I'm just gonna throw this in here and leave the witty commentary to
others for the moment, cause I still have the nksf chart to compile
before my self imposed deadline... All I can I say is, Mattia, well,
what can I say...?
pos # name
--- --- ------------------------
1 357 Mattia Valente
2 146 P@rick
3 129 Peter Kleiweg
4 85 Jonathan Black
5 80 wheez50
6 73 george van hal
7 39 Saskia
8 38 Zwaaneveld
9 36 Fuzzy
10 21 Yorrit
11 19 Claudia van der Lely
12 13 Luke Croll
13 11 Hooresi
= 11 Willem Tel
15 10 Andrea
= 10 Cecilia (incl. Slayage)
17 8 Mark Stevens
= 8 MINK
= 8 Jaap Willems
20 7 Fré Hoogendoorn
= 7 J. Kok
= 7 Ninia
= 7 Spartacus
--
J o N a T H a N
ChartMeister [tm]
"There could be a gang of vampires working the campus!
We need research, an-an-and charts and stuff!"
--Buffy `The Freshman'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
> Well, here it is, the moment we've all been waiting for, the very
> first edition of the Official alt.buffy.europe Top 20 Poster Chart!
Cool.
> pos # name
> --- --- ------------------------
> 1 357 Mattia Valente
well no surprise there, but!
> 7 39 Saskia
*what* is this??? Is there another Saskia around here? Mattia posting under
my name? I can't be that I'm in the Top 10 here too!! I'm sure I haven't
posted that much here...
Whoever's impersonating me : Spill!
Saskia
> "There could be a gang of vampires working the campus!
> We need research, an-an-and charts and stuff!"
>
> --Buffy `The Freshman'
> Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Yep, good one!
Saskia
> > pos # name
> > --- --- ------------------------
> > 1 357 Mattia Valente
>
> well no surprise there, but!
>
> > 7 39 Saskia
>
> *what* is this??? Is there another Saskia around here? Mattia
> posting under my name? I can't be that I'm in the Top 10 here
> too!! I'm sure I haven't posted that much here...
>
> Whoever's impersonating me : Spill!
Sorry Saskia, I think you'll find this is in fact accurate. The
thing is, this is still a lot smaller a group than nksf, with a far
smaller number of different posters, so the top 20 is slimply a lot
easier to get into. As you can see, only 7 posts were necessary.
Hell, even the Queen of Subtlety has charted, albeit in 20th place
shared with three others, after only having started here what, a few
days ago.
--
J o N a T H a N
still compiling that nksf chart - really ;-)
I still was under the impression that even u posted more than me (but then
again i'm in nksf+f too, so i could be mixing up...)
>
> Sorry Saskia, I think you'll find this is in fact accurate. The
> thing is, this is still a lot smaller a group than nksf, with a far
> smaller number of different posters, so the top 20 is slimply a lot
> easier to get into. As you can see, only 7 posts were necessary.
> Hell, even the Queen of Subtlety has charted, albeit in 20th place
> shared with three others, after only having started here what, a few
> days ago.
Still its pretty startling.. I'm unexpectetly in the top5 (i'll ne'er do it
again, i promise ;-) Is this really sucha small group?
> J o N a T H a N
>
> still compiling that nksf chart - really ;-)
still waiting - really
> > > 7 39 Saskia
> >
> > Whoever's impersonating me : Spill!
>
> Sorry Saskia, I think you'll find this is in fact accurate. The
> thing is, this is still a lot smaller a group than nksf, with a far
> smaller number of different posters, so the top 20 is slimply a lot
> easier to get into. As you can see, only 7 posts were necessary.
Ok, it's late, I'm not used to staying up this late (movie's about to begin)
and I wasn't reading very well. I read 39 posts! Comletely missed the 7.
Phew. Relieved! :-)
Saskia
> Jonathan Black wrote:
>
> > > > 7 39 Saskia
> > >
> > > Whoever's impersonating me : Spill!
> >
> > Sorry Saskia, I think you'll find this is in fact accurate. The
> > thing is, this is still a lot smaller a group than nksf, with a far
> > smaller number of different posters, so the top 20 is slimply a lot
> > easier to get into. As you can see, only 7 posts were necessary.
>
> Ok, it's late, I'm not used to staying up this late (movie's about
> to begin) and I wasn't reading very well. I read 39 posts!
> Comletely missed the 7. Phew. Relieved! :-)
I hope you're trolling here or something, Saskia. I said 7 posts
were necessary to get into the top 20. You are at *number* 7, with
39 posts.
--
> I hope you're trolling here or something, Saskia. I said 7 posts
> were necessary to get into the top 20. You are at *number* 7, with
> 39 posts.
The funny thing is that I wasn't trolling and the sad thing is that I'm
never going to stay up late after an incredibly busy day at work.... shees!
so there *were* 39 posts!? And I bet 80% of it was off-topic. Can't believe
it!
Saskia
I think you would be mixing it up. You don't conciously realize how much
you post, trust me on that one, I should know...
> > Sorry Saskia, I think you'll find this is in fact accurate. The
> > thing is, this is still a lot smaller a group than nksf, with a far
> > smaller number of different posters, so the top 20 is slimply a lot
> > easier to get into. As you can see, only 7 posts were necessary.
> > Hell, even the Queen of Subtlety has charted, albeit in 20th place
> > shared with three others, after only having started here what, a few
> > days ago.
>
> Still its pretty startling.. I'm unexpectetly in the top5 (i'll ne'er do it
> again, i promise ;-) Is this really sucha small group?
Yes, it is, really. There aren't *that* many people who post here (semi)
regularly. I was kinda betting you would be in the top 5, especially
since George has been pretty quiet lately. And I'm not sure I believe
you about not posting...I predict it will get quiet pretty fast though,
since Buffy and Angel are going on summer break, as are several of us, I
would imagine..
> > still compiling that nksf chart - really ;-)
> still waiting - really
Hehe..we shall see ;-)
Hehe...DAMN though. Its worse (better? whatever...) than last time.
Thats about 2.45 (yes, I used the calculator ;-) times the amount that
P@trick posted...scary...:-)))
> pos # name
> --- --- ------------------------
> 1 357 Mattia Valente
> 2 146 P@rick
> 3 129 Peter Kleiweg
> 4 85 Jonathan Black
> 5 80 wheez50
OK, pretty close to what I though (except for that really big number
next to my name, that is ;-) I would have thought a few more posts from
Wheez50 and from you though, although you did miss out on a lot because
of that belated watching of episodes thing ;-)
> 6 73 george van hal
> 7 39 Saskia
> 8 38 Zwaaneveld
> 9 36 Fuzzy
> 10 21 Yorrit
Well, until a coupla weeks ago, I would have voted for George to be in
the top 5 as well (then there were exams. Way too many exams. :-) Saskia
is a surprise, though! You go girl!!
> 11 19 Claudia van der Lely
> 12 13 Luke Croll
> 13 11 Hooresi
> = 11 Willem Tel
> 15 10 Andrea
> = 10 Cecilia (incl. Slayage)
>
> 17 8 Mark Stevens
> = 8 MINK
> = 8 Jaap Willems
> 20 7 Fré Hoogendoorn
> = 7 J. Kok
> = 7 Ninia
> = 7 Spartacus
No deep comments on this bit though...I would be interested in knowing
how many different posters there were over the last month. Could we have
those figures too? Would be interetsing to see..
> --
> J o N a T H a N
> ChartMeister [tm]
That you are (nksf+f chart done? No I haven't checked that NG yet ;-)
> "There could be a gang of vampires working the campus!
> We need research, an-an-and charts and stuff!"
>
> --Buffy `The Freshman'
> Buffy the Vampire Slayer
And QuoteMeister[tm] as well!!!
I think I'll give myself another title. How does PostMeister[tm] grab
you? ;-))
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
PostMeister[tm]
Jonathan Black wrote:
> Well, here it is, the moment we've all been waiting for, the very
> first edition of the Official alt.buffy.europe Top 20 Poster Chart!
Ouh, yay!!!
> I'm just gonna throw this in here and leave the witty commentary to
> others for the moment, cause I still have the nksf chart to compile
> before my self imposed deadline... All I can I say is, Mattia, well,
> what can I say...?
>
> pos # name
> --- --- ------------------------
> 1 357 Mattia Valente
Ah yes, it is as we expected. Mattia takes home the number one trophee
(except that there is no actual trophee) with a whopping 357 posts. Did
the math on the rest of the chart and there have been 759 posts apart
from those coming from mattia, coming from posters in the top20. That
means that mattia replyed to aprox. 47 percent of the posts to this
group. The actual percentage would be a bit lower, because of threads he
started himself , plus he may have replied to his own posts a few times
and there have probably been a bit more posts due to posters not in the
top20. So say we give our mattia a 40 percent reply rate, wich is
probably a bit too low. Still a whopping 40%! I guess the title
replymeister is more than a bit deserved ;-)
Also his 357 posts make up aprox. 30 percent of all posts to this
group.......
Hmm.....makes me wonder if mattia has any time to do anything else.
Still not complaining though. The group would be a lot quieter without
him ;-)
> 2 146 P@rick
And again not a real surprise. Not with all the willowy goodness we've
had of late ;-)
> 3 129 Peter Kleiweg
One of the original posters kicks in at third.....again no real
surprise......
> 4 85 Jonathan Black
Ah, yes, the first nksf "bekeerde" enters in 4th......
> 5 80 wheez50
A surprise entry. Didn't expect wheez in the top 5. Nice going ;-)!!
> 6 73 george van hal
A disapointing 6th place for myself ;-p Must be the fact I haven't had
time to post a lot the last two weeks or so. I'll be back with a top5
spot next month though. Probably ;-)
> 7 39 Saskia
And the second person to come over from nksf places in 7th. Still not up
to Jonathan's level of obsession, but very nicely placed anyways ;-)
> 8 38 Zwaaneveld
No real surprises here ;-)
> 9 36 Fuzzy
Hmmm.......would've thought Fuzzy would've been placed higher on this
list......
> 10 21 Yorrit
Again, not a real surprise.....
Not gonna do those commenty thingies on the rest of the top 20 except
for:
> 15 10 Andrea
Disapointing 15th place here for one of the original posters of this
group. Shame on you ;-)!!
> > 17 8 Mark Stevens
> > = 8 MINK
> > = 8 Jaap Willems
> > 20 7 Fré Hoogendoorn
> > = 7 J. Kok
> > = 7 Ninia
> > = 7 Spartacus
>
> No deep comments on this bit though...I would be interested in
> knowing how many different posters there were over the last month.
> Could we have those figures too? Would be interetsing to see..
OK, the total number of posts was 1366 and the number of different
posters was 155. However, 80 of those had only one post to their
name and another 28 had only two. Many of these I guess are the odd
pieces of incoherent crossposted junk that crop up.
> I think I'll give myself another title. How does PostMeister[tm]
> grab you? ;-))
Great one. Nice pun on the word postmaster.
;-)
--
J o N a T H a N
QuoteMeister [tm]
"It seems like people I didn't even know missed me."
--Buffy `Dead Man's Party'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
<snip snip snip>
>Not gonna do those commenty thingies on the rest of the top 20 except
>for:
>
>> 15 10 Andrea
>
>Disapointing 15th place here for one of the original posters of this
>group. Shame on you ;-)!!
Hey, I'm doing the best I can. I've kidnapped Mattia, tied his hands behind
his back and I'm posting like mad.
:)))
Andrea :)
A lot of posts, for such a small group though, right?
Well, i'm kinda the other way 'round
> > 5 80 wheez50
>
> A surprise entry. Didn't expect wheez in the top 5. Nice going ;-)!!
thanks ;;-)
> > 6 73 george van hal
>
> A disapointing 6th place for myself ;-p Must be the fact I haven't had
> time to post a lot the last two weeks or so. I'll be back with a top5
> spot next month though. Probably ;-)
thou shall not beat me! (sorry, jonathan, ... peter ...?)
> > 7 39 Saskia
>
> And the second person to come over from nksf places in 7th. Still not up
> to Jonathan's level of obsession, but very nicely placed anyways ;-)
>
> > 8 38 Zwaaneveld
>
> No real surprises here ;-)
>
> > 9 36 Fuzzy
>
> Hmmm.......would've thought Fuzzy would've been placed higher on this
> list......
m2
> > 10 21 Yorrit
>
> Again, not a real surprise.....
>
> Not gonna do those commenty thingies on the rest of the top 20 except
> for:
>
> > 15 10 Andrea
>
> Disapointing 15th place here for one of the original posters of this
> group. Shame on you ;-)!!
agr
wheez50 (hya all, uhh)
i did wait eventually (who did too?)
Do you monitor that? don't you have other things to do? OK, it's good
for somepeoples ego's (no Offence to anyone).
Yorrit
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
> 10 21 Yorrit
Well that's a pleasant suprise!
AFAIK he has the posts archived, and then runs some little linux program
the sorts most of it out for him, so he doesn't actually sit there with
a pen and paper and put anothr little mark in a column everytime a new
post comes up ;-)
Mattia
PostMeister[tm]
The truth Valente speaks.
And those seeming hours it took me to compile that nksf chart in the
early hours of Thursday morning were really just spent waiting for
the whole month's worth of posts to download from fb1.euro.net as I
discovered at the last minute (*after* I'd annouced that the chart
would be posted well within the hour, argh) that news.tudelft.nl
didn't have the whole month on file anymore as it usually does...
--
J o N a T H a N
ChartMeister [tm]
I'll be right along
'Cause, baby, you're so strong
--Velvet Chain `Strong'
Yes, but, who really cares about whos posts the most posts?
> Yes, but, who really cares about whos posts the most posts?
To `really care' is a relative term. Who `really cares' about
anything?
--
J o N a T H a N
"She wouldn't even kill me. She just left. She didn't even care
enough to cut off my head or set me on fire. I mean, is that too
much to ask? You know? Some little sign that she cared?"
--Spike `Lovers Walk'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
I for one care to have a kinda good life in front of me, not too much
troubles. I do too really care for my family... That's why i kinda disagree
with ya J.
On the other side... You could admit you wanna rank high in the top20 ;-)
WheeZ50 (wondering...)
> Jonathan Black schreef in berichtnieuws
>
> > On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Yorrit wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, but, who really cares about whos posts the most posts?
> >
> > To `really care' is a relative term. Who `really cares' about
> > anything?
>
> I for one care to have a kinda good life in front of me, not too
> much troubles. I do too really care for my family... That's why i
> kinda disagree with ya J.
Disagree with what? I really wasn't saying anything much. Just
wondering how I was expected to `really care' about the poster
chart.
> On the other side... You could admit you wanna rank high in the
> top20 ;-)
I'd be lying.