Flittering around in CyberSpace
I don't think the caving community in Northern California is aware of
a cave by the name of "Ancient Palace". There are a lot of cavers in
this state, and they have poked into almost every nook and cranny.
With rare exceptions, unexplored and pristine caves are do not exist
in this area. None of those exceptions that I am aware of are named
"Ancient Palace".
I think that I may possibly know of the cave being referred to, but I
wouldn't care to discuss it any further in a public forum.
The best way to find out about the local caves is to get in touch with
an NSS group in the area.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 03:44:17 GMT, "Monarch" <Mon...@Butterfly.net>
wrote:
How is it possible to tell that it is 'predominately unexplored'? ;]
Tony Brocklebank <tonybro...@tesco.net> wrote in message
news:875aai$a1q$1...@barcode.tesco.net...
> Nigel,
>
> I'm beginning to enjoy the mystery created by the bizarre shroud of
secrecy
> that surrounds US caves.
>
> Maybe we should try it?? Do you think we should start with Kingsdale, or
> simply go the whole hog and disappear Lancaster/Ease Gill.
>
> Maybe if we started with Swinsto and Simpsons we'd get more help digging?
>
> Tony
>
> --
> __________________________________
> Email: to...@alpine.fsnet.co.uk
> Web site: www.alpine.fsnet.co.uk
> __________________________________
> Nigel Robertson
<ni...@dont-spam-me-im-vegetarian.easegill.freeserve.co.uk>
> wrote in message news:872h24$u9b$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
>How is it possible to tell that it is 'predominately unexplored'? ;]
Because it is twice as dark in a cave at night, and we know that by measuring
it with an 18 inch yardstick.
Jo