two slayers issue
The Masked Superstar
Jonathan Black
> So what are your opinions about this?
Please elaborate. What "two slayers issue"?
--
J o N a T H a N
P@rick
> The Masked Superstar wrote:
>
> > So what are your opinions about this?
>
> Please elaborate. What "two slayers issue"?
We all know *what* two slayers issue. But it would help the discussion get
started if TMS gave his opinion first. And I agree with the please elaborate
part.
Bye, Patrick
Jonathan Black
> Jonathan Black wrote:
> > The Masked Superstar wrote:
> >
> > > So what are your opinions about this?
> >
> > Please elaborate. What "two slayers issue"?
>
> We all know *what* two slayers issue.
We do? That's actually exactly what I was asking him to elaborate
on. I assume Buffy and Faith are the two slayers he's referring
to, but what issue? Is that a stupid question?
> But it would help the discussion get started if TMS gave his
> opinion first. And I agree with the please elaborate part.
You do? Yet you seem to already know what the issue is.
:))
--
J o N a T H a N
"She may simply have what you Americans refer
to as `issues'. Her experience with the Master
must have been extremely traumatic."
--Giles, `When She Was Bad'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
The Masked Superstar
Jonathan Black <jona...@ch.twi.tudelft.nl> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.21.00091...@deadlock.et.tudelft.nl...
> The Masked Superstar wrote:
>
> > So what are your opinions about this?
>
> Please elaborate. What "two slayers issue"?
>
> J o N a T H a N
What two Slayers issue could I possibly be talking about?!!
The Masked Superstar
P@rick <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.VampWillow.uu.nl> wrote in message
news:8prin8$3oc$2...@news.surfnet.nl...
elaborate.
Also since when does one have to state their opinion first?
What if I don't have an opinion about this subject and I just want to know
yours?
The Masked Superstar
Peter Kleiweg <kle...@let.rug.invalid> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.21.00091...@kleigh.nl...
> Jonathan Black skriver...
>
> > The Masked Superstar wrote:
> >
> > > So what are your opinions about this?
> >
> > Please elaborate. What "two slayers issue"?
>
> just likes other people to elaborate.
>
> --
> Peter Kleiweg | P e t r o n o m i c o n |
> e-mail: invalid -> nl | http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg |
> Guardian of Spike's Innocence, and his Dislike of Puppies
I demand an apology.
Andrea
The Masked Superstar said:
That's strange. Because I thought you said you didn't have an opinion, and
that you just wanted to know how other people think about the issue. In my
book, that's exactly what Peter said.
Andrea :)
The Masked Superstar
Andrea <en...@club.tip.nl> wrote in message
news:8psvk6$jlv$2...@nereid.worldonline.nl...
> that you just wanted to know how other people think about the issue. In my
> book, that's exactly what Peter said.
>
> Andrea :)
>
>
got an opinion (on this subject) and saying Masked Superstar hasn't got
anything
worth saying.
So according to him what Masked Superstar says is worthless.
I still demand an apology.
P@rick
> If you know what two Slayers issue I'm talking about than there's no need
to
> elaborate.
Alright then: yes they can.
Bye, Patrick
that's my opinion
P@rick
> P@rick wrote:
> > We all know *what* two slayers issue.
>
> We do? That's actually exactly what I was asking him to elaborate
> on. I assume Buffy and Faith are the two slayers he's referring
> to, but what issue? Is that a stupid question?
No, but I thought you knew.
> > But it would help the discussion get started if TMS gave his
> > opinion first. And I agree with the please elaborate part.
>
> You do? Yet you seem to already know what the issue is.
Yes.
Bye, Patrick
--
Angel: Are you mad at me for being around too much or for not being around
enough?
Buffy: Duh. Yes.
Angel: Which?
Buffy: What?
Angel: I don't get you.
Buffy: No, you don't, not anymore.
Angel: Are you just making this harder to make this easier on yourself?
Buffy: Could we stop with the brain-teasers?
Andrea
The Masked Superstar said:
> >
> I don't agree.There's a difference between saying Masked Superstar hasn't
> got an opinion (on this subject) and saying Masked Superstar hasn't got
> anything
> worth saying.
>
> So according to him what Masked Superstar says is worthless.
>
> I still demand an apology.
Excuse me while I join Peter.
ROTFL!
Andrea :))
Jonathan Black
> The Masked Superstar wrote:
>
> > If you know what two Slayers issue I'm talking about than
> > there's no need to elaborate.
>
> Alright then: yes they can.
No way... Slayers can have kids together? Holy shit...
--
J o N a T H a N
"Hey, as long as you don't go scratchin' at me or
humpin' my leg, we're five by five, you know?"
--Faith, `Faith, Hope & Trick'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Jonathan Black
> Jonathan Black wrote:
>
> > P@rick wrote:
> >
> > > We all know *what* two slayers issue.
> >
> > We do? That's actually exactly what I was asking him to
> > elaborate on. I assume Buffy and Faith are the two slayers
> > he's referring to, but what issue? Is that a stupid question?
>
> No, but I thought you knew.
I don't believe I do. Is it a spoiler?
:)
--
J o N a T H a N
ARE YOU FIVE BY FIVE? http://come.to/5x5
-> Say NO! to out-of-sync airing of BtVS and Angel on Dutch TV!
-> Tape FOX8's Angel, keep it for 5 weeks until Net5's BtVS airs
IT ONLY TAKES FIVE WEEKS TO BE FIVE BY FIVE
Fuzzy
"The Masked Superstar" <maskeds...@hetnet.nl> wrote in message
news:#RK8IGpHAHA.283@net025s...
> So what are your opinions about this?
What's to say?
Buffy died, Kendra came, Kendra died Faith came.
Sierk
Willow: Oz is a werewolf.
Buffy: It's a long story.
Oz: (shrugs) I got bit.
Buffy: Apparently not that long.
--Faith, Hope and Trick
Jonathan Black
> The Masked Superstar wrote:
>
> > So what are your opinions about this?
>
> What's to say?
> Buffy died, Kendra came, Kendra died Faith came.
Oh, right. I actually knew that. I though you meant a more
specific issue, you know, like with drama and intrigue and stuff.
Great. Buffy died, Kendra came, Kendra died, Faith came. I can
see that.
Andrea
Fuzzy said:
>
> "The Masked Superstar" <maskeds...@hetnet.nl> wrote in message
> news:#RK8IGpHAHA.283@net025s...
> > So what are your opinions about this?
>
> What's to say?
> Buffy died, Kendra came, Kendra died Faith came.
What he said.
Andrea :)
wheez50
> Jonathan Black <jona...@ch.twi.tudelft.nl> wrote
> > The Masked Superstar wrote:
> > > So what are your opinions about this?
> >
> > Please elaborate. What "two slayers issue"?
> What two Slayers issue could I possibly be talking about?!!
buffy - kendra
kendra - faith
or chronologically least probable:
buffy - faith.
That's already three, not elaborating anything you know but i do not.
wheez50 (definately *ploink*y, but i'll let him live ... 4 now)(did i
quote ok?)
@nkhoŽ
"Jonathan Black" <jona...@ch.twi.tudelft.nl> schreef in bericht
news:Pine.LNX.4.21.000915...@deadlock.et.tudelft.nl...
> P@rick wrote:
>
> > The Masked Superstar wrote:
> >
> > > If you know what two Slayers issue I'm talking about than
> > > there's no need to elaborate.
> >
>
> No way... Slayers can have kids together? Holy shit...
hmmm, they have to be lesbian and adopt them, or find a
nice guy(Me, me ,me :o) )
@nkhoŽ
"wheez50" <w.zw...@verwijderdit.hccnet.nl> schreef in bericht
news:8pu32t$r5h$1...@news.hccnet.nl...
> The Masked Superstar <maskeds...@hetnet.nl> schreef
> > Jonathan Black <jona...@ch.twi.tudelft.nl> wrote
>
> > > > So what are your opinions about this?
> > >
> > > Please elaborate. What "two slayers issue"?
>
>
> kendra - faith
>
> or chronologically least probable:
>
> buffy - faith.
<spoiler>-----------------------<spoiler>----------------------<spoiler>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
10
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<spoily>
why do you think they put faith in a coma, who knows what slayer would come
back?This time she could have been ugly :o)
And are the watchers the same watchers we see in highlander?
<end of spoiler>
P@rick
> P@rick wrote:
> > Alright then: yes they can.
>
> No way... Slayers can have kids together? Holy shit...
Well, Holy Shit is just one of the ingredients. It also takes an Eye of the
Beholder, some blood of a Slayer, a Cat in the Cradle, the living brains of
a Hacksaw demon, a female-virgin, the feathers of a stork and a cauliflower.
And the right curse... err spell of course.
But yes, it can be done ;o)
Bye, Patrick
P@rick
> P@rick wrote:
> > No, but I thought you knew.
>
> I don't believe I do. Is it a spoiler?
*** SPOILERS Buffy S3 ***
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
No.
Bye, Patrick
Jonathan Black
Right. So let me get this straight. We're talking about some
"issue" involving two Slayers and the fact that it isn't a
spoiler is a spoiler for S3.
I'm lost.
:)
--
J o N a T H a N
"Okay, I pretty much missed out on some stuff, didn't I?
Because this is all making a kind of sense that's not."
--Oz, `Becoming, Part II'
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Andrea
Jonathan said:
> P@rick wrote:
>
> > Jonathan Black wrote:
> >
Yes, ofcourse! Had there been an issue, it would have been a spoiler, so in
a way, since there isn't an issue, it's still sort of a spoiler, because if
we hadn't *known*, we could have had expectations, and one who has
expectations, can get spoiled.
>
> I'm lost.
No, you're not. I've just found you at the bottom of a message. Think you
can manage climbing out by yourself?
Andrea
(nuts :))
Jonathan Black
> Jonathan said:
>
> > P@rick wrote:
> >
> > > Jonathan Black wrote:
> > >
Who said there wasn't an issue?
> > I'm lost.
>
> No, you're not. I've just found you at the bottom of a
> message. Think you can manage climbing out by yourself?
Assuming this thread ever ends.
--
J o N a T H a N
NutsMeister [tm]
No, wait, that's not right...
Andrea
Jonathan said:
> Andrea wrote:
>
> > Jonathan said:
> >
> > > P@rick wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jonathan Black wrote:
> > > >
There is? No, don't spoil me, please!
>
> > > I'm lost.
> >
> > No, you're not. I've just found you at the bottom of a
> > message. Think you can manage climbing out by yourself?
>
> Assuming this thread ever ends.
Bet you it won't.
Andrea :)
wheez50
wheez50
> Andrea wrote:
> > Jonathan said:
> > > P@rick wrote:
> > > > Jonathan Black wrote:
> Who said there wasn't an issue?
Is there?
> > > I'm lost.
> > No, you're not. I've just found you at the bottom of a
> > message. Think you can manage climbing out by yourself?
> Assuming this thread ever ends.
It will .... ... .. . In time.
> J o N a T H a N
> NutsMeister [tm]
> No, wait, that's not right...
Exactly, NotRight [TM]
WheeZ50 is the
NutsMeister [TM] [Patent Pending]
wheez50
> Jonathan Black wrote:
> > P@rick wrote:
> > > Alright then: yes they can.
> >
> > No way... Slayers can have kids together? Holy shit...
>
> Well, Holy Shit is just one of the ingredients. It also takes an
Eye of the
> Beholder, some blood of a Slayer, a Cat in the Cradle, the
living brains of
> a Hacksaw demon, a female-virgin,
A *human* female redheaded virgin that should be... Dear W* isn't
usable anymore ;-)
> the feathers of a stork and a cauliflower.
> And the right curse... err spell of course.
>
> But yes, it can be done ;o)
OC
WheeZ50
Mattia Valente
> Peter Kleiweg <kle...@let.rug.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think The Masked Superstar has anything worth saying. He
> > just likes other people to elaborate.
>
I think I'll join Peter on the floor on this one...
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
No, wait, that didn't come out right...
Mattia Valente
> > that you just wanted to know how other people think about the issue. In my
> > book, that's exactly what Peter said.
> >
> > Andrea :)
Note the Smiley
> I don't agree.There's a difference between saying Masked Superstar hasn't
> got an opinion (on this subject) and saying Masked Superstar hasn't got
> anything worth saying.
First of all, speaking of yourself in the first person continually (have
you ever used the word I? Just curious..) is annoying. Very. Sounds like
a bad movie or a satruday morning cartoon (all, of course, IMHO.)
> So according to him what Masked Superstar says is worthless.
Err...pray point us towards a post you have made where you have actually
a point, voiced an opinion and defended it beyond: "Betty sucks big
time, I hate her, why doesn't Angel just kill her" and things like that?
Bascially, I'm asking for a non-troll post. To this newsgroup.
> I still demand an apology.
I'm still joining Peter and Andrea..
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
Rolling around on the fl...you get the point.
Mattia Valente
> Andrea wrote:
> > Jonathan said:
> > > P@rick wrote:
> > > > > P@rick wrote:
Yeah! There's ALWAYS an Issue!
> > > I'm lost.
Welcome home!
> > No, you're not. I've just found you at the bottom of a
> > message. Think you can manage climbing out by yourself?
>
> Assuming this thread ever ends.
Optimist..
Well, what can I say, it looks like you've managed to kick off a SRT
(it's not that long..) without any help! Congratulations! (Well,
actually, I'm not quite sure whether or not I should be slapping you
with fish ;-)
> J o N a T H a N
> NutsMeister [tm]
> No, wait, that's not right...
;-)
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
RambleMeisterM[tm]
Not really going join in (much) here...I think.
Mattia Valente
>
> P@rick <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.VampWillow.uu.nl> wrote in message
> > We all know *what* two slayers issue. But it would help the discussion get
> > started if TMS gave his opinion first. And I agree with the please elaborate
> > part.
> elaborate.
Yes, there is. I can think of a good number of issues involving any
given pair of slayers that I (among other people) have opinions about.)
> Also since when does one have to state their opinion first?
Not truly necessary, but stating a full *question*, you know, like, one
that's actually formulated as such, does help. "So what are your
opinions about this?" doesn't quite cover it.
However, in general, people discussing stiff on usenet like to discuss.
Opinions are sort of implicit.
> What if I don't have an opinion about this subject and I just want to know
> yours?
If you don't have an opinion about the subject, why do you care enough
to start a thread? Why start another thread about an issue that's been
discussed many a time (various issues pertaining to 2 slayers, at
various points in time, in numerous threads, to be exact.)
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
Mattia Valente
> P@rick wrote:
> >
> > > If you know what two Slayers issue I'm talking about than
> > > there's no need to elaborate.
> >
>
> No way... Slayers can have kids together? Holy shit...
Sure! Well, Holy Ovum might hit the spot more precicesly, actually. You
know, advances in modern technology and all that. Only daughters if
they're doing it without the adoption bureau or the sperm donors, though
:-)
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
Mattia Valente
> Fuzzy said:
> > Buffy died, Kendra came, Kendra died Faith came.
>
> What he said.
Ditto
:-p
Mattia
ReplyMeister[tm]
Fuzzy
"Mattia Valente" <mae.v...@std.vu.nl> wrote in message
news:39C5088A...@std.vu.nl...
<SNIP>
> However, in general, people discussing stiff on usenet like to discuss.
> Opinions are sort of implicit.
I see you were serious about joining Peter on the floor....
Or were you talking about dead people? Cause that would be kinda on topic.
:)
Sierk
"Did anyone else just go to a scary visual place?"
"Oh, yeah."
--Xander and Buffy, "Doppelgängland"
Andrea
wheez50 said:
>
> Andrea <en...@club.tip.nl> schreef
>
> > Andrea
> > (nuts :))
>
> Hey! m3786
Huh?
>
> Wheez#b"00110010"
> NutsMeister [TM]
All right then.
Andrea
(NutsPupil :))
Andrea
Mattia said:
> The Masked Superstar wrote:
> > Peter Kleiweg <kle...@let.rug.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think The Masked Superstar has anything worth saying. He
> > > just likes other people to elaborate.
> >
> > I demand an apology.
>
> I think I'll join Peter on the floor on this one...
>
Another wedding? Great!
Andrea
(party animal :))
wheez50
Mattia Valente <mae.v...@std.vu.nl> schreef
> I'm still joining Peter and Andrea..
And i'm with you (and p&a)
wheez50
Chris Yate
hmm I'd like to see Buffy and Faith TRY to have kids, but I don't really
think it could happen...