brad jesness: forgot passwords and how to clean himself
D.L.Rogers
password to one of your favorite hotmail accounts, one that you usually use
form a different computer. That explains why you haven't answered some
posts on hotmail.
Do you need me to send you that password? Any other passwords you need? I
know a bunch of your friends have your passwords indexed, so if I don't have
it, I'll know someone who does.
By the way, all you denizens of auk: brad has been trying to regain his
status as THE standard for all kooks, lamers, and trolls to aim for. He
certainly has a wonderful tradition.
However, he has not been getting the full dis)respect he earned from auk.
Be more open minded. He is trying to be creative, but it's hard to outdo
himself. Right now, he's trying to join forces with Richard Bullis to
really, really impress everybody.
So, keep your eye's peeled. Believe it or not, he's gonna come back for
more spnak!
Dan R.
Ross
in news:R7Lfa.4$NT...@news02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net:
> brad, from monitoring your wife's computer I can tell that you forgot
> the password to one of your favorite hotmail accounts, one that you
> usually use form a different computer. That explains why you haven't
> answered some posts on hotmail.
Silence from dickless? This is strange....very strange.
>
> Do you need me to send you that password? Any other passwords you
> need? I know a bunch of your friends have your passwords indexed, so
> if I don't have it, I'll know someone who does.
You have to ask others for password reminders, brad?
How badly does it suck to be so totally 0wn3d on Usenet?
> By the way, all you denizens of auk: brad has been trying to regain
> his status as THE standard for all kooks, lamers, and trolls to aim
> for. He certainly has a wonderful tradition.
Well, Wollmann has dropped out of the scene for the time being, so auk is a
froup in need of an UberKook to throw peanuts at.
> However, he has not been getting the full dis)respect he earned from
> auk. Be more open minded. He is trying to be creative, but it's hard
> to outdo himself. Right now, he's trying to join forces with Richard
> Bullis to really, really impress everybody.
I dunno...St00pid seems a bit reticent to join forces with someone who
hooked him into the 'Taylor is Spamford' troll.
Brad has a tradition of alienating his 'allies': first it was Skidmark and
now it is Stoopid. Face facts, brad, you just don't play nicely with other
kooks.
> So, keep your eye's peeled. Believe it or not, he's gonna come back
> for more spnak!
His posts are identifiable from about the second word on.
R.
--
Go not to Usenet for counsel, for they will say both yes and no.
Ross
this in news:r3mv7vkeete9jtrfd...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:28:13 -0000, Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>>You have to ask others for password reminders, brad?
>>
>>How badly does it suck to be so totally 0wn3d on Usenet?
>
> It could be worse, he could be Stoopid. Wait, that's a compliment.
> He could be Larry Bullis.
I stand corrected.
[...]
> Oh did Wollmann get his food stamp hand out? Look out Beverly Hills,
> PantyHead is hungry and is a big tipper.
His efforts to create a moderated alt group met with usual Wollmannesque
disaster: the process was so bungled that anyone could post to it simply
by adding an "Approved" header; alt.astrology.moderated.metapsych became
the smoking radioactive crater it deserved to be. The raft of complaints
sent to nanau, alt.config and abuse admins were forwarded on to their
respective /dev/null's.
[...]
>>I dunno...St00pid seems a bit reticent to join forces with someone who
>>hooked him into the 'Taylor is Spamford' troll.
>
> Stoopid is still pissed that Brad HL&S him into believing his Wallace
> lies. Look how stupid RtS looks now. He has been forced to cut
> Sanford Wallace from his "I know for fact that Taylor Jimenez is
> _________!" (insert current name in blank form Stoopid is using)
I sense St00pid wants to be right about something -- anything. He wants
to be thought of as a clever guy who could figure something out that no
one else could. He will search in vain.
>>Brad has a tradition of alienating his 'allies': first it was Skidmark
>>and now it is Stoopid. Face facts, brad, you just don't play nicely
>>with other kooks.
>
> Big difference here, Tim gave this crap up, he moved on. When Brad
> took friendship with the child pornography Tim was smart to stay away.
> Why align yourself with Richard Bullis? Did you see the way Brad was
> begging for Stoopid to help and call him? Pathetic.
True enough.
> Regardless of the past that I've had with Tim, I do respect him for
> keeping his distance from Richard Bullis. I know he doesn't like
> anything about me and that is fine, he is not alone... but for him to
> steer clear of Bullis tells me I was wrong about how at first I though
> Tim and Stoopid would team up together back in '99 just because Tim
> didn't want to take AUK's word about what Stoopid was. Tim had to
> figure that out on his own without anybody else and I'm glad he was
> objectionable enough to do so.
Tim, for all his issues and problems, has made commitments and stuck to
them. For that, I have respect for him. In some circles, he and his
work wrt to the highway system is greatly valued.
St00pid, OTOH, has no redeeming qualities what so ever. If he were to be
the victim of some traffic accident, I would not hold a single moment of
regret. There aren't many people in this world that I deem as a total
waste. St00pid is a rare exception.
> Even to this day Brad will hide from what he knows about Richard
> Bullis and ignore Stoopid's own words on molesting children at sea or
> traveling to parts of Asia to have sex with children as being legal
> because RtS is willing to follow Brad and help Brad out.
...any port in a storm....
>>> So, keep your eye's peeled. Believe it or not, he's gonna come back
>>> for more spnak!
>>
>>His posts are identifiable from about the second word on.
>
> Takes you that long??? :)
I meant the second word of the subject line. Sorry for not being more
precise.
R.
--
W "Some people are alive only because
. | ,. w , it is illegal to kill them."
\|/ \|/ Perna condita delenda est (.sig from Lionel)
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------