Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

A question from an American...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Heather

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
Hello! I have a question for some of you. There seems to be a lot more
Buffy and Angel magazines, or articles in the UK and elswhere than
there is here in the US. I have thought many of times that I would like
to get a subscription to one of these magazines. But, I am not sure
which one would be worth it. A lot of these magazines would be very
expensive for me, so I do not want to buy one, and then find out I
really hate it. (Some up to $75 for only 12 issues, which, for my
pocket book, is a lot!)So, I thought I would come to the source, You!
What I really want, is a magazine that mostly deals with Buffy/Angel. I
like some other Scifi, but I am not really into reading too much of it,
ya know? So, if there is a good magazine that has Buffy/Angel in almost
every issue, that would be great. I saw a magazine called Dreamwatch,
is that good? I also heard of another magazine, and please forgive me,
I dont remember the name of it at all, where this months issue had an
interview with Joss Whendon (part 1) and part 2 of the interview will
be in the next issue. (now, it could be Dreamwatch that I am talking
about on both counts, but I am not sure)
So, if you very nice people from the UK can help little ole me from
Arizona, I would greatly appreciate it!

Heather

--
"Lets build a fort"
"I'll get the pillows"

Watchers scoff at gravity!!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Arkasha

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
Heather wrote:

Well we're practicaly all dutch here in this newsgroup. You might wanna try
it in
uk.media.tv.buffy-v-slayer. Hope you'll have more succes there.

Arkasha

Heather

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to

Sorry, I saw, Europe, and I came here, I hope I did not offend anyone...

Saskia

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to

Heather wrote:
>
> Sorry, I saw, Europe, and I came here, I hope I did not offend anyone...
>

Not to worry. No-one is offended that easily here, as long as you
don't say anything bad about Willow. ;-)

Saskia

hooresi®

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to

"Saskia" <che...@cistron.nl> schreef in bericht
news:398840D5...@cistron.nl...

Willow bad. :ož Beer good. >=o)

> Saskia
>
>

Yorrit

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
In article <39886e60$0$29720@reader2>,
"hooresi®" <im4fr@*remove*hotmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > Not to worry. No-one is offended that easily here, as long as you
> > don't say anything bad about Willow. ;-)
>

> Willow bad. :oþ Beer good. >=o)


Willow good, Beer good.


Yorrit

Andrea

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to

Yorrit said:

>> Willow bad. :oþ Beer good. >=o)
>
>
>Willow good, Beer good.


Wine good. Angel pretty.

Andrea :)

Daasbavel

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to

Yorrit <Jor...@yorno.tmfweb.nl> schreef in berichtnieuws
8ma10n$d3o$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

> In article <39886e60$0$29720@reader2>,
> "hooresi®" <im4fr@*remove*hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Not to worry. No-one is offended that easily here, as long as you
> > > don't say anything bad about Willow. ;-)
> >
> > Willow bad. :oþ Beer good. >=o)
>
>
> Willow good, Beer good.
>
>
Beer good, Willow better

Yorrit

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
In article <8madfd$h81$1...@azure.nl.gxn.net>,

And those 2 things together are really good.

P@rick

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Andrea wrote:

> Wine good. Angel pretty.

So it takes good wine to make Angel look pretty. Or does it just take a lot?


Bye, Patrick
just testing the Angel-sensitivity in this NG


P@rick

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Hooresi® wrote:

> Willow bad. :oþ Beer good. >=o)

Pffff... not even close.

You're going to have to do a lot better than that!


Bye, Patrick
only serious insults please


Yorrit

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
In article <8mci2r$ht7$3...@news.surfnet.nl>,

"P@rick" <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.uu.nl> wrote:
> Andrea wrote:
>
> > Wine good. Angel pretty.
>
> So it takes good wine to make Angel look pretty. Or does it just take
a lot?
>

Not if you like Nancys.

I'm going to take cover now.

Rob

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to

hooresi® <im4fr@*remove*hotmail.com> schreef in berichtnieuws
39886e60$0$29720@reader2...

>
> "Saskia" <che...@cistron.nl> schreef in bericht
> news:398840D5...@cistron.nl...
> >
> >
> > Heather wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry, I saw, Europe, and I came here, I hope I did not offend
anyone...
> > >
> >
> > Not to worry. No-one is offended that easily here, as long as you
> > don't say anything bad about Willow. ;-)
>
> Willow bad. :oþ Beer good. >=o)
>

Hmmm, what about :
Beer good, Beer Bad bad.

Bye, Rob

P@rick

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
Rob wrote:

> Hmmm, what about :
> Beer good, Beer Bad bad.

Took me some moments to figure that one out :o)

How about: Beer good, Beer Bad also good after sufficient amounts of beer.


Bye, Patrick


wheez50

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to

P@rick <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.VampWillow.uu.nl> schreef
in berichtnieuws 8mci2r$ht7$4...@news.surfnet.nl...

> Hooresi® wrote:
>
> > Willow bad. :oþ Beer good. >=o)
>
> Pffff... not even close.
>
> You're going to have to do a lot better than that!
>
>
> Bye, Patrick
> only serious insults please

Don't tempt me ;-)

wheez50

Rob

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to

P@rick <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.VampWillow.uu.nl> schreef in
berichtnieuws 8mcq5m$m2k$1...@news.surfnet.nl...
I kneel in admiration to such wise words. :->

Bye, Rob

Yorrit

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to
In article <8mcq5m$m2k$1...@news.surfnet.nl>,

"P@rick" <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.uu.nl> wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, what about :
> > Beer good, Beer Bad bad.
>
> Took me some moments to figure that one out :o)
>
> How about: Beer good, Beer Bad also good after sufficient amounts of
beer.
>

A whole truck of beer wouldn't make Beer Bad good. How can something
that puts beer down be good?

Fuzzy

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to

Yorrit wrote in message <8mh5ic$hoi$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

>In article <8mcq5m$m2k$1...@news.surfnet.nl>,
> "P@rick" <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.uu.nl> wrote:
>> Rob wrote:
>>
>> > Hmmm, what about :
>> > Beer good, Beer Bad bad.
>>
>> Took me some moments to figure that one out :o)
>>
>> How about: Beer good, Beer Bad also good after sufficient amounts of
>beer.
>>
>
>A whole truck of beer wouldn't make Beer Bad good. How can something
>that puts beer down be good?


That's what makes it better. Such a nice contrast

Sierk

"And was there a lesson in all this huh? What did we learn about beer?"
"Foamy"
"Good, just as long as that's clear."
Xander and Buffy in Beer Bad

Andrea

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to

P@rick said:

>Andrea wrote:
>
>> Wine good. Angel pretty.
>
>So it takes good wine to make Angel look pretty. Or does it just take a
lot?


Hehe. No, Angel even looks good with plain water. Or in plain water. See
bath tub picture. :))

>
>
>Bye, Patrick
>just testing the Angel-sensitivity in this NG

I'd say we appreciators of Angel aren't that sensitive. Unless you mention
the magic word (twelve letters, beginning with a 'k').

Andrea :)


Andrea

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to

Rob said:


>>
>> Willow bad. :oþ Beer good. >=o)
>>
>

>Hmmm, what about :
>Beer good, Beer Bad bad.


'Worst ep ever' is slightly more accurate, but 'Beer bad bad' would look
great on a T-shirt.

Andrea :))


Saskia

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to

Andrea schreef:
> P@rick said:

> >just testing the Angel-sensitivity in this NG
>
> I'd say we appreciators of Angel aren't that sensitive. Unless you mention
> the magic word (twelve letters, beginning with a 'k').


What she said

But ehm ... k, kross, kathars, katholics, knockwood, knife, kitchen...
ahaaaaa!!!

--

Saskia :-)))

Andrea

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to

Saskia said:


Aaaah! Don't, Saskia, don't! This is a decent ng in which people respect us!

Andrea :))

Saskia

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to

Andrea schreef:


Hey, you started. I'm not going to say another word...

--

Saskia

Rob

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to

Yorrit <Jor...@yorno.tmfweb.nl> schreef in berichtnieuws
8mh5ic$hoi$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

> In article <8mcq5m$m2k$1...@news.surfnet.nl>,
> "P@rick" <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.uu.nl> wrote:
> > Rob wrote:
> >
> > > Hmmm, what about :
> > > Beer good, Beer Bad bad.
> >
> > Took me some moments to figure that one out :o)
> >
> > How about: Beer good, Beer Bad also good after sufficient amounts of
> beer.
> >
>
> A whole truck of beer wouldn't make Beer Bad good. How can something
> that puts beer down be good?
>
>

You *do* have a good point here.
Althought we *have* learned that beer is foamy. To British this might come
as something of a surprise. You see, even a Buffy episode that is less
than perfect can be educational.

It would have been fun to see Buffy getting absolutely drunk, instead of
turning into a cavewoman. (Although she did look very cute).
So : Beer foamy, Beer bad, not so bad.

Bye, Rob(eer)

Arkasha

unread,
Aug 6, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/6/00
to
Daasbavel wrote:

>
> >
> >Beer good, Willow better

Yeah and aren't we all glad it's August ( though April was kinda nice too).

Arkasha

Yorrit

unread,
Aug 6, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/6/00
to
In article <FW%i5.5628$63.126322@zonnet-reader-1>,

"Rob" <r.z...@zonnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Yorrit <Jor...@yorno.tmfweb.nl> schreef in berichtnieuws
> 8mh5ic$hoi$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > In article <8mcq5m$m2k$1...@news.surfnet.nl>,
> > "P@rick" <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.uu.nl> wrote:
> > > Rob wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hmmm, what about :
> > > > Beer good, Beer Bad bad.
> > >
> > > Took me some moments to figure that one out :o)
> > >
> > > How about: Beer good, Beer Bad also good after sufficient amounts
of
> > beer.
> > >
> >
> > A whole truck of beer wouldn't make Beer Bad good. How can something
> > that puts beer down be good?
> >
> >
>
> You *do* have a good point here.
> Althought we *have* learned that beer is foamy. To British this
might come
> as something of a surprise. You see, even a Buffy episode that is
less
> than perfect can be educational.
>

You don't need an ep to know that beer is foamy, everybody knows that
already (except for Buffy, ofcourse).

P@rick

unread,
Aug 6, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/6/00
to
Andrea wrote:

>
> Saskia said:
>
> >But ehm ... k, kross, kathars, katholics, knockwood, knife, kitchen...
> >ahaaaaa!!!
>
>
> Aaaah! Don't, Saskia, don't! This is a decent ng in which people respect
us!

Indeed. You two are as decent as a kitchentable.


Bye, Patrick

wheez50

unread,
Aug 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/7/00
to
Yorrit <Jor...@yorno.tmfweb.nl> schreef in berichtnieuws
8mjn38$5ss$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

> "Rob" <r.z...@zonnet.nl> wrote:
> > Yorrit <Jor...@yorno.tmfweb.nl> schreef in berichtnieuws
> > > "P@rick" <P.J.Mee...@students.fss.uu.nl> wrote:
> > > > Rob wrote:

<snip>

> You don't need an ep to know that beer is foamy, everybody
knows that
> already (except for Buffy, ofcourse).

Except for English (as said)

wheez50 (isrm)

0 new messages