http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue
Liberals, who have always claimed to be the
authoritative source of progressive attitudes on race,
have actually become one of the centers of racist
thinking in America over the last quarter century, a
period of time in which postwar liberalism itself was
being reconfigured by the radical Sixties worldview.
Liberal racism began in the last years of Martin Luther
King, Jr.'s life, when organizations such as the Black
Panther Party and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee (SNCC) radicalized the issue of color in
America by focusing on legitimate "black rage" and the
"institutional racism" they claimed was embedded in the
"DNA" of American society. King was an obstacle in
their path; they rejected the gains he had achieved as
illusory. This was no mere intellectual disagreement
about a strategy for improving race relations in
America; it had a bitter personal component. The black
radicals and their white supporters derided King as "De
Lawd" and "Uncle Martin."
Later on, after King's assassination, most of those who
had expressed contempt for him during his lifetime
would pay cynical homage to his martyrdom. But they
never embraced his vision of an integrated social
world. Rather, the program of these liberal racists,
both white and black, focused on separatism and racial
difference. Instead of subscribing to King's belief in
a colorblind society, they wanted government policies
that were color-coded. The further America progressed
from the dark days of slavery, the more they insisted
that slavery was present in America's social
institutions and its personal interrelationships. The
U.S., they asserted, was steeped in blood and guilt: it
must pay for its crimes against "people of color."
The extent to which such views have not only entered
but dominated the intellectual mainstream of America in
the past three decades can be seen in the degree to
which King's notion that people should be judged by the
content of their character rather than the color of
their skin has become marginalized as quaint and naive.
The racism in the left's view primarily of blacks
themselves, but also of whites, has been clear in the
policies the left has pursued. Some, like the demand
for reparations for slavery, have not yet prevailed.
Others, like the demand for affirmative action, have
become part of America's way of doing business as a
society. Although claiming to be an equitable "leveling
of the playing field," this policy has actually tilted
the social landscape. It has nothing to do with
equality of opportunity, and everything to do with
establishing a regime that will produce an equality of
results. It is a zero sum game in which some win
because of skin color and others lose because of skin
color. Ultimately, affirmative action has put
government back into the business of playing racial
favorites — even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
banned such action.
Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
destroy the black family and create a black underclass
by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
culture rather than race may help explain the
disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
America's black children are born poor, and that this
fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
that 85 percent of these poor children come from
single-parent homes. It is this circumstance—studies
show that children born into single-parent families are
more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
children with two parents—rather than "institutional
racism" that actually handicaps them. Yet in the
liberal view, any policy aimed at countering
illegitimacy and single parenthood among the black
underclass is "blaming the victim."
The effects of liberal racism can be seen in the way
black students taunt those among them who strive for
achievement as sellouts who are "acting white." Liberal
racism can be seen in the unholy alliance between the
Democrat Party, the National Education Association and
other teachers' unions, and black spokesmen such as
Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, to maintain their power
by opposing school choice for black children trapped in
violent and failing public schools. Liberal racism can
be seen in the way black voters are kept on the
proverbial "liberal plantation" through scare tactics
and attacks on "race traitors" such as Colin Powell and
Condoleeza Rice, who have defied the party line.
Liberal racism can be seen, paradoxically, most clearly
in the way anyone straying from its premises is
immediately branded as a "racist." This is a powerful
sanction that liberal racists use like a bludgeon to
control the public discussion about race.
Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!
'The Race Myth: Why We Pretend Race Exists in America'
http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581
quote
Book Description
Does race as we know it really exist?
Preeminent evolutionary biologist Joseph Graves proves once and for all that
it doesn't. Through accessible and compelling language, he makes the
provocative argument that science cannot account for the radical categories
used to classify people, and debunks ancient race-related fallacies that are
still held as fact, from damaging medical profiles to misconceptions about
sports. He explains why defining race according to skin tone or eye shape is
woefully inaccurate, and how making assumptions based on these false
categories regarding IQ, behavior, or predisposition to disease has
devastating effects.
Demonstrating that racial distinctions are in fact social inventions, not
biological truths, The Race Myth brings much-needed, sound science to one of
America's most emotionally charged debates.
About the Author
Joseph L. Graves Jr. is one of the world's leading evolutionary biologists.
He is currently University Core Director and Professor of Biological
Sciences at Fairleigh Dickinson University. He has appeared in six
documentaries about race and his opinions have appeared in The New York
Times and the Los Angeles Times. He is also the author of The Emperor's New
Clothes.
From Booklist
Graves, an evolutionary biologist and professor, debunks numerous myths
associated with the biological basis of race. His central premise is that
there is greater variation within socially constructed races than between
them, yet biological differences are often presumed to be an acceptable
focus in areas of medicine, disease, and other public-oriented concerns.
Graves attacks head-on the false assumptions associated with biological
distinctions. Although he allows for certain genetic and biological points
of differences, he asserts that their interplay with the environment and
culture are too often overlooked and that, for example, differences in
health and mortality rates between blacks and whites are more reflective of
racism than biology. Noting the popular presumptions about blacks being
biologically superior athletes, for example, Graves' analysis of
track-and-field Olympic events undermines the weak basis of this and other
popular fallacies on race. Graves' integration of science and objective
analysis with popular biological assumptions about race makes this an
enlightening and provocative work. Vernon Ford
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text
refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
end quote
http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581
The mythology of race has been used for centuries by conservative types to
justify the exploitation and abuse of non-whites throughout the world. This
book undercuts the conservatives right where it hurts them most: on the
battlefield of ideas!
And, as an added bonus:
The Love Life of Rudy Canudity:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43447455
Fooled By Folksy Republicans
Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016
"This is a tough-minded, provocative indictment of the
failure of liberalism in the post-Civil Rights era. As
Sleeper sees it, liberals once held the moral high
ground because they "fought nobly to help this country
rise above color." Now, however, liberals have become
blinded by race and have abandoned the fight to create
what Sleeper calls the "transracial belonging and civic
faith for which Americans of all colors so obviously
yearn." Much of what Sleeper has to say here flies in
the face of politically correct received wisdom about
race, but as an effort to remind Americans that all of
us are fundamentally responsible for our fates, this is
a much-needed corrective to race-based thinking that
has proven unproductive."
KKK-ganda, from a KKK-gandist and an Argentine Peronista Ca-nudist.
http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581
quote
Book Description
About the Author
From Booklist
end quote
http://www.amazon.com/Race-Myth-Pretend-Exists-America/dp/0452286581
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43447455
Fooled By Folksy Republicans
>
> "drivel snipped
Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016
Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016
KKK-ganda, from a KKK-gandist and an Argentine Peronista Ca-nudist.
Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!
...shoved your face in the shit again. Yes, stupid
marginal, I have
shoved your face in the shit again.
>>>>>> > >> >> > Spout whatever ideological bullshit
you wish about the reasons, but
>>>>>> > >> >> > the
>>>>>> > >> >> > graduation rates are indisputable.
>>>>>> > >> >> >
>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>> > >> >> If you had any brains at all, Canoza,
you'd know that it is harder
>>>>> > >> >> for blacks to afford college in the
first place
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > Bullshit.
BULLSHIT, stupid angry lefty.
>>>> > >> > Anyway, you seem to have ignored what I
said above:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Any sensible person would ignore an idiot
like Canooza.
>> > >
>> > > That leaves you out.
>> > >
> >
> > [Canoza ignored.]
No, you're not ignoring me. You can't. I'm tearing
your dogma to
ribbons.
>>>> > >> > you can posit any
>>>> > >> > pseudo-intellectual bullshit you want
about why they don't go and
>>>> > >> > graduate, but the fact is, not as many
blacks *do* attend university
>>>> > >> > and graduate as do whites.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> So what? I just proved it meaningless.
>> > >
>> > > No, you didn't. You didn't prove a thing
except what a jackball you
>> > > are.
> >
> > Did too,
You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball you are.
>>>> > >> >SO, Mr. Fuckwit, pointing out that blacks
>>>> > >> > are "unaccomplished" in "matters of higher
learning" [jesus, but you
>>>> > >> > write weird] is a factual statement.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> So what? I just proved it meaningless.
>> > >
>> > > You didn't; see above.
> >
> > Did too
Nope. You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball
you are.
>>>> > >> > It's funny you'd be dwelling on this fact,
though, because the link I
>>>> > >> > supplied you indicates that even fewer
Hispanics graduate from
>>>> > >> > university as a percentage of all
Hispanics. That same link also has
>>>> > >> > links to other interesting
race-and-ethnicity-based data, such as high
>>>> > >> > school drop-out percentages by race or
ethnicity. Hispanics also drop
>>>> > >> > out of high school at much higher rates
than blacks.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> So you're a drop-out
>> > >
>> > > Nope. Ph.D. in economics; UCLA.
> >
> > UCLA doesn't give out Ph.Ds
Right - I earned it, jackball.
> > "Rudy Canoza" <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
> >
news:1168302585.5...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
>>> > >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>>>> > >> >> Racists often make pseudoscientific
claims in these newsgroups that
>>>>> > >> >> blacks
>>>>> > >> >> are unaccomplished in matters of higher
learning...let's debunk that
>>>>> > >> >> bigoted
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > [snip remainder of straw man bullshit]
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > A smaller percentage of blacks graduate
from four-year universities
>>>> > >> > than do whites:
>>>> > >> >
http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/collrace.html
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Why would blacks want to go to school
>> > >
>> > > So, you're claiming blacks don't go to
university because they don't
>> > > want to go? Why do you think you know this?
> >
> > Isn't it obvious? I wouldn't want to go to school
And so you didn't, just to spite someone.
>>>> > >> > Spout whatever ideological bullshit you
wish about the reasons, but the
>>>> > >> > graduation rates are indisputable.
>>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >> If you had any brains at all, Canooza, you'd
know that it is harder for
>>> > >> blacks to afford college in the first place
>> > >
>> > > Bullshit.
>> > >
>> > > Anyway, you seem to have ignored what I said above:
> >
> > Any sensible person
That leaves you out.
>> > > you can posit any
>> > > pseudo-intellectual bullshit you want about why
they don't go and
>> > > graduate, but the fact is, not as many blacks
*do* attend university
>> > > and graduate as do whites.
> >
> > So what? I just proved it meaningless.
You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball you are.
>> > >SO, Mr. Fuckwit, pointing out that blacks
>> > > are "unaccomplished" in "matters of higher
learning" [jesus, but you
>> > > write weird] is a factual statement.
> >
> > So what? I just proved it meaningless.
You didn't prove a thing except what a jackball you are.
>> > > It's funny you'd be dwelling on this fact,
though, because the link I
>> > > supplied you indicates that even fewer
Hispanics graduate from
>> > > university as a percentage of all Hispanics.
That same link also has
>> > > links to other interesting
race-and-ethnicity-based data, such as high
>> > > school drop-out percentages by race or
ethnicity. Hispanics also drop
>> > > out of high school at much higher rates than
blacks.
> >
> > So you're
...shoving your face in the shit again. Yes, I am
doing that.
>> > > So, Fuckwit, why do you dwell on what people
might say about blacks,
>> > > when clearly Hispanics have even bigger
problems in education. Why,
>> > > it's because you're a racist motherfucking
shitbag bigot, isn't it?
>> > > Someone who *needs* blacks to be in a a
position of dependency on you
>> > > and your, uh, "enlightenment".
> >
> > Again, with the filthy language thing!
You'll take it and you'll like it, impotent punk.
>> > > You filthy shitbag.
> >
> > Am!
Right.
>>>> > >> > You stupid twat.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> From the looks of your Myspace profile
>> > >
>> > > I don't have a myspace profile.
> >
> > Liar,
No myspace profile, jackball.
Liberal Racism
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue
Graves has not one peer reviewed article
quote from my college library
"search returned 0 articles"
So? Judge the book on it's merits...
For example, I judge that your views have no merit. See how easy it is!
>
> quote from my college library
You're in college? Basketweaving U?
FBFR
>
> "search returned 0 articles"
So, he's a fraud, and you're a predictably stupid
shitworm for citing him.
Liberal Racism
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue
Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!
Liberal Racism
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue
Liberal Racism
Liberal Racism
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue
BULLSHIT, stupid angry lefty.
>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
>>> > >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016
Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!
"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>My Racism
>
Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!
Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the
American Dream
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Racism-Fixating-Subverts-American/dp/0742522016
BULLSHIT, stupid angry lefty.
>> > > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> > >> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
>>> > >>
news:1168298228.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>>>> > >> > Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
Liberal Racism
Debunking racist-conservative pseudo-intellectualism is easy and fun!
"Rudy Canudist" <rudy-...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:oa%oh.8470$pQ3....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Liberal Racism
just like Tim wise Graves is no one
On 9-Jan-2007, "Fooled By Folksy Republicans"
<Look...@ITalkCowboyTalk.con> wrote:
> So? Judge the book on it's merits...
damn you are dumb
if I have access to college libraries what should that tell you
> You're in college? Basketweaving U?
So, he's a fraud, and you're a predictably stupid
shitworm for citing him.
Liberal Racism
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue
favorites — even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
the summary achievement of the civil rights movement,
banned such action.
Liberal racists believe that neutral and objective
tests for college admissions are actually rigged in
favor of whites. When Asians, many of them recent
immigrants with little or no cultural experience,
refute this notion by outscoring whites on these tests,
liberal racists say that these Asians are not really a
minority at all but inauthentic, imitation whites.
Liiberal racists bear a heavy burden for having helped
destroy the black family and create a black underclass
by their romanticization of ghetto behavior, and their
insistence that blacks are victims who cannot be held
responsible for what they do. They reject the idea that
culture rather than race may help explain the
disadvantages those in the black underclass face. It is
true, as they point out, that some 40 percent of
America's black children are born poor, and that this
fact affects their life chances. But it is also true
that 85 percent of these poor children come from
single-parent homes. It is this circumstance—studies
show that children born into single-parent families are
more likely to be poor, regardless of race, than
children with two parents—rather than "institutional
Yet the LIBERAL racists all moved to the Republican Party when they welcomed
the "DIXIECRATS" with open arms.
Racism is what conservatism is all about! It what makes YOUR form of FACISM
work in the US!
No. The Dixiecrats were never liberal in any sense of
the word.
> Racism is what conservatism is all about!
False.
Strom Thurman, ever hear of him? DIXIECRAT then Republican.
>
>> Racism is what conservatism is all about!
>
> False.
Race baiting is your stock and trade.
But never a liberal.
Why did you bring up an example that disproves your
fuckwitted claim?
>>> Racism is what conservatism is all about!
>> False.
>
> Race baiting is your stock and trade.
False.
You're a fuckwit. Right.