kick Buffy's ass
The Masked Superstar
because I didn't want to wait until the summerbreak was over).
However I'm sick and tired of Buffy always winning.And don't get me started
how she wins.Rulebreaker!
Buffy vs The Master(probably the coolest.He drowned her and broke her
neck.So he killed her twice.How cool can you be.)
Buffy vs Spike(It would be justice if he's the one who kills her at the end.
"When I get this chip out of my head,you and me are
gonna
have a confrontation")
Buffy vs Angel(she only won because her nerd friend was doing a spell)
Buffy vs Faith(had Faith been a full baddie she would have destryed Buffy in
a second.
Spoiler
Buffy vs Adam(the greatest scam ever.it was 5 against one.How unfair!)
Soon Buffy vs Masked Superstar.
Mattia Valente
>
> I say the show is very enjoyable.(I actually got myself the entire season 4
> because I didn't want to wait until the summerbreak was over).
No will power?
<gloat>
well, *I* managed to wait. *I* have willpower..
</gloat>
:-p
> However I'm sick and tired of Buffy always winning.And don't get me started
> how she wins. Rulebreaker!
What rules? All's fair in love and war, right? Its not like she has an
honor code to follow (no compulsions about backstabbing, as we well know
;-)
> Buffy vs The Master(probably the coolest.He drowned
> her and broke her neck.So he killed her twice.How cool
> can you be.)
Umm...oh, you mean in 'The Wish'. Confused me for a minute. The Master
was indeed a worthy foe, but her encounter with him only made her all
the stronger.
Spoilerspace for S4......
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
> Buffy vs Spike(It would be justice if he's the one who
> kills her at the end. "When I get this chip out of my
> head,you and me are gonna have a confrontation")
Chip is S4, thus a spoiler. OK, its out of context, so it doesn't make
much sense to people not in the know...
That would be fun, but she's kicked his ass quite consistently
throughout the seasons, so I don't see him really winning easily.
However, Sunday did kick Buffy's ass in 'The Freshmen' which didn't last
the whole time, but it was kind of odd, to be honest. Mainly because she
usualy kicks vamp ass so easily.
> Buffy vs Angel(she only won because her nerd friend was doing a spell)
vs Angelus, you mean..And anyway, are you disparaging Willow here? How
dare you!! ;-)
Seriously though, it was a lot closer than that. The Angelus breaking
down wasn't the only thing that allowed her to win. My guess, she would
have managed anyway in the end (because, well, she's the Heroine ;-)
> Buffy vs Faith(had Faith been a full baddie she would have destryed Buffy
> in a second.
Nah...Too irrational, Faith is. Buffy better fighter in the end, when
she decides to do what's necessary.
Spoiler later S4
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
>
> Buffy vs Adam(the greatest scam ever.it was 5 against one.How unfair!)
Who CARES about fair? Since when is Fair standard issue?
> Soon Buffy vs Masked Superstar.
What, you have a death wish?
:-p
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
Simaldeff
most important things in the show: she can't die... but she can lost: not
her life, but something or someone who has an importance for her...
We can say that she lost when Angel lost his Soul, when Kendra was killed,
when Faith became a vilain, when Angel went to LA, ....
She can be hurt, or sick but she can realy die until the and of the show.
PS: escuse me i don't speeck english very well.
A rumor say that Faith gonna have her own series, is it real?
P@rick
> PS: escuse me i don't speeck english very well.
And still I agree with all you said :o)
> A rumor say that Faith gonna have her own series, is it real?
Well it won't be coming from Joss. He's busy enough as it is with Angel and
Buffy. And when it's not coming from Joss, there's little chance Faith will
get a spin off.
Bye, Patrick
P@rick
> Buffy vs Angel(she only won because her nerd friend was doing a spell)
Nerd friend?? You watch your mouth mister!
> Soon Buffy vs Masked Superstar
You like a good spanking, don't ya?
Bye, Patrick
;o) obviously
J. Kok
The Masked Superstar wrote:
Actually....S5Ep1 Is titled: Buffy vs ...<GO DOWN BELOW SPOILER ALERT>
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
A
L
E
R
T
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
...Dracula
Mattia Valente
> Actually....S5Ep1 Is titled: Buffy vs ...<GO DOWN BELOW SPOILER ALERT>
>
> S
> P
> O
> I
> L
> E
> R
> A
> L
> E
> R
> T
> S
> P
> O
> I
> L
> E
> R
>
> ...Dracula
Is that the actual TITLE?!?!?!?!? That's, I dunno, way too uncryptic for
a Buffy ep. Bad title. I know that's what the ep is about, and it also
seems that its the only ep Dracula will be in, so he's not the big bad
for S5 (last I heard..)
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
george van hal
Mattia Valente wrote:
Yup. That is the actual title. According to TWW at least. It's a little (or
actually, not a little) cheesy, imho. It would be the worst title of a Buffy
ep *ever*. This whole Dracula thing is getting weirder with every passing
minute. Definatly gonna read a synopsis when it has aired in America.....
Oh and only one ep? How could *dracula* be a MotW. Just doesn't really fit,
imho......
See Ya,
George
george van hal
Mattia Valente wrote:
> It sure as hell gets my vote. Its sounds like a french translation of a
> buffy ep transalted back to english (You know, Passion was called the
> Orb of Thesulah or some such garbage...stoopid.)
*lol* Oh, c'mon. Talk about stupid ep titles! ;-) Anyways, I'm dreading the french
translation of the Passion monologue given by Angel......
> > This whole Dracula thing is getting weirder with every passing
> > minute. Definatly gonna read a synopsis when it has aired in America.....
>
> I'm going to have too. Its just WAAAAY too weird for me right now. I
> just have to know.
I so *know*. Last year, with s4, I wasn't really into the whole "searching out
info" thing, so I didn't know too much about the upcomming season then. Now this
season is just too weird. I mean, its either gonna mark the return to greatness of
the show, or its gonna be its downfall. Of course I'm hoping for the first, but I
simply *have* to know. Too bad we can't discuss transcripts of the first few s5
eps in here (of course we *can*, but I don't think anyone'll be up for it....)
> > Oh and only one ep? How could *dracula* be a MotW. Just doesn't really fit,
> > imho......
>
> Right. Supposedly Dawn appears out of the blue at the end of the ep
> arguing with Buffy or something. CLiffhanger type thing. OTOH, it makes
> all these adverts look more Red Herring again....It is Joss, after all..
Dawn. Another interesting thing. I mean, she's gonna be buffy's sister and all.
Completly out of the blue. Everyone remembering her and stuffs. Apareantly she's
got something to do with the seasons main baddy, which still *could* be good 'ol
dracul of course......
> I wish we didn't have to wait so damn long for the eps...
I feel your pain.....
> Mattia
> ReplyMeister[tm]
> Interview with a Vampire is on Veronica on sunday..
Prolly too much gore for my tastes. Also busy on friday iirc.....
See Ya,
George
Mattia Valente
>
> george van hal (hal0...@wxs.nl) wrote:
> :
> :
> : Mattia Valente wrote:
> :
> : > "J. Kok" wrote:
> : > > Actually....S5Ep1 Is titled: Buffy vs ...<GO DOWN BELOW SPOILER ALERT>
> : > >
> : > > S
> : > > P
> : > > O
> : > > I
> : > > L
> : > > E
> : > > R
> : > > A
> : > > L
> : > > E
> : > > R
> : > > T
> : > > S
> : > > P
> : > > O
> : > > I
> : > > L
> : > > E
> : > > R
> there's the Angel promos, where he's, like, jousting on a horse, or
> something...)
Right. You know, that was actually incredibly weird, Much, much weirder
than the Buffy promo's. Angel, on a Horse, on an LA street, with a lance
and all that. verrry bizarre. I've heard less about the new Angel
season, though, and I think I'll leave it that way. I'm less spoiled for
the rest of S1 of Angel than I am for the rest of S4 of Buffy..
> Would anyone be interested in my doing either a ep summary or review
> (or both)? Under the appropriate spoiler space, of course...it's not
> *completely* appropriate, as I'm not yurpeeyun, but with all the
> discussion going on, I thought I'd ask/offer.
Yeah! That would be kinda nice, although I would say to do it this way:
Start with a cautious, relatively detail-free review (not too many
spoilers) and let us ask the specific questions that arise. Gotta try to
limit myself..a little.
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
Working on that style sheet. I like style sheets! And the Framed version
as well...
Jonathan Black
[season 5]
> Would anyone be interested in my doing either a ep summary or
> review (or both)? Under the appropriate spoiler space, of
> course...it's not *completely* appropriate, as I'm not
> yurpeeyun, but with all the discussion going on, I thought I'd
> ask/offer.
Sure, that would be most welcome, I think, no objection at all. I
was actually thinking of asking you if you'd like to post some
*non* spoiler reviews at the start of the new season(s). You
know, describing what it's like and how good it is without giving
too much away (some of us like to at least pretend not to be
spoiler sluts). We're kind of hoping it's gonna be good, you
know, way better than `Doomed' sort of thing. So maybe you could
do both, some spoiler and some non-spoiler thoughts? Whatever you
like. Thanks in advance.
:)
--
J o N a T H a N
Andrea
george said:
> I so *know*. Last year, with s4, I wasn't really into the whole "searching
out
> info" thing, so I didn't know too much about the upcomming season then.
Now this
> season is just too weird. I mean, its either gonna mark the return to
greatness of
> the show, or its gonna be its downfall. Of course I'm hoping for the
first, but I
> simply *have* to know. Too bad we can't discuss transcripts of the first
few s5
> eps in here (of course we *can*, but I don't think anyone'll be up for
it....)
I'm up.
Andrea :)
Andrea
Mattia said:
> Gore? IwaV? No, hardly. Its actually pretty good.
Agree. Think I'll tape it this time.
Un-Buffy, but good.
> Blade was Gore, this is Anne Rice. what's friday got to do with sunday,
> anyway? Irrelevant..:-p
Isn't he always?
<ducks!>
Andrea :)
Andrea
Miriam said:
> Would anyone be interested in my doing either a ep summary or review
> (or both)? Under the appropriate spoiler space, of course...it's not
> *completely* appropriate, as I'm not yurpeeyun, but with all the
> discussion going on, I thought I'd ask/offer.
I vote yes.
Andrea :)
Mattia Valente
>
> Jonathan Black (jona...@ch.twi.tudelft.nl) wrote:
> : Miriam Rocke wrote:
> :
> : [season 5]
> : > Would anyone be interested in my doing either a ep summary or
> : > review (or both)? Under the appropriate spoiler space, of
> : > course...it's not *completely* appropriate, as I'm not
> : > yurpeeyun, but with all the discussion going on, I thought I'd
> : > ask/offer.
> :
> : Sure, that would be most welcome, I think, no objection at all. I
> : was actually thinking of asking you if you'd like to post some
> : *non* spoiler reviews at the start of the new season(s).
>
It's harder to do, in a way ;-)
> Sure-- I'll do both; and I'll also answer questions (spoiler and un)
> as best I can. Question-- what's the current (well, okay, Sept 26th)
> spoiler line?
Yay! Anyway, 'The Prom just aired today, that's the spoiler line until
next week thursday, when it becomes Grad Day pt1...so, Sept 26 it'll be
'The Freshmen' I guess...
> If I want to say, like, "Gee, the episode was
> [worse|better|kinda like] Episode X, and there were references to
> Episodes Y and Z and K, but they totally ignored this fact in Episode
> Epsilon" -- I need to know what's spoilersafe and what's not. <g>
Basically, as I figure it, S4 is starting in the UK about the same time
S5 starts in the US. Hence, S5E1: spoiler line is S4E1 and so forth.
> Mir
> who is very happy, 'cause B5 starts on SFC a day before new Buffies...
:-)
Mattia
ReplyMesiter[tm]
Style Sheets are cool.....web site (framed coming nicely..) Kinda
chaotic, 5 proggy's running, DL MP3's, listening to some, different web
browsers, etc. etc..no crashes yet (knock on wood..)
Miriam Rocke
: > :
: > : Sure, that would be most welcome, I think, no objection at all. I
: > : was actually thinking of asking you if you'd like to post some
: > : *non* spoiler reviews at the start of the new season(s).
: >
: > ....dang, I didn't even think of that.
:
: It's harder to do, in a way ;-)
Well, no. It's easy to do. It's just hard to do *well*. <g>
But hey, I can be informative and vague at the same time...
: Yay! Anyway, 'The Prom just aired today, that's the spoiler line until
: next week thursday, when it becomes Grad Day pt1...so, Sept 26 it'll be
: 'The Freshmen' I guess...
Coolness.
Mir
who doesn't have a Title. sob. ;)
--
Miriam Rocke "Just so we're clear, you guys
mrr...@ucdavis.edu know you're nuts, right?"
http://handel.cipic.ucdavis.edu/~mrrocke/ --BtVS, "Gingerbread"
P@rick
> Mir
> who doesn't have a Title. sob. ;)
Yes, that's a little sad, isn't it?
Let's see... sob... SobMeister? Nah, that's still sad.
I notice you <g> a lot. That's a good habit. It's shows you have a positive
outlook on life. And a good sense of humor (as your postings prove). So I
think GrinMeister [tm]is rather fitting (or does this have a corny ring to
it?). Because you seem to <g> and <G> a lot, and because your postings make
us <g> and <G> too.
Your other distinguishing feature is that you are an American posting in an
European ng. We like your input. You are sort of like a correspondent to us.
You can fill in the culture and USA related details we're missing. And you
are way ahead of us in watching episodes. So in that way, USAMeister [tm]
would fit. But that would also place emphasis on your exceptional position.
You might not want that. You might want to be considered just one of the
boys.. err girls.. err.. one of us. And USAMeister, wouldn't that be your
president?
So it's your choice. Personally, I like GrinMeister [tm] best. Or you could
pass for the moment and wait untill something more suitable comes along.
Bye, Patrick
or should we make that [..]Meisterin [tm]?
Xander X
wrote:
>> Interview with a Vampire is on Veronica on sunday..
>
>Prolly too much gore for my tastes. Also busy on friday iirc.....
Gore?? Hmm. some Buffy eppies contain more gore..
And is anyone else bothered that Veronica calls that moovie Interview
with -the- Vampire?
_
X-rays are now diagnosing even rare X-factors
Andrea
Jonathan said:
> Andrea wrote:
> My god, people, have you no shame?! *Discussing* *transcripts* of
> unseen eps, are you out of your minds?! I'm already mad enough at
> myself for taking in pretty much most of the S5 info that has
> become available so far, but discussing transcripts, man, that it
> *so* out of line.
Um. Why? I'd say it's something like reading the book before watching the
movie.
What the heck are you gonna do when the eps
> finally start to air on Net5 in April or whatever. No matter how
> good they are it's gonna be "boring, seen it, well, read it".
Hm. No. I did it before, and I must admit it's a different kind of watching
an ep when you've read the thing, but it's not always worse.
> Man, if the "Buffy feeling" is gone, then hell, you may just have
> yourself to blame for that if you go around behaving like this.
Ahem. No. I'm not to blame if I don't enjoy watching something. You could
blame me if I gave up on Buffy easily, but for now, I'll keep watching, I'll
keep taping, and I really don't understand what the big fuzz is all about.
:)
> Shees.
>
> Okay, just wanted to get that off my chest. No offence.
Well, feel free to get anything off your chest, but could you please explain
what's the Big Bad in reading transcripts on forehand and discussing them
here?
Andrea
(puzzled :))
Jonathan Black
> Jonathan said:
>
> > My god, people, have you no shame?! *Discussing*
> > *transcripts* of unseen eps, are you out of your minds?! I'm
> > already mad enough at myself for taking in pretty much most
> > of the S5 info that has become available so far, but
> > discussing transcripts, man, that it *so* out of line.
>
> Um. Why? I'd say it's something like reading the book before
> watching the movie.
Hmm. Okay... I come back to this in a moment.
> > Man, if the "Buffy feeling" is gone, then hell, you may just
> > have yourself to blame for that if you go around behaving
> > like this.
>
> Ahem. No. I'm not to blame if I don't enjoy watching something.
Then who is? The writers? If the lack of enjoyment is beacuse
you've been spoiled, I think not, I think in that case you - or
whoever spoiled you - is to blame. Nothing beats seeing a movie
or episode or whatever (or reading a book) completely unspoiled.
That's the way it was meant to be seen. So I just meant *maybe*,
if you start reading transcripts beforehand, you *might* enjoy
the eps less as a result (e.g. because you know exactly what's
going to happen), so in that case your lack of enjoyment could
conceivably be your own stupid fault.
> > Okay, just wanted to get that off my chest. No offence.
>
> Well, feel free to get anything off your chest, but could you
> please explain what's the Big Bad in reading transcripts on
> forehand and discussing them here?
Well, I thought simply because it's the ultimate form of
spoilage, and spoilage is bad. I know some people don't care
about being spoiled, but many do, hence our use of spoiler space
for this, that and the other. I thought *you* cared, which is why
I was "puzzled" myself about the way you seemed to see no problem
about reading transcripts beforehand, but now (esp. in your
"reading the book before watching the movie" comment above) I
think I'm hearing you see this thing slightly differently. You're
seeing the reading of the transcript not as spoiling yourself for
the ep, but simply as an alternative way of "seeing" the ep for
the first time and this does not necessarily mean that you don't
care about spoilers, e.g. you might well still be cross with me
for revealing important events like the fact that, say (and I'm
making this up), Giles will die in the first ep of season 5, and
say "Hey, Jonathan, you little !@%%*$**^@, I was going to read
that transcript when it came out, now you've spoiled it for me!".
Am I right? At all? :)
--
J o N a T H a N
"The point of this course is not to critique popular American
culture. It is not to pick at it, or look down upon it. And it
is not to watch videos for credit."
--Prof. Riegert, `The Freshman'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
george van hal
Andrea wrote:
> Mattia said:
>
> > george van hal wrote:
> > > Mattia Valente wrote:
> > > > Mattia
> > > > ReplyMeister[tm]
> > > > Interview with a Vampire is on Veronica on sunday..
> > >
> > > Prolly too much gore for my tastes. Also busy on friday iirc.....
> >
> > Gore? IwaV? No, hardly. Its actually pretty good.
>
> Agree. Think I'll tape it this time.
Ouh. Well that's a plus. Perhaps I'll be watching it than......
> Un-Buffy, but good.
> > Blade was Gore, this is Anne Rice. what's friday got to do with sunday,
> > anyway? Irrelevant..:-p
>
> Isn't he always?
Hey!
> <ducks!>
Scoops some shrimp out of the Freezemaster 200XZ [tm] and throws them at
Andrea....
See Ya,
George
Grumble......
george van hal
Andrea wrote:
[reading s5 transcripts]
> I'm up.
Ouh..... we'd just do s5, ep1 for starters of course. Just to get to see whats
up with all the weirdish developments. Anyone have any idea how long it takes
for a transcipt to be put online after the ep airs??
Anyone else up for this???
See Ya,
George
george van hal
Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> george van hal skriver...
>
> > > "J. Kok" wrote:
> > > > Actually....S5Ep1 Is titled: Buffy vs ...<GO DOWN BELOW SPOILER ALERT>
> > > >
> > > > S
> > > > P
> > > > O
> > > > I
> > > > L
> > > > E
> > > > R
> > > > A
> > > > L
> > > > E
> > > > R
> > > > T
> > > > S
> > > > P
> > > > O
> > > > I
> > > > L
> > > > E
> > > > R
> > > >
> > > > ...Dracula
>
<snip>
>
> How could *dracula* be a MotW. Just doesn't really fit,
> > imho......
>
> Perhaps another out of Buffyverse ep.
I certainly *hope* not. Would get those persky VST [tm] type discussions going
again, methinks.
> Or a university course on
> Gothic literature.
Perhaps ;-)
See Ya,
George
Welcome back, btw :-)
Jonathan Black
> george van hal skriver...
>
> > > > S
> > > > P
> > > > O
> > > > I
> > > > L
> > > > E
> > > > R
> > > > A
> > > > L
> > > > E
> > > > R
> > > > T
> > > > S
> > > > P
> > > > O
> > > > I
> > > > L
> > > > E
> > > > R
>
> > [...] This whole Dracula thing is getting weirder with every
> > passing minute. Definatly gonna read a synopsis when it has
> > aired in America..... Oh and only one ep? How could *dracula*
> > be a MotW. Just doesn't really fit, imho......
>
> Perhaps another out of Buffyverse ep.
"Another" one? Which was the first one?
--
J o N a T H a N
"Whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm still spinning on
this whole fairy-tales-are-real thing."
--Xander, `Gingerbread'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Mattia Valente
>
> Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> > Perhaps another out of Buffyverse ep.
>
> "Another" one? Which was the first one?
Hmmm...VST[tm] anyone? I think he means the Zeppo. Or possibly the Wish
or somesuch..
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
Jonathan Black
Hehe... VST[tm] indeed. I feel great disagreements already. IMO,
there can't really be any such thing as an "out of Buffyverse
ep", as all episodes take place within the Buffyverse, pretty
much by definition.
:)
--
J o N a T H a N
"It's all part of the glamorous world of vampire slayage."
--Buffy, `Invisible Girl'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Andrea
Jonathan said:
<snip>
> > Ahem. No. I'm not to blame if I don't enjoy watching something.
>
> Then who is? The writers? If the lack of enjoyment is beacuse
> you've been spoiled, I think not, I think in that case you - or
> whoever spoiled you - is to blame. Nothing beats seeing a movie
> or episode or whatever (or reading a book) completely unspoiled.
> That's the way it was meant to be seen. So I just meant *maybe*,
> if you start reading transcripts beforehand, you *might* enjoy
> the eps less as a result (e.g. because you know exactly what's
> going to happen), so in that case your lack of enjoyment could
> conceivably be your own stupid fault.
Aha, now I understand. At first I thought you blamed me for not enjoying The
Ring and Doomed.
>
> > > Okay, just wanted to get that off my chest. No offence.
> >
> > Well, feel free to get anything off your chest, but could you
> > please explain what's the Big Bad in reading transcripts on
> > forehand and discussing them here?
>
> Well, I thought simply because it's the ultimate form of
> spoilage, and spoilage is bad. I know some people don't care
> about being spoiled, but many do, hence our use of spoiler space
> for this, that and the other. I thought *you* cared, which is why
> I was "puzzled" myself about the way you seemed to see no problem
> about reading transcripts beforehand, but now (esp. in your
> "reading the book before watching the movie" comment above) I
> think I'm hearing you see this thing slightly differently. You're
> seeing the reading of the transcript not as spoiling yourself for
> the ep, but simply as an alternative way of "seeing" the ep for
> the first time and this does not necessarily mean that you don't
> care about spoilers, e.g. you might well still be cross with me
> for revealing important events like the fact that, say (and I'm
> making this up), Giles will die in the first ep of season 5, and
> say "Hey, Jonathan, you little !@%%*$**^@, I was going to read
> that transcript when it came out, now you've spoiled it for me!".
>
> Am I right? At all? :)
You're right. Reading a transcript you'll get the whole story, and events
are shown within the orignal context. In my experience, when you watch the
ep after reading the script, it's like watching it for the second time, and
imo, that's not a bad thing. The impact of something like Giles' death may
be not as enormous in a script compared to when you see it on tv, but the
meaning and background and everything won't be lost. Random spoilers like
who dies and who'll live however, really 'spoil' that first viewing. So yes,
in those cases I do the !@%%*$**^@ thing.
Andrea :))
Jonathan Black
> Jonathan said:
>
> > [...] So I just meant *maybe*, if you start reading
> > transcripts beforehand, you *might* enjoy the eps less as a
> > result (e.g. because you know exactly what's going to
> > happen), so in that case your lack of enjoyment could
> > conceivably be your own stupid fault.
>
> Aha, now I understand. At first I thought you blamed me for not
> enjoying The Ring and Doomed.
Good grief, no :) Hell, I was pretty much completely unspoiled
for both those eps, and didn't really enjoy either, well, they
were disappointing to say the least.
> > [...] You're seeing the reading of the transcript not as
> > spoiling yourself for the ep, but simply as an alternative
> > way of "seeing" the ep for the first time and this does not
> > necessarily mean that you don't care about spoilers [...]
>
> You're right. Reading a transcript you'll get the whole story,
> and events are shown within the orignal context. In my
> experience, when you watch the ep after reading the script,
> it's like watching it for the second time, and imo, that's not
> a bad thing. The impact of something like Giles' death may be
> not as enormous in a script compared to when you see it on tv,
> but the meaning and background and everything won't be lost.
> Random spoilers like who dies and who'll live however, really
> 'spoil' that first viewing. So yes, in those cases I do the
> !@%%*$**^@ thing.
Good. I get it now. I'm glad we had this little chat. I may even
join you guys in reading the 501 transcript, but I still don't
think it's something I'd want to make a habit of. *Seeing* new
eps for the first time is still the best way, I think, even if it
means waiting 7 or 8 months for them.
Bye,
--
J o N a T H a N
"Fill me in then, 'cause I've read the book, seen the
movie, and I'm still fuzzy about what's going on."
--Xander, `I Only Have Eyes for You'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Fré Hoogendoorn
>
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2000 22:16:49 +0200, george van hal <hal0...@wxs.nl>
> wrote:
>
> >> Interview with a Vampire is on Veronica on sunday..
> >
> >Prolly too much gore for my tastes. Also busy on friday iirc.....
>
> Gore?? Hmm. some Buffy eppies contain more gore..
>
> And is anyone else bothered that Veronica calls that moovie Interview
> with -the- Vampire?
Actually no, because that is the proper name.