>>>> In 2012 it was budgeted for Ł30 billion.
>>>> A pale shadow of the original project
>>>> could now be as high as Ł170 billion.
Near LA to near SF through empty desert. Could be nimby's and high
real estate values had something to do with that route.
Since you reference wiki, here is what it says
"The California High-Speed Rail system will be built in two major
phases. Phase I, about 520 miles (840 km) long using high-speed rail
through the Central Valley, will connect San Francisco to Los Angeles.
In Phase 2, the route will be extended in the Central Valley north to
Sacramento, and from east through the Inland Empire and then south to
San Diego. The total system length will be about 800 miles (1,300 km)
long.[1] Phase 2 currently has no timeline for completion.
The Interim Initial Operating Segment currently under construction
will connect the downtowns of Merced and Bakersfield. Its completion
date is estimated to be between 2030 and 2033.[2]
The route of Phase 1 has been selected, however, the route for Phase 2
has not been finalized."
Also
"On August 13, 2008, California Assembly Bill 3034 (AB 3034) was
approved by the state legislature and signed by Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger on August 26, 2008.[3] The bill was submitted to
California voters in the November 2008 election as Proposition 1A and
approved.[4] "
Which suggest that various parties and administrations have been
involved with the project, and your assertion that phases 2 has been
abandoned is not supported. The situation does not appear so dire as
you suggest, although final completion might well be somewhere near
2050, maybe. 10 years more or so for completion of phase 1. Actually,
the whole idea seems like a boondoggle to me. Who knows what needs
will look like in 2050. Is there sufficient traffic between sf and la
to justify a 40 year rail (not auto) project?
However the boondoggle, if it is such, is attributable to human
foolishness, which includes us all and your tribe (Schwarzie and
successors includes r's).
--
Noah Sombrero