Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ancient Palace Cave????

85 views
Skip to first unread message

Monarch

unread,
Jan 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/30/00
to
Anybody got any infor on this cave? Word I've heard is that it's still in
pristine state and remains predominately unexplored? Somewhere in Northern
California. Anybody know any of the history such as when it was found or by
whom?


Flittering around in CyberSpace

Ken Miller

unread,
Jan 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/30/00
to
I tried to email a confidential reply to this posting, but
"Mon...@butterfly.net" is not a valid address.

I don't think the caving community in Northern California is aware of
a cave by the name of "Ancient Palace". There are a lot of cavers in
this state, and they have poked into almost every nook and cranny.
With rare exceptions, unexplored and pristine caves are do not exist
in this area. None of those exceptions that I am aware of are named
"Ancient Palace".

I think that I may possibly know of the cave being referred to, but I
wouldn't care to discuss it any further in a public forum.

The best way to find out about the local caves is to get in touch with
an NSS group in the area.


On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 03:44:17 GMT, "Monarch" <Mon...@Butterfly.net>
wrote:

Nigel Robertson

unread,
Jan 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/30/00
to

"Monarch" <Mon...@Butterfly.net> wrote in message
news:lsOk4.925$yw.3...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...

> Anybody got any infor on this cave? Word I've heard is that it's still in
> pristine state and remains predominately unexplored

How is it possible to tell that it is 'predominately unexplored'? ;]

Paul Montgomery

unread,
Jan 31, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/31/00
to
I pity you fellows that can't take the time to go out and find you a few new
holes. You've wore yours out and now look what a mess your in. Perhaps you
can persuade some of the French to let you in their caves.

Tony Brocklebank <tonybro...@tesco.net> wrote in message
news:875aai$a1q$1...@barcode.tesco.net...
> Nigel,
>
> I'm beginning to enjoy the mystery created by the bizarre shroud of
secrecy
> that surrounds US caves.
>
> Maybe we should try it?? Do you think we should start with Kingsdale, or
> simply go the whole hog and disappear Lancaster/Ease Gill.
>
> Maybe if we started with Swinsto and Simpsons we'd get more help digging?
>
> Tony
>
> --
> __________________________________
> Email: to...@alpine.fsnet.co.uk
> Web site: www.alpine.fsnet.co.uk
> __________________________________
> Nigel Robertson
<ni...@dont-spam-me-im-vegetarian.easegill.freeserve.co.uk>
> wrote in message news:872h24$u9b$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...

Tony Brocklebank

unread,
Feb 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/1/00
to

Jo Schaper

unread,
Feb 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/2/00
to
In article <872h24$u9b$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Nigel Robertson"
<ni...@dont-spam-me-im-vegetarian.easegill.freeserve.co.uk> writes:

>How is it possible to tell that it is 'predominately unexplored'? ;]

Because it is twice as dark in a cave at night, and we know that by measuring
it with an 18 inch yardstick.
Jo

Monarch

unread,
Feb 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/2/00
to
The size of this cave makes it nearly impossible to explore and log based on
the ever present regulations of dear sweet Uncle Sam within the time
restraints to not disturb it's inhabitants

0 new messages