Conservative or Liberal?
Nomen Nescio
determined by both universal `laws' of cause and affect/effect and social
concensus. The affects and meanings of any action are due to the order of
the material creation of universe and we are not wholely responsible for
those by that. Society asserts what desires and/or means it will respect,
yet assertive, dominating individuals commonly establish their own values,
attitudes, ways, etc. upon the society. Indeed, each individual and group
act to assert their own moral, political values, etc., and democracy
supposes the majority will effect those `standards', whilst non-democracies
will see only individuals or minority groups do so. Standards established
form the `status-quo' and when the status-quo serves the majority, the
majority's welfare determines when change to those standards is desireable.
Commonly, the status-quo persists in so much as the majority are satisfied
with their current havings,but as acts for change require ones suffering
labour and loss, yet only others know gain, they are opposed; the majority
see no selfish gain, but only loss and/or suffering. By this, status-quo-
of-majority only finds change when the majority suffers.(individuals and/or
minority groups can also change the status-quo;`elitism')
The elements of body, mind, and Heart establish our personal and group
identity, and our value to the society is founded upon the meanings of
these elements. Healthy, pleasing, strong,etc. bodies have particular type
and quantity of value, as does clear mindedness and social compassion. The
male/chauvanist identity commonly asserts his unique social value as by his
strength, albeit such often means muscular strength. The female/feminist
identity commonly asserts her unique value to society from the Heartful,
sensual meaning she has. (the name `beauty' commonly expresses the
balanced/fair, pleasing meanings of one's face and hair, and the gradient
of `homely' to `beautious' is a discrimination (difference of values) that
derives from the body-politic, including bodily skin color, eye shape,etc.)
Conservative and liberal philosophies derive from the Heart, wherein
supposed good and right is the product of ones own rational, emotional
response to various issues. Generally, conservatives assert their right to
place-first their own life, needs, and identity, and have a NARROW `list'
of good by their own values as standard. Liberals serve the fact their own
life needs others and they must protect those differing identities/values,
forming a BROAD `list' of moral good by valuing the opposite-gender
identity, the basis for all varied multitude. The names right-wing and
left-wing derive from the issue of self-concern versus care for the other,
and right-wing is self concern. Of this, left-wing conservatives maybe as
the religious whom deny themself to give to the needs of others, or
right-wing liberals, as sexual hedonists, serving good as more only for
more sexual pleasure.
(There is no freedom on/by the earth, for all are victimized and suffered
by the tyranny of it's evil. The earth is a rich multitude of selves in
selfishness and wanting of more, all existing in a limited and wonderous
identity variety and in groups, competing against and preying upon each
other for the provided and limited benefits of this life, yet also caring
and giving to one another. We live with a small set of pre-determined
values, and ways and means for their satisfaction are also pre-determined.
One persons or groups gain is anothers loss and/or suffering, and the
grievances and conflicts of individuals and groups are both normal and
perpetual to the earth; never will their be peace on earth, the end to
poverty, nor any true social justice. The need and right of the self to
love and protect it's life is the foundation for all social/political/moral
law and institute, being also the rational basis of the conservative,
right-wing self-first philosophy. The means to do so is only by also
protecting the lives of other differing and competing others, being the
basis of the liberal, left-wing philosophy. Those cultures whom achieve
excellence mutually co-operate, contribute, and share with differing and
competing identity groups/cultures. The `everyone one for themself'
right-wing conservative/reform/nazi culture falls into stagnant
traditionalism, fundamentalism, and identity-oneness, even as religious
zealots force fear, obedience, and superstition upon all they can.
Alternately, liberalism's freedom-obsession attacks the vitally healthy and
necessary values, standards, and `anchors' of the culture and society,
acting to `seduce' and manyways cause the conformity of others. Societies
`ping-pong' between extreme liberalism and conservatism (aristocracy), but
neither achieve social justice and societies move back again by suffering.)
(The duty to not harm the life of another is only morally, politically
meaningful when they whom violate that duty are themselves unrewarded.
Of this, MORAL JUSTICE IS FOUNDED UPON THE DUALISM OF LAWFUL LIVING AND
UNLAWFUL HARMING, wherein `punishment' is established from the right of
means to the protection of the continuance of life. (The intention to then
stop all harm upon life is frustrated if justice needs punishment. However,
police should not suppose themselves self-appointed/vigilanty judgers and
punishers. POLICE LOVE TO HATE AND HURT/SUFFER BAD and FIRSTLY CONDEMNING
ANOTHER IS VITAL TO THAT. As police serve their own desire for superior
moral status, praise, and paycheck,etc. hating bad, they are rewarded to
condemn others and this forms a habit for eager condemnation, gross
intolerance, and narrow-minded `black or white' logic. Police condem
opponents, readily confuse arbitrary, tentative political law with moral
good, and `shieldedly' pursue to suffer others as if they are only loving
others. Social goodness and value co-relate with greatest moral virtue as
also greatest social value, sothen devaluing implies incrimination/
corruption/evil and property implies virtue. When social value is judged an
issue of property and police-income derives from tax-contributions, they of
less property contribute less, as if then being a greater moral evil, being
why police often morely prejudge and assault the poor than middle and upper
classes.)
(Commonly, they whom value, do, and `enjoy' strengthliness to suffer others
doso for Heartwise excitement and superior social status.(hockey-fans,
etc., willful that others suffer for to add to their status and only from a
payment) The self-first-for-more/all-for-self-alone is the basis of the
conservative, reform, and nazi philosophy, and these eagerly attack the
goodness/value of others to `sanctify' their caring-less and harming.
`Indoctrination' ceremony/ritual attacks the Heartful as `weak', cowardly,
effeminate, and undue STATUS and benefits. Also, when ones genuine identity
derives from their Heart, that first identity must be changed, so ones
image (haircut,shave) name (nick-naming), values, attitudes, friendships,
etc. must change. (Also common to many cults is the deprivation of food and
sleep to soby overcome the mind's grip on truth and logic, enabling
psychotic logic to be `installed'.) This selfishness by devaluing,
carelessness, and/or hate serves the intent, and delusion, only
`the other' will suffer, refuses to relate-to/share-feelings-of victims,
but when the agony, horror, and stench suffers themself also and beyond
endurance (war), they regret it, stop it, and deny their carelessness for
to join to want and serve love)
(Sociopathy is intimately joined by self-hate and refusal to care-for other
person's lives, needs, and sufferings, to soby pursue selfish more from
all manner of harm and neglect, often wearing symbols of death and harm.
Ammoral rationalists detach from others feelings to pacify their own
Hearts; psychopathy refuses to share the feelings and sufferings of it's
victims; violence-machismo disregards suffering in it's quest for honour,
valour, glory, etc., making itself fearless, merciless, quickly-condemming,
as utterly bad and with no need for evidence and knowledge/truth, and
eagerly driven to forcing violence, murder, rape, torture, and destruction
for it's glorious victory/status. (It's strength-obsession competes with
Heartfulness as an opposite, where Heartfulness becomes weakness and it
worships strength/fears weakness. All such rationale forces an attack
against the very Heart of life, wherein the Heartful are devalued, shamed,
ridiculed, and otherways opposed) Socio-pathy derives from the absence of
the family's valuing of the self, even the WHOLE OF SOCIETY sees no value
in them, albeit some is also the welcome rationale for careless, harmful
selfish more.)
(Although crime's future offence may seem certain, the quantity of harm to
the moment of harm against crime is definite. Of this, all harmful actions
against crime add to the whole quantity of harm altogether and a net
increase in harm occurs, but the incident rate/velocity of harm/evil is
slowed. Violence, police-violence, war, etc. are altimes an increase to the
velocity of evil, wherein evil confronts evil to reduce evil, but the
intent is clearly self-contradicting. Police judge others by their
carelessness of others, but then their hatred of carelessness becomes
itself criminal harm. (and when used by the elite to hate/force critics,
their evil gains velocity.) In whole meaning,all violence is evil and they
whom suppose praise, honour, and glory by it are also victims by it; life's
foundation is love. Although harm is materially forced and it's net meaning
may reduce the incident-rate/velocity of moral evil, it is falsely named a
moral good, being altimes only a net increase in moral evil. (The police
`law and order' state is a dead, mechanical, absolutist `walk-don't walk'
society and must never be established. Their current labour-movement acts
of aggressive government campaign contributions, opponents-attacks, etc.,
must be seen for what they are; efforts for the police state)
(Aboriginal remedy for offenders and victims has good wisdom, for when
one does not perceive the suffering of the other, that suffering does
seemingly not exist and the offender will not take that suffering upon
their own Heart. Many whom offend do so in blindness, but if their soul has
love, it has compassion, remorse, regret, and promise/intent; healing!))
It must reason, God's will is our being in life and we only thank/love God
by protecting our more-being in life, so by to act to attain it's
continuance. We must love ourself to be healthy/peaceful and we most love
ourself acting for our perfect health and eternal life. When we don't act
for more health and life-time, we then also act for sickness and death,
expressing sick hate against ourself. We must love others to protect the
dualism/twoness that all life is and when we harm their lives, we harm our
own, even as to care-less of others is to careless of ourself, expressing
hate against ourself and all others and desiring we and they know suffering
and death. We must hate evil to love life and we must love others to love
ourself. When we most love others,we then most love ourself, then most
loving God and God's gift of life. One most loves themself first loving
others when material self-first more is both life and death. If we don't
most love ourself, we then careless of ourself and all others, desiring we
and they know sickness, suffering, and death. We most love life and God
when most loving others!
Desire/belief in heaven supports the social duty to protect the life of
others from harm as love for others intends to mean. To not believe/desire
heaven supports the right to care less of others, but also others have the
right to care-less of oneself. Love's foundation is love for ones being in
life and the will for continuance in life, both needy of the life and
welfare of others, yet all earthly living leads into death. The prophets
assert our `Father' loves us and desires our health and continuance, for
God is opposed to our knowing/experience of death, illness, and suffering.
All earthly act leads into death and we can only protect our life by
renouncing earthly life. We only act to protect our health and continuance
by love for our life, but our health and continuance needs others and we
must love and protect their health and continuance to then ever protect our
own. The earth forces careless and harmful social living and we cannot
protect the other's lives by that, thereby neither our own. They whom live
this earthly life must care-less of others from lesser to greater amount,
even as I have described the harms and conspiracy of the elite. To protect
the lives of others we must deny/refuse the earth and believe GOD PROTECTS
THAT SACRIFICE BY HEAVEN, wherein is the only place for our perfect health
and peace from evil. Our only means to love our gift of life is to most
protect it and we doso most protecting/wanting the lives of others, soby to
most love God; refusing the earth returns one to God's company; true love
wants more company with, not less.
--------------------
I am `moonbeam', reflecting the light of the `son' for to fight against
the darkness the earth is. (it's daily revolving to life and death,
light and dark, health and sickness, and summer and winter; to want
it's goods is to accept it's evils; to oppose it's evils is to deny
it's goods) I have posted the file `Creation,Human Identity, and Suffering'
in the group `alt.religion.clergy' for to offer you my complete
learnings and experience/testimony/witness of my `uncommon' studentship
with God, Jesus, and Heaven's company. There are many issues, apart from
the cross, being explained, and I believe all peoples can take some value
from this . (please, the likeness of the name moonbeam to `moonies' is
unfortunate and I have no knowledge nor affiliation with them, nor ANY
association with any religious organisation nor institute; I stand alone)