Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

South Carolina mall shooting suspect's bond set at $25,000, can go to work with ankle monitor

2 views
Skip to first unread message

buh buh biden

unread,
Apr 18, 2022, 4:46:59 AM4/18/22
to
A South Carolina judge set a $25,000 bond for a suspect in a mall shooting
on Saturday that left 14 people injured, according to the Columbia Police
Department.

Jewayne Price, 22, will be on house arrest but allowed to travel to and
from work while wearing an ankle monitor if he posts bond.

He was charged with unlawful carrying of a pistol and could face
additional charges after the prosecutor reviews evidence.

Price is one of three people who were detained by law enforcement
following the shooting. The other two adults males were released after
police determined they weren't involved.

"We don’t believe this was random," Columbia Police Chief W.H. "Skip"
Holbrook said at a news conference. "We believe they knew each other and
something led to the gunfire."

SOUTH CAROLINA MALL SHOOTING LEAVES MORE THAN A DOZEN INJURED

Evidence collected at the scene indicates at least three people displayed
guns and two firearms were used, according to police.

Price was previously arrested in June 2018 and charged with accessory
before the fact following the shooting death of 17-year-old Amon Rice in
Hopkins, South Carolina. The outcome of that is unclear.

"We catch people, they serve a little bit of time, they get out and they
get right back doing what they normally do and that’s commit crimes,"
Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott said at a recent press conference. "The
criminal justice system needs to do better."

CALIFORNIA 9-YEAR-OLD GIRL WOUNDED IN MALL SHOOTING

Price's attorney, South Carolina state Rep. Todd Rutherford, claims that
his client acted in self-defense.

"It was unprovoked by him. He called the police, turned himself in, turned
over the firearm that was used in this, and gave a statement to the
Columbia Police Department," Rutherford said after the bond hearing,
according to WIS. "That is why he got a $25,000 bond."

The 14 victims range in age from 15 to 73. At least nine of them suffered
gunshot wounds, while the other five were injured while trying to flee the
chaos.

The 73-year-old victim is still being treated at a local hospital, while
the other 13 victims have been released.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Today’s isolated, senseless act of violence is extremely upsetting and
our thoughts are with everyone impacted," Columbiana Centre said in a
statement.

"We are grateful for the quick response and continued support of our
security team and our partners in law enforcement."

https://www.foxnews.com/us/south-carolina-mall-shooting-suspects-bond-set-
at-25000-can-go-to-work-with-ankle-monitor

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Apr 18, 2022, 9:14:00 AM4/18/22
to
Can he drive a car, which was used to commit violence by the Granny
killer terrorist.... as a weapon?

Banning one weapon but leaving him free to use others is NOT protecting
the public. We the public didn't commit the violence it was the SC mall
shooter that caused the violence. There is no PUBLIC SAFETY difference
between attempted mass murder which was just a poor attempt at murder
and actually succeeding and having them die. The difference will be in
the years in prison NOT the fact that if guilty he will be going to
prison for a long time. That means if he sits in jail awaiting a trial
that determines how long he will be in prison, it's NOT a case of him
serving more time in prison awaiting the trial than he will after he's
actually sentenced for all the attempted murders.

And why hasn't he been charged with terrorism? He's apparently one of
those *White Supremacists that the DOJ/FBI and Democrats* are telling us
are the most serious threat to America that there is today. He fit the
profile by trying to kill innocent people in a mall, you know like White
Supremacists do.

--
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's karma-

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Apr 18, 2022, 9:38:39 AM4/18/22
to
On 4/18/22 4:46 AM, buh buh biden wrote:
Can he drive a car, which was used to commit violence by the Granny
killer terrorist.... as a weapon?

Banning one weapon but leaving him free to use others is NOT protecting
the public. We the public didn't commit the violence it was the SC mall
shooter that caused the violence. There is no PUBLIC SAFETY difference
between attempted mass murder which was just a poor attempt at murder
and actually succeeding and having them die. The difference will be in
the years in prison NOT the fact that if guilty he will be going to
prison for a long time. That means if he sits in jail awaiting a trial
that determines how long he will be in prison, it's NOT a case of him
serving more time in prison awaiting the trial than he will after he's
actually sentenced for all the attempted murders.

/--> *ADDENDUM*

Oh, and I forgot to mention that January 6 protestors that were unarmed
are still in jail and being held there by Democrats on bogus inflated
charges that it was an unarmed attempt to take over the government. When
the Capital building isn't actually even "THE GOVERNMENT" and taking
over that building would be futile and wouldn't stop a government that
is separated into multiple branches of government with no one branch of
government holding all the power... making that charge of insurrection
ridiculous and only something a stupid Democrats could conceive.

Democrats should explain why those Jan/6 people are still in jail cells
when they didn't attempt an ARMED INSURRECTION or any ARMED actions.

*END ADDENDUM* <--/

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Apr 18, 2022, 9:18:18 PM4/18/22
to
On 4/18/22 4:46 AM, buh buh biden wrote:
Can he drive a car, which was used to commit violence by the Granny
killer terrorist.... as a weapon?

Banning one weapon but leaving him free to use others is NOT protecting
the public. We the public didn't commit the violence it was the SC mall
shooter that caused the violence. There is no PUBLIC SAFETY difference
between attempted mass murder which was just a poor attempt at murder
and actually succeeding and having them die. The difference will be in
the years in prison NOT the fact that if guilty he will be going to
prison for a long time. That means if he sits in jail awaiting a trial
that determines how long he will be in prison, it's NOT a case of him
serving more time in prison awaiting the trial than he will after he's
actually sentenced for all the attempted murders.

/--> *ADDENDUM*

Oh, and I forgot to mention that January 6 protestors that were unarmed
are still in jail and being held there by Democrats on bogus inflated
charges that it was an unarmed attempt to take over the government. When
the Capital building isn't actually even "THE GOVERNMENT" and taking
over that building would be futile and wouldn't stop a government that
is separated into multiple branches of government with no one branch of
government holding all the power... making that charge of insurrection
ridiculous and only something a stupid Democrats could conceive.

Democrats should explain why those Jan/6 people are still in jail cells
when they didn't attempt an ARMED INSURRECTION or any ARMED actions.

/--> *ADDENDUM*

An addendum in the middle of an addendum, caught so me of Tucker when I
was surfing the wasteland of Cable TV.... and oddly enough I hit it
when Margery Taylor Green was talking and she said that she was being
targeted as participating in an insurrection.... and again I have to
point to the fact that it was an unarmed protest and even if someone
took over the Capital Building, it isn't an insurrection since you can't
disable the entire GOVERNMENT by unarmed protesting inside the U.S.
capital building. There is in fact other contingencies for running each
branch of the Federal Government if their daily office space is targeted
by terrorists.... and the Capital is only a symbol and NOT the actual
center of the GOVERNMENT that can be captured and it disable the government.

NOT to mention that there was no plot to kidnap anyone and even the
Michigan Governor Whitemer case where the FBI was accusing White
Supremacists of trying to kidnap Whitemer, it turns out that the jury
didn't believe the FBI was trying to catch them and in fact the jury
didn't believe and/or convict them on that charge, because the FBI
turned out to be the ones who were actually planning it and the people
they were FRAMING for the crime weren't the master minds.



*END ADDENDUM* <--/



*END ADDENDUM* <--/


And why hasn't the SC Mall shooter been charged with terrorism? He's
apparently one of those *White Supremacists that the DOJ/FBI* and
*Democrats* are telling us are the most serious threat to America that
there is today. He fit the profile by trying to kill innocent people in
a mall, you know like White Supremacists do.




As it turns out the most serious threat to America is the *CORRUPTION*
*AND THE WEAPONIZING* *OF THE DOJ/FBI* against the American people.


--
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-

*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html

*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
*When Democrats confiscate our guns they'll become the occupying force*
-BMUS-

0 new messages