Three questions:
1. What size gravel would be optimal to use - pea size gravel or
a larger diameter (please specify the size) and why?
2. Should I use alternating layers of gravel and tamped dirt to
fill the post holes or will using 100% gravel offer any advantages,
such as better drainage, stronger support, and less work (little or no
tamping required)?
3. Is there a 'better' material to use other than gravel?
Thanks.
> 3. Is there a 'better' material to use other than gravel?
Yeah, concrete. There is a special formulation sold in bags called Post Mix
(I believe it's a Qwik Crete product.)
IMHO, concrete is worse. Crushed gravel works great.
Sue
When I replace old fence posts, it's mostly because they've rotted where
the post enters the concrete in the hole. I assume water gets trapped
after the post shrinks enough and then begins the rotting process. This
might be slowed by using pressure treated posts.
The gravel would let the water drain better.
Anyone been installing posts in gravel for a long time? Do they work loose
easier than those in concrete?
Charles
That certainly helps. If you want to go the extra little bit you can caulk the
top of the concrete where it abuts the post. Polyurethane caulk is about the
best, long term.
R
I have built miles of fence and installed about
100,000 Century 21 signs. Use SAND.
Unless you are building metal posts, why waste money. You'll be lucky if
you get 15-20 years out of teh post, then you have this big concrete mass
to remove. Gravel is MUCH cheaper and easier.
Sue
> R
Jason Cousins
ProBuilt Concepts
Maspeth, NY
917.709.3045