Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: A Family Destroyed by the Gay Agenda -- Just say you're dumping mother of your children to pursue a life of sodomy
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Bill Steele
Sep 29, 2014, 5:18:00 PM9/29/14
to
In article <a3b55a5c-4261-4b55-80ac-
323ee2...@googlegroups.com>
wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
>
> Progressives are fond of proclaiming that you can�t make an omelet
> without breaking some eggs. One of the eggs broken by the Culture War
> blitzkrieg seeking to establish homosexuality as normal is named Janna
> Darnelle. Here�s a slightly condensed version of her story:
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> In the fall of 2007, my husband of almost ten years told me that he was
> gay and that he wanted a divorce. In an instant, the world that I had
> known and loved�the life we had built together�was shattered.
>
> I tried to convince him to stay, to stick it out and fight to save our
> marriage. But my voice, my desires, my needs�and those of our two young
> children�no longer mattered to him. We had become disposable, because he
> had embraced one tiny word that had become his entire identity. Being gay
> trumped commitment, vows, responsibility, faith, fatherhood, marriage,
> friendships, and community. All of this was thrown away for the sake of
> his new identity.
>
> Try as I might to save our marriage, there was no stopping my husband.
> Our divorce was not settled in mediation or with lawyers. No, it went all
> the way to trial. My husband wanted primary custody of our children. His
> entire case can be summed up in one sentence: �I am gay, and I deserve my
> rights.� It worked: the judge gave him practically everything he wanted.
> At one point, he even told my husband, �If you had asked for more, I
> would have given it to you.�
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> Hard to believe, isn�t it? You�re right; it�s not the least bit hard to
> believe. Not anymore.
>
> At least now you know how to keep from getting taken to the cleaners in
> divorce court. Just say you are dumping the mother of your children to
> pursue a life of sodomy, and the liberal establishment will back you to
> the hilt.
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> I truly believe that judge was legislating from the bench, disregarding
> the facts of our particular case and simply using us�using our children�
> to help influence future cases. In our society, LGBT citizens are seen as
> marginalized victims who must be protected at all costs, even if it means
> stripping rights from others. By ignoring the injustice committed against
> me and my children, the judge seemed to think that he was correcting a
> larger injustice.
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> That injustice presumably consists of the failure of every generation
> throughout human history prior to our own to appreciate the political
> righteousness of homosexuality.
>
> From here it gets worse:
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> My ex-husband and his partner went on to marry. Their first ceremony took
> place before our state redefined marriage. After it created same-sex
> marriage, they chose to have a repeat performance. In both cases, my
> children were forced�against my will and theirs�to participate. At the
> second ceremony, which included more than twenty couples, local news
> stations and papers were there to document the first gay weddings
> officiated in our state. USA Today did a photo journal shoot on my ex and
> his partner, my children, and even the grandparents. I was not notified
> that this was taking place, nor was I given a voice to object to our
> children being used as props to promote same-sex marriage in the media.
>
> At the time of the first ceremony, the marriage was not recognized by our
> state, our nation, or our church. And my ex-husband�s new marriage, like
> the majority of male-male relationships, is an �open,� non-exclusive
> relationship. This sends a clear message to our children: what you feel
> trumps all laws, promises, and higher authorities. You can do whatever
> you want, whenever you want�and it doesn�t matter who you hurt along the
> way.
>
> After our children�s pictures were publicized, a flood of comments and
> posts appeared. Commenters exclaimed at how beautiful this gay family was
> and congratulated my ex-husband and his new partner on the family that
> they �created.� But there is a significant person missing from those
> pictures: the mother and abandoned wife. That �gay family� could not
> exist without me.
>
> There is not one gay family that exists in this world that was created
> naturally.
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> Thought criminal! No wonder USA Today wasn�t interested in her
> perspective.
>
> Janna hasn�t been the only one to suffer from this sick travesty:
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> Our two young children were willfully and intentionally thrust into a
> world of strife and combative beliefs, lifestyles, and values, all in the
> name of �gay rights.� Their father moved into his new partner�s condo,
> which is in a complex inhabited by sixteen gay men. One of the men has a
> 19-year-old male prostitute who comes to service him. Another man, who
> functions as the father figure of this community, is in his late sixties
> and has a boyfriend in his twenties. My children are brought to gay
> parties where they are the only children and where only alcoholic
> beverages are served. They are taken to transgender baseball games, gay
> rights fundraisers, and LGBT film festivals.
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> We are required to pretend that this sort of atmosphere is normal and
> healthy. Most any liberal would be willing to inflict it on unseen,
> theoretical children in the name of political correctness. But how many
> people out there would be wicked enough to inflict it on their own
> children?
All homosexuals are child molesters.
> Source: http://bit.ly/1B7MCK3
> Remember in November - This election is our first referendum on amnesty.
>
> --
> "Apparently, the leading cause of hard drive failures is subpoenas.�
> (Clarice Feldman)
>
> "Never underestimate the willingness of white progressives to be offended
> on behalf of people who aren�t and to impose their will on those who
> didn�t ask for it." (Derek Hunter)
>
> "If the Democrats didn�t have double standards, they wouldn�t have any
> standards all." (Chuck Lehmann)
�
323ee2...@googlegroups.com>
wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
>
> Progressives are fond of proclaiming that you can�t make an omelet
> without breaking some eggs. One of the eggs broken by the Culture War
> blitzkrieg seeking to establish homosexuality as normal is named Janna
> Darnelle. Here�s a slightly condensed version of her story:
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> In the fall of 2007, my husband of almost ten years told me that he was
> gay and that he wanted a divorce. In an instant, the world that I had
> known and loved�the life we had built together�was shattered.
>
> I tried to convince him to stay, to stick it out and fight to save our
> marriage. But my voice, my desires, my needs�and those of our two young
> children�no longer mattered to him. We had become disposable, because he
> had embraced one tiny word that had become his entire identity. Being gay
> trumped commitment, vows, responsibility, faith, fatherhood, marriage,
> friendships, and community. All of this was thrown away for the sake of
> his new identity.
>
> Try as I might to save our marriage, there was no stopping my husband.
> Our divorce was not settled in mediation or with lawyers. No, it went all
> the way to trial. My husband wanted primary custody of our children. His
> entire case can be summed up in one sentence: �I am gay, and I deserve my
> rights.� It worked: the judge gave him practically everything he wanted.
> At one point, he even told my husband, �If you had asked for more, I
> would have given it to you.�
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> Hard to believe, isn�t it? You�re right; it�s not the least bit hard to
> believe. Not anymore.
>
> At least now you know how to keep from getting taken to the cleaners in
> divorce court. Just say you are dumping the mother of your children to
> pursue a life of sodomy, and the liberal establishment will back you to
> the hilt.
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> I truly believe that judge was legislating from the bench, disregarding
> the facts of our particular case and simply using us�using our children�
> to help influence future cases. In our society, LGBT citizens are seen as
> marginalized victims who must be protected at all costs, even if it means
> stripping rights from others. By ignoring the injustice committed against
> me and my children, the judge seemed to think that he was correcting a
> larger injustice.
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> That injustice presumably consists of the failure of every generation
> throughout human history prior to our own to appreciate the political
> righteousness of homosexuality.
>
> From here it gets worse:
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> My ex-husband and his partner went on to marry. Their first ceremony took
> place before our state redefined marriage. After it created same-sex
> marriage, they chose to have a repeat performance. In both cases, my
> children were forced�against my will and theirs�to participate. At the
> second ceremony, which included more than twenty couples, local news
> stations and papers were there to document the first gay weddings
> officiated in our state. USA Today did a photo journal shoot on my ex and
> his partner, my children, and even the grandparents. I was not notified
> that this was taking place, nor was I given a voice to object to our
> children being used as props to promote same-sex marriage in the media.
>
> At the time of the first ceremony, the marriage was not recognized by our
> state, our nation, or our church. And my ex-husband�s new marriage, like
> the majority of male-male relationships, is an �open,� non-exclusive
> relationship. This sends a clear message to our children: what you feel
> trumps all laws, promises, and higher authorities. You can do whatever
> you want, whenever you want�and it doesn�t matter who you hurt along the
> way.
>
> After our children�s pictures were publicized, a flood of comments and
> posts appeared. Commenters exclaimed at how beautiful this gay family was
> and congratulated my ex-husband and his new partner on the family that
> they �created.� But there is a significant person missing from those
> pictures: the mother and abandoned wife. That �gay family� could not
> exist without me.
>
> There is not one gay family that exists in this world that was created
> naturally.
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> Thought criminal! No wonder USA Today wasn�t interested in her
> perspective.
>
> Janna hasn�t been the only one to suffer from this sick travesty:
>
> [Janna Darnelle]
>
> Our two young children were willfully and intentionally thrust into a
> world of strife and combative beliefs, lifestyles, and values, all in the
> name of �gay rights.� Their father moved into his new partner�s condo,
> which is in a complex inhabited by sixteen gay men. One of the men has a
> 19-year-old male prostitute who comes to service him. Another man, who
> functions as the father figure of this community, is in his late sixties
> and has a boyfriend in his twenties. My children are brought to gay
> parties where they are the only children and where only alcoholic
> beverages are served. They are taken to transgender baseball games, gay
> rights fundraisers, and LGBT film festivals.
>
> [/Janna Darnelle]
>
> We are required to pretend that this sort of atmosphere is normal and
> healthy. Most any liberal would be willing to inflict it on unseen,
> theoretical children in the name of political correctness. But how many
> people out there would be wicked enough to inflict it on their own
> children?
All homosexuals are child molesters.
> Source: http://bit.ly/1B7MCK3
> Remember in November - This election is our first referendum on amnesty.
>
> --
> "Apparently, the leading cause of hard drive failures is subpoenas.�
> (Clarice Feldman)
>
> "Never underestimate the willingness of white progressives to be offended
> on behalf of people who aren�t and to impose their will on those who
> didn�t ask for it." (Derek Hunter)
>
> "If the Democrats didn�t have double standards, they wouldn�t have any
> standards all." (Chuck Lehmann)
�
0 new messages