Wall Street - Barrons: Avoid the Droid?
Developers cut back on unprofitable Android Development
Apple iPhone? Well according to an article over on Barrons, no it
doesn’t as they say the Motorola Droid is less attractive, less
intuitive and less functional.
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125875979311658127.html?mod=rss_barrons_technology
GADGET OF THE WEEK
Avoid the Droid?
By MIRIAM GOTTFRIED
Motorola's Droid is not a truly smart smartphone.
---
For those of you who are too cheap to subscribe to Barrons...
They also go on to state that the Motorola Droid doesn’t sync music
from computers and well is actually even disappointing as a basic
mobile phone.
On the other hand the Motorola Droid does offer Android 2.0, which is
good if your world revolves around all things Google, and syncs with
Microsoft Exchange although isn’t easy to set up and their tech guy
just couldn’t get the handset to sync.
They say the worst thing about the Motorola Droid though is its
reception which was poor in their tests, which surprised them with
Verizon, but the sound was broken up and hazy.
Ness-Net
I find it very interesting that since the Droid came out, Vic (whomever)
has literally come out of the woodwork against it.
Seems to me that the fanbois know that their jebus phone now has some serious
competition. So what do the insecure twits do..? Attack like the whiny little brats they are...
Android is poised to eat Apple's lunch BIG time and it scares the hell out of them.
The more they post, the more it really shows just how insecure they are.
Kinda like AT&T and the new adverts - every syllable just digs the hole deeper.
Pathetic...
Ness-Net
"Developers cut back on unprofitable Android Development" <vic.h...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cdffa05f-1eeb-49ff...@o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 22, 1:18 pm, "Ness-Net" <richard.nod...@nessnet.spam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Android is poised to eat Apple's lunch BIG time and it scares the hell out of them.
>> The more they post, the more it really shows just how insecure they are.
>
>
> You got to be kidding?
>
> Just look at the facts, Android is a big ball of hurt for every one
> but the iPhone crowd.
>
> Would you rather someone with long tech experience laugh at your pain
> or warn you of what lies ahead?
>
> Do you think Barron's "Avoid the Droid" warning to investors was
> because they were scared?
>
> Educate yourself
> http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/11/21/inside-googles-android-and-apples-iphone-os-as-software-markets/
No need to "educate myself" Vic - I'm very well aware of the facts - thank you.
Certainly with MUCH longer "tech experience" than obviously you have..... (if you even have any, which is doubtful)
Being a rabid moron fanboi doesn't qualify as "tech experience" - just makes you quite delusional.
Let's just say - he who laughs last, laughs best.
(We will see just who is laughing in a year or so....)
Now, keep posting and dig the hole deeper.
It is quite entertaining watching you flail.
Ness-Net
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message news:michelle-98652F...@nothing.attdns.com...
> In article <tZOdnR9nR9ohApTW...@giganews.com>,
> "Ness-Net" <richard...@nessnet.spam.com> wrote:
>
>> Being a rabid moron fanboi doesn't qualify as "tech experience" - just
>> makes you quite delusional.
>
>
>> Let's just say - he who laughs last, laughs best.
>> (We will see just who is laughing in a year or so....)
>
>
> --
> Member National Rifle Association
> Member American Civil Liberties Union
> Member Human Rights Campaign
Not even close, sorry.
But thanks for playing.
No "Applephobe" here.
I just think the fanboys blind devotion is quite laughable and an easy target.
As to the rest - time will tell.
Steve Sobol
mich...@michelle.org says...
>
> In article <iKGdnYGQhqDdm5fW...@giganews.com>,
> "Ness-Net" <richard...@nessnet.spam.com> wrote:
>
> > No "Applephobe" here. I just think the fanboys blind devotion is quite
> > laughable and an easy target.
>
Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
> so far as I have seen, only Applephobes use the term "fanboy" and/or
> "fanboi".
Then you should look around more. The term is used to describe many
other groups.
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjs...@JustThe.net
Richard B. Gilbert
> In article <iKGdnYGQhqDdm5fW...@giganews.com>,
> "Ness-Net" <richard...@nessnet.spam.com> wrote:
>
>> laughable and an easy target.
>
> "fanboi".
>
We do seem to be getting a lot of "argumentum ad hominem"!
Calling your opponent a "fanboy", or any other term of opprobrium is one
of the fastest ways to lose in a debate.
Charles
<sjs...@JustThe.net> wrote:
> Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
There is one fracking fanboi poster. The bashers are much worse and
dumber.
--
Charles
WindsorFox<[SS]>
> In article <iKGdnYGQhqDdm5fW...@giganews.com>,
> "Ness-Net" <richard...@nessnet.spam.com> wrote:
>
>> laughable and an easy target.
>
> so far as I have seen, only Applephobes use the term "fanboy" and/or
> "fanboi".
>
I used that term way before the iPhone ever existed.
--
.
Well, it was important enough for several folks to
comment on. Fortunately, they were not burdened
by Microsoft shitware which fails to properly
implement a decade-old standard. - Sam
News
> Michelle Steiner wrote:
>> In article <iKGdnYGQhqDdm5fW...@giganews.com>,
>> "Ness-Net" <richard...@nessnet.spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No "Applephobe" here. I just think the fanboys blind devotion is
>>> quite laughable and an easy target.
>>
>> The fact that there isn't any blind devotion completely escapes you.
>> And so far as I have seen, only Applephobes use the term "fanboy"
>> and/or "fanboi".
>>
>
>
> I used that term way before the iPhone ever existed.
>
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fanboi
http://www.uberreview.com/2008/01/25-signs-that-you-might-be-an-apple-fanboy.htm
Ernie & Eythl
> In article <michelle-68FE12...@nothing.attdns.com>,
> mich...@michelle.org says...
>> In article <iKGdnYGQhqDdm5fW...@giganews.com>,
>> "Ness-Net" <richard...@nessnet.spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No "Applephobe" here. I just think the fanboys blind devotion is quite
>>> laughable and an easy target.
>> The fact that there isn't any blind devotion completely escapes you.
>
> Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
>
>> so far as I have seen, only Applephobes use the term "fanboy" and/or
>> "fanboi".
>
> Then you should look around more. The term is used to describe many
> other groups.
>
>
yeah, like JEW=Boi Sobol
--
Ernie
<The man on the hill with a mountainous load in his shorts>
WindsorFox<[SS]>
Or sometimes a complete dickheaded doucheweasel such as yourself.
George Kerby
On 11/23/09 6:07 PM, in article hef84i$tq1$2...@posting2.glorb.com,
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Michelle Steiner wrote:
>> In article <iKGdnYGQhqDdm5fW...@giganews.com>,
>> "Ness-Net" <richard...@nessnet.spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No "Applephobe" here. I just think the fanboys blind devotion is quite
>>> laughable and an easy target.
>>
>> The fact that there isn't any blind devotion completely escapes you. And
>> so far as I have seen, only Applephobes use the term "fanboy" and/or
>> "fanboi".
>>
>
>
> I used that term way before the iPhone ever existed.
Oh, aren't we sooooooo special?!?
News
> In article <231120090905318539%for...@mac.com>, Charles <for...@mac.com>
>
>>> Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
>> There is one fracking fanboi poster. The bashers are much worse and
>> dumber.
>
> with the racists, homophobes, religious bigots, anti-choicers, teabaggers,
> and birthers.
>
Which rant puts you squarely in that league. Congratulations.
Richard B. Gilbert
Are we supposed to take your anonymous rant seriously?
News
Suit yourself, as you surely will.
SMS
> Android is poised to eat Apple's lunch BIG time and it scares the hell
> out of them.
While I'm not fond of the the fanbois, I don't think that there's much
danger of Android eating Apple's lunch any time soon.
I was reading the January 2010 Consumer Reports, the issue where they
report the result of their annual cell phone survey. This is the first
year where Alltel is not a separate company, and while Verizon took
first place in every single metropolitan area that they surveyed they
did mention that iPhone users love their phones, even while being not
happy with AT&T's coverage and quality.
From a cursory look at the results it appeared that Verizon's lead is
not as great as in the past. There are a few regions where AT&T is
especially bad, such as in the San Francisco Bay Area, but in most areas
Verizon's lead is not all that great. AT&T continues to drop in the
rankings.
SMS
> Android is poised to eat Apple's lunch BIG time and it scares the hell
> out of them.
While I'm not fond of the the fanbois, I don't think that there's much
Todd Allcock
> In article <MPG.2573cb648...@news.justthe.net>,
>
> > > > No "Applephobe" here. I just think the fanboys blind devotion is
> > > > quite laughable and an easy target.
> > >
> > > The fact that there isn't any blind devotion completely escapes you.
> >
> > Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
>
So you obviously have Oxford and Vic killfiled, then...
Todd Allcock
> > > > Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
> > >
> > > No, because there aren't any.
> >
> > So you obviously have Oxford and Vic killfiled, then...
>
> I don't know who Oxford is, and Vic doesn't show blind devotion to Apple,
> but I wouldn't expect anyone who shows blind denigration of Apple to
> understand that.
Oxford/David Moyer is a regular here and at CSMA, but hasn't been too
active the last couple of months, and Vic is to the iPhone as Fox News is
to the GOP, as his frequent unattributed cut and paste posts here show.
That last one supposedly by the "hacker" who knows how to steal all of
your personal info from an Android phone was especially entertaining.
> "Fanboi" or "fanboy": noun. a derisive term used by fanatics to
describe
> anyone who doesn't share that fanatic's blind opposition to whatever
entity
> or policy the fanatic is opposed to.
You must have the new Funk and Wagnall's. My dictionary simply calls
fanboys "enthusiastic devotees."
News
> In article <T5SdnTv6k_Sp-ZHW...@speakeasy.net>,
> News <Ne...@Group.Name> wrote:
>
>>>>> Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
>>>> There is one fracking fanboi poster. The bashers are much worse and
>>>> dumber.
>>> The bashers are anti-Apple fanbois. They share the same kind of mindset
>>> with the racists, homophobes, religious bigots, anti-choicers, teabaggers,
>>> and birthers.
>> Which rant puts you squarely in that league.
>
>
So says the ranting parrot.
Verizon we have a fee for that - $3 extra for Visual Voice Mail
> That last one supposedly by the "hacker" who knows how to steal all of
> your personal info from an Android phone was especially entertaining.
>
Todd, Todd
How do I make a point with out going down a path I am not willing to?
Several who share my views suggested a perfectly acceptable way of
proving Android is easy, very easy.
Here is a suggested demonstration'
Please refer your friends to
Android Spy Software
http://www.mobile-spy.com/android.html
Did you notice that same type of Android spy software can also
interact with a jail broken iPhone, but not a normal iPhone?
Apple has built a strong wall around their Internet connected device
so I can recommend it as long as it has not been jail broken which
breaks iPhone's built in security. A few may always have a private
reason to jailbreak an iPhone but I do not recommend normal users do
that.
All Android products by design are easy to gain root access with
after a little tinkering.
Those guys on the above web site got that from the hacker community
and are making money off of it in a legal way.
I have no problem with that.
The apps Android users need to fear are products that do more than
that without their knowledge because malware was built into an app
that appears to perform some other type of desirable function that
they downloaded from the Android App store. Anyone for $25 bucks can
post any kind of app for Android and hope suckers go for it, they will
never know what got them until it is too late if ever. Android is
beyond insecure. It is a potential nightmare for the young and
innocent who do not have a clue.
Android in your pocket, always connected to the Internet + Secure =
FAIL
Richard B. Gilbert
Are we supposed to take an anonymous parrot seriously?
Verizon we have a fee for that - $3 extra for Visual Voice Mail
> That last one supposedly by the "hacker" who knows how to steal all of
> your personal info from an Android phone was especially entertaining.
>
Todd, Todd
Verizon has a fee for that - $350 to bail out of a Droid
though, is in mobile advertising.
The Droid already accounts for nearly a quarter (24%) of the ad
impressions generated by Android-powered phones worldwide in the two
week's following its Nov. 6 launch, according to the latest data from
mobile ad network AdMob. That made it second only to the G1, the
initial Android phone launched last year, which had a 36% share.
A Droid problem is that Google knows how to sell Ads not Technology.
Banner Ads for instance need to go.. Everyone hates them. They are
almost worthless in the scheme of things which is why they cost so
little.
Have you seen the ads yet on a Droid home screen? Do you care if they
are there on YOUR cell phone?
Does Verizon get a cut for serving ads?
News
You and "Michelle" are operating under noms de plume?
Richard B. Gilbert
I'm using my own name and AFAIK, Michelle is also. I was referring to
"News <Ne...@Group.Name>".
Todd Allcock
> In article <XV3Pm.39842$X01....@newsfe07.iad>,
> Todd Allcock <elecc...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
>
> > Oxford/David Moyer is a regular here and at CSMA,
>
> misc.phone.mobile.iphone.
Sorry, I meant misc.phone.mobile.iphone, but if Vic or Oxford are
involved in the thread, it'll be every group with "cellular" in the
title.
> > Vic is to the iPhone as Fox News is to the GOP, as his frequent
> > unattributed cut and paste posts here show.
>
> He attributes his pastes. BTW, at least you and I agree about Faux News.
He occasionally attributes his pastes, with "occasionally" leaning towards
"seldom."
> > > "Fanboi" or "fanboy": noun. a derisive term used by fanatics to
> > > describe anyone who doesn't share that fanatic's blind opposition
to
> > > whatever entity or policy the fanatic is opposed to.
> >
> > You must have the new Funk and Wagnall's. My dictionary simply calls
> > fanboys "enthusiastic devotees."
>
> I'm describing how the term is actually used.
It's used too often by both sides of a 'net debate. It fits Oxford, and
Vic straddles the line.
News
Well, bully for you.
Todd Allcock
> On Nov 25, 1:12 am, Todd Allcock <eleccon...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
>
> > That last one supposedly by the "hacker" who knows how to steal all of
> > your personal info from an Android phone was especially entertaining.
> >
>
> Todd, Todd
>
> How do I make a point with out going down a path I am not willing to?
What path is that? The limits of your understanding?
> Several who share my views suggested a perfectly acceptable way of
> proving Android is easy, very easy.
>
> Here is a suggested demonstration'
> Please refer your friends to
> Android Spy Software
> http://www.mobile-spy.com/android.html
That's software that you must have access to the phone to install it.
Given physical access, no phone is safe:
<http://www.fiercemobileit.com/story/new-iphone-3gs-hacked-2-minutes/2009-
07-27?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal>
> Did you notice that same type of Android spy software can also
> interact with a jail broken iPhone, but not a normal iPhone?
True, but again, given access to the iPhone it's trivial to jailbreak it
first.
> Apple has built a strong wall around their Internet connected device
> so I can recommend it as long as it has not been jail broken which
> breaks iPhone's built in security.
Again, compromising any phone requires physical access.
> A few may always have a private
> reason to jailbreak an iPhone but I do not recommend normal users do
> that.
Neither do I- I recommend they buy a phone that suits their needs without
hacking it first..
Todd Allcock
out of a Droid wrote:
> One area where the Droid already appears to be having an impact,
> though, is in mobile advertising.
>
> The Droid already accounts for nearly a quarter (24%) of the ad
> impressions generated by Android-powered phones worldwide in the two
> week's following its Nov. 6 launch, according to the latest data from
> mobile ad network AdMob. That made it second only to the G1, the
> initial Android phone launched last year, which had a 36% share.
Oh the irony...
How many times have you and Oxford quoted AdMob stats to "prove" that
over 50% of all mobile internet usage is by iPhones?
> A Droid problem is that Google knows how to sell Ads not Technology.
>
> Banner Ads for instance need to go.. Everyone hates them. They are
> almost worthless in the scheme of things which is why they cost so
> little.
Shhhh! Don't tell anyone! Ironically, banner ads are the revenue method
used by the majority of free iTunes app store apps... You don't want to
bust the myth that all it takes is a used garage sale Mac and a $99
developers fee to strike it rich writing iPhone apps!
> Have you seen the ads yet on a Droid home screen? Do you care if they
> are there on YOUR cell phone?
I see them all the time on my wife's iPhone in a variety of third-party
apps. Fair is fair. Those devs gotta earn their $99 developer's fee
back somehow...
News
> In article <tuydnZlVMeIF0JDW...@speakeasy.net>,
> News <Ne...@Group.Name> wrote:
>
>>> Are we supposed to take an anonymous parrot seriously?
>>
>> You and "Michelle" are operating under noms de plume?
>
> ranting; all you do by it is to continue making a fool of yourself.
>
Says the one who blurted out the following rant:
"... share the same kind of mindset with the racists, homophobes,
religious bigots, anti-choicers, teabaggers, and birthers."
Happy Thanksgiving, turkey.
Richard B. Gilbert
> In article <tuydnZlVMeIF0JDW...@speakeasy.net>,
> News <Ne...@Group.Name> wrote:
>
>>
>> You and "Michelle" are operating under noms de plume?
>
> ranting; all you do by it is to continue making a fool of yourself.
>
Blap!! And he say ouch because it hurt him!!!
News
> In article <gNWdncKBtsn86ZPW...@speakeasy.net>,
> News <Ne...@Groups.Name> wrote:
>
>>>>> Are we supposed to take an anonymous parrot seriously?
>>>> You and "Michelle" are operating under noms de plume?
>>> I don't know about Gilbert, but I'm not. And you certainly are. Keep
>>> ranting; all you do by it is to continue making a fool of yourself.
>> Says the one who blurted out the following rant:
>>
>> "... share the same kind of mindset with the racists, homophobes,
>> religious bigots, anti-choicers, teabaggers, and birthers."
>
More like you, the ranter.
>
>> Happy Thanksgiving, turkey.
>
> Oh I am having one, asshole.
>
Typical.
WindsorFox<[SS]>
> In article <T5SdnTv6k_Sp-ZHW...@speakeasy.net>,
> News <Ne...@Group.Name> wrote:
>
>>>>> Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
>>>> There is one fracking fanboi poster. The bashers are much worse and
>>>> dumber.
>>> and birthers.
>
> Not according to any rational thought.
>
For someone with the brain of Michael Moore perhaps.
--
.
Well, it was important enough for several folks to
comment on. Fortunately, they were not burdened
by Microsoft shitware which fails to properly
implement a decade-old standard. - Sam
WindsorFox<[SS]>
> On Nov 25, 1:12 am, Todd Allcock <eleccon...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
>
>> That last one supposedly by the "hacker" who knows how to steal all of
>> your personal info from an Android phone was especially entertaining.
>>
>
> Todd, Todd
>
> How do I make a point with out going down a path I am not willing to?
>
> Several who share my views suggested a perfectly acceptable way of
> proving Android is easy, very easy.
You have a severe habit of pointing out certain flaws that exist in
the Android phones which also exist in all other smart phones, including
the iPhone.
WindsorFox<[SS]>
There are no ads on my phone. You don't even have a Droid, who
would you know?
George Kerby
On 11/30/09 2:33 PM, in article hf1a7o$ccv$2...@posting2.glorb.com,
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Verizon has a fee for that - $350 to bail out of a Droid wrote:
>> One area where the Droid already appears to be having an impact,
>> though, is in mobile advertising.
>>
>> The Droid already accounts for nearly a quarter (24%) of the ad
>> impressions generated by Android-powered phones worldwide in the two
>> week's following its Nov. 6 launch, according to the latest data from
>> mobile ad network AdMob. That made it second only to the G1, the
>> initial Android phone launched last year, which had a 36% share.
>>
>> A Droid problem is that Google knows how to sell Ads not Technology.
>>
>> Banner Ads for instance need to go.. Everyone hates them. They are
>> almost worthless in the scheme of things which is why they cost so
>> little.
>>
>> Have you seen the ads yet on a Droid home screen? Do you care if they
>> are there on YOUR cell phone?
>>
>> Does Verizon get a cut for serving ads?
>
>
> There are no ads on my phone. You don't even have a Droid, who
> would you know?
I don't know. Whom do YOU know?
WindsorFox<[SS]>
> In article <hf16lq$bqf$1...@posting2.glorb.com>,
> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
>>>>>> There is one fracking fanboi poster. The bashers are much worse and
>>>>>> dumber.
>>>>> The bashers are anti-Apple fanbois. They share the same kind of
>>>>> mindset with the racists, homophobes, religious bigots,
>>>>> anti-choicers, teabaggers, and birthers.
>>>> Which rant puts you squarely in that league.
>>> Not according to any rational thought.
>>>
>> For someone with the brain of Michael Moore perhaps.
>
> your feet leave the ground?
>
Who? That you used the term "teabagger" removes credibilty to
anything you could ever possibly say. Evar...
News
> Michelle Steiner wrote:
>> In article <hf16lq$bqf$1...@posting2.glorb.com>,
>> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Have you read some of the fanboi posts?
>>>>>>> There is one fracking fanboi poster. The bashers are much worse
>>>>>>> and dumber.
>>>>>> The bashers are anti-Apple fanbois. They share the same kind of
>>>>>> mindset with the racists, homophobes, religious bigots,
>>>>>> anti-choicers, teabaggers, and birthers.
>>>>> Which rant puts you squarely in that league.
>>>> Not according to any rational thought.
>>>>
>>> For someone with the brain of Michael Moore perhaps.
>>
>> When Glenn Beck tells you to jump, do you ask "How high?" before or
>> after your feet leave the ground?
>>
>
>
> Who? That you used the term "teabagger" removes credibilty to
> anything you could ever possibly say. Evar...
>
BINGO
WindsorFox<[SS]>
Do you really think you are going to make any points by completely
ignoring questions and/or drifting totally off topic by making silly
jokes about typos? All it does is tell me you have no logical or
accurate contribution toward the subject. Care to try again? Again.
WindsorFox<[SS]>
> In article <hf3eg9$k59$1...@posting2.glorb.com>,
> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That you used the term "teabagger" removes credibilty to
>> anything you could ever possibly say. Evar...
>
> hoot!
>
That's correct. As for "wingnut" this proves my point entirely, you
can not make points or proof as they do not exist so you resort to name
calling and personal attacks. It is a very typical socialist tactic. It
is fine for the minority to scream and swing signs around, but when the
normally quiet majority does some of the same you start with the name
calling. I find it very interesting how your diva Michael Moore blasts
capitalism as it only proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that even he
doesn't understand where his wealth came from. You are the epitome of a
Mac user. Needs/wants everything done for you and really doesn't want to
be bothered with the details, is not concerned how much it costs as long
as it is simplistic. Not all Mac users are you, but you are all Mac
users. And, you've no credibility. Please, enjoy your iPhone and iTunes,
you fully deserve it.
Buh-bye...
--
.
"A smorgasbord of tomfoolery" - L0afy
George Kerby
On 12/1/09 10:31 AM, in article hf3gds$kej$1...@posting2.glorb.com,
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
A lot can be derived about one's persona by looking at their written word.
You have revealed to me that you are not my peer and I am wasting my time
trying to have a logical discussion with your distorted being.
Therefore, you have my permission to have the last 'word' in this post.
Good day.
WindsorFox<[SS]>
Yes I agree.
>
> You have revealed to me that you are not my peer and I am wasting my time
> trying to have a logical discussion with your distorted being.
You have said absolutely nothing logical but I am sure you are
completely aware of that. Your first words to me were to evade the
subject at hand completely and insert elementary level jokes about
typographical errors. There after you waded through your
pseudo-intellectual tirade which was nothing more than sugar coated
insults toward me, again totally evading the subject. One must assume
you have no grasp or knowledge of the subject so you are excused. Don't
make that mistake again, if you do not know what you are talking about,
don't comment.
>
> Therefore, you have my permission to have the last 'word' in this post.
>
> Good day.
>
There's nothing that you could do about it if you wished as this is
an unmoderated group.
WindsorFox<[SS]>
> You have revealed to me that you are not my peer and I am wasting my time
> trying to have a logical discussion with your distorted being.
Ah yes, going back to March in just this group (VZW) alone I see
what we are dealing with here. You *don't* have any actual working
knowledge of this subject, and you have absolutely zero logic or
discussion about you. You've contributed nothing but name calling and
trolling in any reply you made, which I will admit are limited. In more
ways than one. You are correct, I am *NOT* your peer. You are a troll
and a very poor one at that. At least when I troll I do a far better job
of it.