Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

AT&T GSM Roaming areas in Southern California??

0 views
Skip to first unread message

PRJ

unread,
Oct 5, 2002, 4:42:27 PM10/5/02
to
The coverage map on the ATT site for GSM shows roaming areas directly in
between Los Angeles and San Diego. Before I make a decision to switch to
ATT/GSM I need to make sure I'm not going to be paying roaming right in my
own backyard. I live in Mission Viejo (South Orange County).

Also....... is anyone familiar with ATT return policy?? If I buy this
service + new phone, and the coverage is not at least as good as my current
Nextel coverage, do I have a period of time to return the phone and cancel
the contract?? How long?

I guess this also a request for the input of anyone using ATT/GSM in the
Orange County to LA area as to the quality of coverage compared to other
carriers. Thanks.

Joel Horner

unread,
Oct 5, 2002, 7:12:48 PM10/5/02
to
PRJ <prj...@cox.net> wrote:

> The coverage map on the ATT site for GSM shows roaming areas directly in
> between Los Angeles and San Diego. Before I make a decision to switch to
> ATT/GSM I need to make sure I'm not going to be paying roaming right in my
> own backyard. I live in Mission Viejo (South Orange County).

I've not used the phone beyond Irvine, so I cannot comment on this part.
What I will say is that I found that areas that did not have AT&T GSM
coverage did _not_ roam...I couldn't even access another network. (In my
case it would have been Cingular's.)

>
> Also....... is anyone familiar with ATT return policy?? If I buy this
> service + new phone, and the coverage is not at least as good as my current
> Nextel coverage, do I have a period of time to return the phone and cancel
> the contract?? How long?

30 days is what they gave me.

> I guess this also a request for the input of anyone using ATT/GSM in the
> Orange County to LA area as to the quality of coverage compared to other
> carriers. Thanks.

I've found the coverage to be equal to, and in some cases a little
worse, than Cingular. It is much worse than Verizon. I haven't used
Sprint or Nextel, so I cannot comment on their coverage.

The story changes in the Bay Area, by the way.

stan low

unread,
Oct 7, 2002, 8:06:11 PM10/7/02
to
ne...@jbhorner.com (Joel Horner) wrote in message news:<1fjl7zm.1a9avw916nq8dzN%ne...@jbhorner.com>...


The coverage with ATT in somme parts of Irvine is bad, especially in
the Amhest Aisle apartment area close to UCI. But I don't have the
GSM.

stan low

unread,
Oct 7, 2002, 8:13:26 PM10/7/02
to
ne...@jbhorner.com (Joel Horner) wrote in message news:<1fjl7zm.1a9avw916nq8dzN%ne...@jbhorner.com>...


Coverage in Irvine is spotty and poor in the Amherst Aisle apartments
across from UCI. Only one reception bar. I don't have GSM though.

anonymous

unread,
Oct 7, 2002, 9:05:46 PM10/7/02
to
GSM is poor at Arroyo Vista at UCI as well, but I can roam on Cingular while
visiting friends in Arroyo Vista. AT&T also credits my roaming charges on
Cingular.

"stan low" <lo...@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:444fba91.02100...@posting.google.com...

0 new messages