Special Numbers
Mike Kincaid
> Could someone post a listing of the number for calling Verizon from a
> cell phone? (if available)
611 and *611 should reach CS
#646 (#MIN) to check minute usage
#225 (#BAL) to check payments/balance
*228 to program phone or update PRL (check other posts in this NG for an
explanation of what that is)
I once got a message on an unactivated phone saying I could call *711 to
open a temporary account, but that worked neither with that phone nor
with another activated one, so go figure.
There might be other non-obvious ones I'm missing here.
Darkbandit
phone? (if available)
Thanks
Bill Radio
http://www.mountainwireless.com/prl.htm/
-Bill
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-16F161...@news.west.cox.net...
>
>
> BTY, although I've seen PRL used in messages, and indications that it
> has something to do with roaming, I can't say that I've ever seen it
> explained.
John A
http://www.mountainwireless.com/prl.htm
-John
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in article
<michelle-16F161...@news.west.cox.net>:
> In article <20021118185...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>,
> Mike Kincaid <kz7y...@unspam.sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> > *228 to program phone or update PRL (check other posts in this NG for an
> > explanation of what that is)
>
> Oh, I've seen it as #228; no wonder I've never gotten through.
>
> BTY, although I've seen PRL used in messages, and indications that it
> has something to do with roaming, I can't say that I've ever seen it
> explained.
>
> --Michelle
>
> --
> We're not human beings having a spiritual experience.
> We're spiritual beings having a human experience.
[posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]
james g. keegan jr.
2. some time ago there was a discussion as to whether you should press #228,
2 every time you were in a new location. knowing which would be a help to
travelers.
<jazzer23ATyahoo.com (Doc Yahoo)> wrote in message
news:utjpr2q...@corp.supernews.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Michelle,
>
> After you select Yes, listen to the voice instruction coming over the
> phone. It will give you two options, press 2 to update your PRL.
>
> DocYahoo
>
> Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in article
> <michelle-2512D1...@news.west.cox.net>:
> > In article <tSkC9.39099$46.32064@fe01>,
> > "Bill Radio" <Bi...@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> >
> > > PRL explained at:
> > > http://www.mountainwireless.com/prl.htm/
> >
> > Weirdly enough, when I try to access that URL by clicking on it in the
> > newsgroup message, I get a "page not found" error, but when I access it
> > from within the mountainwireless site, I can get to it. Very strange.
> >
> > Anyway, when I enter *228 and press the send button, the display asks if
> > I want to start activation; I'm too chicken to answer "Yes" without
> > knowing what's going on.
> >
> > Got any step-by-step instructions?
Jason Protheroe
> In article <20021118185...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>,
> Mike Kincaid <kz7y...@unspam.sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> > explanation of what that is)
>
>
> BTY, although I've seen PRL used in messages, and indications that it
> has something to do with roaming, I can't say that I've ever seen it
> explained.
>
> --Michelle
>
It's like an index of different System IDs that Verizon programmed
in for the phone to connect to with certain priorities on
certain SIDs over others. It also is what drives the roaming
indicator on the phone to indicate whether Verizon has a roaming
agreement with the carrier you're roaming with or not.
Google "prl 50057" and you'll be able to see one and then it will
make sense.
--
Jason Protheroe
Scott J
--
why not stay with the best!
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in article
<michelle-E1034A...@news.west.cox.net>:
> In article <CBrC9.64552$Em.22...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
> "james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > 2. some time ago there was a discussion as to whether you should press #228,
>
> Actually, it's *228 <send>
TJ
1. if you press #1 it will program your phone number, home SID, NID and
other basic programming info including PRL version for your price plan
2. #228 will not work. it's *228. However. it should never be done when you
are outside of your real "home" area. (example: if you are from chicago,
even if you have SR national price plan, you still should not do *228 while
you are in NYC or LA,)
3 (or maybe 2 again?) everytime you are roaming in different location. you
may try *18 to ensure follow me roaming is activated.
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:CBrC9.64552$Em.22...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Charles Hoch
james g. keegan jr. <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>1. what happens when you press #1?
>
>2. some time ago there was a discussion as to whether you should press #228,
>2 every time you were in a new location. knowing which would be a help to
>travelers.
Option 1 usually means to program your phone number, home system id, and
such into your phone, and then load the PRL. This is usually a one-time
thing when you get a new phone. It used to be that all of the info had
to be manually entered, in a model-dependent procedure. Now the CSR just
enters the ESN into their system, and then does *228,option 1 on the phone.
Option 2 just loads the current (for better or for worse) PRL.
On your next point, sounds like *28, which was used to get your phone
registered in the location where you were roaming. Except for a few
oddball cases, usually involving "mom-and-pop" local cellular companies,
this is no longer needed, since the registration happens automatically
when your phone acquires the new system. In fact, if you are roaming
in CDMA digital mode, this registration HAS to happen, since the link
from the phone to the tower is encoded with the ESN (serial number)
of your phone, which is never transmitted over the air. The system
you are roaming on has to get this info from your home system.
Jason Protheroe
> Obviously you don't know how to count
>
> 1. if you press #1 it will program your phone number, home SID, NID and
> other basic programming info including PRL version for your price plan
>
> 2. #228 will not work. it's *228. However. it should never be done when you
> are outside of your real "home" area. (example: if you are from chicago,
> even if you have SR national price plan, you still should not do *228 while
> you are in NYC or LA,)
>
> 3 (or maybe 2 again?) everytime you are roaming in different location. you
> may try *18 to ensure follow me roaming is activated.
>
>
heard of it before.
--
Jason Protheroe
james g. keegan jr.
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-E1034A...@news.west.cox.net...
> In article <CBrC9.64552$Em.22...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
> "james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > #228, 2 every time you were in a new location. knowing which would
> > be a help to travelers.
: Actually, it's *228 <send>
you don't know either, eh?
good for readers to ahve anotehr chance to the legitimacy of your posts
though.
jk
ps. i replaced some of the text you deleted
Bill Radio
Please be careful about your recommendation. You imply that "travelers"
should press #228, "every time you were in a new location..." That has
been a recipe for disaster!
If you upgrade outside of your home market, the system may not recognize
you, and will probably load a generic PRL, probably one that shows the
roaming indicator everywhere outside your home market. This effectively
disables your ability to determine your roaming situation, a critical factor
with the America's Choice plan, until you get home.
Don't upgrade unless you are fairly certain of the results!
-Bill Radio
Western U.S. Wireless Reviews, Now w/Texas
http://www.MountainWireless.com
TJ
http://www.mountainwireless.com/prl.htm
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-2512D1...@news.west.cox.net...
> In article <tSkC9.39099$46.32064@fe01>,
> "Bill Radio" <Bi...@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>
> > PRL explained at:
> > http://www.mountainwireless.com/prl.htm/
>
james g. keegan jr.
"Bill Radio" <Bi...@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:J4GC9.1548$EY.1229@fe01...
james g. keegan jr.
> Actually, I do know. It's *228 <send>. #228 gets you nowhere.
> Apparently, you don't know.
i believe you and, perhaps tj, are the only two persons posting to this
newsgroup to have flamed a typo contained in an information request. (tj, if
you did not do the same, i apologize, but, as i recall, you did.)
that action portrays you far more accurately than any others' post could.
perhaps your life is so ugly and hopeless that you have some excuse for this
behavior. still, you would be better off to keep your hatred at home.
kz
a great place for free-speech, but "hatred" seems a tad strong; and Michelle
is such a nice name. I'm of the opinion that everyone is trying to pull
this boat in the same direction. Once in a while an "oar" does slip out of
the water.
The world will be a better place if you/I show a bit of tolerance, and I
hope it starts with me or I / You / We / Us / They / Them)
(editorial ends here) KZ
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:T_KC9.152351$c51.44...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Scott J
about the *228 he may have not entered send or maybe put # instead of *,
but we knew what he was talking about. I think people need to stop
finding the little things that are wrong with a post and focus on the
positive. That will stop a lot of conflict!!
--
why not stay with the best!
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in article
<michelle-964C1D...@news.west.cox.net>:
> In article <T_KC9.152351$c51.44...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
> "james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > i believe you and, perhaps tj, are the only two persons posting to this
> > newsgroup to have flamed a typo contained in an information request. (tj, if
> > you did not do the same, i apologize, but, as i recall, you did.)
>
> Considering that the "typo" was presented many times, by a number of
> people, it constituted an error of fact, not just a typographical error.
>
> But you are so full of yourself, and unable to accept any perceived
> criticism, and apparently thrive on conflict, that you feel compelled to
> attack anyone and everyone who doesn't toady to you, that it is
> impossible for you to behave rationally.
>
> There hasn't been a flame on this newsgroup in the past three weeks that
> you were not in the thick of, and very few that you didn't instigate or
> initiate.
james g. keegan jr.
i was simply reacting to something i saw as really ugly ... miclelle's flame
of a legitimate request for information because it contained a typo.
this newsgroup's purpose is to exchange information. if people like michell
can intimidate lurkers who are considering posting and make them afraid to
ask a question becauwse of the way they see others' questions being bashed
about, then it makes the newsgroup a less good place to be.
i think when someone behaves as michelle did, it's not so bad a thing for
people to speak up and say something.
but you still make a good point. :-)
"kz" <kaz...@insightbbnospam.com> wrote in message
news:cxNC9.1572$Kw6.9...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
james g. keegan jr.
> In article <T_KC9.152351$c51.44...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
> > newsgroup to have flamed a typo contained in an information request.
(tj, if
> > you did not do the same, i apologize, but, as i recall, you did.)
> > that action portrays you far more accurately than any others' post
could.
> > perhaps your life is so ugly and hopeless that you have some excuse for
this
> >behavior. still, you would be better off to keep your hatred at home.
> Considering that the "typo" was presented many times, by a number of
> people, it constituted an error of fact, not just a typographical error.
too bad you didn't just correct the typo rather than attack the typist.
as i said, "perhaps your life is so ugly and hopeless that you have some
excuse for this
behavior. still, you would be better off to keep your hatred at home."
now run along until you develop the character to apologize to all the
readers who do not post looking for help or information because they don't
want to deal with the ugliness of a response like yours.
jk.
ps. some deleted text replaced for accuracy and context
james g. keegan jr.
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-D90CE2...@news.west.cox.net...
> Keegan, as is typical of him, launched into yet another personal attack.
you didn't really need to lie again here. why did you do so?
readers know you flamed a typo in a legitimate request for information.
that was a mean spirited and ugly thing for you to have done.
readers know you should have responded with a quick apology for your
behavior and moved on.
instead you make more personal attacks.
> He is a liar and an abuser.
you paint a clear portrait of yourself in this thread,
shame on you.
james g. keegan jr.
> > i was simply reacting to something i saw as really ugly ...
> > miclelle's flame of a legitimate request for information because it
> > contained a typo.
>
you already posted proof of my statement by reposting your article. were you
so filled with anger and hatred that you didn't read what you said?
keep on denying what you did because in doing so you paint yourself in a way
that is far, far uglier than anyone else could.
you flamed a typo contained in a legitimate request for information.
then, instead of apologizing, you twisted and lied and denied, as has been
your history in the past.
you are ugly, meanspirited and completely without honor or character.
james g. keegan jr.
> > you didn't really need to lie again here. why did you do so?
>
in your display of hatred and anger, you already proved that you lied. you
reposted an example
> > readers know you flamed a typo in a legitimate request for information.
>
> No, they do not. They know that you flamed me for pointing out that it
> is *228, not #228.
your continued lies and denials don;t change what you did. your blatant lies
don;t change the facts of what people can read for themselves.
>
> > that was a mean spirited and ugly thing for you to have done.
>
> No, it was mean spirited and ugly for you to have attacked me and lied
> about me.
i think when you fall into this mode of projection and denial, you could be
displaying signs of emotional problems.
>
> > readers know you should have responded with a quick apology for your
> > behavior and moved on.
>
> That's what you should have done.
why do you want me to apologize for your lies? have you become so twisted
you are not sure who you are?
>
> > instead you make more personal attacks.
> I'm responding to your personal attacks.
no, you are responding in rage because your character has again been
displayed for the newsgroup to see.
i have to admit, you generate more fan mail to me than anything else has in
several years. tell me, what did you do to make so many readers hate you?
jk
james g. keegan jr.
wrote in message news:michelle-916898...@news.west.cox.net...
because i told her to apologize for her lies and deceptions in her twisted
denial of her attack of an information request, michelle rants:
> I want you to apogize for your lies and your unwarranted and unprovoked
> attacks.
because i told her the facts were evident for all to see that had lied and
attacked without provocation, michelle repeats:
> The facts are evident for all to see; you have lied about me, and have
> attacked me without reason or provocation.
because i told her she was ugly, meanspirited and completely without honor
or character, michelle retorts:
> You are an unscrupulous person, you do not know right from wrong, and
> you have no regard for facts or truth.
do you really think that your childish repetition fools anyone?
i will continue to respond to your lies as long as you keep posting them.
Anon Ymous
time to take your discussion private.
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in article
<michelle-916898...@news.west.cox.net>:
> In article <8mVC9.153771$c51.45...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
> "james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > > > readers know you should have responded with a quick apology for your
> > > > behavior and moved on.
> > >
> > > That's what you should have done.
> >
> > why do you want me to apologize for your lies? have you become so twisted
> > you are not sure who you are?
>
> I want you to apogize for your lies and your unwarranted and unprovoked
> attacks.
>
> The facts are evident for all to see; you have lied about me, and have
> attacked me without reason or provocation.
>
> You are an unscrupulous person, you do not know right from wrong, and
> you have no regard for facts or truth.
>
> You want to restore peace here? Cease and desist your attacks; then
> I'll not have any to respond to.
>
> But if you persist in attacking me, I'll continue to defend myself.
james g. keegan jr.
> > you already posted proof of my statement by reposting your article. were
you
> > so filled with anger and hatred that you didn't read what you said?
>
> anger and hatred blinds you to the obvious.
>
> > you flamed a typo contained in a legitimate request for information.
>
you already posted proof of my statement by reposting your article. were you
so filled with anger and hatred that you didn't read what you said?
i think you should show everyone and repost it again and again.
and when you do, keep denying what your post says.
Proconsul
acting like five year olds fighting over an Oreo cookie at recess......:(
Neither of you seems to understand that you're feeding the fire and that
you're BOTH wrong!
PC
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:yNVC9.153789$c51.45...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Mike Kincaid
wrote:
>> 2. some time ago there was a discussion as to whether you should
>> press #228,
>
how is this a flame? To me it looks like a simple correction to a common
and understandable typo... everyone gets mixed up with the # and * codes
sometimes. and everybody benefits if the information later gets
corrected, right?
james g. keegan jr.
"Mike Kincaid" <kz7y...@unspam.sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:20021120173...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
right, except you read the wrong post, as michelle intended.
the actual flame is below in its entirety. her creative editing fooled you,
eh?
===begin post
Re: Special Numbers
From:
Michelle Steiner
Date:
Today, 2:32 AM
In Response To:
Re: Special NumbersYesterday, 5:43 PM by james g. keegan jr.
Top Message:
Special NumbersMonday, 9:15 PM by Darkbandit
In article <D8zC9.146856$c51.43...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> > > 2. some time ago there was a discussion as to whether you should
> > > press #228, 2 every time you were in a new location. knowing
> > > which would be a help to travelers.
> :
> : Actually, it's *228 <send>
>
> you don't know either, eh?
Actually, I do know. It's *228 <send>. #228 gets you nowhere.
Apparently, you don't know.
After *228 <send> you have to press the left softkey to answer "Yes,"
and then press 2 in response to the voice prompt.
> good for readers to ahve anotehr chance to the legitimacy of your
> posts though.
thanks. But why you would want to do that and at the same time show the
illigitimacy of your posts is beyond me. Most people in your position
would be trying to hide their ignorance, not broadcast it.
--
We're not human beings having a spiritual experience.
We're spiritual beings having a human experience.
===end post
Justa Lurker
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in alt.cellular.verizon:
| i believe you and, perhaps tj, are the only two persons posting to
| this newsgroup to have flamed a typo contained in an information
| request.
And you seem to flame everyone else.
| that action portrays you far more accurately than any others'
| post could.
Projecting?
| perhaps your life is so ugly and hopeless that you have some
| excuse for this behavior. still, you would be better off to
| keep your hatred at home.
Projecting.
JL
-----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =-----
Yuk Fu
miss out on good information because I will no longer read or respond to
what either of them post, and maybe others here will do the same. I'm
here for information, not to listen to two supposed adults calling each
other names and arguing over a # sign. I think they both have done a
great job demonstrating to the group exactly what kind of people they
are.
Maybe they are one user posting under two names!
"Proconsul" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in article
<ByWC9.4629$OQ5.9...@news2.west.cox.net>:
[posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]
TJ
whenever you are roaming to other system...that system report your presence
to your home switch
so if people call you. it can be routed to the roaming system you are
roaming with
it doesn't always work (it's not a prefect world) so to ensure incoming
calls. always dail *18 when you roam in a new area, city or town. This will
allow your phone say "hello" to the switch that "hey, i am roaming over
here! any incoming calls, please route it over here!"
"Jason Protheroe" <prot...@NOSPAM.uiuc.N0SPMedu> wrote in message
news:slrnatlj8l....@eesnop1.ews.uiuc.edu...
TJ
No, I don't have hatred against anyone here. no need to.... in fact....if
someone cut me off at 90 mph, I'll just report to 911.
In fact...I have never honk at someone! (I did get middle finger one time
when I pick up my cell phone because this guy with single occupancy cutting
me off on a car pool lane going 80 mph. I thought it was fun because he
thought I am calling the cop)
see? I don't hate anyone, no need to. However. I like to make fun of people
when they call me jerk. :-P
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:T_KC9.152351$c51.44...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
james g. keegan jr.
> I see; and your "you don't know either, eh?" is not a flame?
no, it is a clear statement of fact.
i asked a question of the newsgroup.
you creatively edited your reply and flamed my question for a typo. others
have pointed that out to you.
all you needed to to was say "sorry" or even leave the discussion go.
instead you have protested, lied, defended without reason and started yet
another flame war.
the last you did this, i let you off the hook after a few exchanges when you
were blatantly lying. this time, i will not do that. obviously you are not
emotionally equipped to apologize for either your flame or for your
subsequent lies so i will not demand that of you. i will, however, respond
to each post where you continue to lie and to each future post where you
lie.
james g. keegan jr.
"Justa Lurker" </dev/null@.com> wrote in message
news:3ddc6542....@news.newsfeeds.com...
james g. keegan jr.
"Bugs Bunny®" <bu...@hare.net> wrote in message
news:utp6gor...@corp.supernews.com...
> I think you both need to get laid.
were you offering?
GandalfSC
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:I94D9.74787$Em.24...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> hi michelle. embarassed to use your name?
>
Justa Lurker is NOT Michelle.
Justa is a regular here. Very knowlegeable and helpful.
Do a google or open the headers for justa and you'll see
that Justa Lurker and Michelle are two different people.
As to the ongoing flame war betweeen you and Michelle, take it private.
GandalfSC
--
Here we go again...
Another new phone.
james g. keegan jr.
"GandalfSC" <gan...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:uC7D9.156590$c51.46...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> Justa Lurker is NOT Michelle.
that is clearly a good think for justa, assuming you are correct.
> As to the ongoing flame war betweeen you and Michelle, take it private.
no.
when someone attacks another person's information request, then more than a
few people should be critical of that attack.
i have no interest in flaming michelle. but i do have an interst in being
critical of some of her more despicable actions and subsequent lies about
them. given the number of supportive email messages i have received from
lurkers, i am comfortable that i did the right thing in this case. i'm sorry
it bothers you.
Proconsul
PC
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:QR3D9.74774$Em.24...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Proconsul
to do that.....:)
Don't let jerks cause you to forget that you're a "lady".....:)
PC
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-6F0DC9...@news.west.cox.net...
| In article <ByWC9.4629$OQ5.9...@news2.west.cox.net>,
| "Proconsul" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
|
| > Why don't both of you take this childish exchange "private"....! You're
both
| > acting like five year olds fighting over an Oreo cookie at
recess......:(
| >
| > Neither of you seems to understand that you're feeding the fire and that
| > you're BOTH wrong!
|
| You are absolutely right, and I offer my apologies for being his
| enabler, and shall try to do better.
GandalfSC
"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7P7D9.74887$Em.25...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
> "GandalfSC" <gan...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:uC7D9.156590$c51.46...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > Justa Lurker is NOT Michelle.
>
> that is clearly a good think for justa, assuming you are correct.
>
Check the headers.
Justa has no need to pose as someone else. At least none that I know of.
Justa is a trusted person in the group.
> > As to the ongoing flame war betweeen you and Michelle, take it private.
>
> no.
>
> when someone attacks another person's information request, then more than
a
> few people should be critical of that attack.
>
Michelle made a mistake. The attacks have no merit, IMHO
> i have no interest in flaming michelle. but i do have an interst in being
> critical of some of her more despicable actions and subsequent lies about
> them. given the number of supportive email messages i have received from
> lurkers, i am comfortable that i did the right thing in this case. i'm
sorry
> it bothers you.
>
As someone who has been posting here for a quite a while, I see this all the
time.
Others are seeing it diferently, including me.
james g. keegan jr.
"Proconsul" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:C4aD9.740$ro.8...@news2.west.cox.net...
> Enough of your childish nonsense! Begone, wretch!!
whereas your posted added much content, eh?
do you know the meaning of the word hypocrite?
james g. keegan jr.
> Michelle made a mistake.
i agree.
she does not agree, and viciously attacked me
> The attacks have no merit, IMHO
exactly.
james g. keegan jr.
"Bugs BunnyŽ" <bu...@hare.net> wrote in message
news:utqh5jj...@corp.supernews.com...
> On or about Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:21:37 GMT, someone claiming to be "james
g.
> keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> scribbled the following:
> :"Proconsul" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> Do you?
> hypocrite
i see you felt the need to demonstrate.,
james g. keegan jr.
> On or about Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:19:22 GMT, someone claiming to be "james> :"Bugs Bunny®" <bu...@hare.net> wrote in message
> :news:utp6gor...@corp.supernews.com...
> :> I think you both need to get laid.
> :
> :were you offering?
> :
> If it'll shut you two up, yeah. <g>
do you have a preference as to who you're gonna do first?
Mark Allread
> Now, go look up SPAM ...
"Shoulder of Pork and hAM." Non-sequitor.
Darkbandit
Justa Lurker
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in alt.cellular.verizon:
| "GandalfSC" <gan...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
| news:uC7D9.156590$c51.46...@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
|> Justa Lurker is NOT Michelle.
|
| that is clearly a good think for justa, assuming you are
| correct.
There is no reason to assume. Gandalf has the required
intellegence to notice that by reading post headers.
|> As to the ongoing flame war betweeen you and Michelle,
|> take it private.
|
| no.
Your loss. People who act respectable are respected.
Let it go, James. You will never be 'right' as long
as you follow this childish approach.
| given the number of supportive email messages i have
| received from lurkers, i am comfortable that i did
| the right thing in this case. i'm sorry it bothers you.
"I have support in email." That CAN be the lamest excuse
on usenet. Right or wrong, you just look like the fool.
Lets talk cellular, Verizon flavored please!
kz
in the kill file. No matter how good your thoughts and ideas, I find it now
unwelcome. Sadly I might miss a good idea from either one of you, but that
is the price I am willing to pay to not see your jousting in public and on
my browser.
kz
"Proconsul" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ByWC9.4629$OQ5.9...@news2.west.cox.net...
james g. keegan jr.
"Bugs Bunny®" <bu...@hare.net> wrote in message
news:utrpm0c...@corp.supernews.com...
> On or about Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:57:53 GMT, someone claiming to be "james> :doing exactly that for which it is critical........
> :
> :"Bugs Bunny®" <bu...@hare.net> wrote in message
> :news:utqh5jj...@corp.supernews.com...
> :> On or about Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:21:37 GMT, someone claiming to be
"james
> :g.
> :> keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> scribbled the following:
> :> :"Proconsul" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> :> :news:C4aD9.740$ro.8...@news2.west.cox.net...
> :> :> Enough of your childish nonsense! Begone, wretch!!
> :> :
> :> :whereas your posted added much content, eh?
> :> :do you know the meaning of the word hypocrite?
> :>
> :> Do you?
> :> hypocrite
> :
> :i see you felt the need to demonstrate.,
>
> That makes no sense. Demonstrate what?
never mind. <chuckle>
james g. keegan jr.
> On or about Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:58:55 GMT, someone claiming to be "james
g.
> keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> scribbled the following:
>
> :
> :"Bugs Bunny®" <bu...@hare.net> wrote in message
>
> I'm a Warner Brothers wabbit and you're on Road Runner. Oh, the irony.
>
> However, Michelle's got Cox Cumunications. <G>
> I might never get to you. hehe
just like in the movies -- a happy ending.
james g. keegan jr.
wrote:
: Agreed. It does one thing which I think is bad for the group. Now I may
: miss out on good information because I will no longer read or respond to
: what either of them post, and maybe others here will do the same. I'm
: here for information, not to listen to two supposed adults calling each
: other names and arguing over a # sign. I think they both have done a
: great job demonstrating to the group exactly what kind of people they
: are.
it's too bad you never understood what the argument was about before
you decide to killfile, but that's your decision.
whenever i see someone flame another for making a typo in an
information request, i'm going to say something about it. i think more
people should do the same.