Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
It's that time of the year again, kooks!
26 views
Skip to first unread message
Libtard
Dec 28, 2019, 12:53:45 AM12/28/19
to
Wollmann time, that is.
I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas Day:
Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself these
days), and Gergles.
All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too distant
future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early in January,
which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
Wollmann!
--
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas Day:
Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself these
days), and Gergles.
All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too distant
future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early in January,
which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
Wollmann!
--
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
"Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."
Dec 28, 2019, 12:21:12 PM12/28/19
to
Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
Apply ROT 13.
LOL
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory
Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignøred misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
Checkmate
Dec 29, 2019, 2:45:39 PM12/29/19
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:21:14 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
> >Wollmann time, that is.
> >
> >I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas Day:
> >Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself these
> >days), and Gergles.
> >
> >All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too distant
> >future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early in January,
> >which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >Wollmann!
>
> Didn't I TELL you...
>
> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
>
> Apply ROT 13.
>
> LOL
You were right on the money, and I probably spent all of ten minutes here
on Xmas day, JFTR.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved
https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc
***************************************************
"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as
kensi." -Nadegda
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$2...@dont-email.me>
***************************************************
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Checkmate.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:21:14 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
> >Wollmann time, that is.
> >
> >I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas Day:
> >Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself these
> >days), and Gergles.
> >
> >All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too distant
> >future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early in January,
> >which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >Wollmann!
>
> Didn't I TELL you...
>
> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
>
> Apply ROT 13.
>
> LOL
on Xmas day, JFTR.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved
https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc
***************************************************
"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as
kensi." -Nadegda
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$2...@dont-email.me>
***************************************************
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
Dec 29, 2019, 4:54:22 PM12/29/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Seconded.
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Nadegda
Dec 29, 2019, 4:55:49 PM12/29/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>
>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>these days), and Gergles.
>>
>>
> And? Are they Christians?
>>
>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>these days), and Gergles.
>>
>>
Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>
>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>in January,
>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>Wollmann!
>
> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>in January,
>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>Wollmann!
>
Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you aren't
even among the nominees?
Just curious.
Nadegda
Dec 29, 2019, 4:57:55 PM12/29/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:45:38 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:21:14 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >Wollmann time, that is.
>> >
>> >I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> >Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>> >itself these days), and Gergles.
>> >
>> >All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> >anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> >distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>> >in January,
>> >which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>> >Wollmann!
>>
>> Didn't I TELL you...
>>
>> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
>>
>> Apply ROT 13.
>>
>> LOL
>
> You were right on the money,
No, he wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar to the one
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:21:14 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >Wollmann time, that is.
>> >
>> >I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> >Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>> >itself these days), and Gergles.
>> >
>> >All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> >anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> >distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>> >in January,
>> >which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>> >Wollmann!
>>
>> Didn't I TELL you...
>>
>> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
>>
>> Apply ROT 13.
>>
>> LOL
>
> You were right on the money,
Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
Nadegda
Dec 29, 2019, 5:51:13 PM12/29/19
to
On 2019-12-29 2:54 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>
>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>> these days), and Gergles.
>>
>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>> in January,
>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>> Wollmann!
>
> Seconded.
>
you keep sipping on me like this you're going to get a mouth full of sperm
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>
>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>> these days), and Gergles.
>>
>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>> in January,
>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>> Wollmann!
>
> Seconded.
>
%
Dec 29, 2019, 5:51:41 PM12/29/19
to
On 2019-12-29 3:04 p.m., Scooter wrote:
> and that line of shit is supposed to fool who?
>
wild bill cody
>
wild bill cody
"Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."
Dec 29, 2019, 6:07:50 PM12/29/19
to
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard<lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>
>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>>these days), and Gergles.
>>>
>> And? Are they Christians?
>
>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>>
>>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>>in January,
>>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>Wollmann!
>>
>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>
>Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you aren't
>even among the nominees?
>
>Just curious.
I'm just curious why you forgot to second your own
>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard<lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>
>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>>these days), and Gergles.
>>>
>> And? Are they Christians?
>
>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>>
>>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>>in January,
>>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>Wollmann!
>>
>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>
>Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you aren't
>even among the nominees?
>
>Just curious.
nomination when you even put a reminder in (up there)
for your Nads sock, *Libtard*????
%
Dec 29, 2019, 6:09:51 PM12/29/19
to
"Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."
Dec 29, 2019, 6:10:15 PM12/29/19
to
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019, Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
<...>
>No, he (Gerk) wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar
among us knows that. Yes, that means even PeeScent
and Scooter.
<...>
>No, he (Gerk) wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar
>to the one Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
Libtard = Nadegda = kensi. Even the stupidest
among us knows that. Yes, that means even PeeScent
and Scooter.
"Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."
Dec 29, 2019, 6:11:49 PM12/29/19
to
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>
>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>> these days), and Gergles.
>>
>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> distant future. <....>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>
>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>> these days), and Gergles.
>>
>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>
>Seconded.
LOL!!! Nads confirms her own prediction. Quelle Surprise!
%
Dec 29, 2019, 6:12:59 PM12/29/19
to
On 2019-12-29 4:10 p.m., "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019, Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
> <...>
>
>> No, he (Gerk) wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar
>> to the one Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
>
> Libtard = Nadegda = kensi. Even the stupidest
> among us knows that. Yes, that means even PeeScent
> and Scooter.
>
thanks for the spell checker test ,
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019, Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
> <...>
>
>> No, he (Gerk) wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar
>> to the one Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
>
> Libtard = Nadegda = kensi. Even the stupidest
> among us knows that. Yes, that means even PeeScent
> and Scooter.
>
tell me do you also keep thing peesonal ,
and do you live in a peefect home too
%
Dec 29, 2019, 6:34:43 PM12/29/19
to
On 2019-12-29 4:11 p.m., "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>
>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>
>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>> these days), and Gergles.
>>>
>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>> distant future. <....>
>>
>> Seconded.
>
> LOL!!! Nads confirms her own peediction. Quelle Surprise!
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>
>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>
>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>> these days), and Gergles.
>>>
>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>> distant future. <....>
>>
>> Seconded.
>
>
Janithor
Dec 29, 2019, 10:40:24 PM12/29/19
to
x-no-archive: yes
On 12/29/2019 1:55 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>
>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>> these days), and Gergles.
>>>
>>>
>> And? Are they Christians?
>
> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>>
>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>> in January,
>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>> Wollmann!
>>
>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>
> Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you aren't
> even among the nominees?
>
> Just curious.
Will we run this same exercise during Ramadan?
On 12/29/2019 1:55 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>
>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>>> these days), and Gergles.
>>>
>>>
>> And? Are they Christians?
>
> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>>
>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>> in January,
>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>> Wollmann!
>>
>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>
> Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you aren't
> even among the nominees?
>
> Just curious.
%
Dec 29, 2019, 11:15:44 PM12/29/19
to
Janithor
Dec 29, 2019, 11:17:01 PM12/29/19
to
x-no-archive: yes
I have no idea what the means.
%
Dec 29, 2019, 11:22:15 PM12/29/19
to
On 2019-12-29 8:40 p.m., Janithor wrote:
%
Dec 29, 2019, 11:25:44 PM12/29/19
to
but you having no idea is pretty common knowledge in a few locals
Janithor
Dec 29, 2019, 11:47:12 PM12/29/19
to
x-no-archive: yes
Who peed in your cornflakes this morning, Mr. Grumpypants?
mixed nuts
Dec 29, 2019, 11:48:56 PM12/29/19
to
--
Grizzly H.
Janithor
Dec 29, 2019, 11:51:34 PM12/29/19
to
x-no-archive: yes
I'm a racist Nazi, so that would be a good thing.
kensi
Dec 30, 2019, 12:33:02 AM12/30/19
to
On 12/29/2019 6:10 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019, Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> No, he (Gerk) wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar
>> to the one Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
>
> Libtard = Nadegda = kensi.
Proof, ko0k?
>
>> No, he (Gerk) wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar
>> to the one Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
>
> Libtard = Nadegda = kensi.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Libtard
Dec 30, 2019, 1:35:40 AM12/30/19
to
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 15:04:08 -0700, Scooter wrote:
won't have any trouble supplying us with the MID.
(Cue extreme display of cowardice in 3, 2, 1...)
> and that line of shit is supposed to fool who?
Are you k'laming that Nadegda did make a similar post, kook? Then you
won't have any trouble supplying us with the MID.
(Cue extreme display of cowardice in 3, 2, 1...)
Libtard
Dec 30, 2019, 1:36:41 AM12/30/19
to
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>
>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>> these days), and Gergles.
>>
>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>> in January,
>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>> Wollmann!
>
> Seconded.
Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>
>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
>> these days), and Gergles.
>>
>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>> in January,
>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>> Wollmann!
>
> Seconded.
Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
Janithor
Dec 30, 2019, 3:49:07 AM12/30/19
to
x-no-archive: yes
Let me guess, you are really Napoleon.
I think it's time for the guys in white suits with big butterfly nets to
come get Libtard.
I think it's time for the guys in white suits with big butterfly nets to
come get Libtard.
%
Dec 30, 2019, 11:37:34 AM12/30/19
to
Checkmate
Dec 30, 2019, 4:33:09 PM12/30/19
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:11:49 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
Checkmate.
the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
> >
> >> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>
> >> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
> >> these days), and Gergles.
> >>
> >> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >> distant future. <....>
> >
> >Seconded.
>
> LOL!!! Nads confirms her own prediction. Quelle Surprise!
Nads spent Christmas day riding her mighty Sybian hobby horse, and left a
>
> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
> >
> >> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>
> >> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling itself
> >> these days), and Gergles.
> >>
> >> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >> distant future. <....>
> >
> >Seconded.
>
> LOL!!! Nads confirms her own prediction. Quelle Surprise!
snail trail everywhere.
Checkmate
Dec 30, 2019, 5:00:30 PM12/30/19
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
Checkmate.
following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> > And? Are they Christians?
>
> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the sheeple
>
> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the bible-
thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which has been
falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by ghost writers
and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt to use "ancient and
holy" writing as a form of mind control and manipulation. Anyone who
claims to "know what (their chosen) god wants" is a fool or is in the god
business for profit. Please make a note of it.
Checkmate
Dec 30, 2019, 5:04:51 PM12/30/19
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:57:54 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
Checkmate.
%
Dec 30, 2019, 5:10:54 PM12/30/19
to
On 2019-12-30 3:00 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>
>> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
> Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the sheeple
> who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the bible-
> thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which has been
> falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by ghost writers
> and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt to use "ancient and
> holy" writing as a form of mind control and manipulation. Anyone who
> claims to "know what (their chosen) god wants" is a fool or is in the god
> business for profit. Please make a note of it.
>
i am my god
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>
>> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
> Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the sheeple
> who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the bible-
> thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which has been
> falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by ghost writers
> and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt to use "ancient and
> holy" writing as a form of mind control and manipulation. Anyone who
> claims to "know what (their chosen) god wants" is a fool or is in the god
> business for profit. Please make a note of it.
>
mixed nuts
Dec 30, 2019, 5:28:08 PM12/30/19
to
On 12/30/2019 5:00 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by Checkmate.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>
>> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
> Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the
> sheeple who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the
> bible- thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which
> has been falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by
> ghost writers and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt
> to use "ancient and holy" writing as a form of mind control and
> manipulation. Anyone who claims to "know what (their chosen) god
> wants" is a fool or is in the god business for profit. Please make a
> note of it.
They can't be all that wrong because there's a Whites House chaplain who
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by Checkmate.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>
>> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
> Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the
> sheeple who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the
> bible- thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which
> has been falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by
> ghost writers and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt
> to use "ancient and holy" writing as a form of mind control and
> manipulation. Anyone who claims to "know what (their chosen) god
> wants" is a fool or is in the god business for profit. Please make a
> note of it.
make everything she touches holy and advises The President who is a
devout Presbyterian with many fantastic achomishments.
--
Grizzly H.
Checkmate
Dec 31, 2019, 12:34:30 AM12/31/19
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 -0000 (UTC) Libtard put forth the
Checkmate.
following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
insubordination, Fucktard.
Checkmate
Dec 31, 2019, 12:39:20 AM12/31/19
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 15:51:40 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
Checkmate.
which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
> On 2019-12-29 3:04 p.m., Scooter wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:57:54 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:57:54 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> > <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:45:38 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >>> Checkmate.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:21:14 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> >>> Checkmate.
> >>>
> >>> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
> >>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
> >>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
> >>>>> in January,
> >>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >>>>> Wollmann!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
> >>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
> >>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
> >>>>> in January,
> >>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >>>>> Wollmann!
> >>>>
> >>>> Didn't I TELL you...
> >>>>
> >>>> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Apply ROT 13.
> >>>>
> >>>> LOL
> >>>
> >>> You were right on the money,
> >>
> >> No, he wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar to the one
> >> Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
> >
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Apply ROT 13.
> >>>>
> >>>> LOL
> >>>
> >>> You were right on the money,
> >>
> >> No, he wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar to the one
> >> Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
> >
> >
> > and that line of shit is supposed to fool who?
> >
> wild bill cody
> >
The guy who invented the leisure suit?
Checkmate
Dec 31, 2019, 12:40:10 AM12/31/19
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:33:00 -0500 kensi put forth the following
Checkmate.
notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> > Libtard = Nadegda = kensi.
> Proof, ko0k?
>
Yup.
> Proof, ko0k?
>
Nadegda
Dec 31, 2019, 3:14:31 AM12/31/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>
>>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>
>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>
>>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>
>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>
>>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>>
>>
>>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>>
>>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
Irrelevant anyway: the Wollmann criterion is, and I quote, "those who
would rather spend public holidays frothing continously on Usenet than
risk contact with human beings in real life".
Given that most of the kooks posting here are American, Canadian, or
British, and December 25 is a national public holiday in all three
nations, the criterion is met regardless of any particular kook's
professed creed. Including yours.
<snicker>
>>>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>>>in January,
>>>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>>Wollmann!
>>>
>>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>>
>>Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you
>>aren't even among the nominees?
>>
>>Just curious.
>
> I can't offer an answer.
>>
>>Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you
>>aren't even among the nominees?
>>
>>Just curious.
>
No surprise there, really.
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Nadegda
Dec 31, 2019, 3:15:28 AM12/31/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:00:27 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>> > And? Are they Christians?
>>
>> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
> Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the
> sheeple who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the
> bible- thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which has
> been falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by ghost
> writers and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt to use
> "ancient and holy" writing as a form of mind control and manipulation.
> Anyone who claims to "know what (their chosen) god wants" is a fool or
> is in the god business for profit. Please make a note of it.
It is *so* easy to make you froth that I *almost* get bored of doing it.
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>> > And? Are they Christians?
>>
>> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>
> Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the
> sheeple who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the
> bible- thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which has
> been falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by ghost
> writers and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt to use
> "ancient and holy" writing as a form of mind control and manipulation.
> Anyone who claims to "know what (their chosen) god wants" is a fool or
> is in the god business for profit. Please make a note of it.
<snicker>
Nadegda
Dec 31, 2019, 3:16:34 AM12/31/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:57:54 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:45:38 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>> by Checkmate.
>>>
>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:21:14 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>> by Checkmate.
>>>
>>> forth
>>> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Wollmann time, that is.
>>>> >
>>>> >I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>> >Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>> >itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>> >
>>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Wollmann time, that is.
>>>> >
>>>> >I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>> >Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>> >itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>> >
>>>> >All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>> >anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>> >distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>> >early in January,
>>>> >which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>> >Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> >anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>> >distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>> >early in January,
>>>> >which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>> >Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> Didn't I TELL you...
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
>>>>
>>>> Apply ROT 13.
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> You were right on the money,
>>
>>No, he wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar to the
>>one Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
>
> You outted yourself as Libtard long ago.
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <osl70fpka7g5ktj0i...@4ax.com>
>>>>
>>>> Apply ROT 13.
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> You were right on the money,
>>
>>No, he wasn't. He predicted that *I* would make a post similar to the
>>one Libtard made that started this thread. And yet I didn't.
>
MID or it never happened.
> Unless you want to claim you lied, as you claimed when you proved you're
> Kensi, you're stuck with the prediction being correct.
In a pig's eye I am!
Nadegda
Dec 31, 2019, 3:17:20 AM12/31/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Nadegda
Dec 31, 2019, 3:18:11 AM12/31/19
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Libtard
Dec 31, 2019, 4:05:00 AM12/31/19
to
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>
>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>
>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>> early in January,
>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>> Wollmann!
>>>
>>> Seconded.
>>
>>Second accepted.
>
> According to you, kooks cannot nominate or second. By the very
> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>
>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>
>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>> early in January,
>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>> Wollmann!
>>>
>>> Seconded.
>>
>>Second accepted.
>
> rules you hold, you can't nominate or second.
I'm not a kook, kook.
>>All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's Wollmann, and may
>>the best kook win!
>
> existed outside of your delusions, none of the names can be on the
> ballot. Not unless you're prepared to admit you've been lying about the
> rules you hold.
Non sequitur. But have a Tinfoil Sombrero. It's on the house.
<chuckle>
Libtard
Dec 31, 2019, 4:06:12 AM12/31/19
to
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:34:27 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 -0000 (UTC) Libtard put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>
>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>
>> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> > melt!
>> > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>> >
>> >> Wollmann time, that is.
>> >>
>> >> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> >> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>> >> itself these days), and Gergles.
>> >>
>> >> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> >> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> >> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>> >> early in January,
>> >> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>> >> Christmas Wollmann!
>> >
>> > Seconded.
>>
>> Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
>> Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
>
> I'm awarding you some ti<SLAP>
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 -0000 (UTC) Libtard put forth the
> following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>
>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>
>> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> > melt!
>> > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>> >
>> >> Wollmann time, that is.
>> >>
>> >> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>> >> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>> >> itself these days), and Gergles.
>> >>
>> >> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>> >> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>> >> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>> >> early in January,
>> >> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>> >> Christmas Wollmann!
>> >
>> > Seconded.
>>
>> Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
>> Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
>
With literally hours left in the decade, Checkmate scores himself what
will likely be the last Tinfoil Sombrero to be handed out before 2020.
Libtard
Dec 31, 2019, 4:07:36 AM12/31/19
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:02:19 -0700, Scooter wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:18:10 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>
>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>> early in January,
>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>>> Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> Seconded.
>>>
>>> Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
>>> Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
>>
>>Hail Fluffy!
>
> Piss on Fluffy.
You dare blaspheme in my house?
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:18:10 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>
>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>> early in January,
>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>>> Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> Seconded.
>>>
>>> Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
>>> Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
>>
>>Hail Fluffy!
>
You dare blaspheme in my house?
KWills Shill #2
Dec 31, 2019, 5:37:46 AM12/31/19
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:14:31 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>Bible is a proper noun and should be capitalized. I wouldn't normally
>>>care, but you like to meltdown over grammar and spelling.
>>> I don't recall Skeeter ever expressing a religious view.
>>> As for Greg. Well, you got me there. If he's not a Christian, he
>>>certainly likes to make it appear as if he is.
>Given that most of the kooks posting here are American, Canadian, or
>British, and December 25 is a national public holiday in all three
>nations, the criterion is met regardless of any particular kook's
>professed creed. Including yours.
You're foaming fails to address the TRUTH I posted. Will you do
so now, or continue to add to the evidence that you hate reality?
>
><snicker>
>
>>>>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>>>>in January,
>>>>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>>>Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>>>
>>>Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you
>>>aren't even among the nominees?
>>>
>>>Just curious.
>>
>> Whereas I'm not foaming, outside of your fear of reality, I can't
>>offer an answer. Perhaps you will explain what it is about reality
>>that you fear so much. One can hope.
>> You will, of course, play some avoidance game rather than answer.
>>It's kind of what you do.
>
>No surprise there, really.
I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
--
C:\DOS
C:\DOS\RUN
RUN\DOS\RUN
<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>
>>>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>>itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>
>>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>>
>>>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>>>
>>> I recall Checkmate bashing a Bible thumper not so long ago. BTW,
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>
>>>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>>itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>
>>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>>
>>>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>>>
>>>Bible is a proper noun and should be capitalized. I wouldn't normally
>>>care, but you like to meltdown over grammar and spelling.
>>> I don't recall Skeeter ever expressing a religious view.
>>> As for Greg. Well, you got me there. If he's not a Christian, he
>>>certainly likes to make it appear as if he is.
>>>
>>>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>
>Irrelevant anyway: the Wollmann criterion is, and I quote, "those who
>would rather spend public holidays frothing continously on Usenet than
>risk contact with human beings in real life".
>
It is amazing how you are able to rationalize your actions.
>>>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>
>Irrelevant anyway: the Wollmann criterion is, and I quote, "those who
>would rather spend public holidays frothing continously on Usenet than
>risk contact with human beings in real life".
>
>Given that most of the kooks posting here are American, Canadian, or
>British, and December 25 is a national public holiday in all three
>nations, the criterion is met regardless of any particular kook's
>professed creed. Including yours.
so now, or continue to add to the evidence that you hate reality?
>
><snicker>
>
>>>>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
>>>>>in January,
>>>>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>>>Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>>>
>>>Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you
>>>aren't even among the nominees?
>>>
>>>Just curious.
>>
>>offer an answer. Perhaps you will explain what it is about reality
>>that you fear so much. One can hope.
>> You will, of course, play some avoidance game rather than answer.
>>It's kind of what you do.
>
>No surprise there, really.
I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
--
C:\DOS
C:\DOS\RUN
RUN\DOS\RUN
KWills Shill #2
Dec 31, 2019, 5:38:08 AM12/31/19
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 09:05:00 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>>All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's Wollmann, and may
>>>the best kook win!
>>
>> By the very rules you hold, they can't be. Even if the awards
>> existed outside of your delusions, none of the names can be on the
>> ballot. Not unless you're prepared to admit you've been lying about the
>> rules you hold.
>
>Non sequitur. But have a Tinfoil Sombrero. It's on the house.
>
><chuckle>
If only the awards existed outside of your delusions.
Feel free to continue to prove you're a kook. You are probably
going to anyway.
--
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day.
<lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>
>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>> early in January,
>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>>> Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> Seconded.
>>>
>>>Second accepted.
>>
>> According to you, kooks cannot nominate or second. By the very
>> rules you hold, you can't nominate or second.
>
>I'm not a kook, kook.
>
Your foaming your projection isn't working.
>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>
>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>> early in January,
>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
>>>>> Wollmann!
>>>>
>>>> Seconded.
>>>
>>>Second accepted.
>>
>> According to you, kooks cannot nominate or second. By the very
>> rules you hold, you can't nominate or second.
>
>I'm not a kook, kook.
>
>>>All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's Wollmann, and may
>>>the best kook win!
>>
>> By the very rules you hold, they can't be. Even if the awards
>> existed outside of your delusions, none of the names can be on the
>> ballot. Not unless you're prepared to admit you've been lying about the
>> rules you hold.
>
>Non sequitur. But have a Tinfoil Sombrero. It's on the house.
>
><chuckle>
Feel free to continue to prove you're a kook. You are probably
going to anyway.
--
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day.
Sn!pe
Dec 31, 2019, 5:50:07 AM12/31/19
to
Scooter <Sc...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Libturd (Paul) wrote:
> > Scooter wrote:
> >> Nerdegda (Paul) wrote:
[...]
Suppose Paul's house was on fire,
would you piss on it then?
--
^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
> Libturd (Paul) wrote:
> > Scooter wrote:
> >> Nerdegda (Paul) wrote:
[...]
> >>>Hail Fluffy!
> >>
> >> Piss on Fluffy.
> >
> >You dare blaspheme in my house?
>
> I piss on your house.
> >>
> >> Piss on Fluffy.
> >
> >You dare blaspheme in my house?
>
Suppose Paul's house was on fire,
would you piss on it then?
--
^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
mixed nuts
Dec 31, 2019, 8:38:54 AM12/31/19
to
On 12/31/2019 5:50 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> Scooter <Sc...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> Libturd (Paul) wrote:
>>> Scooter wrote:
>>>> Nerdegda (Paul) wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> Hail Fluffy!
>>>>
>>>> Piss on Fluffy.
>>>
>>> You dare blaspheme in my house?
>>
>> I piss on your house.
>
> Suppose Paul's house was on fire, would you piss on it then?
That seems like a silly question. Where's the self-righteous cruelty in
> Scooter <Sc...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> Libturd (Paul) wrote:
>>> Scooter wrote:
>>>> Nerdegda (Paul) wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> Hail Fluffy!
>>>>
>>>> Piss on Fluffy.
>>>
>>> You dare blaspheme in my house?
>>
>> I piss on your house.
>
> Suppose Paul's house was on fire, would you piss on it then?
that?
I could see him parking his car in the middle of the street so the fire
trucks couldn't get through while he takes a piss on the nearest pansy
patch.
--
Grizzly H.
%
Dec 31, 2019, 10:29:36 AM12/31/19
to
"Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."
Dec 31, 2019, 10:41:41 AM12/31/19
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, snip...@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
<...>
>Suppose Paul's house was on fire,
>would you piss on it then?
In Canada, it's against the law to
piss on public housing.
LOL
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory
Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignøred misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
<...>
>Suppose Paul's house was on fire,
>would you piss on it then?
piss on public housing.
LOL
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory
Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignøred misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 1:40:52 AM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 09:06:12 -0000 (UTC) Libtard put forth the
Checkmate.
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 1:46:23 AM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:14:31 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
Checkmate.
following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
> Irrelevant anyway
>
>
Now you're catching on. Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks?
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 1:47:53 AM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:15:27 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
Checkmate.
following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:00:27 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate.
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> > following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> >
> >
> >> > And? Are they Christians?
> >>
> >> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
> >
> > Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the
> > sheeple who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the
> > bible- thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which has
> > been falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by ghost
> > writers and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt to use
> > "ancient and holy" writing as a form of mind control and manipulation.
> > Anyone who claims to "know what (their chosen) god wants" is a fool or
> > is in the god business for profit. Please make a note of it.
>
> It is *so* easy to make you froth that I *almost* get bored of doing it.
>
> <snicker>
Simple people are easily amused.
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:00:27 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate.
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
> > following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> >
> >
> >> > And? Are they Christians?
> >>
> >> Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
> >
> > Hey Dummytard: *I'M* not an x-tian, so don't lump me in with the
> > sheeple who are. *I* thump no bibles, and have often criticized the
> > bible- thumpers for believing all the bullshit in the bible, which has
> > been falsified and altered numerous times over the centuries by ghost
> > writers and plagiarists. Just like ALL religions that attempt to use
> > "ancient and holy" writing as a form of mind control and manipulation.
> > Anyone who claims to "know what (their chosen) god wants" is a fool or
> > is in the god business for profit. Please make a note of it.
>
> It is *so* easy to make you froth that I *almost* get bored of doing it.
>
> <snicker>
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 1:48:43 AM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:16:33 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
Checkmate.
following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> In a pig's eye I am!
>
If you say so, Yoda...
>
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 1:49:44 AM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:17:19 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
Checkmate.
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 1:50:54 AM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:18:10 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the
Checkmate.
following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
> >>
> >>> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>>
> >>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
> >>> itself these days), and Gergles.
> >>>
> >>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
> >>> in January,
> >>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >>> Wollmann!
> >>
> >> Seconded.
> >
> > Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
> > Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
>
> Hail Fluffy!
Is Fluffy going for a ride on the Sybian again?
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
> >>
> >>> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>>
> >>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
> >>> itself these days), and Gergles.
> >>>
> >>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
> >>> in January,
> >>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >>> Wollmann!
> >>
> >> Seconded.
> >
> > Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
> > Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
>
> Hail Fluffy!
"Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."
Jan 1, 2020, 11:44:28 AM1/1/20
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
>...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 2:42:19 PM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
Checkmate.
the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
"Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
>
> >...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2020
%
Jan 1, 2020, 2:48:26 PM1/1/20
to
On 2020-01-01 12:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
>
> "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
>
> It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
> made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
>
why does no one remember nads is a male
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
>
> "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
>
> It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
> made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
>
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 2:58:30 PM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:48:27 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
Checkmate.
which was duly noted and recorded:
>
> On 2020-01-01 12:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate.
> >
> > On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> > the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
> >
> > "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
> >
> > It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
> > made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
> >
> why does no one remember nads is a male
We weren't talking about him.
>
> On 2020-01-01 12:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate.
> >
> > On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> > the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
> >
> > "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
> >
> > It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
> > made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
> >
> why does no one remember nads is a male
%
Jan 1, 2020, 3:04:31 PM1/1/20
to
On 2020-01-01 12:58 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:48:27 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
> which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>>
>> On 2020-01-01 12:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
>>> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
>>>
>>> "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
>>>
>>> It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
>>> made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
>>>
>> why does no one remember nads is a male
>
> We weren't talking about him.
>
oh ok , sorry , i thought you were when i saw this
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate.
>
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:48:27 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
> which was duly noted and recorded:
>
>
>>
>> On 2020-01-01 12:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
>>> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
>>>
>>> "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
>>>
>>> It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
>>> made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
>>>
>> why does no one remember nads is a male
>
> We weren't talking about him.
>
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 3:14:31 PM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:04:32 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
Checkmate.
which was duly noted and recorded:
>
> On 2020-01-01 12:58 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate.
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:48:27 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
> > which was duly noted and recorded:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On 2020-01-01 12:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >>> Checkmate.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> >>> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
> >>>
> >>> "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
> >>>
> >>> It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
> >>> made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
> >>>
> >> why does no one remember nads is a male
> >
> > We weren't talking about him.
> >
> oh ok , sorry , i thought you were when i saw this
>
> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
The law says we have to respect gender queer's declared identities.
>
> On 2020-01-01 12:58 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate.
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:48:27 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
> > which was duly noted and recorded:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On 2020-01-01 12:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >>> Checkmate.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:44:27 -0500 "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." put forth
> >>> the following notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Checkmate <More.Bul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ktsnqZzDE
> >>>
> >>> "Look at ME! I'm PRETTY!"
> >>>
> >>> It's a good thing for men that all those years of selective breeding have
> >>> made pretty girls a dime a dozen.
> >>>
> >> why does no one remember nads is a male
> >
> > We weren't talking about him.
> >
> oh ok , sorry , i thought you were when i saw this
>
> ...Nads says, as she puts on her shiny new tinfoil underpanties.
Checkmate
Jan 1, 2020, 3:15:11 PM1/1/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:29:35 -0700 % put forth the following notion,
Checkmate.
%
Jan 1, 2020, 3:19:21 PM1/1/20
to
%
Jan 1, 2020, 3:20:13 PM1/1/20
to
Nadegda
Jan 1, 2020, 7:22:56 PM1/1/20
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:37:47 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
[post-edits have been restored to the original text below]
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:14:31 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>melt!
>>>>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>>>itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>>
>>>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>>>
>>>>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>>>>
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:55:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>melt!
>>>>On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 06:36:06 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
>>>>>>Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
>>>>>>itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>>
>>>>> And? Are they Christians?
>>>>
>>>>Yep. And that last one is particularly prone to bible-thumpage.
>>>>
>>>>> If not, they may not care about a Christian holiday.
>>
>>Irrelevant anyway: the Wollmann criterion is, and I quote, "those who
>>would rather spend public holidays frothing continously on Usenet than
>>risk contact with human beings in real life".
>
> It is amazing how you are able to rationalize your actions.
Why would I need to rationalize your frothing?
>>
>>Irrelevant anyway: the Wollmann criterion is, and I quote, "those who
>>would rather spend public holidays frothing continously on Usenet than
>>risk contact with human beings in real life".
>
> It is amazing how you are able to rationalize your actions.
>>Given that most of the kooks posting here are American, Canadian, or
>>British, and December 25 is a national public holiday in all three
>>nations, the criterion is met regardless of any particular kook's
>>professed creed. Including yours.
>
> You're foaming
>><snicker>
>>
>>>>>>All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>>>anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>>>distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>>>early in January,
>>>>>>which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>>>>Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>>
>>>>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>>>>
>>>>Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you
>>>>aren't even among the nominees?
>>>>
>>>>Just curious.
>>>
>>> I can't offer an answer.
>>
>>
>>No surprise there, really.
>
> I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
Admitting what, that you can't offer an explanation for your own kooky
>
> I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
behavior?
Nadegda
Jan 1, 2020, 7:26:26 PM1/1/20
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
has lost the argument.
Now which argument had you lost again? It was so unimportant I am having
trouble recalling. But the amount of foam you've been spilling since you
lost it suggests it was rather more important to you, so perhaps you do
recall?
Nadegda
Jan 1, 2020, 7:28:23 PM1/1/20
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
than Dubya had for those phantom WMDs in Iraq.
SPNAK!
<snicker>
Nadegda
Jan 1, 2020, 7:29:44 PM1/1/20
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
%
Jan 1, 2020, 7:57:41 PM1/1/20
to
%
Jan 1, 2020, 7:58:09 PM1/1/20
to
%
Jan 1, 2020, 7:58:36 PM1/1/20
to
%
Jan 1, 2020, 7:59:09 PM1/1/20
to
vallor
Jan 1, 2020, 8:00:03 PM1/1/20
to
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:29:43 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> Wrong. That was Libtard, idiot. Can't you read?
Your little fictions are adorable.
> Wrong. That was Libtard, idiot. Can't you read?
--
-v
%
Jan 1, 2020, 8:01:46 PM1/1/20
to
Checkmate
Jan 2, 2020, 4:16:17 AM1/2/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 00:26:26 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the following
Checkmate.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2020
Checkmate
Jan 2, 2020, 4:19:57 AM1/2/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 00:29:43 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the following
Checkmate.
"Namecalling is all you have left? It's the last refuge of whichever side
has lost the argument."
Checkmate
Jan 2, 2020, 4:21:37 AM1/2/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:02:19 -0700 Scooter put forth the following
Checkmate.
notion, which was duly noted and recorded:
>
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:18:10 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:18:10 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 +0000, Libtard wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >>
> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>> melt!
> >>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
> >>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
> >>>>
> >>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
> >>>> in January,
> >>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >>>> Wollmann!
> >>>
> >>> Seconded.
> >>
> >> Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
> >> Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
> >
> >Hail Fluffy!
> >
> >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >>
> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>> melt!
> >>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Wollmann time, that is.
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on Christmas
> >>>> Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is calling
> >>>> itself these days), and Gergles.
> >>>>
> >>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
> >>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
> >>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide, early
> >>>> in January,
> >>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's Christmas
> >>>> Wollmann!
> >>>
> >>> Seconded.
> >>
> >> Second accepted. All three kooks will be on the ballot for December's
> >> Wollmann, and may the best kook win!
> >
>
> Piss on Fluffy.
Nads wipes his ass with Fluffy.
Checkmate
Jan 2, 2020, 4:24:57 AM1/2/20
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate.
On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 00:28:22 -0000 (UTC) Nadegda put forth the following
Checkmate.
j <--- (tug-tug)
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2020
Libtard
Jan 2, 2020, 7:10:39 AM1/2/20
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:38:09 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 09:05:00 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>Second accepted.
>>>
>>> According to you, kooks cannot nominate or second. By the very
>>> rules you hold, you can't nominate or second.
>>
>>I'm not a kook, kook.
>
> Your foaming your projection isn't working.
... says the kook foaming his projection.
--
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 09:05:00 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:57:17 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:36:40 -0000 (UTC), Libtard
>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>
>>> <lib...@sandernistas.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:54:21 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 05:53:45 +0000, Libtard wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on
>>>>>> Christmas Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is
>>>>>> calling itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>>> early in January,
>>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>>>> Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>>
>>>>> Seconded.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wollmann time, that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that the following kooks were extensively posting on
>>>>>> Christmas Day: Checkmate, Skeeter (or whatever his morphing ass is
>>>>>> calling itself these days), and Gergles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>>> early in January,
>>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>>>> Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Second accepted.
>>>
>>> According to you, kooks cannot nominate or second. By the very
>>> rules you hold, you can't nominate or second.
>>
>>I'm not a kook, kook.
>
> Your foaming your projection isn't working.
... says the kook foaming his projection.
--
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
%
Jan 2, 2020, 8:17:53 AM1/2/20
to
On 2020-01-02 3:25 a.m., KWills Shill #2 wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 00:22:55 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Post edits restored to the original.
> You frothed. And, outside of your further PROOF that you're a
> k00k, you are not me. Honest.
>>> so now, or continue to add to the evidence that you hate reality?
>>
>> Don't be silly.
>>
>
> I expected you to further prove yourself the unmatched k00k you
> are. But I figured I'd offer you the chance to address the truth.
>>>>> offer an answer. Perhaps you will explain what it is about reality
>>>>> that you fear so much. One can hope.
>>>>> You will, of course, play some avoidance game rather than answer.
>>>>> It's kind of what you do.
> present yourself to be. And that you have lost. Feel free to continue
> to prove these truths, if you feel compelled to do so. I will simply
> restore the context so that anyone reading will see what you're
> admitting to.
>
then will you admit you're a convicted felon
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 00:22:55 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Post edits restored to the original.
> k00k, you are not me. Honest.
>
>>>> Given that most of the kooks posting here are American, Canadian, or
>>>> British, and December 25 is a national public holiday in all three
>>>> nations, the criterion is met regardless of any particular kook's
>>>> professed creed. Including yours.
>>>
>>> You're foaming fails to address the TRUTH I posted. Will you do
>>>> Given that most of the kooks posting here are American, Canadian, or
>>>> British, and December 25 is a national public holiday in all three
>>>> nations, the criterion is met regardless of any particular kook's
>>>> professed creed. Including yours.
>>>
>>> so now, or continue to add to the evidence that you hate reality?
>>
>> Don't be silly.
>>
>
> I expected you to further prove yourself the unmatched k00k you
> are. But I figured I'd offer you the chance to address the truth.
>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>>>>> early in January,
>>>>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>>>>>> Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you
>>>>>> aren't even among the nominees?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just curious.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whereas I'm not foaming, outside of your fear of reality, I can't
>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> All of them are hereby nominated for December's Wollmann -- and I
>>>>>>>> anticipate that someone will second this nomination in the not too
>>>>>>>> distant future. Which means you, the voters, will get to decide,
>>>>>>>> early in January,
>>>>>>>> which of these lucky kooks will be honored with this year's
>>>>>>>> Christmas Wollmann!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which *might* mean something if the awards still existed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a question for you: why are you foaming about this when you
>>>>>> aren't even among the nominees?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just curious.
>>>>>
>>>>> offer an answer. Perhaps you will explain what it is about reality
>>>>> that you fear so much. One can hope.
>>>>> You will, of course, play some avoidance game rather than answer.
>>>>> It's kind of what you do.
>>>>
>>>> No surprise there, really.
>>>
>>> I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
>>
>> Admitting what, that you can't offer an explanation for your own kooky
>> behavior?
>
> Your post edits only serve to prove you truly are the k00k you
>>>> No surprise there, really.
>>>
>>> I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
>>
>> Admitting what, that you can't offer an explanation for your own kooky
>> behavior?
>
> present yourself to be. And that you have lost. Feel free to continue
> to prove these truths, if you feel compelled to do so. I will simply
> restore the context so that anyone reading will see what you're
> admitting to.
>
then will you admit you're a convicted felon
Nadegda
Feb 2, 2020, 5:36:34 PM2/2/20
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:25:19 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 00:22:55 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:37:47 -0800, KWills Shill #2 wrote:
>>
>>> I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
>>
>>Admitting what, that you can't offer an explanation for your own kooky
>>behavior?
>
> My post edits only serve to prove I truly am the k00k you
>>
>>> I'm surprised that you are admitting it.
>>
>>Admitting what, that you can't offer an explanation for your own kooky
>>behavior?
>
> revealed me to be. And that I have lost. Feel free to continue to
> prove these truths, if you feel compelled to do so. I will simply
> post edit even though anyone reading will see what you really wrote
> when they read your articles in this thread.
(Above de-projected.)
Ah, I see.
<snicker>
Nadegda
Feb 2, 2020, 5:38:23 PM2/2/20
to
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 01:19:53 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always make ANSI approved safety giggles when reading posts by
No counter, eh? /Quelle/ surprise.
<snicker>
0 new messages