Skin bridge (adult): To remove or not to remove?
a...@a.com
bridge until now. Should I get it removed or not? Is this a very
straight forward and fast procedure and can be done by any urologist?
Thanks!
Neal Smith
Well, it depends on how bad it is and how you feel about it.
I oppose infant circumcision, but if an adult wants to get himself
circumcused, to me that's his decision. Same here. You evaluate how
you feel about the skin bridge and you make your choice.
I think a urologist might be a good place to start.
Go here:
www.familypractice.com/journal/2002/ v15.n06/1506.08/1506-08.pdf
That should be all one link on one line. If it won't work, go to
Google and search for "office management of penile skin bridges"
That should be unique enough to bring up that single paper.
It apparently is not a particularly complicated procedure.
Good luck.
Neal
Josema
"Neal Smith" <nealUNDERSCOREsmithATrocketmailDOTcom> escribió en el mensaje
news:9f7jjvgq1fc348hct...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:20:35 GMT, a...@a.com wrote:
>
> >I had a bad circumcision as a kid and didn't realize I have a skin
> >bridge until now. Should I get it removed or not? Is this a very
> >straight forward and fast procedure and can be done by any urologist?
> >Thanks!
>
> Well, it depends on how bad it is and how you feel about it.
>
> I oppose infant circumcision, but if an adult wants to get himself
> circumcused, to me that's his decision. Same here. You evaluate how
> you feel about the skin bridge and you make your choice.
>
> I think a urologist might be a good place to start.
Skin bridge is usually the results of a bad circumcision. This man is
already circumcised, Neal, so he has to decide if fixing the problem the
"problem solutionator" created.
Skin bridges are usually an infection focus, and sometimes makes sex act
painful, unaesthetic and umpleasant, id depends on the skin bridge degree
you have. It's not difficoult to fix by a good surgeon (urologist), check
one on your zone.
Cheers,
Josema
Winding Highway
>Date: 8/13/2003
>Skin bridges are usually an infection focus, and sometimes makes sex act
>painful, unaesthetic and umpleasant
Sounds like a foreskin, so I would recommend removal.
anthony baker
i too thought my skin bridge was normal and that every man too had one
a...@a.com wrote in message news:<06mijv42en7kjod45...@4ax.com>...
Hugh Young
said:
They seem remarkably common. There are more skin bridges than any
other kind of complication at
http://www.circumstitions.com/Botched.html
Actor Rupert Everett has one. Porn "actor" Marcus Iron has two.
Serialpest
Young" <hu...@buGARzz.neBAGEt.nz> wrote:
You find this out when you were going down on them? Lucky that because
usually you're facing the other way to see aren't you?
Intoxicatingmoon
>> I had a bad circumcision as a kid and didn't realize I have a skin
>> bridge until now. Should I get it removed or not? Is this a very
>> straight forward and fast procedure and can be done by any urologist?
>> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
More than likely the circ was fine, the parents just need to push the remaining
skin back once in awhile. Actually the same thing can happen in uncut boys too!
Go to an MD..10min no big deal.
Josema
1.Skin bridges are due BAD CIRCUMCISIONS only. You learn nothing about the
links and information hundreds of times posted here?. Simply do a search on
google and learn before writing nonsense.
2. Bridges are not phimosis, bridges can't be cured "pushing the remaining
skin back once in a while"...(in most circumcisions, specially on Merkin
circs, that are brutal, what "remaining" skin, silly?). Solution for bridges
is surgical only. It's fast, but surgical, and most men don't even realize
they have this ugly and sometimes dangerous bridge problem. They simply
think "every dick is like this..."
3. Bridges can't happen on uncut boys since foreskin naturally and fully
separates from glans without bridges if this is left alone.
4. Don't try to deny bridges as a problem connected with bad circumcisions.
Cheers,
Josema
Hugh Young
>3. Bridges can't happen on uncut boys since foreskin naturally and fully
>separates from glans without bridges if this is left alone.
Yes, if they are left alone, but they can happen on intact penises.
The explanation is that the foreskin must have been prematurely
forcibly retracted. The moral is the same, JUST LEAVE THEM ALONE.
>4. Don't try to deny bridges as a problem connected with bad circumcisions.
Jose, trying to talk sense to the likes of IM, WH, SP, Oc, and of
course W, is like trying to teach a pig to sing. Just filter them.
Josema
"Hugh Young" <hu...@buGARzz.neBAGEt.nz> escribió en el mensaje
news:3f4497dc...@news.buzz.net.nz...
> On 21 Aug 2003 00:36:11 -0500, "Josema" <a@b.c> said:
>
> >3. Bridges can't happen on uncut boys since foreskin naturally and fully
> >separates from glans without bridges if this is left alone.
>
> Yes, if they are left alone, but they can happen on intact penises.
> The explanation is that the foreskin must have been prematurely
> forcibly retracted. The moral is the same, JUST LEAVE THEM ALONE.
Yes, perhaps this can happen due to ignorant dads or moms obsessed about a
baby penis not looking like the nude and dry stick his dad's is. This drives
them to forcibly retract foreskin, that can SERIOUSLY damage the glans
tissue. Only one word: ignorance about male anathomy, in both people who has
been circumcised (even ignoring millions of men around the world have
foreskin) and pediatricians who don't know other than the mutilated penis
(their own first) and can't give advise about the intact state of a babyboy.
If this is left alone, nothing happens. Phimosis is a rare problem that, if
in teenage didn't correct itself (most of times does), some creams and
stretching can fix. In EXTREME cases surgery (a partial circumcision enough
for the glans to have free way out, not the carnage Merkins apply to the
smallest problem...) can help. This phimosis obsession is silly.
Circumcision itself causes more problems, counting dryness, bridge problems,
bad circumcisions and unsensitiviness than being intact causes itself.
> >4. Don't try to deny bridges as a problem connected with bad
circumcisions.
>
> Jose, trying to talk sense to the likes of IM, WH, SP, Oc, and of
> course W, is like trying to teach a pig to sing. Just filter them.
Yes, I agree, but sometimes one must reply them, unless we want them to
spread misinformation every time they want. They don't cheat us, but cheat
others who come here looking for information or guide, this is when we must
drop something stating they are wrong.
Their misinformation can be replied. That we must not reply is their free
flame or personal attack
Cheers,
Josema
W
a...@a.com
Can skin bridge removal be done by a general pratice family doctor or
it must be done by an urologist?
drewwo...@gmail.com
spencer...@gmail.com
wosz...@yahoo.com
Pat Lastingham
> I have a skind bridge and my urologist offered me treatment with emla cream which freezes the area and he said hew will tear it after the hour of applying. This sounds nrutal to me and im scared. Does thi method seem to be ok
Some earlier contributors here are under the impression than adhesions happen only in circumcised men, as a result of improper healing after the procedure. In fact the condition also occurs in uncircumcised men, as a result of improper separation of the foreskin from the penis during childhood.
