Uncomfortable Tales
Frankie Lee
that of holocaust deniers.
He had sinisterly instigated that parents who discouraged their
children to learn ET should be arrested, and he spread hatreds all
around by his anti-religion speech. Since he had believed that one
would become oblivion upon death, his deceits on the Computer
simulations of the eyes as documented by Ann Coulter,godless,The
Church of liberalism, PAGE 208: why should he fear about anything
after death?
The "mindsets" of Hitler and Mao as propagated by him for our world
today, it is their evil logic and rationales which became popular. His
invisible messages, just like Darwin, one can throw morals out of the
window.
The morals of God are to be override by the morals of man; this is the
most evil and dangerous precedents ever known to mankind, proven and
tested by Hitler, Mao and Stalin and Communism and yet he dares to
talk about it.
How does one not to have known such simple reasons: If you believe
that God created Adam and Eve, and all Christians must believe such
historical accounts by Moses, it is absolutely impossible to embrace
ET?
If a Christian does not accept the stories of Creation of God, he is
no Christian. Period.
Variations of species (or micro-evolution), it is understood to be
natural.
The evils of ET are to mask human Conscience, harden its convicting
power, and strengthen the resolve to be immoral and one can do evils
with impunity, so to speak. In contrast to the words of God that say:
Everyone will stand in judgment before the Creator, giving accounts of
what one had done on earth.
The testimony of truths in Genesis are so powerful and its prophecy
never fail has been known to mankind ever since, and only Idiots
cannot acknowledge it.
1,"ye shall surely die”. Man’s appointment of death is a fact and all
those who deny the Genesis accounts never dispute it. Instead of
praising its accuracy of prophecy for man, why attempt to say it is
fairy tale? Does human die then?
2, Fruits and Animals yielding to its kinds; an observations by all
studies confirmed such facts, in the Bible. Scientists have been
surprise by its meticulous accuracies of a written document of truths
rather than dismiss it as mere stories.
3, The consciousness of shame by being naked after Eve, the mother of
human race, felt it, after she had sinned. Man and woman always felt
shame when being physically exposed, caught without clothes (or when
our sins were exposed), and such consciousness stays within our
nature.
4, Birth pangs. Only the deniers of holocaust would say that woman
don't suffer child-birth. There has been no document or books ever
explained, or could explain reasons of such matters except the Holy
Bible, and dare anyone trivialize it.
Most die-hard Nay-Sayers who wish to distort the Bible, by not
believing these accounts such at Eve's sins led to consciousness of
shame or birth pangs, but our day to day observation had seen a
fulfillment of the prophecies of God.
Our imaginations can say: probably this or probably that to discount
the Bible's prophecy, but it is still in the sense of make-up tales to
discredit the testimony of God.
Can anything be clearer than that?
I raised a woman who was dead, by prayer and "rebuke the angel of
death”, and she opened her eyes, and recover, now living. The
incidents had passed, and all I can offer is a testimony to the
events.
Since it was Jesus who heals the sick and raised the dead in
actuality, while He was on earth, and today He is seen to be doing
that daily, unabated for the past 2000 years, the issues were; Can He
do it again through many of his servants and children? Countless of
documented facts revealing the explosion of miracles, signs and
wonders which came upon to our world stage, it is observable,
testable,REPEATABLE and verifiable.
The difference is, have you read, verify, seen or heard about it? The
evidence of God is all over the places, and the main issues were: have
you verified it, study it and know about it? There is no shortage of
evidence of God that demands a verdict.
The Bible never runs away. Libraries of documented accounts are still
there. The Churches are all around. Pastors are still there. Jesus is
still alive and is here among us now and He could be at
everywhere.Human can still open their mouth and pray to
Jesus.Christmas is coming soon.
The acts of Jesus, since He had ascended to Heaven, but He did visits
our Earth often by appearing to many witnesses, confirming His words
again and again, not just one decades, or one's lifetime but many
lifetimes. How can one dispute a continual evidence of His deeds and
His presence here on earth? How can one who has not seen or felt His
presence, received His miracles, or studies into His supernatural
works among countless of people, by the (6000)2000 years of long
history, to dismiss it as untrue?
Albert Einstein wrote to his friend, said the most unthinkable words
as supposed by weird Intellectuals,” an inner voice told him that his
theory Quantum Mechanic is not complete yet".(Niels Bohr)
If Einstein were to tell it to the Academy of Science,of such
phenomenon,rather than his close friends,what would you think?
Dawk already said the most distinguish professor in Harvard to be
booted out for taking the Bible words as above sciences.
Einstein emphatically and seriously said that Jesus Christ is true. He
can never be myth. He is no myth.
Since no one on earth, ever, declared that he/she has the keys of
Life, Death and Hell, except the Lord Jesus Christ, would you seek
someone who doesn't have it, knew next to nothing about it, a nut like
Hawking to show you the way?
Like Kennedy’s death bed, a liberal, he requested someone who knows
about God to his side.(His impending death was also prophesied way
before it actually took place. The Bible said it. (A pastor predicted
recently, of such event too, coming to world’s stage.It happened just
like Micheal Jackson's death)
Either you believe my words or disbelieve it, that’s all. Even the
most stupid Lawyers would want a witness to be credible, reliable and
truthful; unlike crooks like Dog making fake theories.
By not understanding the deceits of ET,and what is crafted stories,
unobserved evo process, and inability to pronounce bombastic names
given to bones and skeleton, their own description of tales, does that
makes one uneducated and ignorant?
ET is the Redundant, totally useless theory for humankind, brought
forth no benefits to civilization but hatred and strife and atheists,
and on top of that, atrocities of a most disgusting kinds. Of all the
fields of sciences, this so-called ET is in the wicked forms,(Others
is amoral) which actively encouraged wicked doers to further their
cause, without fear of punishment and to a God to account for.” Human
is a pitiless existence.”
Ever since the dawn of ET by Darwin, humanity sank to the lowest,
stoop to the lowest, and Genocides happen.
Hitler taught world leaders,” If a lie is repeated often enough, they
will believe in it.” Can you believe it, some folks wrote to me and
quote words of Hitler, and how he lied to be a Roman Catholic, the
Catholic never reject him as a Christian, and then to support the
logic that Hitler was a Christian?
Using lies from the most monstrous man of history to support the views
that Hitler was a Christian? Fully understanding that he lied about
his Faith? We saw his Aryan concept, Eugenics and propaganda, and how
he murdered countless of people and yet proponents of ET try to link
his lies about Faith to Christianity?
All of Hitler's works resemble to that of Darwinian Faith rather than
Christianity goes by works (deceits) alone.
Jesus teaches: Unless you are born again, you shall not see the
Kingdom of God.Nicodemus supposed that one goes back to the mother's
womb.
Jesus died on the cross to save; the crooks suppose that Christianity
is barbaric. Jesus reveals the truths of an eternity in Hell for
sinners; they look at His words, as mere threats.(What if, it is
true?)
Pretending that they didn't understand the Christian message, of how
the God of love came here to be a savior, not to judge them or condemn
them. Jesus' blood is able to cleanse sinners but some distort it to
some kind of unscientific practice, explain it in the natural realm.
What a way to confess ignorance!
Asking the blood of Jesus to cleanse your sins is through prayer,
calling upon Him, and that is all. Jesus will take care of the
spiritual thing.
The slanderer implied that, Christians are like cults, going to
physical sacrificial acts of blood, act it out like some, who beat
upon themselves, cut their own tongues, and to be crucified like
Jesus.
Jesus says: By the fruits, ye shall know the trees.
Frankie Lee
Singapore
Smiler
> Richard Dawkings equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
> that of holocaust deniers.
>
> He had sinisterly instigated that parents who discouraged their
> children to learn ET should be arrested, and he spread hatreds all
> around by his anti-religion speech. Since he had believed that one
> would become oblivion upon death, his deceits on the Computer
> simulations of the eyes as documented by Ann Coulter,godless,The
> Church of liberalism, PAGE 208: why should he fear about anything
> after death?
>
> The "mindsets" of Hitler and Mao as propagated by him for our world
> today, it is their evil logic and rationales which became popular. His
> invisible messages, just like Darwin, one can throw morals out of the
> window.
>
> The morals of God are to be override by the morals of man; this is the
> most evil and dangerous precedents ever known to mankind, proven and
> tested by Hitler, Mao and Stalin and Communism and yet he dares to
> talk about it.
>
> How does one not to have known such simple reasons: If you believe
> that God created Adam and Eve, and all Christians must believe such
> historical accounts by Moses, it is absolutely impossible to embrace
> ET?
The Pope doesn't believe in God?
He certainly accepts evolution as the process by which we all got here.
>
> If a Christian does not accept the stories of Creation of God, he is
> no Christian. Period.
So the Pope isn't a Christian. Tell that to the RCC.
>
> Variations of species (or micro-evolution), it is understood to be
> natural.
>
> The evils of ET are to mask human Conscience, harden its convicting
> power, and strengthen the resolve to be immoral and one can do evils
> with impunity, so to speak.
I didn't see any god punishing Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot.
> In contrast to the words of God that say:
First show evidence that there is any god, then show it's the one you
believe in, out of the myriad of gods invented by mankind.
> Everyone will stand in judgment before the Creator, giving accounts of
> what one had done on earth.
>
Your objective evidence for this is?
> The testimony of truths in Genesis are so powerful and its prophecy
> never fail has been known to mankind ever since, and only Idiots
> cannot acknowledge it.
Only idiots like you believe in fairy tales.
>
> 1,"ye shall surely die�. Man�s appointment of death is a fact and all
> those who deny the Genesis accounts never dispute it. Instead of
> praising its accuracy of prophecy for man, why attempt to say it is
> fairy tale? Does human die then?
Yep. They die, as do all living things. No gods needed.
>
> 2, Fruits and Animals yielding to its kinds; an observations by all
> studies confirmed such facts, in the Bible. Scientists have been
> surprise by its meticulous accuracies of a written document of truths
> rather than dismiss it as mere stories.
Give cites for these supposed scientists and their scientific evidences.
>
> 3, The consciousness of shame by being naked after Eve, the mother of
> human race, felt it, after she had sinned. Man and woman always felt
> shame when being physically exposed, caught without clothes (or when
> our sins were exposed), and such consciousness stays within our
> nature.
Indoctrination. Did the bare-breasted African women feel shame before they
were told about christinsanity?
>
> 4, Birth pangs. Only the deniers of holocaust would say that woman
> don't suffer child-birth. There has been no document or books ever
> explained, or could explain reasons of such matters except the Holy
> Bible, and dare anyone trivialize it.
As do most mammals. Try forcing a whole orange down your throat, without
feeling pain.
>
> Most die-hard Nay-Sayers who wish to distort the Bible, by not
> believing these accounts such at Eve's sins led to consciousness of
> shame or birth pangs, but our day to day observation had seen a
> fulfillment of the prophecies of God.
So you believe, but without any evidence.
>
> Our imaginations can say: probably this or probably that to discount
> the Bible's prophecy, but it is still in the sense of make-up tales to
> discredit the testimony of God.
Prove that the book of fairy tales, myths, contradictions and downright lies
you call the bible, or any other 'holy' book, was not written by humans. You
cannot use the book to prove that the book is true (circular reasoning) or
the same could be applied to any book of fiction.
> Can anything be clearer than that?
You cannot be clearer in showing that you're a moron of the highest order.
>
> I raised a woman who was dead, by prayer and "rebuke the angel of
> death�, and she opened her eyes, and recover, now living. The
> incidents had passed, and all I can offer is a testimony to the
> events.
So you can't prove that it ever happened. Why should I believe you?
>
> Since it was Jesus
Please show extra-biblical evidence that your Jesus character ever lived.
Why do we not hear of him in any other book but the wholly babble?
who heals the sick and raised the dead in
> actuality, while He was on earth, and today He is seen to be doing
> that daily, unabated for the past 2000 years, the issues were; Can He
> do it again through many of his servants and children? Countless of
> documented facts revealing the explosion of miracles, signs and
> wonders which came upon to our world stage, it is observable,
> testable,REPEATABLE and verifiable.
>
Unevidenced bullshit.
> The difference is, have you read, verify, seen or heard about it?
Does reading = believing in your world?
>The
> evidence of God is all over the places,
Only to deluded believers. Unless you can show me some objective, verifiable
evidence, I don't believe you.
> and the main issues were: have
> you verified it, study it and know about it? There is no shortage of
> evidence of God that demands a verdict.
Then present some objective, verifiable evidence so that I may examine it
and draw my own conclusions.
>
> The Bible never runs away. Libraries of documented accounts are still
> there.
Then please cite some that aren't in the bible.
> The Churches are all around.
But closing rapidly here.
> Pastors are still there.
The blind leading the blind.
> Jesus is
> still alive
Your objective, verifiable evidence for this is?
> and is here among us now
Your objective, verifiable evidence for this is?
> and He could be at
> everywhere.
But, more likely, nowhere.
> Human can still open their mouth and pray to
> Jesus.
Talking to yourself can be a sign of madness.
> Christmas is coming soon.
You mean Yule, the Pagan festival stolen by Christianity.
Plase explain why shepherds were watching their flocks by night, something
they only do in the lambing season which is springtime, in December when
your supposed Jesus was supposedly born?
>
> The acts of Jesus,
Fictional characters don't do 'acts'
> since He had ascended to Heaven,
Your evidence that such a place exists is?
> but He did visits
> our Earth often by appearing to many witnesses,
= hallucinations.
> confirming His words
Fictional characters don't speak any words.
> again and again, not just one decades, or one's lifetime but many
> lifetimes. How can one dispute a continual evidence of His deeds
Then please present this objective, verifiable evidence you claim to have.
and
> His presence here on earth?
What's his address? Can I visit him there?
> How can one who has not seen or felt His
> presence, received His miracles, or studies into His supernatural
> works among countless of people, by the (6000)2000 years of long
> history, to dismiss it as untrue?
>
For the very reason that we have not seen any evidence of this fairy tale
character.
> Albert Einstein wrote to his friend, said the most unthinkable words
> as supposed by weird Intellectuals,� an inner voice told him that his
> theory Quantum Mechanic is not complete yet".(Niels Bohr)
What leads you to equate 'inner voice' with your supposed god?
>
> If Einstein were to tell it to the Academy of Science,of such
> phenomenon,rather than his close friends,what would you think?
>
Although A. Eistein was a brilliant Physicist and Mathematician, he had no
qualifications in theology.
> Dawk already said the most distinguish professor in Harvard to be
> booted out for taking the Bible words as above sciences.
Care to translate that from gibberish into English?
>
> Einstein emphatically and seriously said that Jesus Christ is true.
Bullshit. He was born a Jew and was a Deist. He NEVER believed in your Jesus
character for one single moment of his life.
> He
> can never be myth. He is no myth.
Einstein or Jesus?
<rest of insane garbage snipped>
--
Smiler
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to
perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer
Olrik
> Richard Dawkings
That's Mr. Richard Dawkins to you, trolling fucktard.
> equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
> that of holocaust deniers.
And Dawkins' right. Do you deny gravity, trolling fucktard?
Now FOAD.
<snip long, endless cry for help>
Frankie Lee
> Frankie Lee wrote:
>
> The Pope doesn't believe in God?
> He certainly accepts evolution as the process by which we all got here.
***Here you proved it.Do you want me to explain it to you?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>If a Christian does not accept the stories of Creation of God, he is
> > no Christian. Period.
>
> So the Pope isn't a Christian. Tell that to the RCC.
***you have intelligently puts it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > The evils of ET are to mask human Conscience, harden its convicting
> > power, and strengthen the resolve to be immoral and one can do evils
> > with impunity, so to speak.
>
> I didn't see any god punishing Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot.
***So do I.
So what a good way to copy their footstep,and we won't see evidence of
God punishment them in Hell?
Think!You are praising my message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > In contrast to the words of God that say:
>
> First show evidence that there is any god, then show it's the one you
> believe in, out of the myriad of gods invented by mankind.
Reply: You have said it.There are myriad of gods invented by
mankind.There is some deceits somewhere,right?What evidence to say my
God is true and the rest are false?What kinds of proves you want?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Everyone will stand in judgment before the Creator, giving accounts of
> > what one had done on earth.
>
> Your objective evidence for this is?
***What kinds of objective evidence you want?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The testimony of truths in Genesis are so powerful and its prophecy
> > never fail has been known to mankind ever since, and only Idiots
> > cannot acknowledge it.
>
> Only idiots like you believe in fairy tales.
***In response to my messages,which had said that woman had birth
pangs from the Bible,and upon the issues which I relate,you called it
fairy tales,so what you are saying is----WOMEN DON'T HAVE BIRTH
PANGS.Have birth pangs are fairy tales...
Are you telling me,you are a fairy-tale nuts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 1,"ye shall surely die”. Man’s appointment of death is a fact and all
> > those who deny the Genesis accounts never dispute it. Instead of
> > praising its accuracy of prophecy for man, why attempt to say it is
> > fairy tale? Does human die then?
>
> Yep. They die, as do all living things. No gods needed.
***Are you saying then,the Bible is true and accurate,agree to my
points?So what's the fuss?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 2, Fruits and Animals yielding to its kinds; an observations by all
> > studies confirmed such facts, in the Bible. Scientists have been
> > surprise by its meticulous accuracies of a written document of truths
> > rather than dismiss it as mere stories.
>
> Give cites for these supposed scientists and their scientific evidences.
***OOps,you wasn't informed.Check it out for yourself.It is abundance
there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > 3, The consciousness of shame by being naked after Eve, the mother of
> > human race, felt it, after she had sinned. Man and woman always felt
> > shame when being physically exposed, caught without clothes (or when
> > our sins were exposed), and such consciousness stays within our
> > nature.
>
> Indoctrination. Did the bare-breasted African women feel shame before they
> were told about christinsanity?
***Well,this is a good point by you.But ,why so many porno girls
having no shame showing their vagina and breast?It was the
indoctrination and perverted cultures from them,rather than our decent
man and woman who tell us,what is and what is not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > 4, Birth pangs. Only the deniers of holocaust would say that woman
> > don't suffer child-birth. There has been no document or books ever
> > explained, or could explain reasons of such matters except the Holy
> > Bible, and dare anyone trivialize it.
>
> As do most mammals. Try forcing a whole orange down your throat, without
> feeling pain.
>
***You must be really saying the Bible make sense to you.So it isn't
fairy-tale as you accused?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Most die-hard Nay-Sayers who wish to distort the Bible, by not
> > believing these accounts such at Eve's sins led to consciousness of
> > shame or birth pangs, but our day to day observation had seen a
> > fulfillment of the prophecies of God.
>
> So you believe, but without any evidence.
***I believe with many evidences,and the most stringent test ever
known to human kinds.What some of you requested for evidence of God
are superficial types which can be easily given.
What you are asking is the type of evidence to convince your own
fancies,not the objective evidence which God provides.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > Our imaginations can say: probably this or probably that to discount
> > the Bible's prophecy, but it is still in the sense of make-up tales to
> > discredit the testimony of God.
>
> Prove that the book of fairy tales, myths, contradictions and downright lies
> you call the bible, or any other 'holy' book, was not written by humans. You
> cannot use the book to prove that the book is true (circular reasoning) or
> the same could be applied to any book of fiction.
***The Koran was tested to be full of contradictions and nonsense,and
does not square up with science.The Bible were proven to be true by
the many thousand of years,not just one lifetimes.The Bible is
evidence,and one can check and verified it.It is still there.
Since you used circular reasoning,and never show me where it has
contradictions or purported myths,are you not being helpless to
discuss my messages?
Moreover you have no objections to the few facts of Genesis,but
actually affirmed,so your reasoning were weird.Why discredit your own
assertions?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Can anything be clearer than that?
>
> You cannot be clearer in showing that you're a moron of the highest order.
****Now you indulges by insults,after being lost to the truths.Are you
beginning to show my messages which must be superior,right?
Can anything be more clearer than your "moronic nature of the highest
order?"
----------------------------------------------------------
>
> > I raised a woman who was dead, by prayer and "rebuke the angel of
> > death”, and she opened her eyes, and recover, now living. The
> > incidents had passed, and all I can offer is a testimony to the
> > events.
>
> So you can't prove that it ever happened. Why should I believe you?
***You confessed to be a moron,so why should an idiot like you believe
me?
Unless you confess to be sane,civil and reasonable,then ....of course
you implied those who desire to be sane should believe my words.
-----------------------------------------------------
> > Since it was Jesus
>
> Please show extra-biblical evidence that your Jesus character ever lived.
> Why do we not hear of him in any other book but the wholly babble?
***There are libraries everywhere,and you say you've not seen any?Did
you make yourself an ass?You must have never been to a bookstore,have
you?
(You have not heard of Josephus,the earliest historians,do you?..I
mentioned this for others,and not for you)
-----------------------------------------
More of your misconception to be discover some other times.
Frankie Lee
***Why exhibit yourself as an Idiot,making erratic replies?Are you so
hurt,to the extent that you must be a congenital retard?
I don't deny gravity Theory is true,as this Christian,Isaac Newton,
who believe in God and Christ, founded that theory.
Frankie Lee
Corrections: I believe Gravity Theory is true,which was founded by a
Christian,a great scientist,world respected intellectual,a Preacher of
the Bible---ISAAC NEWTON.
Christopher A. Lee
wrote:
>Frankie Lee wrote:
>> 4, Birth pangs. Only the deniers of holocaust would say that woman
>> don't suffer child-birth. There has been no document or books ever
>> explained, or could explain reasons of such matters except the Holy
>> Bible, and dare anyone trivialize it.
The man is an outright liar. The reasons are well known. See below.
>As do most mammals. Try forcing a whole orange down your throat, without
>feeling pain.
Actually, no. If you have ever seen a cat give birth, she does it in
an ecstasy of purring.
A baby's head is proportionally larger than other animals', because of
the enlarged brain. Couple this with the fact that women still have a
quadruped's reproductive system but with the birth canal bent through
ninety degrees because humans are an upright animal, and it causes
them much more distress and pain than most other animals.
It's also why babies are born much less developed than other animals.
Any later and the head would be too large for the birth canal.
The result is that much of the development which would have taken
place inside the womb comes after it is born. Which is one of the
things that enables Man to be a software animal absorbing programming
from the care givers.
Christopher A. Lee
>Frankie Lee wrote:
>> Richard Dawkings
>
>That's Mr. Richard Dawkins to you, trolling fucktard.
>
>> equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
>> that of holocaust deniers.
>
>And Dawkins' right. Do you deny gravity, trolling fucktard?
Their methods are the same.
Olrik
> On Nov 3, 1:31 pm, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Frankie Lee wrote:
>>> Richard Dawkings
>> That's Mr. Richard Dawkins to you, trolling fucktard.
>>
>>> equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
>>> that of holocaust deniers.
>> And Dawkins' right. Do you deny gravity, trolling fucktard?
>>
>> Now FOAD.
>>
>> <snip long, endless cry for help>
>
> ***Why exhibit yourself as an Idiot,making erratic replies?Are you so
> hurt,to the extent that you must be a congenital retard?
FOAD, ignorant asshole.
> I don't deny gravity Theory is true,as this Christian,Isaac Newton,
> who believe in God and Christ
Newton was a religious nut.
>, founded that theory.
Which was modified, corrected and perfected by a jew.
What was your point again, trolling bastard?
Yap
I said: By the seed of the fruit, you idiot shall be choked.
The Christianity was meant to con the Jews and the whites, but you
stupid Singaporean have been included as well.
Frankie Lee
The man is an outright liar.
Reply: You have shown to be a liar and a crook.Proves.
1,When I mentioned Birth Pangs,and I elaborate it.Am I referring to
human,a women,or some cats and dogs?
The Bible talks about what Eve will suffer.
Anyone would have know what I am referring or what I am saying if they
read Genesis.
So,why must you exhibit yourself as a Liar?
Or are you pretending to be dumb?
Or are you really dumb?
Frankie Lee
***Did you mean yourself as as Trolling Bastard?If you don't implied
yourself as one,why utter it?Is it difficult for me or anyone to use
that terms on you?
"You trolling bastard,shut your mouth".
You question as to whether have I deny gravity.I said I believe Isaac
Newton invent it.I accept the theory.
Now which part you cannot understand?
Frankie Lee
**What was your point,then a trolling bastard?
Did you not say we shouldn't be rude,or we should be rude and vulgar?
Don't pretend to be stupid.Or are really that stupid?
Frankie Lee
*Any honest folks who read my message know that I am referring to
woman.Instead you wrote these words:
You:
The man is an outright liar. The reasons are well known. See below.
As do most mammals. Try forcing a whole orange down your throat,
without
feeling pain.
Actually, no. If you have ever seen a cat give birth, she does it in
an ecstasy of purring.
Me: Why do you show proved that yourself is an obnoxious nut,zero
credibility and talk nonsensically?
Since you refute your ilks of her error,why bring it upon my messages?
VoiceOfReason
Another subject where you have little knowledge. Isaac Newton was a
heretic who did not believe that Jesus Christ was God.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_religious_views
Erwin Moller
> Richard Dawkings equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
> that of holocaust deniers.
>
> He had sinisterly instigated that parents who discouraged their
> children to learn ET should be arrested, and he spread hatreds all
> around by his anti-religion speech.
<snipped propaganda>
Frankie,
Just curious: I wonder where Richard claimed the above things.
I read a lot of his work, but I cannot remember coming across these.
Can you provide me some citations? URLs/books+pagenumbers?
Thanks.
Erwin Moller
--
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."
-- C.A.R. Hoare
Mark Evans
Dude, get some help. Your rants are getting even more delusional.
And stop trying to use Ann Coulter as a reference. She is totally
deranged.
Mark Evans
Christopher A. Lee
<Since_humans_read_this...@spamyourself.com> wrote:
>Frankie Lee schreef:
>> Richard Dawkings equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
>> that of holocaust deniers.
>>
>> He had sinisterly instigated that parents who discouraged their
>> children to learn ET should be arrested, and he spread hatreds all
>> around by his anti-religion speech.
>
><snipped propaganda>
>
>Frankie,
>
>Just curious: I wonder where Richard claimed the above things.
>I read a lot of his work, but I cannot remember coming across these.
I've seen it a book by Martin Gardner or perhaps Michael Shermer on
what goes wrong with people's thinking.
Creationists and holocaust deniers both use the same methods to
"support" their bizarre beliefs.
raven1
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Could you re-post this in English, please? I don't speak gibberish.
Olrik
You deserve all the rudeness and vulgarity directed at you, asshole.
Olrik
Gravity is a physical phenomenon. As such, Newton did not *invent* it.
He tried an explanation, and it was basically correct (and still is),
but his theory did not account for everything. So it took Einstein and
is theory of general relativity to explain the problems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity
BTW, Newton was a religious nut and you would not want him in your
church. And Einstein was jewish and was very suspicious of religions.
> I accept the theory.
LOL!
Syd M.
Yes, Frankie, you certianly have.
PDW
Syd M.
>
> - Show quoted text -
So, you have none, except to deny science.
PDW
Syd M.
Why do you hand wave and project your deficensies on us, Liar Frankie?
PDW
Christopher A. Lee
Why didn't you address any of this?
>--------
>The man is an outright liar.
>
>Reply: You have shown to be a liar and a crook.Proves.
And you confirm that you are an outright liar.
>1,When I mentioned Birth Pangs,and I elaborate it.Am I referring to
>human,a women,or some cats and dogs?
That bit was to correct Smiler, imbecile.
>The Bible talks about what Eve will suffer.
Why should we give a flying fuck what the Bible talks about, imbecile?
What part of WE'RE NOT CHRISTIAN are you pretending you are too stupid
to understand?
If you, a Christian don't take Hindu holy writing seriously, WHY THE
FUCK SHOULD NON-CHRISTIANS TAKE THE BIBLE SERIOUSLY?
Apparently you really are this stupid.
>Anyone would have know what I am referring or what I am saying if they
>read Genesis.
And I was refuting your lie that there was no document of book that
could explain why women suffer in childbirth, liar.
>So,why must you exhibit yourself as a Liar?
Where do I do that, liar?
>Or are you pretending to be dumb?
>Or are you really dumb?
You are either dumb or pretending to be, But this doesn't matter. If
you want to tell the world you are insane that's your business. But
don't whine when that's how you get treated.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Christopher A. Lee
Frankie Wankie in his Hankie has never had any attachment to a female
- either human or feline.
Somebody should tell him that real women don't have staples in their
navels, and that his right hand is no substitute for the real thing.
>PDW
Christopher A. Lee
<pdwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Nov 3, 1:57�am, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 2:17�pm, Christopher A. Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:16:09 -0000, "Smiler" <Smi...@joe.king.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > >Frankie Lee wrote:
>> > >> 4, Birth pangs. Only the deniers of holocaust would say that woman
>> > >> don't suffer child-birth. There has been no document or books ever
>> > >> explained, or could explain reasons of such matters except the Holy
>> > >> Bible, and dare anyone trivialize it.
>>
>> > The man is an outright liar. The reasons are well known. See below.
>>
>> > >As do most mammals. Try forcing a whole orange down your throat, without
>> > >feeling pain.
>>
>> > Actually, no. If you have ever seen a cat give birth, she does it in
>> > an ecstasy of purring.
Like I said, the reasons are well known:
>> > A baby's head is proportionally larger than other animals', because of
>> > the enlarged brain. Couple this with the fact that women still have a
>> > quadruped's reproductive system but with the birth canal bent through
>> > ninety degrees because humans are an upright animal, and it causes
>> > them much more distress and pain than most other animals.
>>
>> > It's also why babies are born much less developed than other animals.
>> > Any later and the head would be too large for the birth canal.
>>
>> > The result is that much of the development which would have taken
>> > place inside the womb comes after it is born. Which is one of the
>> > things that enables Man to be a software animal absorbing programming
>> > from the care givers.
>>
>> --------
>> The man is an outright liar.
>>
>> Reply: You have shown to be a liar and a crook.Proves.
Confirmation that the man is an outright liar who could not refute
what I wrote.
>Yes, Frankie, you certianly have.
He's certifiably insane.
>PDW
Christopher A. Lee
<ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
Sorry Smiler, reading that again sounds a bit arrogant. Make it "was a
response to Smiler".
The whole thing was, including the refutation of Frankie Wankie In His
Hankie's lie about the Bible having the only explanation for a woman's
suffering in childbirth.
Which many men with pregnant loved ones have looked up, asked their
doctor, etc.
Sanity's Little Helper
> Richard Dawkings equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
> that of holocaust deniers.
>
> He had sinisterly instigated that parents who discouraged their
> children to learn ET should be arrested
That's an awful lot of bad grammar for two paragraphs.
I think you need it pointing out to you that, if you just believe things,
then you don't know anything, and if you don't know anything, then each and
every assertion you make is a lie.
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
"Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
duity, and any response as persecution
Not authentic without this signature.
Auntie Lib
> Richard Dawkings equate Christians who deny Evolution Theory ET to
You know what, dude? Until you learn how to spell his name (it's
Dawkins) you got nothin' to contribute but noxious gas.
elizabeth
aa#2098
EAC Director of Useless Endeavors
Vice-Chairman Of The Committee On Wasted Time
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"I was born with a skeptical mind. Now I ask you, is that fair?
If God gives me a skeptical nature and you an accepting one, then
you're going to be a believer and I'm not. If belief is a ticket to
eternal happiness, I'm definitely handicapped. God gives me a mind
capable of asking questions and what? I'm damned if I use it?"
F. Paul Wilson "The Haunted Air"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Andy W
>
> Variations of species (or micro-evolution), it is understood to be
> natural.
Everything about evolution is understood to be natural.
>
> The evils of ET are to mask human Conscience, harden its convicting
> power, and strengthen the resolve to be immoral and one can do evils
> with impunity, so to speak. In contrast to the words of God that say:
> Everyone will stand in judgment before the Creator, giving accounts of
> what one had done on earth.
>
> The testimony of truths in Genesis are so powerful and its prophecy
> never fail has been known to mankind ever since, and only Idiots
> cannot acknowledge it.
Prophecies that were written down after the events don't count. Give
me just one clear and unambiguous prophecy, unquestionably written
before the event, not possible to predict by normal means and not self-
fulfilling, and I'll conceed the whole game to you.
>
> 1,"ye shall surely die”. Man’s appointment of death is a fact and all
> those who deny the Genesis accounts never dispute it. Instead of
> praising its accuracy of prophecy for man, why attempt to say it is
> fairy tale? Does human die then?
>
> 2, Fruits and Animals yielding to its kinds; an observations by all
> studies confirmed such facts, in the Bible. Scientists have been
> surprise by its meticulous accuracies of a written document of truths
> rather than dismiss it as mere stories.
>
> 3, The consciousness of shame by being naked after Eve, the mother of
> human race, felt it, after she had sinned. Man and woman always felt
> shame when being physically exposed, caught without clothes (or when
> our sins were exposed), and such consciousness stays within our
> nature.
>
> 4, Birth pangs. Only the deniers of holocaust would say that woman
> don't suffer child-birth. There has been no document or books ever
> explained, or could explain reasons of such matters except the Holy
> Bible, and dare anyone trivialize it.
>
> Most die-hard Nay-Sayers who wish to distort the Bible, by not
> believing these accounts such at Eve's sins led to consciousness of
> shame or birth pangs, but our day to day observation had seen a
> fulfillment of the prophecies of God.
These things would have been obvious even to the bronze age people who
wrote the Bible. Just because there are some factual statements in the
Bible does not mean the rest of it is true, or that any of it is
divinely inspired. You might as well argue that Harry Potter is true
because London is real.
>
> Our imaginations can say: probably this or probably that to discount
> the Bible's prophecy, but it is still in the sense of make-up tales to
> discredit the testimony of God.
> Can anything be clearer than that?
Almost anything could be clearer than that.
>
> I raised a woman who was dead, by prayer and "rebuke the angel of
> death”, and she opened her eyes, and recover, now living. The
> incidents had passed, and all I can offer is a testimony to the
> events.
No you didn't. If this event really happened at all, which I doubt
very much, it's much more likely tht the woman's recovery was nothing
to do with your prayers, and everything to do with a team of doctors
or paramedics.
>
> Since it was Jesus who heals the sick and raised the dead in
> actuality, while He was on earth, and today He is seen to be doing
> that daily, unabated for the past 2000 years, the issues were; Can He
> do it again through many of his servants and children? Countless of
> documented facts revealing the explosion of miracles, signs and
> wonders which came upon to our world stage, it is observable,
> testable,REPEATABLE and verifiable.
And yet, this does not happen. Curious.
>
> The difference is, have you read, verify, seen or heard about it? The
> evidence of God is all over the places, and the main issues were: have
> you verified it, study it and know about it? There is no shortage of
> evidence of God that demands a verdict.
And yet, you cannot produce even a shred apart from your ridiculous
unsupported claims.
<snip>
>
> By not understanding the deceits of ET,and what is crafted stories,
> unobserved evo process, and inability to pronounce bombastic names
> given to bones and skeleton, their own description of tales, does that
> makes one uneducated and ignorant?
No, your ignorance and lack of education do that.
Andy
Frankie Lee
***you deserve all the rudeness and vulgarity directed at you,
asshole.
Reply: You couldn't find anything wrong in any of my messages,except
being hurt by it.That's the fact.And,dishonest people,I wouldn't
expect them not be evil,rude or vulgar.Your words of another
confession spoke volumes.
Frankie Lee
Richard Westfall, the leading biographer says: "Well before 1675,
Newton had become an Arian in the original sense of the term." That
is, Newton did not believe that Jesus was God. Westfall adds, his
views "remained unaltered until his death."[1]
Comments: Newton had a life story,a long life history to see whether
what he had believe.Was Westfall being correct?I doubt so.
Perhaps you are not aware about the Confessions of what you
believe,which had to be uttered then,a practice even till today.
In any case,my points here are that he believe in God,a Creaator as
opposed to no-god mindsets.
Frankie Lee
***American founding fathers were Christian.Are you not stupid?
Frankie Lee
> On 3 Nov, 04:01, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Prophecies that were written down after the events don't count. Give
> me just one clear and unambiguous prophecy, unquestionably written
> before the event, not possible to predict by normal means and not self-
> fulfilling, and I'll conceed the whole game to you.
Reply: It has never been about "conceding to me".It is about your own
destiny and your own good,nothing got to do with me.
There is a prophecy in Revelations 13:17 which states...,"No man shall
be able to buy or sell,except he receives the mark of the beast"
This is the cashless system,or if you had notice.
Olrik
I'm usually "hurt" by stupidity, sheer, boastful ignorance and utter
hypocrisy. So yes, your "messages" hurt me.
Olrik
>>> theory Quantum Mechanic is not complete yet".(Niels Bohr)
>>> If Einstein were to tell it to the Academy of Science,of such
>>> phenomenon,rather than his close friends,what would you think?
>>> Dawk already said the most distinguish professor in Harvard to be
>>> booted out for taking the Bible words as above sciences.
>>> Einstein emphatically and seriously said that Jesus Christ is true. He
>>> can never be myth. He is no myth.
>>> Since no one on earth, ever, declared that he/she has the keys of
>>> Life, Death and Hell, except the Lord Jesus Christ, would you seek
>>> someone who doesn't have it, knew next to nothing about it, a nut like
>>> Hawking to show you the way?
>>> about God to his side.(His impending death was also prophesied way
>>> before it actually took place. The Bible said it. (A pastor predicted
>>> like Micheal Jackson's death)
>>> most stupid Lawyers would want a witness to be credible, reliable and
>>> truthful; unlike crooks like Dog making fake theories.
>>> By not understanding the deceits of ET,and what is crafted stories,
>>> unobserved evo process, and inability to pronounce bombastic names
>>> given to bones and skeleton, their own description of tales, does that
>>> makes one uneducated and ignorant?
>>> ET is the Redundant, totally useless theory for humankind, brought
>>> forth no benefits to civilization but hatred and strife and atheists,
>>> and on top of that, atrocities of a most disgusting kinds. Of all the
>>> fields of sciences, this so-called ET is in the wicked forms,(Others
>>> is amoral) which actively encouraged wicked doers to further their
>>> is a pitiless existence.�
>>> Ever since the dawn of ET by Darwin, humanity sank to the lowest,
>>> stoop to the lowest, and Genocides happen.
>>> will believe in it.� Can you believe it, some folks wrote to me and
You should read some history books before making an accusation like that.
Olrik
> On Nov 4, 8:11 am, Andy W <vor...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>> On 3 Nov, 04:01, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Prophecies that were written down after the events don't count. Give
>> me just one clear and unambiguous prophecy, unquestionably written
>> before the event, not possible to predict by normal means and not self-
>> fulfilling, and I'll conceed the whole game to you.
>
> Reply: It has never been about "conceding to me".It is about your own
> destiny and your own good,nothing got to do with me.
>
> There is a prophecy in Revelations 13:17 which states...,"No man shall
> be able to buy or sell,except he receives the mark of the beast"
>
> This is the cashless system,or if you had notice.
First, do you really think a credit card is the "mark of the beast"?
Second, tell me more about where this "cashless system" is.
O.
fasgnadh
> First, do you really think a credit card is the "mark of the beast"?
Only once your wife has signed it. B^]
> Second, tell me more about where this "cashless system" is.
As soon as you wife signs it, you will know! B^]
Nice self portrait, Olrek;
big fat belly -> O.
^
|
tiny penis
--
alt.atheism FAQ:
http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source
"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest
"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest
http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg
Yap
Your reply is directing towards yourself.
That means you are a dishonest person who wish to be a member of the
Jewish race such that you can be a part of the god's people?
Unfortunately, delusion in both parts will be the result.
Yap
American founders are Christians, but they are not the Jewish people
wanted by the god.
So, could your tiny bird brain able to see this vital and far reaching
point?
Yap
thinks he is smart and isn't proud of his traditional affiliation with
Buddhism. He won't have any respect for Eastern cultural value at all.
We have a saying in a phrase to mock these loons:"Ah, the moon in the
west is rounder....".
Christopher A. Lee
Doesn't surprise me that he's one of those bar code loonies.
Olrik
> Olrik wrote:
>
>> First, do you really think a credit card is the "mark of the beast"?
>
> Only once your wife has signed it. B^]
>
>> Second, tell me more about where this "cashless system" is.
>
>
>
> As soon as you wife signs it, you will know! B^]
>
> Nice self portrait, Olrek;
>
> big fat belly -> O.
> ^
> |
> tiny penis
Wow. Just, wow.
O.
Olrik
Isn't, though? Maybe his next thread will be about how we faked the moon
landing...
Olrik
Andy W
> On Nov 4, 8:11 am, Andy W <vor...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
> > On 3 Nov, 04:01, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Prophecies that were written down after the events don't count. Give
> > me just one clear and unambiguous prophecy, unquestionably written
> > before the event, not possible to predict by normal means and not self-
> > fulfilling, and I'll conceed the whole game to you.
>
> Reply: It has never been about "conceding to me".It is about your own
> destiny and your own good,nothing got to do with me.
I am saying that I will agree with you and believe everything you say
if you can do that one thing. Then you'll have saved my soul and
earned no end of afterlife brownie points, which is what you really
want, isn't it, converts. I make such a grand offer because I am
supremely confident that you will not be able to.
>
> There is a prophecy in Revelations 13:17 which states...,"No man shall
> be able to buy or sell,except he receives the mark of the beast"
Doesn't say when this is supposed to happen, or describe this mark
except to say that it goes on your hand or forehead. Still too
ambiguous I'm afraid.
>
> This is the cashless system,or if you had notice.
>
Is it? Then what are all these pieces of metal and paper in my wallet
for? Besides, that doesn't even fit with the passage. So no prophecy,
and no fulfillment either. Was that the best you had?
Andy
Frankie Lee
***I just get only one out of the hundreds fulfilled prophecy,and
already saw you stumbling.It is not the best I can do.
Fit with the passage?
Revelations are about future events and prophecies.Even the secular
world would concede and writes about Armageddon.
Cory Albrecht
And some of them kept slaves. So what? Add American history to that ever
expanding list of things to which Frankie thinks he is knowledgeable but
is, in actuality, ignorant of.
From <http://www.ffrf.org/nontracts/xian.php>:
Is America a Christian Nation?
The U.S. Constitution is a secular document. It begins, "We the people,"
and contains no mention of "God" or "Christianity." Its only references
to religion are exclusionary, such as, "no religious test shall ever be
required as a qualification to any office or public trust" (Art. VI),
and "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" (First Amendment). The
presidential oath of office, the only oath detailed in the Constitution,
does not contain the phrase "so help me God" or any requirement to swear
on a bible (Art. II, Sec. 1, Clause 8). If we are a Christian nation,
why doesn't our Constitution say so?
In 1797 America made a treaty with Tripoli, declaring that "the
government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the
Christian religion." This reassurance to Islam was written under
Washington's presidency, and approved by the Senate under John Adams.
The First Amendment To The U.S. Constitution:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . ."
What about the Declaration of Independence?
We are not governed by the Declaration. Its purpose was to "dissolve the
political bands," not to set up a religious nation. Its authority was
based on the idea that "governments are instituted among men, deriving
their just powers from the consent of the governed," which is contrary
to the biblical concept of rule by divine authority. It deals with laws,
taxation, representation, war, immigration, and so on, never discussing
religion at all.
The references to "Nature's God," "Creator," and "Divine Providence" in
the Declaration do not endorse Christianity. Thomas Jefferson, its
author, was a Deist, opposed to orthodox Christianity and the supernatural.
Cory Albrecht
You doubts don't mean squat, unless you have evidence to back them up.
But as you have never given evidence before, I doubt that you shall here.
I used to think it was Adman who was the king of unsupported assertions,
but I think that Frankie has dethroned him.
Frankie Lee
A baby's head is proportionally larger than other animals', because of
>> > the enlarged brain. Couple this with the fact that women still have a
>> > quadruped's reproductive system but with the birth canal bent through
>> > ninety degrees because humans are an upright animal, and it causes
>> > them much more distress and pain than most other animals.
>> > It's also why babies are born much less developed than other animals.
>> > Any later and the head would be too large for the birth canal.
>> > The result is that much of the development which would have taken
>> > place inside the womb comes after it is born. Which is one of the
>> > things that enables Man to be a software animal absorbing programming
>> > from the care givers.
You: Confirmation that the man is an outright liar who could not
refute
what I wrote.
Frankie: Just because I didn't rebut your words meant I am a liar?What
kinds of English are you writing?
See for yourself how stupid you are.
I show by my earlier messages,that women suffers through child
birth,or birth pangs.And you,hot on my heels agree that,and even
explain the accuracies of my message.You want me to deny that women
don't suffer "birth-child pangs"?
You are describing the process as to why women suffers birth pangs.You
guys,most of you just chit-chat on your own silly notions to one
another.You guys make me laugh at your incompetence.
Most of you guys,way beneath my intellect and wisdom.
Andy W
You see only what you want to see, and it has no connection with
reality.
> It is not the best I can do.
Do better then. Oh, I suppose I had better point out that prophecies
whose "fulfillment" is only reported in the Bible do not count.
Fantasy fiction is filled with prophecies that were fulfilled by the
end of the book.
>
> Fit with the passage?
Yes. If your event doesn't fit the prophecy then it doesn't count as
fulfillment. And if the prophecy was so vague that it can't be clearly
interpreted ahead of time then it's no prophecy at all.
>
> Revelations are about future events and prophecies.Even the secular
> world would concede and writes about Armageddon.
It's a widely used term to describe the hypothetical end of the world.
Just because someone uses the word does not mean they believe in the
Biblical meaning of it.
Andy
Frankie Lee
***And if the prophecy was so vague that it can't be clearly
interpreted ahead of time then it's no prophecy at all.
Me: Biblical prophecy came as quite vague for some parts.The cashless
system prediction has never been vague.It states"buying and
selling".One need not even to infer about it.
Nostradamus failed umpteen times.That book is discredited.
Andy W
And as such is worthless as prophecy.
> The cashless
> system prediction has never been vague.It states"buying and
> selling".One need not even to infer about it.
It says you will not be able to buy or sell unless you have the mark
of the Beast. It says exactly nothing about a cashless system.
>
> Nostradamus failed umpteen times.That book is discredited.
Now that, I absolutely agree with.
Andy