
: Nah, the Brits would have made it down eventually. And even if they didn't
: the local Maowries would have eaten the Jap invaders.
IF it weren'T for the US, the BRits would be too busy singing
"Deutschland! Deutschland!" to help you Kiwis. As for the Maowries, those
grass skirt wearing folk would have been no match for the Japanese
Imperial Army.
I am a Japanese historian currently in residence in Japan. I *DARE* you to
contest me!
: BTW back then the majority of Americans were still un-cut and less
: politically correct. Nowadays you'd get some faggot loving, circumcised, new
: age type wanting to "compromise" with the Japs and practice "reconciliation"
: rather than nuke their sorry fascist asses!
World War II Japan was not fascist. Most educated people know this.
:> : I'll crosspost this to that other group where all the circumcision
:> : discussion was going on and we'll see what it picks up. Someone was
:> : criticising liberals for their derogetory language like "mutilator" and
:> : "gun nut".
:>
:>
: Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
: Before you buy.
--
John
stev...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> In article <8ju20h$6u4$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu>,
> Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com wrote:
> > Doggy Dicks For All <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> saw fit to say:
> > : The Boy From Oz wrote:
> > :>
> > :> "Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
> > :> news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
> > :> > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
> > :> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> > :> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> > :> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> > :> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
> > :> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> > :> > painful assualt at birth.
> > :>
> > :> You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
> > :> of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
> > :> That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
> > :> circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
> > :> The country's basically fucked.
> >
> > The correlation is very clear. Just as I have a right to a aerodynamic
> > penis,
>
> Aerodynamic?! A cut dick lacks the smooth gliding action of an uncut dick and
> tends to chafe the female partner a bit more (that's why cut guys need to use
> so much lube!)
I've never used lube in my life! Maybe you need to find some women who are alittle more into you. If she's down with it she'll give you all the lube you need.....
She probably turned off from looking at your Snuffleupagus.
>
> A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
> providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
>
> >I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
> > at my handcrafted penis,
>
> You call an ugly scar from a 5 minute chop job hand crafted?!
>
> I am reminded of my beautiful handcrafted Sig
> > Sauer, and how they both impress the ladies with their sexy BANG!!!
>
> The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat, white-trash,
> trailer park redneck chicks!
>
> >
> > ALso, it's in the Constitution
>
> Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's" right to
> keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right to
> keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
>
> Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was the
> first U.S. President born in a hospital and therefore probably the first U.S.
> President who had his dick cut!
>
> and if it weren't for American guns you
> > Kiwis would be Torimoto prefecture of the Japanese Empire.
> >
>
> Nah, the Brits would have made it down eventually. And even if they didn't
> the local Maowries would have eaten the Jap invaders.
>
> BTW back then the majority of Americans were still un-cut and less
> politically correct. Nowadays you'd get some faggot loving, circumcised, new
> age type wanting to "compromise" with the Japs and practice "reconciliation"
> rather than nuke their sorry fascist asses!
>
Ma...@thelabyrinthe.net
stev...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> In article <8ju20h$6u4$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu>,
> Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com wrote:
> > Doggy Dicks For All <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> saw fit to say:
> > : The Boy From Oz wrote:
> > :>
> > :> "Doggy Dicks For All" <I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid> wrote in message
> > :> news:395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid...
> > :> > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is there
> > :> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is the
> > :> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person in
> > :> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down, even
> > :> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun could
> > :> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> > :> > painful assualt at birth.
> > :>
> > :> You're quite right, the people who insist on circumcision are the same type
> > :> of fruitcakes who insist on their 'right' to own a gun.
> > :> That's why there's hundreds of sex re-assignments every year due to botched
> > :> circumcisions and twenty thousand homicides.
> > :> The country's basically fucked.
> >
> > The correlation is very clear. Just as I have a right to a aerodynamic
> > penis,
>
> Aerodynamic?! A cut dick lacks the smooth gliding action of an uncut dick and
> tends to chafe the female partner a bit more (that's why cut guys need to use
> so much lube!)
>
> A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
> providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
>
> >I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
> > at my handcrafted penis,
>
> You call an ugly scar from a 5 minute chop job hand crafted?!
>
> I am reminded of my beautiful handcrafted Sig
> > Sauer, and how they both impress the ladies with their sexy BANG!!!
>
> The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat, white-trash,
> trailer park redneck chicks!
>
> >
> > ALso, it's in the Constitution
>
> Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's" right to
> keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right to
> keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
Actually, you numbscull, if you'd get up off your fat ass and read
the Federalist Papers, which was written by those who actually WROTE
the Constitution, you'd see that what is meant by a militia is EVERY
man, not a formally formed armed service or National Guard. At the
time of the drafting of the Constitution that the bottom line of
defense was not an army but the Citizens of a country to insure that
a totalitarian government does not turn against its' people.
Ma...@thelabyrinthe.net
Chazz
news:8kjg50$718$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
Funny, never seen aflying penis before... HAVE seen a penis that looks all
dried out due to constant exposure, see it every day when I take a shower.
You do realize of course that the glans has evolved over thousands of years
to be an internal body part that is able to become external, ala the eyes
and tounge, right? If you've ever had your eyes open for an extended period
of time, or perhaps fallen asleep with your mouth open all night, you know
how dried out and "icky" it feels? That's essentially what happens to the
glans due to circumcision.
BTW, in case you didn't know, most foreskins are partially/totally retracted
when erect, this not only stops the shaft skin from tearing due to the
strain, but also allows more skin movement during sex, only an abnormally
long foreskin still completely covers the glans when totally erect.
> : A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
> : providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
>
> I have never seen a tank fly. Perhaps they are not as aerodynamic as you
> think.
Well, did you ever think that penises aren't designed for flight? The
foreskin acts like the hunk of flesh around a turtle's neck: it facilitates
moving in and out (whether it be a turtle's head moving in and out of its
shell or a penis moving in and out of a vagina) by reducing the amount of
friction, thereby decreasing the amount of lubrication needed and preventing
EXTREMELY aggrivating and downright painfull chaffing for both parties.
> :>I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
> :> at my handcrafted penis,
>
> : You call an ugly scar from a 5 minute chop job hand crafted?!
>
> Not only that, but my penis has increased in value, as this hand-crafted
> product was limited to a run of 180 firing days.
Oh my, I do hope I have more than 180 days of sexual pleasure in my life. No
wonder you love guns so much, you need a "release" somehow.
> : I am reminded of my beautiful handcrafted Sig
> :> Sauer, and how they both impress the ladies with their sexy BANG!!!
>
> : The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat,
white-trash,
> : trailer park redneck chicks!
>
> So your sisters are the only gun enthusiasts you have ever met?
>
> :>
> :> ALso, it's in the Constitution
>
> : Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's"
right to
> : keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right
to
> : keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
>
> Funny, I was ready the part where it mentions the "people's right to keep
> and bear arms". Re: the militia, please read US Code Title 10, Subtitle A,
> Part I, Chapter 13, Section 311, Subsection a which states:
>
> (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at
> least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32,
> under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention
> to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the
> United States who are members of the National Guard.
>
> I have click your head like MOE! I DARE you to respond!
>
> *CLICK!*
*who are members of the National Guard* That does not include the paranoid
militant wing-nuts who have a larger arsenal than some small countries
locked up in their little shack out in the middle of Montana or wherever.
> : Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was
the
> : first U.S. President born in a hospital and therefore probably the first
U.S.
> : President who had his dick cut!
>
> Monica?
>
> : and if it weren't for American guns you
> :> Kiwis would be Torimoto prefecture of the Japanese Empire.
> :>
>
> : Nah, the Brits would have made it down eventually. And even if they
didn't
> : the local Maowries would have eaten the Jap invaders.
>
> IF it weren'T for the US, the BRits would be too busy singing
> "Deutschland! Deutschland!" to help you Kiwis. As for the Maowries, those
> grass skirt wearing folk would have been no match for the Japanese
> Imperial Army.
>
> I am a Japanese historian currently in residence in Japan. I *DARE* you to
> contest me!
>
> : BTW back then the majority of Americans were still un-cut and less
> : politically correct. Nowadays you'd get some faggot loving, circumcised,
new
> : age type wanting to "compromise" with the Japs and practice
"reconciliation"
> : rather than nuke their sorry fascist asses!
>
> World War II Japan was not fascist. Most educated people know this.
You mean they DIDN'T consider other countries worse than their and wanted to
take them over? Gee, I thought that was the Axis' entire PLAN in World War
II.
--
Chazz
-------------
To reply, change everything after the @ to aol.com
stev...@my-deja.com
>
> If you doubt me, take a look at any airplane. I have never seen a jet with
> a ridiculous foreskin-type structure draped over the cockpit, flapping in
> the breeze making a hilarious FLAPPETTYFLAPPYFLOPFLOPFLARP! sound.
What about the removable nose cone that protects the sensitive radar unit at
the tip of the plane?
But seriously, the foreskin does not "flap" during sex. It slides neatly back
and may (depending on how tight it is) either function as a built in cock
ring by staying back behind the glans or smoothly slide up an down over the
glans like the sleave of a piston or the treadle on a battle tank.
...
>
> I have never seen a tank fly. Perhaps they are not as aerodynamic as you
> think.
>
They don't fly but they are pretty effective when it comes to penetration ;-p
>
> : The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat, white-trash,
> : trailer park redneck chicks!
>
> So your sisters are the only gun enthusiasts you have ever met?
>
I don't have any sisters. But the cute girls I pick up tend to hang around
trendy night clubs NOT fireing ranges or roadside diners.
> :>
> :> ALso, it's in the Constitution
>
> : Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's" right to
> : keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right to
> : keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
>
> Funny, I was ready the part where it mentions the "people's right to keep
> and bear arms". Re: the militia, please read US Code Title 10, Subtitle A,
> Part I, Chapter 13, Section 311, Subsection a which states:
>
> (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at
> least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32,
> under 45 years of age who are,
OK then, according to your strict constructionalist reading of the statute
they should have to turn them in on their 45th birthday!
> or who have made a declaration of intention
> to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the
> United States who are members of the National Guard.
>
> I have click your head like MOE! I DARE you to respond!
>
> *CLICK!*
Click! Dare accepted!
In every first world military I've ever heard of the soldiers do NOT bring
their guns home with them while on leave.
In fact AFAIK the U.S. military stores it's guns and amo in separate
locations and trying to sneak a gun off the base and take it home for
personal use whould get you court marshalled.
Yes the national gaurd members have a right to guns. But... those guns are
meant to be locked up nice and safe at their training bases etc.
Under your interpretation of the Bill of Right and Title 10 members of the
gaurd would be allowed to carry home surface to air missle after training to
protect their homes from burglars!
>
> : Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was the
> : first U.S. President born in a hospital and therefore probably the first U.S.
> : President who had his dick cut!
>
> Monica?
>
Monica? Are you talking about Monica Lewinski? I don't follow you here.
This does bring up the point that that little JAP was probably sucking on an
uncut dick in the Oval office. Clinton was born at home (not a hospital), 50
years ago in what was then the deep, deep South. Someone on one of these news
groups also claims to have seen a picture of him on TV from when he broke his
leg as a kid and said he was uncut. But I haven't seen the pcture so I can't
say for certain.
> : and if it weren't for American guns you
> :> Kiwis would be Torimoto prefecture of the Japanese Empire.
> :>
>
> : Nah, the Brits would have made it down eventually. And even if they didn't
> : the local Maowries would have eaten the Jap invaders.
>
> IF it weren'T for the US, the BRits would be too busy singing
> "Deutschland! Deutschland!" to help you Kiwis.
I think the concensous is that Hitler's invasion of Britain would have failed
in any case because of Britain's natural "white cliffs" defences.
As for the Maowries, those
> grass skirt wearing folk would have been no match for the Japanese
> Imperial Army.
>
The JAPS are all uncut though!
> I am a Japanese historian currently in residence in Japan. I *DARE* you to
> contest me!
>
Do you get to fuck a lot of Jap girls? (Not JAPs just Japanes). Do they ever
comment on your cut dick?
>
>
> World War II Japan was not fascist. Most educated people know this.
>
Oh give me a break! They were allies with Hitler and a total dictatorship
with a command control style economny. What would you call them?
DAVIDHERO
<Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
news:8ktke8$h7m$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
>
> : The JAPS are all uncut though!
>
> You, sir, have never been to a Japanese bath house.
So, those little people are cut?
DAVIDHERO
<Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
news:8ktrac$ier$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
> DAVIDHERO <Le...@msn.net> saw fit to say:
>
> : <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
They just want to be like us at any cost.
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
If you are being told your glans feels "icky", perhaps you are doing
something wrong. I hear they have books about that sort of thing,
techniques and such.
: BTW, in case you didn't know, most foreskins are partially/totally retracted
: when erect, this not only stops the shaft skin from tearing due to the
: strain, but also allows more skin movement during sex, only an abnormally
: long foreskin still completely covers the glans when totally erect.
All foreskins are abnormally long. SNIP!
:> : A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
:> : providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
:>
:> I have never seen a tank fly. Perhaps they are not as aerodynamic as you
:> think.
: Well, did you ever think that penises aren't designed for flight? The
: foreskin acts like the hunk of flesh around a turtle's neck: it facilitates
: moving in and out (whether it be a turtle's head moving in and out of its
: shell or a penis moving in and out of a vagina) by reducing the amount of
: friction, thereby decreasing the amount of lubrication needed and preventing
: EXTREMELY aggrivating and downright painfull chaffing for both parties.
If girls aren't getting wet for you, perhaps you and your icky glans are
doing something wrong.
:> :>I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
:> :> at my handcrafted penis,
:>
:> : You call an ugly scar from a 5 minute chop job hand crafted?!
:>
:> Not only that, but my penis has increased in value, as this hand-crafted
:> product was limited to a run of 180 firing days.
: Oh my, I do hope I have more than 180 days of sexual pleasure in my life. No
: wonder you love guns so much, you need a "release" somehow.
Tee hee. Somebody doesn'T understand the phrase "run of 180 firing days"
:> : I am reminded of my beautiful handcrafted Sig
:> :> Sauer, and how they both impress the ladies with their sexy BANG!!!
:>
:> : The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat,
: white-trash,
:> : trailer park redneck chicks!
:>
:> So your sisters are the only gun enthusiasts you have ever met?
:>
:> :>
:> :> ALso, it's in the Constitution
:>
:> : Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's"
: right to
:> : keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right
: to
:> : keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
:>
:> Funny, I was ready the part where it mentions the "people's right to keep
:> and bear arms". Re: the militia, please read US Code Title 10, Subtitle A,
:> Part I, Chapter 13, Section 311, Subsection a which states:
:>
:> (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at
:> least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32,
:> under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention
:> to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the
:> United States who are members of the National Guard.
:>
:> I have click your head like MOE! I DARE you to respond!
:>
:> *CLICK!*
: *who are members of the National Guard* That does not include the paranoid
: militant wing-nuts who have a larger arsenal than some small countries
: locked up in their little shack out in the middle of Montana or wherever.
Um, no. The NG is mentioned where it says "and of female citizens of the
United States who are members of the National Guard" THis means women who
are in the NG are in the militia, while those who are not in the NG are
not in the militia. Men are in the militia regardless of their NG status.
THis is further explained in US Code Title 10, Subtitle A,
Part I, Chapter 13, Section 311, Subsection B which states:
(b) The classes of the militia are -
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard
and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of
the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the
Naval Militia.
We are members of the unorganized militia. Go get your gun.
:> : Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was
Imperialism does not equal fascism. Thank you for playing. Good night.
I win.
SInce I am a professor of Japanese history as well as hold a law decree,
you really won't be able to beat me.
: --
: Chazz
: -------------
: To reply, change everything after the @ to aol.com
--
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
:>
:> If you doubt me, take a look at any airplane. I have never seen a jet with
:> a ridiculous foreskin-type structure draped over the cockpit, flapping in
:> the breeze making a hilarious FLAPPETTYFLAPPYFLOPFLOPFLARP! sound.
: What about the removable nose cone that protects the sensitive radar unit at
: the tip of the plane?
: But seriously, the foreskin does not "flap" during sex. It slides neatly back
: and may (depending on how tight it is) either function as a built in cock
: ring by staying back behind the glans or smoothly slide up an down over the
: glans like the sleave of a piston or the treadle on a battle tank.
: ...
:>
:> I have never seen a tank fly. Perhaps they are not as aerodynamic as you
:> think.
:>
: They don't fly but they are pretty effective when it comes to penetration ;-p
:>
:> : The only girls I've seen who like firearms are butt ugly, fat, white-trash,
:> : trailer park redneck chicks!
:>
:> So your sisters are the only gun enthusiasts you have ever met?
:>
: I don't have any sisters. But the cute girls I pick up tend to hang around
: trendy night clubs NOT fireing ranges or roadside diners.
OOh, you'll meet a real nice girl to bring home to Mama at the trendy
night club. You must like flakey girls named Tofutti who are hairdressers.
She doesn't love you.
:> :>
:> :> ALso, it's in the Constitution
:>
:> : Actually the Second Amendment refers to a "well REGULATED militia's" right to
:> : keep arms. No where does it give individual redneck assholes the right to
:> : keep guns! You should READ before you shoot your mouth off.
:>
:> Funny, I was ready the part where it mentions the "people's right to keep
:> and bear arms". Re: the militia, please read US Code Title 10, Subtitle A,
:> Part I, Chapter 13, Section 311, Subsection a which states:
:>
:> (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at
:> least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32,
:> under 45 years of age who are,
: OK then, according to your strict constructionalist reading of the statute
: they should have to turn them in on their 45th birthday!
Why? THis part of the law says nothing about possessing guns.
:> or who have made a declaration of intention
:> to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the
:> United States who are members of the National Guard.
:>
:> I have click your head like MOE! I DARE you to respond!
:>
:> *CLICK!*
: Click! Dare accepted!
: In every first world military I've ever heard of the soldiers do NOT bring
: their guns home with them while on leave.
A militia is not a military.
: In fact AFAIK the U.S. military stores it's guns and amo in separate
: locations and trying to sneak a gun off the base and take it home for
: personal use whould get you court marshalled.
: Yes the national gaurd members have a right to guns. But... those guns are
: meant to be locked up nice and safe at their training bases etc.
: Under your interpretation of the Bill of Right and Title 10 members of the
: gaurd would be allowed to carry home surface to air missle after training to
: protect their homes from burglars!
Section 311 says able-bodied males are members of the militia, period. Let
me allow you to read Subsection B of Section 311:
(b) The classes of the militia are -
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard
and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of
the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the
Naval Militia.
Get it? Members of the militia who are NOT members of the National Guard!
*CLICK!*
:>
:> : Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter was the
:> : first U.S. President born in a hospital and therefore probably the first U.S.
:> : President who had his dick cut!
:>
:> Monica?
:>
: Monica? Are you talking about Monica Lewinski? I don't follow you here.
: This does bring up the point that that little JAP was probably sucking on an
She is American.
: uncut dick in the Oval office. Clinton was born at home (not a hospital), 50
: years ago in what was then the deep, deep South. Someone on one of these news
: groups also claims to have seen a picture of him on TV from when he broke his
: leg as a kid and said he was uncut. But I haven't seen the pcture so I can't
: say for certain.
Uncut dick? THat explains all of his immorality. I am going to write a
book about the foreskin in the Oval Office.
:> : and if it weren't for American guns you
:> :> Kiwis would be Torimoto prefecture of the Japanese Empire.
:> :>
:>
:> : Nah, the Brits would have made it down eventually. And even if they didn't
:> : the local Maowries would have eaten the Jap invaders.
:>
:> IF it weren'T for the US, the BRits would be too busy singing
:> "Deutschland! Deutschland!" to help you Kiwis.
: I think the concensous is that Hitler's invasion of Britain would have failed
: in any case because of Britain's natural "white cliffs" defences.
THose cliffs are in Dover. Have you ever heard of the blitz? THe war in
Europe was over by the end of 1940. THAT is the historical consensus.
: As for the Maowries, those
:> grass skirt wearing folk would have been no match for the Japanese
:> Imperial Army.
:>
: The JAPS are all uncut though!
You, sir, have never been to a Japanese bath house.
:> I am a Japanese historian currently in residence in Japan. I *DARE* you to
:> contest me!
:>
: Do you get to fuck a lot of Jap girls? (Not JAPs just Japanes). Do they ever
: comment on your cut dick?
Yes and yes. The comments are "big", "cute" and "I want it in my mouth".
:>
:>
:> World War II Japan was not fascist. Most educated people know this.
:>
: Oh give me a break! They were allies with Hitler and a total dictatorship
: with a command control style economny. What would you call them?
The Japanese war-time economy, like those of Italy and Germany, was free
market. The Japanese government before and during World War II was a
constitutional monarchy with a bicameral legislature. It still is.
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
: news:8ktke8$h7m$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
:>
:> : The JAPS are all uncut though!
:>
:> You, sir, have never been to a Japanese bath house.
: So, those little people are cut?
A fair number, yeah.
--
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
DAVIDHERO <Le...@msn.net> saw fit to say:
: <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
: news:8ktrac$ier$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
:> DAVIDHERO <Le...@msn.net> saw fit to say:
:>
:> : <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
:> : news:8ktke8$h7m$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
:> :>
:> :> : The JAPS are all uncut though!
:> :>
:> :> You, sir, have never been to a Japanese bath house.
:>
:>
:> : So, those little people are cut?
:>
:> A fair number, yeah.
: They just want to be like us at any cost.
Ain't that the truth. Then they turn around and hang up a sign outside
their business that says "Japanese Only".
DAVIDHERO
<Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
news:8ku16a$j54$2...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
>
> DAVIDHERO <Le...@msn.net> saw fit to say:
>
> : <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
> : news:8ktrac$ier$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
> :> DAVIDHERO <Le...@msn.net> saw fit to say:
> :>
> :> : <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
> :> : news:8ktke8$h7m$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
> :> :>
> :> :>
> :> :> You, sir, have never been to a Japanese bath house.
> :>
> :> : So, those little people are cut?
> :>
> :> A fair number, yeah.
>
>
> : They just want to be like us at any cost.
>
> Ain't that the truth. Then they turn around and hang up a sign outside
> their business that says "Japanese Only".
You should ad "4 feet tall" to the next sign you see.
Chazz
news:8ktjj5$h50$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
Trust me, after nineteen years, my glans is not "icky," it is dried out. The
open-mouth scenario that I described above is a one-night thing, if you held
your mouth open 24 hours a day and were more or less constantly rubbing
cotton over your tounge, soon enough it would reach the same feeling (or
lack thereof) of a circumcised glans.
> : BTW, in case you didn't know, most foreskins are partially/totally
retracted
> : when erect, this not only stops the shaft skin from tearing due to the
> : strain, but also allows more skin movement during sex, only an
abnormally
> : long foreskin still completely covers the glans when totally erect.
>
> All foreskins are abnormally long. SNIP!
Actually, the only foreskins that are abnormally long give the pro-circ
stereotype of an "elephant's trunk" where it hangs well beyond the tip of
the glans. It's only in your twisted mind that all foreskins are too long.
Do you also circumcise those messy eyelids and lips?
> :> : A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
> :> : providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
> :>
> :> I have never seen a tank fly. Perhaps they are not as aerodynamic as
you
> :> think.
>
> : Well, did you ever think that penises aren't designed for flight? The
> : foreskin acts like the hunk of flesh around a turtle's neck: it
facilitates
> : moving in and out (whether it be a turtle's head moving in and out of
its
> : shell or a penis moving in and out of a vagina) by reducing the amount
of
> : friction, thereby decreasing the amount of lubrication needed and
preventing
> : EXTREMELY aggrivating and downright painfull chaffing for both parties.
>
> If girls aren't getting wet for you, perhaps you and your icky glans are
> doing something wrong.
It's not a matter of getting wet, it's staying wet. A circumcised penis
generates more friction than an intact one, therefore will not only need
more lubrication at the start, but will require more lube to be added more
frequently as it will also rub it away more quickly. Whether that comes from
the woman's natural excretions or a tube isn't important.
If you have a gun, please give me your general area so I know to avoid the
general incompetance which would probably lead to frequent misfires.
Uh, no, you don't.
> SInce I am a professor of Japanese history as well as hold a law decree,
> you really won't be able to beat me.
Fascism is extreme nationalism, to the point of considering other nations
beneath them. Since you are a profesor of Japanese history (and I feel
genuinely sorry for any students) you should know this pretty well sums it
up.
DAVIDHERO
<Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
news:8l31ve$b1p$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
>
> Well since you have redirected the debate I pretty much won that one. I
> have two guns and my aim is balls-on accurate. If you doubt me, there is
> someone in Georgia's Ware State Prison you should talk to.
What was this all about?
Chazz
news:8l31ve$b1p$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
> No, it isn't. Fascism is a very specific term. IT's origins are 20th
> century Italian. It was a plebian movement in origin, directed and
> financed by big capitalist powers. It issued forth from the petty
> bourgeoisie, the slum proletariat, and even to a certain extent from the
> proletarian masses.
fas·cism (fshzm)
n.
1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a
dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition
through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent
nationalism and racism.
2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system
of government.
Oppressive, dictatorial control.
Taken from dictionary.com Are you saying this does not describe WWII Japan?
> The genuine basis for fascism is the petty bourgeoisie. In italy, it
> has a very large base - the petty bourgeoisie of the towns and cities,
> and the peasantry. To be sure, a sense of strong nationalism is to be
> found in the fascist regime but such is the case of all authoritarian
> governments. For an example of this, we need look only to communism, which
> is the political opposite of fascism. Marx' slogan was "workers of the
> world unite!", with the goal of NO nations. Yet, every country which has
> had a communist revolution, Russia, China, Vietnam and so on, has had a
> nationalist core. American nationalism is perhaps the fiercest in the
> world, yet it is not fascist. Fascism does not equal extreme nationalism.
> Not at all.
>
> If you had been in my class, I would have made you cry. Every semester I
> do it to at least one schmuck who thinks he can defeat me.
Oh, please. I don't cry because an asshole professor doesn't want to listen,
I either prove him/her wrong or prove him/her to be the obstenant asshole
that he/she appears to be.
> : Since you are a profesor of Japanese history (and I feel
> : genuinely sorry for any students) you should know this pretty well sums
it
> : up.
>
> But it doesn't. Please go back do discussing topics of which you possess
> more knowledge, like your foreskin.
Well, it's obvious you aren't a good teacher since you obviously don't pay
attention to details, since I have stated many times on this board that I
was circumcised at birth. Maybe if you got your head out of your ass, you
would see that just because you're the teach, doesn't make you always right.
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
You said, "you know how dried out and "icky" it [the tongue] feels? That's
essentially what happens to the glans due to circumcision." You are
directly comparing the tongue to your glans. Your glans is dired out and
"icky" by your own admission and now you are scared that people will find
out and you will not get laid!
:> : BTW, in case you didn't know, most foreskins are partially/totally
: retracted
:> : when erect, this not only stops the shaft skin from tearing due to the
:> : strain, but also allows more skin movement during sex, only an
: abnormally
:> : long foreskin still completely covers the glans when totally erect.
:>
:> All foreskins are abnormally long. SNIP!
: Actually, the only foreskins that are abnormally long give the pro-circ
: stereotype of an "elephant's trunk" where it hangs well beyond the tip of
: the glans. It's only in your twisted mind that all foreskins are too long.
: Do you also circumcise those messy eyelids and lips?
Eyelids and lips have a function. The foreskin does not. Plus, eyelids are
not smelly.
:> :> : A foreskin works like the treadle on a battle tank, rolling along and
:> :> : providing a smooth ride thereby facilitating easier penetration.
:> :>
:> :> I have never seen a tank fly. Perhaps they are not as aerodynamic as
: you
:> :> think.
:>
:> : Well, did you ever think that penises aren't designed for flight? The
:> : foreskin acts like the hunk of flesh around a turtle's neck: it
: facilitates
:> : moving in and out (whether it be a turtle's head moving in and out of
: its
:> : shell or a penis moving in and out of a vagina) by reducing the amount
: of
:> : friction, thereby decreasing the amount of lubrication needed and
: preventing
:> : EXTREMELY aggrivating and downright painfull chaffing for both parties.
:>
:> If girls aren't getting wet for you, perhaps you and your icky glans are
:> doing something wrong.
: It's not a matter of getting wet, it's staying wet. A circumcised penis
: generates more friction than an intact one, therefore will not only need
: more lubrication at the start, but will require more lube to be added more
: frequently as it will also rub it away more quickly. Whether that comes from
: the woman's natural excretions or a tube isn't important.
It sure is important. If she isn't wet, she isn'T into you. I'm sorry I
had to be the one to tell you this.
:> :> :>I have a right to a beautifully contoured firearm. Everytime I look
Well since you have redirected the debate I pretty much won that one. I
have two guns and my aim is balls-on accurate. If you doubt me, there is
someone in Georgia's Ware State Prison you should talk to.
:> :> : Real liberals, like Harry Truman, were un-circumcised! Jimmy Carter
Yes, I do.
:> SInce I am a professor of Japanese history as well as hold a law decree,
:> you really won't be able to beat me.
: Fascism is extreme nationalism, to the point of considering other nations
: beneath them.
No, it isn't. Fascism is a very specific term. IT's origins are 20th
century Italian. It was a plebian movement in origin, directed and
financed by big capitalist powers. It issued forth from the petty
bourgeoisie, the slum proletariat, and even to a certain extent from the
proletarian masses.
The genuine basis for fascism is the petty bourgeoisie. In italy, it
has a very large base - the petty bourgeoisie of the towns and cities,
and the peasantry. To be sure, a sense of strong nationalism is to be
found in the fascist regime but such is the case of all authoritarian
governments. For an example of this, we need look only to communism, which
is the political opposite of fascism. Marx' slogan was "workers of the
world unite!", with the goal of NO nations. Yet, every country which has
had a communist revolution, Russia, China, Vietnam and so on, has had a
nationalist core. American nationalism is perhaps the fiercest in the
world, yet it is not fascist. Fascism does not equal extreme nationalism.
Not at all.
If you had been in my class, I would have made you cry. Every semester I
do it to at least one schmuck who thinks he can defeat me.
: Since you are a profesor of Japanese history (and I feel
: genuinely sorry for any students) you should know this pretty well sums it
: up.
But it doesn't. Please go back do discussing topics of which you possess
more knowledge, like your foreskin.
: Chazz
: -------------
: To reply, change everything after the @ to aol.com
--
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
:> No, it isn't. Fascism is a very specific term. IT's origins are 20th
:> century Italian. It was a plebian movement in origin, directed and
:> financed by big capitalist powers. It issued forth from the petty
:> bourgeoisie, the slum proletariat, and even to a certain extent from the
:> proletarian masses.
: fas·cism (fshzm)
: n.
: 1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a
: dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition
: through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent
: nationalism and racism.
: 2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system
: of government.
: Oppressive, dictatorial control.
This describes many governments which are not fascist.
: Taken from dictionary.com Are you saying this does not describe WWII Japan?
That definiton does not. You should also bear in mind that dictionary.com
is not the font of political knowledge or theory. I counter you with the
roots of Italian fascism and you respond with a definition from
dictionary.com? What kind of student are you? Could you even understand
the vocabulary of my previous post?
:> The genuine basis for fascism is the petty bourgeoisie. In italy, it
:> has a very large base - the petty bourgeoisie of the towns and cities,
:> and the peasantry. To be sure, a sense of strong nationalism is to be
:> found in the fascist regime but such is the case of all authoritarian
:> governments. For an example of this, we need look only to communism, which
:> is the political opposite of fascism. Marx' slogan was "workers of the
:> world unite!", with the goal of NO nations. Yet, every country which has
:> had a communist revolution, Russia, China, Vietnam and so on, has had a
:> nationalist core. American nationalism is perhaps the fiercest in the
:> world, yet it is not fascist. Fascism does not equal extreme nationalism.
:> Not at all.
:>
:> If you had been in my class, I would have made you cry. Every semester I
:> do it to at least one schmuck who thinks he can defeat me.
: Oh, please. I don't cry because an asshole professor doesn't want to listen,
: I either prove him/her wrong or prove him/her to be the obstenant asshole
: that he/she appears to be.
Since most of my colleagues and I have been experts in our fields before
our students were out of diapers, I've yet to know a professor who has
been proven wrong by a student.
:> : Since you are a profesor of Japanese history (and I feel
:> : genuinely sorry for any students) you should know this pretty well sums
: it
:> : up.
:>
:> But it doesn't. Please go back do discussing topics of which you possess
:> more knowledge, like your foreskin.
: Well, it's obvious you aren't a good teacher since you obviously don't pay
: attention to details, since I have stated many times on this board that I
: was circumcised at birth. Maybe if you got your head out of your ass, you
: would see that just because you're the teach, doesn't make you always right.
I'm sorry. I meant to say your knowledge of the foreskins of other men.
BTW, my ass is very warm.
DAVIDHERO
Chazz <Chazb...@moc.loa> wrote in message
news:S_8d5.109875$t91.7...@news4.giganews.com...
> <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
> news:8l31ve$b1p$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
>
> > No, it isn't. Fascism is a very specific term. IT's origins are 20th
> > century Italian. It was a plebian movement in origin, directed and
> > financed by big capitalist powers. It issued forth from the petty
> > bourgeoisie, the slum proletariat, and even to a certain extent from the
> > proletarian masses.
>
> n.
>
> 1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a
> dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition
> through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent
> nationalism and racism.
> 2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system
> of government.
>
> Oppressive, dictatorial control.
>
Japan?
I think the dictionary would not be useful for our purposes here. They
obviously condensed the issue, Kevin did not.
Chazz
news:8l3802$bnc$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
> Chazz <Chazb...@moc.loa> saw fit to say:
> : <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
>
> :> No, it isn't. Fascism is a very specific term. IT's origins are 20th
> :> century Italian. It was a plebian movement in origin, directed and
> :> financed by big capitalist powers. It issued forth from the petty
> :> bourgeoisie, the slum proletariat, and even to a certain extent from
the
> :> proletarian masses.
>
> : n.
>
> : 1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a
> : dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the
opposition
> : through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent
> : nationalism and racism.
> : 2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a
system
> : of government.
>
> : Oppressive, dictatorial control.
>
>
Japan?
>
> That definiton does not. You should also bear in mind that dictionary.com
> is not the font of political knowledge or theory. I counter you with the
> roots of Italian fascism and you respond with a definition from
> dictionary.com? What kind of student are you? Could you even understand
> the vocabulary of my previous post?
I can and I do, what I am saying is that the ROOTS of Fascism does not
necessarily equate with its current meaning. A Nazi is, in fact, someone who
supported the German National Socialst party in WWII, but it has come to
mean a general term for a racist. That's not how it STARTED, and that's not
what it's SUPPOSED to be, but that's what it is.
> :> The genuine basis for fascism is the petty bourgeoisie. In italy, it
> :> has a very large base - the petty bourgeoisie of the towns and cities,
> :> and the peasantry. To be sure, a sense of strong nationalism is to be
> :> found in the fascist regime but such is the case of all authoritarian
> :> governments. For an example of this, we need look only to communism,
which
> :> is the political opposite of fascism. Marx' slogan was "workers of the
> :> world unite!", with the goal of NO nations. Yet, every country which
has
> :> had a communist revolution, Russia, China, Vietnam and so on, has had a
> :> nationalist core. American nationalism is perhaps the fiercest in the
> :> world, yet it is not fascist. Fascism does not equal extreme
nationalism.
> :> Not at all.
> :>
> :> If you had been in my class, I would have made you cry. Every semester
I
> :> do it to at least one schmuck who thinks he can defeat me.
>
> : Oh, please. I don't cry because an asshole professor doesn't want to
listen,
> : I either prove him/her wrong or prove him/her to be the obstenant
asshole
> : that he/she appears to be.
>
> Since most of my colleagues and I have been experts in our fields before
> our students were out of diapers, I've yet to know a professor who has
> been proven wrong by a student.
I've proven MANY teachers wrong, since grade school. History teachers, math
teachers, science teachers, I think the only ones I wasn't able to get was
my semester course in Psychology senior year and the English lit/Greek
mythology teacher of the same year.
> :> : Since you are a profesor of Japanese history (and I feel
> :> : genuinely sorry for any students) you should know this pretty well
sums
> : it
> :> : up.
> :>
> :> But it doesn't. Please go back do discussing topics of which you
possess
> :> more knowledge, like your foreskin.
>
> : Well, it's obvious you aren't a good teacher since you obviously don't
pay
> : attention to details, since I have stated many times on this board that
I
> : was circumcised at birth. Maybe if you got your head out of your ass,
you
> : would see that just because you're the teach, doesn't make you always
right.
>
> I'm sorry. I meant to say your knowledge of the foreskins of other men.
> BTW, my ass is very warm.
Now that's just sick. And, your innuendo aside, I know the workings of a
foreskin in general, I've never handled one "up close and personal," as it
were.
--
Y2K...@y2kevin.com
: <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
:> Chazz <Chazb...@moc.loa> saw fit to say:
:> : <Y2K...@Y2Kevin.com> wrote in message
:> : news:8l31ve$b1p$1...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
:>
:> :> No, it isn't. Fascism is a very specific term. IT's origins are 20th
:> :> century Italian. It was a plebian movement in origin, directed and
:> :> financed by big capitalist powers. It issued forth from the petty
:> :> bourgeoisie, the slum proletariat, and even to a certain extent from
: the
:> :> proletarian masses.
:> : fas·cism (fshzm)
:> : n.
:>
:> : 1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a
:> : dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the
: opposition
:> : through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent
:> : nationalism and racism.
:> : 2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a
: system
:> : of government.
:>
:> : Oppressive, dictatorial control.
:>
:> This describes many governments which are not fascist.
:>
:> : Taken from dictionary.com Are you saying this does not describe WWII
: Japan?
:>
:> That definiton does not. You should also bear in mind that dictionary.com
:> is not the font of political knowledge or theory. I counter you with the
:> roots of Italian fascism and you respond with a definition from
:> dictionary.com? What kind of student are you? Could you even understand
:> the vocabulary of my previous post?
: I can and I do, what I am saying is that the ROOTS of Fascism does not
: necessarily equate with its current meaning.
Your posts have yet to betray this fact.
: A Nazi is, in fact, someone who
: supported the German National Socialst party in WWII, but it has come to
: mean a general term for a racist.
Actually, it doesn't. I have never know a black racist to be called a
Nazi. You are a fool.
: That's not how it STARTED, and that's not
: what it's SUPPOSED to be, but that's what it is.
Actually, no. Usage does not determine the definition of words.
:> :> The genuine basis for fascism is the petty bourgeoisie. In italy, it
:> :> has a very large base - the petty bourgeoisie of the towns and cities,
:> :> and the peasantry. To be sure, a sense of strong nationalism is to be
:> :> found in the fascist regime but such is the case of all authoritarian
:> :> governments. For an example of this, we need look only to communism,
: which
:> :> is the political opposite of fascism. Marx' slogan was "workers of the
:> :> world unite!", with the goal of NO nations. Yet, every country which
: has
:> :> had a communist revolution, Russia, China, Vietnam and so on, has had a
:> :> nationalist core. American nationalism is perhaps the fiercest in the
:> :> world, yet it is not fascist. Fascism does not equal extreme
: nationalism.
:> :> Not at all.
:> :>
:> :> If you had been in my class, I would have made you cry. Every semester
: I
:> :> do it to at least one schmuck who thinks he can defeat me.
:>
:> : Oh, please. I don't cry because an asshole professor doesn't want to
: listen,
:> : I either prove him/her wrong or prove him/her to be the obstenant
: asshole
:> : that he/she appears to be.
:>
:> Since most of my colleagues and I have been experts in our fields before
:> our students were out of diapers, I've yet to know a professor who has
:> been proven wrong by a student.
: I've proven MANY teachers wrong, since grade school. History teachers, math
: teachers, science teachers, I think the only ones I wasn't able to get was
: my semester course in Psychology senior year and the English lit/Greek
: mythology teacher of the same year.
Please give an example of when you have proven a teacher wrong. I can see
it now...your teacher is discussing politcal theory and you pipe in with
dictionary.com.
:> :> : Since you are a profesor of Japanese history (and I feel
:> :> : genuinely sorry for any students) you should know this pretty well
: sums
:> : it
:> :> : up.
:> :>
:> :> But it doesn't. Please go back do discussing topics of which you
: possess
:> :> more knowledge, like your foreskin.
:>
:> : Well, it's obvious you aren't a good teacher since you obviously don't
: pay
:> : attention to details, since I have stated many times on this board that
: I
:> : was circumcised at birth. Maybe if you got your head out of your ass,
: you
:> : would see that just because you're the teach, doesn't make you always
: right.
:>
:> I'm sorry. I meant to say your knowledge of the foreskins of other men.
:> BTW, my ass is very warm.
: Now that's just sick. And, your innuendo aside, I know the workings of a
: foreskin in general, I've never handled one "up close and personal," as it
: were.
Well, YOU'RE the one who pointed out that I like to keep my head in my
ass. I just thought you might like to know why.
: --
Chazz
news:8l4evs$gan$3...@lendl.cc.emory.edu...
I can see you making a student cry, I honestly can. I've seen it before, and
it's always the asshole who refuses to make the least concession that does
it. BTW, maybe it's just me, but making a student whom you are supposed to
be helping break down in tears doesn't exactly sound like something to be
proud of.
> : That's not how it STARTED, and that's not
> : what it's SUPPOSED to be, but that's what it is.
>
> Actually, no. Usage does not determine the definition of words.
Actually, it can. When a word or phrase is used in a certain way for long
enough, the meaning can be adopted as "official." If usage didn't determine
the meaning, we'd all still be making obscure noises and not understanding
each other, because there has to be a base of "this series of sounds means
this, this series of sounds means that." When new information or
circumstances come up a definition may have to be changed, and in the case
of theoretical cases the definition by nature has to be flexible.
Let me see, I can remember several cases of proving math teachers'
computations wrong, I corrected my physics teacher when he mistaught
Einstein's famous (or maybe infamous) E=MCsquared, I demonstrated several
techniques to my various programming teachers that they insisted were
impossible, would you like me to continue?
[ending nonsense cropped]
Ma...@notatthelabyrinthe.net
Chazz wrote:
It's not a matter of getting wet, it's staying wet. A circumcised penis
> generates more friction than an intact one, therefore will not only need
> more lubrication at the start, but will require more lube to be added more
> frequently as it will also rub it away more quickly. Whether that comes from
> the woman's natural excretions or a tube isn't important.
Every time a cut cock exits, it brings with it moisture which evaporates in the
air causing more dryness.
>
wadi
<Ma...@notatthelabyrinthe.net> wrote in message
news:3978A1F5...@notatthelabyrinthe.net...
>
[snip]
>
> Every time a cut cock exits, it brings with it
moisture which evaporates in the
> air causing more dryness.
>
You mean like some "quick dry" substance? ... LOL
... go sell that crock of shit someplace else.
Dr. Coonie Street
Ma...@notatthelabyrinthe.net wrote:
>
>
> Chazz wrote:
> It's not a matter of getting wet, it's staying wet. A circumcised
penis
>
> > generates more friction than an intact one, therefore will not only
need
> > more lubrication at the start, but will require more lube to be
added more
> > frequently as it will also rub it away more quickly. Whether that
comes from
> > the woman's natural excretions or a tube isn't important.
>
evaporates in the
> air causing more dryness.
>
Could cut cock be linked with the climatic diasters of the mid and
southwest ?
--
Circumcision is the largest scale medical and ethics fraud of all time.
Dr. Coonie Street
"wadi" <wa...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> <Ma...@notatthelabyrinthe.net> wrote in message
> news:3978A1F5...@notatthelabyrinthe.net...
> >
> [snip]
> >
> moisture which evaporates in the
> > air causing more dryness.
> >
>
> ... go sell that crock of shit someplace else.
>
Perhaps this is why in the regions of Africa were circumcision is
routine there has been a climatic degredation from lust forest to
flea infested desert? LOL ?
We need to a study very soon on this profound finding. In fact just look
at the middle east.. sand every-where and not a drop to drink.
Nature finds a balance. If the Jews really wish a green and lust
homeland
they should give up circumcision immediately. In 1,000 years the garden
of Eden will return.
--
Circumcision is the largest scale medical and ethics fraud of all time.
tom_d_...@my-deja.com
prh...@bitstream.net (Paul Hagen) wrote:
> In article <395EAE72...@your-e-mail.invalid>,
> I-don't-w...@your-e-mail.invalid wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking of the USA in comparison to many other countries. Is
there
> > a link between being a gun nut and being circumcised? Maybe it is
the
> > subconscious trying to compensate for the loss, even if the person
in
> > question seems to think they enjoy their circumcision, deep down,
even
> > if they can't admit it to themself, they might not be. Also a gun
could
> > ease a sense of vulnerability resulting from the circumcised male's
> > painful assualt at birth.
>
by
> men with foreskins. Our foreskinned American forefathers were
apparently
> reacting to the oppressive nature of the foreskinned governments
they'd
> left behind across The Big Pond. Could there be a relationship between
> foreskins and oppressive governments that limit personal freedom? (I
doubt
> it, but couldn't resist following one ridiculous assertion with
another.)
>
> OK, so now "Doggie Dicks For All" (who has a foreskin) has blamed the
> perennial love affair between Americans and guns (which I personally
do
> not share) on American circs. Others here have blamed circ for high
school
> shootings, global warming, and a diminished capacity to be a "fit
husbnd,
> father, and member of society." And **ALL** of these assertions have
come
> from U.S. guys who have foreskins (and grew up surrounded by mostly
circ'd
> peers). Maybe it is the subconscious trying to compensate for feeling
left
> out. Even if the guys in question seem to think they enjoy their
> foreskins, deep down, even if they can't admit it to themselves, they
> might not be as happy as they INSIST (and relentlessly keep INSISTING)
> that they are.
>
> Most circ'd guys don't seem to have a problem with the presence of
> foreskins in their midst, or with parents who choose foreskin over
circ
> for their boys, so why do these foreskinned guys have such a problem
with
> circ?
>
> As for the handful of circ'd guys here who are mad at mommy and daddy
> about the (well-intended) decision they made, I'm betting that if they
> still had their foreskins, they'd have found something alse to be mad
at
> mommy and daddy about - and (cruel irony) some of them might be even
be
> writing in with questions about painful foreskin retraction, phimosis,
> tearing and bleeding, or recurring irritation and infections.
>
> The good news is that, outside of this contentious little backwater
of the
> Internet, MOST guys, both circ'd and with foreskins, are happy with
the
> status their parents chose for them, and they assume that guys with
the
> opposite status are happy too. Just another individual difference,
and a
> minor one at that.
>
I hope the immediately preceding logical and well reasoned post will
calm some of the hyperbolic rhetoric vomited all over this topic by
persons with more of an axe to grind (and smegma to clean up) then they
have data or common sense. I have read about half of the posts
generated by "Doggie Dicks for All's" screed and have yet to find
someone contradicting with reliable evidence the oft heard datum that
penile cancer does not occur in circumsised males. If true, in my
opinion, it is a compelling justification for uncircumsised males to
hike themseselves down to a clinic and get that job done. While much
in sympathy with the notion this elective procedure should always be
left to the delibration of an adult in charge of there own body, I feel
any actual attempt to halt the practice by the govenment or
organization having the political sanction to do so (the AMA) would
intrude too greatly on parent's rights to raise their children as they
see fit. The parents of a child overwhelmingly have the most invested
in a child, emotionally, morally, and financially. I will not yield
but that they have an all but literally life and death authority over a
child.
In any case, I doubt that any statistically meaningful study of
the question can be made, but please consider this; if any essentially
cosmetic surgery can be made on a child that in later life encourages
such an ethically responsibly desire as a need to acquire militarily
competent firearms, the same being indispensible to self defense and
political freedom, it should be mandatory.
Chazz
news:8lipl1$kea$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> I hope the immediately preceding logical and well reasoned post will
> calm some of the hyperbolic rhetoric vomited all over this topic by
> persons with more of an axe to grind (and smegma to clean up) then they
> have data or common sense. I have read about half of the posts
> generated by "Doggie Dicks for All's" screed and have yet to find
> someone contradicting with reliable evidence the oft heard datum that
> penile cancer does not occur in circumsised males. If true, in my
> opinion, it is a compelling justification for uncircumsised males to
> hike themseselves down to a clinic and get that job done. While much
> in sympathy with the notion this elective procedure should always be
> left to the delibration of an adult in charge of there own body, I feel
> any actual attempt to halt the practice by the govenment or
> organization having the political sanction to do so (the AMA) would
> intrude too greatly on parent's rights to raise their children as they
> see fit. The parents of a child overwhelmingly have the most invested
> in a child, emotionally, morally, and financially. I will not yield
> but that they have an all but literally life and death authority over a
> child.
The fact of the matter is that it has not been proven that circumcision in
fact reduces the risk of penile cancer, only that OF THOSE IN THE SURVEY
those who were circumcised had a lower rate. Correlation, however, does not
intone causation. Now, please answer this question: why is it that
circumcision, which has not been PROVEN to have any benefits only theorized
with some pretty shakey studies and surveys, is the only elective surgery
which does not legally require the prior consent of the patient? Most of the
"benefits" are minor and much more easily acheived and surpassed by living a
smart, healthy lifestyle.
> In any case, I doubt that any statistically meaningful study of
> the question can be made, but please consider this; if any essentially
> cosmetic surgery can be made on a child that in later life encourages
> such an ethically responsibly desire as a need to acquire militarily
> competent firearms, the same being indispensible to self defense and
> political freedom, it should be mandatory.
Alright.... let me get this traight... you're saying not only that guns are
indispensible to self defense (ever hear of karate?) and political freedom,
but that it's a better idea to cut off healthy and fully functioning tissue
to give them a sense of "ethical responsibility" than for the parents to
just teach it to them? I'm already thoroughly disgusted with USAmerican
society's "quick fix" attitude towards everything, including children, but
that is just assanine.
In His Image
> Perhaps this is why in the regions of Africa were circumcision is
>routine there has been a climatic degredation from lust forest to
Is this vernacular for the pubic region?? ;-)
-Image