>
> On 2018-08-05, 11:47 AM Wolffan wrote:
> > On 05 Aug 2018, Alan Baker wrote
> > (in article <pk78u9$a3r$
1...@news.datemas.de>):
> >
> > > On 2018-08-05 3:51 AM, Wolffan wrote:
> > > > On 05 Aug 2018, Your Name wrote
> > > > (in article <pk645s$o88$
1...@adenine.netfront.net>):
> > > >
> > > > > On 2018-08-05 04:17:59 +0000, Nomen Nescio said:
> > > > > > <
https://gizmodo.com/apples-sole-main-processor-supplier-just-got-hit-wi
> > > > > > th
> > > > > > -a
> > > > > > -1828109094>
> > > > make up your mind.If it’s the _main_ processor supplier, that means that
> > > > there are others, so it can’t be the _sole_ supplier. God-damn, but
> > > > you’re a cretin, and so are the cunts you’re quoting.
> > > You're not realizing that the word "main" has two possible meanings in
> > > the phrase "main processor supplier"
> > >
> > > 1. The main supplier of processors. Your interpretation.
> > >
> > > 2. The supplier of main processors as opposed to the other processors
> > > that are also found within a device.
> > their inability to clearly communicate their points is not my problem.
>
> Did you actually read the article? That point is clearly communicated in the
> first couple of
> paragraphs.