Esquire Magazine: Patricia Cornwell in Perverted Lesbian Stalking of Actress Jodie Foster

[Dan Hajidah]

by Dan Hajidah

To help cover for her crimes against her Jewish victim, the famous
author Patricia Cornwell recently began to spread fake stories about
'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' against her victim Dr Les (Leslie)
Sachs, whom US government sources confirm that Patricia Cornwell
indeed had threatened to murder several years previously.

With Patricia Cornwell's false and absurd 'stalking' stories already
exposed as more lies of the proven perjurer Cornwell, it's worth
taking a look at some of Cornwell's own guilty lesbian stalking of
other women. Patricia Cornwell has stalked married straight women in
order to try to get them to have lesbian affairs with her. But
Cornwell's most famous stalking episode, was when Patricia Cornwell
went to Hollywood and conducted a sustained lesbian stalking of the
actress Jodie Foster, which was reported in Esquire magazine.

Author Patricia Cornwell has long benefited - and likely kept out of
prison - while her dear friend George Bush was President of the United
States. But she may go to prison now under President Obama.

As the Bush era closes, sources within the US Department of Justice
confirm that they hold proof of Patricia Cornwell's clear convictable
guilt in felony crimes of perjury, and Cornwell's guilt in hiring
lawyers who threatened to torture to death the Jewish-heritage but non-
Zionist writer Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs.

Witness statements also show Patricia Cornwell paying a US $1 million
bribe, paid to George Bush's mother, shortly after the attacks on
Sachs, to help ensure that Cornwell would not be criminally indicted
while George Bush was President.

Patricia Cornwell has made it clear she will spend unlimited money to
pay people who will assist Cornwell in her efforts to have Dr Les
Sachs silenced, banned, smeared and destroyed, and to intimidate those
who try to tell the truth about Cornwell.

US media employees, have apparently accepted cash from Cornwell, to
publish false media stories covering for Cornwell's crimes, and
helping Cornwell to spread various lies, such as the false 'stalker'
and 'cyberstalker' stories against Sachs, and Cornwell's lies (and
media lies) that the case is about 'plagiarism'; stories which have
already been debunked as hoaxes.

Some of these false media stories remain on the internet, though some
have already been withdrawn, as new legal actions loom in Europe
against Patricia Cornwell and those who have been helping her.

Patricia Cornwell, the US judges and government, and various others,
face European legal charges of illegally blocking access to European
websites for the purpose of racist and terrorist murder; the spreading
of criminal libel via Patricia Cornwell's hoax 'stalking' and
'cyberstalking' stories; and other related charges in the CIA-backed
attacks on EU citizen, dissident journalist, and political refugee
from the USA, Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs.

Here then are some internal US Department of Justice files, scanned
and on display as available at Patricia Cornwell Court Trial
Documents:

http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/

by Dan Hajidah

For more background details, see recent articles:

Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les
Sachs

http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581

Also at: http://mytinyurl.net/10e98

Patricia Cornwell buys US courts to block websites to help murder
author of Cornwell biography

http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259

Also at: http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e

This is published with a maximally open Creative Commons Licence:
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0"
src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/80x15.png"/></a><br/>This
work is licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>.

4. Esquire magazine, author Patricia Cornwell in lesbian stalking of
Hollywood actress Jodie Foster - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept
of Justice, European police files

by Dan Hajidah

It is said that one of the characteristics of habitual criminals, is
that of accusing others of the crimes which they themselves have
committed. Here is a piece from Esquire magazine in January 1997, by
Jeannette Walls, "Reality Check: Devotion - Jodie, Jodie, Jodie",
discussing Patricia Cornwell's lesbian stalking of actress Jodie
Foster, Patricia Cornwell apparently having the same erotic obsession
as John Hinckley Jr, the attempted assassin of President Ronald
Reagan, who also pursued Foster.

Now, Cornwell is now facing multiple legal charges in Europe, over
criminally false and clearly fictional 'stalking' and 'cyberstalking'
accusations she made in 2007, in order to get the journalism of her
victim Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs banned from the internet, and to create
the opportunity for the completion of Sachs' murder.

Like the Vanity Fair piece from 1997 which documented Patricia
Cornwell's boasts that she can murder people, this Esquire piece about
Cornwell's lesbian stalking of Jodie Foster, is part of the last wave
of genuinely critical articles about Cornwell, before the media
'lockdown' began to hide the facts of Cornwell's life from media and
the internet. Jeannette Walls and Esquire appear too frightened to
write anything more today, about such dark facts regarding Bush's
friend Patricia Cornwell.

Patricia Cornwell herself has long been known as a lesbian stalker of
other women. According to witness statements from people in police
files, Cornwell's stalking habits have continued, as Cornwell tries to
induce or intimidate married or other women to get involved in lesbian
affairs with her. Witness reports are that Cornwell takes brutal
revenge on victims, and families of victims, who have refused the
amorous advances of the now somewhat aging, "drug-worn skank" Patricia
Cornwell. In one case, Cornwell's revenge activities included the
painting of swastika's on a victim's house, continuing the neo-Nazi-
type themes evident in Cornwell's attacks on the Jewish author Dr Les
Sachs.

Patricia Cornwell's role as a documented stalker of Jodie Foster and
others, is of particular relevance, now that the hoax of Cornwell's
2007 'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' charges against Dr Les (Leslie)
Sachs has been exposed. Patricia Cornwell is now facing criminal libel
and other charges in Europe, over spreading these hoaxes as part of
her long-standing threats to have Sachs murdered.

In the course of her nine years of attacking and trying to ban and
silence her victim Dr Les Sachs, Patricia Cornwell and her media team
have told a number of rather whopping lies, now clearly exposed as
criminal hoaxes, as well as felony perjury by Cornwell in US
courtrooms, according to sources within the US Dept of Justice itself.

An enormous lie and hoax launched by Patricia Cornwell in 2007 - which
Cornwell's lawyers now do not deny was a hoax - are Cornwell's out-of-
the-blue stories that Dr Les Sachs was both a 'cyberstalker' and an
actual 'stalker'.

It appears that these hoax 'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' stories were
developed partly by the US intelligence agencies (the CIA and others)
in a collaboration with the CIA-linked WilmerHale law firm, and
WilmerHale lawyers Joan Lukey in Boston USA, and Christian Duvernoy in
Brussels, Belgium, the country where Dr Les Sachs now lives as a
political refugee from the USA.

For the Patricia Cornwell gang, the strategy of the hoax 'stalking'
and 'cyberstalking' stories, was to go back to the very same group of
US federal judges in Virginia who had staged the initial fake trial to
have Dr Les Sachs banned and threatened with murder, and who had
forced Dr Sachs to become a political refugee in Europe.

The CIA and Cornwell's WilmerHale lawyers thought it was 'clever' to
have these same US federal judges conduct a second fraudulent 'legal
proceeding' against the refugee in Europe. The US federal judges,
hating Sachs and wanting him murdered as much as Cornwell herself
hates him, promptly issued declarations that the political refugee
journalist Sachs was a 'cyberstalker', and they began issuing illegal
orders on Google and the search engines to block Sachs' European
websites from the entire world internet.

The US federal judges simply didn't care that they were violating
international laws and treaties, as they issued orders upon Google to
help them to murder a European citizen.

Cornwell's media allies spread the fake 'stalking' stories, and
Cornwell herself was encouraged by her lawyers to tell lies about
Sachs being a 'stalker'. However, the mentally-twisted Cornwell, often
sunk under alcohol and drugs when not in rehab, began to go quite
crazy with the 'stalking' stories, telling stories that are literally
impossible.

Forgetting that Dr Les Sachs would face instant arrest and lifetime
jailing if he shows up at a US border, Cornwell began giving
interviews, saying how Sachs had been sneaking over to the USA from
Europe, 'stalking' her around her house, and then somehow sneaking
back to his refuge in Europe, without anyone at US Homeland Security
noticing, and without Cornwell ever calling the police about this
'stalker' in her backyard.

Crazy Patricia Cornwell did not explain how Sachs somehow managed to
avoid the entire US Department of Homeland Security; how Sachs managed
to avoid all the guns and security and police around Cornwell's
residences; and why on earth Sachs, who is faced with both lifetime
jailing and threats of being tortured to death inside the US, would
somehow risk all that to sneak into the USA just to prowl around the
outside of Cornwell's house, and then somehow sneak back to Europe
after the 'stalking'. It was all laughably absurd.

Cornwell made weird claims about Sachs had been 'stalking' her inside
the USA, yet there is no record, ever, of Cornwell having contacted
any police or lawyers about this supposed 'stalking'. There is not
even a single e-mail from Cornwell's lawyers - who have been in
regular e-mail communication with Sachs for nine years - saying
anything like 'don't contact us again', or asking about any 'stalking'
near Cornwell's house.

Patricia Cornwell's lawyers do not deny now, that all the 'stalking'
stories Cornwell told about Sachs, are lies and perjury and
obstruction of justice, designed to distract from the fact that
Cornwell had paid people to threaten to kill Sachs several years
earlier.

As for the 'cyberstalking' charge, the accusation that Sachs' internet
writings about Cornwell somehow are 'cyberstalking', Cornwell's
lawyers do not deny that Sachs' biography of Cornwell, and Sachs'
account of how Cornwell's lawyers and judges threatened to torture him
to death, are all completely factual.

Cornwell's lawyers do not deny that, when the held their in absentia
'court hearing' in 2007 to have Sachs' websites blocked from Google,
that they simply found a dishonest 'expert witness' who would commit
perjury for money, and that this 'psychiatrist' simply was paid money
to provide false testimony that the journalism on Sachs' websites
should be labelled as 'cyberstalking'. - Of course, at this fraudulent
'hearing', no one was there to speak for the victim Sachs in Belgium,
to cross-examine this 'psychiatric witness' about the false testimony.

In contradiction to the 'cyberstalking' hoax, Cornwell's lawyers do
not deny that the documents show Sachs is speaking the truth, and even
sources within the US Department of Justice acknowledge Sachs is
telling the truth. So the 'cyberstalking' is as much of a hoax as the
other absurd 'stalking' stories related by Cornwell.

Some of the media propaganda against Sachs with the fake 'stalking'
stories, has now begun to be withdrawn from the internet, as Cornwell
and the media companies recognise their liability in the European
courts.

But in the context of being a stalker, it is clear that it is Patricia
Cornwell herself who is the real 'stalker' of other people. Jodie
Foster certainly knows.

Here is the link to the scan of the Esquire magazine page 14, January
1997, about Patricia Cornwell in a disturbing lesbian stalking of
actress Jodie Foster. The number stamped on the page. is a US federal
courthouse document stamp number, as this scan is taken from official
US courthouse, Department of Justice, and European police file
records.

You can see the Esquire article on Patricia Cornwell's lesbian
stalking of actress Jodie Foster here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/364yqzwd1h/2983/cornwell-stalking-jodie.jpg

3. Vanity Fair magazine, Patricia Cornwell boasting she can get away
with murdering people - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of
Justice, European police files

by Dan Hajidah

The right-wing US political financier Patricia Cornwell, has long
openly boasted of her ability to successfully murder people and get
away with it, and this is important background for the evidence
acknowledged as held by US Justice Department sources, evidence that
Patricia Cornwell indeed paid extortionists to threaten to torture to
death the US dissident Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs.

Here is a scan of the relevant pages from Vanity Fair magazine in May
1997, where as part of a lengthy interview with Patricia Cornwell, she
is directly quoted. Patricia Cornwell boasts: "I literally could kill
someone and get away with it."

A scan of the cover of the magazine is provided, as well as of the
page where Patricia Cornwell's boast about being able to murder people
is highlighted. This scan looks somewhat imperfect, because it is a
scan of the actual copy of this article which resides in courthouse
and US and European police agency files.

This Vanity Fair article on Patricia Cornwell form May 1997 is also
significant, because it appears to be the last major article on
Patricia Cornwell, before the US-UK corporate media agreed to
'lockdown' and to start hiding the facts about Cornwell's life. The
article is by Judy Bachrach, "Stranger than Fiction: Patricia
Cornwell's Real-Life Villains". Vanity Fair itself appears too afraid
now to write such a critical article about Cornwell, and seems to co-
operate with the US government demand that the facts about Patricia
Cornwell's life be hidden and exterminated from all major media, and
from Google and the internet.

The context of Patricia Cornwell's ability to get away with murdering
people inside the USA, is that she is able to harness the full
machinery of the US government, in support of any crimes that relate
to her large political donations to the US establishment. This is
fully accepted by US lawyers, who fearfully describe Cornwell as a
'friend of the federal judges', and accept that, within the USA, the
well-connected Cornwell can indeed successfully murder people and take
their human rights away.

According to law enforcement sources and the evidence files,
Cornwell's relationships of bribery and influence include the
President Bush family; US federal and local judges; law enforcement
agents at the FBI, state police agencies and also Scotland Yard in the
UK; US politicians of both 'Republican' and 'Democratic' parties, but
focused especially on bribes to the Bushes and right-wing allies; and
unlimited bribery of US lawyers who will join in schemes of court
fraud and efforts to suppress and murder people.

It is said that Cornwell has been funnelling massive money to
organisations linked to US President-Elect Barack Obama, to try to
ensure that Mr Obama continues the Bush-era policy of the Bush
Attorneys-General, who have ordered the Department of Justice to not
prosecute any crimes linked to Bush's friend Cornwell, despite huge
amounts of evidence in their hands.

Cornwell's actual power of being able to murder people, is widely
acknowledged by fearful US lawyers, who personally express their fear
of being murdered or otherwise destroyed via Cornwell's connections.

US lawyers cite the capstone of Cornwell's influence as her being a
"friend of the federal judges", able to bribe US federal judges and
get virtually unlimited favours from them, to help suppress and murder
any witnesses to her crimes.

No US lawyer or organisation has ever been brave enough to confront
political crimes connected with Patricia Cornwell, even though
thousands of lawyers have been asked, and have been offered hundreds
of thousands of dollars to do so.

For a decade now, no USA lawyer has been brave enough to oppose
Cornwell with regard to her politically-related activities, though US
lawyers privately acknowledge the clear evidence that Cornwell is
clearly guilty of felony perjury, obstruction of justice, and
threatening to torture to death the journalist Dr Les Sachs, among
other crimes.

No US lawyer is willing to help any political victims threatened or
intimidated by Patricia Cornwell, while, on the other hand, US lawyers
line up by the dozens to take a share of Cornwell's money, and help
her in all forms of threats intimidation, banning of freedom of
speech, blocking of websites, burning of books, intimidation of
bloggers and journalists.

Such is the privilege of Patricia Cornwell being a "friend of the
federal judges" in the USA:

Cornwell's bribery of leading officials has been massive, funded out
of a personal fortune estimated at points to be in the neighbourhood
of US $200 million. It should be noted that the President Bush family,
and right-wing political preacher Billy Graham - who supervised
Cornwell's foster guardianship as a teen-ager - were actually the key
people in launching Cornwell's influence in the publishing industry,
and giving her that fortune in the first place.

It was when Cornwell's friend was in the White House, the first
President George Bush, that the publishing industry started to
manufacture Cornwell into a 'famous novelist'.

Thus Cornwell's political bribes to the Bushes and others, can be seen
as returning the favour to the political figures who placed her at the
centre of the US-based global media companies.

According to witness statements, as well as Department of Justice
sources, Patricia Cornwell paid a bribe of US $1 million to the Bush
family on one occasion alone, shortly after she hired friends of US
federal judge Robert Payne to threaten to torture Dr Les Sachs to
death. Cornwell's lawyers do not deny that these funds were paid as
bribes to the Bush family, to help ensure that the Bush attorneys-
general did not prosecute Cornwell's crimes.

Regarding Patricia Cornwell's boasts that she can murder people: In
addition to Cornwell's long-standing threats to have Dr Les Sachs
tortured to death, for which she faces criminal charges and other
legal actions in Europe, there are some stories circulating that
Patricia Cornwell has already actually murdered some individuals
inside the USA.

One of these stories is that Patricia Cornwell actually murdered
someone as a teen-ager, perhaps one of her temporary foster-parents,
around the time that she was hospitalised for mental illness. The
story details that since Cornwell's first actual murder of an innocent
person, would have reflected badly on the famous right-wing Christian
political preacher Billy Graham, that the influence of the Grahams and
the Bushes was used to cover-up for the murder.

According to this story, this initial success of Patricia Cornwell in
getting away with an actual murder thanks to political influence, set
the stage for Cornwell's later obsession with dead bodies, and
Cornwell's obsessive fear of investigative journalists, and this is
the ultimate background for her long-standing nine years of Cornwell
threats to destroy and silence the Jewish journalist and author Dr Les
Sachs.

However, this account of Patricia Cornwell actually murdering someone
as a teen-ager, is not verified as of now by independent sources. What
is verified, rather, is that Cornwell does indeed boast of being able
to murder people; that she has the political influence and bribery
relationships sufficient to carry out murders and other crimes; and
that sources within the US Department of Justice verify that Patricia
Cornwell is clearly guilty of felony perjury and other crimes in
connection with threatening to murder the journalist Dr Les (Leslie)
Sachs, and forcing him to take political refuge in Europe.

The cover and relevant page from Vanity Fair magazine, May 1997, where
Patricia Cornwell boasts she can get away with murdering people, can
be found here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/w94jxt81x2/2988/cornwell-vanity-fair-2.jpg

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/m7gtl816ba/2987/cornwell-vanity-fair-1.jpg

5. Patricia Cornwell threatens in writing to destroy the books of a
Jew - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice, European police
files

by Dan Hajidah

Here is a scan of a key document from US federal courthouse and US
Department of Justice files, and also European police files, the first
of a central packet of documents that can send author Patricia
Cornwell and several other people to prison for the rest of their
lives.

It is a document that is part of proof that Patricia Cornwell is a
criminal liar who has committed felony perjury under oath, and that
Cornwell engages in extortion threats against Jews who try to honour
the memory of victims of the Holocaust.

This is the letter that began Patricia Cornwell's nine-year-long
campaign to silence, destroy, ban, and apparently threaten to murder,
the Jewish author and journalist Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs.

It is a letter that shows Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers 'playing
Nazi', as they threatened and demanded the book-burning of the books
of a Jewish author. Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers faxed this
letter to Dr Les Sachs on 1 February 2000.

This letter of extortion, shows author Patricia Cornwell insulting and
degrading a Jewish relative of Holocaust survivors, demanding that the
Jewish writer Sachs spit on the memory of Jewish Holocaust victims,
and submit to an impossibly degrading immediate submission to the book-
burning of his own books.

It is a letter of extortion to which no self-respecting Jew could
possibly submit, trying to impose book-burning on a Jewish victim,
reminding any Jew of the Nazis of Adolf Hitler against the Holocaust
victims of the 1930s and 1940s, who burned the books of Jews as a
central symbol and prelude of their racist mass murder of Jews.

This extortion letter by Patricia Cornwell, threatening and demanding
the book-burning of a Jew's books, is so important, and so
embarrassing to Cornwell, that hiding this letter was a major purpose
of Cornwell's lawyers arranging with US federal judges to impose
instant banning of freedom of speech upon Dr Les Sachs, and then
banning his freedom of speech for the rest of his life, in order to
prevent Sachs from showing this letter or talking about it.

This extortion letter, where Patricia Cornwell threatens the book-
burning of a Jew's books, is so important and embarrassing, that, as
proven by court transcripts (see scans of transcript pages in
following postings), and as acknowledged by US Department of Justice
sources, Patricia Cornwell later committed clear felony perjury about
this letter, lying about her threats to destroy the books of a Jew.

Since Cornwell's perjury about this letter, are part of evidence also
held by the US Dept of Justice, that Patricia Cornwell paid others to
threaten to torture this Jewish victim to death, as well as to take
away his human and Constitutional rights, Cornwell now faces a
potential lifetime in prison for perjury and other crimes that arose
from Cornwell trying to hide what she had done.

This document, of Cornwell's book-burning threats, is also part of
what debunks and explodes a hoax of many years that has long been
broadcast for many years by false media articles and false Wikipedia
articles. From almost the beginning of her attacks on Sachs, Patricia
Cornwell has funded a global media hoax that she sought to ban the
freedom of speech of a Jewish writer because he publicly complained
about trivial issues of 'plagiarism' (which is a lie, as it turns
out).

The real truth, evidenced clearly by the court and law enforcement
files, is that Patricia Cornwell paid to spread the hoax 'plagiarism'
story, in order to distract from Cornwell's threats of book-burning
against a Jewish writer, and that Cornwell's Jewish victim refused to
submit to her, which, according to US Dept of Justice sources, led to
Patricia Cornwell paying to ban her victim's freedom of speech and
paying to have extortionists threaten to torture him to death.

As Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers and allies now face criminal and
other charges in Europe, they do not deny that the whole 'plagiarism'
story is indeed a hoax, designed to distract from Cornwell's racist,
anti-Semitic, and neo-Nazi-style activity, including bribery, court
fraud, and threats of torture and murder.

Why did Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers fax this strange extortion
letter to Sachs, demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books, and then
a few weeks' later demand from US federal judges that they impose
instant banning of freedom of speech upon Sachs, precisely so that he
would be instantly jailed if he dared to talk to the media about this
letter? What was the point here?

The motives need to be dissected somewhat separately here, for
Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers.

For Patricia Cornwell, it is clear that this is an episode of 'playing
Nazi', imitating Nazi leaders like Hitler and Eichmann and Himmler.
The Jewish author Sachs happened to fall into the place of being
Cornwell's target victim, for Cornwell to carry out a kind of neo-Nazi
erotic fantasy.

For people who love sadistic power over others, for people who love
the ideas of murder and mass death and images of thousands of dead
bodies - as Cornwell does - the ultimate fantasy is to become a Nazi
in real life. The ultimate Nazi exercise is to have power over Jews,
to do what the Nazis did with them - threaten them, extort them, rob
them, burn their books, ban their freedom of speech, threaten to
torture and kill them, put them on their knees. For a neo-Nazi
fantasist, what is desired is the provision of a Jew as an object of
abuse and submission.

Patricia Cornwell, with over 100 million US dollars, will pay
unlimited money to fulfil fantasies. Cornwell's lawyers, understanding
this, served up the Jew Dr Les Sachs for her, an object for the play
of Cornwell's Jewish obsessions, to fulfil Cornwell's apparent desires
to abuse Jews.

Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers know the perfect formula for
locating a Jew to extort and murder - find a Jew like Dr Les Sachs who
is a non-Zionist, a dissident and friend of Muslims. Such Jews will be
abandoned by the 'Jewish leadership', so anti-Semites can successfully
harass and kill Jews who are non-Zionists, who will not be protected
by 'Jewish leadership' figures who are more loyal to Zionist causes,
than to the life of individual Jews. - Patricia Cornwell gives
millions of dollars to pro-Zionist politicians, so 'Jewish leaders'
will look the other way if Cornwell wants to threaten or even murder
one or two non-Zionist Jewish individuals. Those Jewish leaders will
stay silent while a non-Zionist Jew like Dr Les Sachs is banned,
slandered, attacked, and murdered.

Patricia Cornwell certainly loves the topic of death and of power over
others, as shown in her novels, and her brazen Heinrich-Himmler-like
statements at times, her fascination with the notion of 'thousands' of
dead bodies, Patricia Cornwell's boasting that she can get away with
murdering people (see post of scan from Vanity Fair interview with
Cornwell, containing this boast).

As a child, Cornwell's mother abandoned her on the doorstep of right-
wing political preacher Billy Graham, who then supervised Cornwell's
early life. Cornwell would have picked up her obsession about Jews
from Billy Graham if not earlier. Graham gained global fame for his
anti-Semitic denunciation of Jews, on tape with US President Richard
Nixon.

Witness statements in police files, confirm that Patricia Cornwell's
obsession with Jews has continued well into her adult life, where
Cornwell speaks like a common US southern white racist, Cornwell
casually denouncing the "dirty Jews", the "filthy Jews". But
Cornwell's obsession with Jews is not an obsession of avoidance - It
is an obsession of involvement, on a very deep level, as was true of
many leading Nazis, who took Jewish sexual partners and servants,
while taking part in the mass murder of Jews by the hundreds of
thousands.

Cornwell takes a great pleasure in Jewish submissives. She has a
Jewish literary agent who serves her, Esther Newberg, and she hires
Jewish lawyers - who, for the sake of money, will help Cornwell to
attack a Jewish victim. Cornwell's desire for Jewish submissives
extends to the erotic, where Cornwell takes Jewish lesbian sexual
partners, and has these Jewish women on their knees submissive, and
licking Cornwell in the most intimate of places.

The Jew Dr Sachs did not want to get on his knees and lick, however,
and this has led to Cornwell spending an estimated US $2 million in
bribes and fees in a nine-year-long campaign to have Sachs silenced,
slandered, banned and destroyed. And the machinery of US government,
under Cornwell's friend President Bush, has been largely deployed to
help in this scheme, to the point of multiple criminal acts being
committed by US agents on European soil.

When Cornwell threatened the Jewish author and journalist Sachs with
book-burning, demanding that a Jewish writer submit to the book-
burning of his own books, Cornwell likely just had in mind the
momentary pleasure involved. Threatening a Jew, playing Nazi,
demanding that the Jew Sachs get down on his knees, just like one of
Cornwell's Jewish lesbian lovers would agree to get on her knees and
be degraded.

Cornwell likely was not thinking ahead, to the fact that her fantasy-
pleasure of demanding to burn a Jew's books, would lead to spending
millions of dollars, and the evidence of criminal acts by Cornwell
leading to possibly both criminal arrest warrants in Europe, or
possibly a lifetime sentence to prison inside the USA. - For Cornwell,
a self-admitted abuser of alcohol and drugs, often in rehab, the
pleasure of the moment was likely all she had in mind, as she started
to threaten Dr Les Sachs.

Which raises the question of Cornwell's lawyers, principally New York
'entertainment lawyer' Michael Rudell, who actually did the mechanical
job of drafting and faxing this extortion letter to the home of Dr Les
Sachs on 1 February 2000.

Michael Rudell's Manhattan law firm, Franklin Weinrib, Rudell &
Vassallo, would be considered a 'Jewish' law firm with Jewish lawyers
on its staff. So why would a 'Jewish' law firm, fax an extortion
letter threatening to burn a Jew's books, and get involved in all sort
of other crimes, including perjury and extortion and threats of
murder? Why would a Jewish law firm go out of its way to attack
another Jew?

The answer - as is common with questions about lawyers, whether Jewish
or not - comes down to money. It seems that the Michael Rudell 'Jewish
law firm', has a philosophy rather like that ascribed to Bernard
Madoff's investment firm - The biggest money is to be made by raping
and robbing and destroying other Jews.

For Michael Rudell, the faxing of this extortion letter, was a
magnificent opportunity to earn himself several hundred thousand
dollars out of Cornwell's purse. From Rudell's point of view, this is
one of the most profitable letters he has ever drafted, in that this
letter has resulted in Patricia Cornwell spending millions of dollars
to continue attacking Sachs, with several hundred thousand dollars
given directly to Michael Rudell and his friends.

For Rudell, it was a 'piece of cake'. Rudell knew Cornwell intimately,
and had nearly full powers to manipulate her. Rudell was friends with
a Virginia lawyer named Conrad Shumadine at Willcox & Savage, who is
quoted in US law enforcement files as declaring about Patricia
Cornwell, that Cornwell was "a totally stupid lesbian whore" and that
Shumadine could "milk that bitch like a fat fucking cow."

Michael Rudell and Conrad Shumadine had worked together to make a case
'disappear' in the Virginia courts, a case involving Cornwell copying
stolen autopsy files of murdered children and seeming to insert them
nearly verbatim in a novel, with no compensation for the families.
According to Virginia lawyers, the case 'disappeared' by Shumadine
bribing the Virginia judge, right at the outset of the time Cornwell
became known as a 'friend of the judges' and frightening any US lawyer
from ever challenging her again on a major case affecting Cornwell's
role as political financier.

Rudell and Shumadine earned several hundred thousand from Cornwell for
that first case, and they wanted to make some big money again from
Cornwell. As they couldn't find another big case, they needed to
create one, and figure out how to push Cornwell into a new legal
controversy that would lead Cornwell to spending more hundreds of
thousands of dollars.

Rudell saw his magic opportunity as soon as he learned of the Jewish
journalist Sachs conducting a private investigation of Cornwell.
Rudell was ecstatic to find that Sachs was a neighbour of Cornwell's
in Virginia, USA, where Conrad Shumadine promised unlimited favours
from US federal judges, to destroy Sachs in any way that was
requested.

Knowing Patricia Cornwell's obsessions about Jews, and Cornwell's love
for power and dominance over others, and for the power to kill people,
Rudell took steps to present Cornwell with a Jew whom Cornwell would
want to murder.

For her part, Patricia Cornwell was unable to see her lawyers
manipulating her, and Cornwell thought that Michael Rudell was her
'friend Mike'.

Michael Rudell allows that he and his firm designed and crafted the
extortion letter threatening the book-burning of a Jew's books, very
specifically to 'light up a Jew' - in other words to so insult and
threaten another Jew, with direct insults connected to the Holocaust,
as to make it impossible for the Jewish target to respond, with
anything other than rejection and contempt. Voila! - Instant legal
controversy, the means to get Patricia Cornwell to spend hundreds of
thousands of dollars, along with full guarantees of legal 'victory'
given the Virginia culture of bribery, Shumadine's 'friendship' with
federal judges, and Cornwell's own relationship with the Bush family,
the political establishment, FBI officials and so on.

People still ask, however: Why would Michael Rudell's 'Jewish' law
firm, go out of its way to engage in neo-Nazi activity, threatening to
burn another Jew's books, banning his freedom of speech, and
threatening to kill him? - When in fact it was the Rudell firm's
knowledge of Jewish culture, that enabled them to know how to threaten
and insult a Jew in such an offensive way, that the creation of public
controversy would be virtually guaranteed.

It is itself an anti-Semitic myth that 'all Jews stick together' or
some such, to make claims as if Jews will never attack or murder other
Jews. When in fact Jews are often murdering other Jews, as is a
regular event inside Israel.

Atheist Jews murder religious Jews. Zionist Jews murder non-Zionist
Jews. Neo-con-supporting Jews murder dissident Jews. And some Jews
will destroy other Jews just for money. These kind of intra-Jewish
murders are well documented inside the Jewish community. It is anti-
Semitic myth that 'Jews all stick together'. - Rather, the dominant
'Jewish leaders' often try to hide the protests of non-Zionist Jews,
and how many such non-Zionist Jews will denounce political crimes of
the state of Israel.

Posing questions to the Rudell law firm about why they threatened book-
burning of a Jew's books, and helped in a campaign to ban and destroy
a Jew, one can observe these intra-Jewish forces at work, of which
Jewish writers themselves often speak.

Secular Jews, who live in the world of power and money, often have
contempt for religious Jews like Dr Les Sachs. (Sachs is a unitarian
Christian who honours the rabbi prophet Jesus, but Sachs honours his
Jewish heritage, and thus he was 'Jew enough' for Rudell and
Cornwell.) It seems, from the practice of the Rudell law firm, that in
order to make money, some Jewish lawyers will be glad to destroy
another Jew, and take away his human rights and set him up to be
murdered, in order to make money. Michael Rudell does not deny that
money was his motive here.

Dr Les Sachs is also a non-Zionist, a friend of Muslims who respects
the rights of Muslims around the world, and the rights of Palestinians
in the ancient holy lands. Many Zionist Jews despise non-Zionist Jews
like Sachs, and do not care if non-Zionist Jews are killed. Religious
non-Zionist Jews in Israel are sometimes murdered, and some Zionist
Jews do not grieve about such murders. Indeed, the Jewish
'establishment' seems to have fully abandoned Sachs to be murdered.

Amid the thousands of witness e-mails Sachs has received from around
the world, are notes from many Jews who have no problem understanding
the situation of Sachs. One of them summarised, that one often sees
"rich Jews helping rich Nazis" to kill and destroy poor Jews.

When Michael Rudell and Patricia Cornwell began their threats and
attacks upon Dr Les Sachs, it seems they did quick investigation of
Sachs via Cornwell's law enforcement contacts. The leftist Sachs had a
long record as an activist dissident, a non-Zionist, a friend of
Muslims and of innocent Mexicans and black Americans in US prisons, an
opponent of the death penalty, a critic of US judges - it was Sachs'
past history as a dissident, that led to the US establishment giving
Cornwell a 'green light' to go ahead and attack Sachs.

With Sachs identified as a non-Zionist, dissident Jew, with no
corporate political connections, the Cornwell operation calculated
correctly, that Sachs was a Jew who could be targeted with extortion
and murder, and 'Jewish leaders' would abandon Sachs for
extermination.

For Patricia Cornwell, it was initially just the momentary pleasure of
threatening a Jewish victim. For Cornwell's lawyers, however, the
motives seem to be that of a long-term haul of money out of Cornwell's
bank accounts into their own pockets.

Indeed, Patricia Cornwell was at first a little stingy about wanting
to spend a great deal of money attacking Sachs. Cornwell enjoyed
threatening him, but, at first, she didn't want to spend a lot of
money on another legal case.

So Michael Rudell and Conrad Shumadine had to give Patricia Cornwell a
final 'push'. US Department of Justice sources describe what happened
next. Perhaps using a little of their own cash, Cornwell's lawyers
Rudell and Shumadine, managed to plant a false article with a
dishonest reporter at the Richmond Times-Dispatch, a man who never met
Sachs and never interviewed him.

The 'reporter' and the Times-Dispatch management, thought they were
'helping' Patricia Cornwell by doing what her lawyers requested, and
planting a fake 'interview' and putting it on the front page of their
newspaper. The Times-Dispatch did not realise at that time they were
helping Cornwell's lawyers to defraud Cornwell herself.

The article was blasted on the front page of the newspaper, and
included phony quotations put into Sachs' mouth, composed by
Cornwell's lawyers. The article was obviously a hoax, as it quite
contradicted the content than the material on Sachs' websites at that
time. Moreover, Sachs denounced the hoax immediately, but the Richmond
Times-Dispatch refused to print Sachs' letter to the editor.

Cornwell's lawyers also did not inform Patricia Cornwell that the
article was a hoax they had planted, and that Sachs had denounced it
as a hoax. - Instead, Michael Rudell and Conrad Shumadine waved the
article at the gullible Cornwell, and said something like, "See! This
Jew Sachs is really out to get you! You need to give us lots of money
to help destroy him!"

Patricia Cornwell quite freaked out seeing the article on the front
page of the Richmond, Virginia newspaper - Cornwell herself was living
in Richmond at that time, a neighbour of Sachs. Cornwell had no clue
her lawyers were defrauding and manipulating her.

Patricia Cornwell agreed to give Rudell and Shumadine unlimited
hundreds of thousands of dollars to have Sachs banned and destroyed,
by any means necessary, fair or foul, including extortion and threats
of murder. Cornwell was too dim and brain-addled to realise she had
just been defrauded by her own lawyers.

A few weeks later, the major lawsuit was filed, and Shumadine's
friend, federal Judge Robert Payne, instantly banned Sachs' freedom of
speech on the telephone, using the fake Times-Dispatch article planted
by Rudell and Shumadine, as 'evidence' to ban Sachs' freedom of
speech. - Sachs was banned from publicly exposing that the Times-
Dispatch article was a fraud, which helped hide the fact from Cornwell
herself, as Cornwell was manipulated by her lawyers.

The Times-Dispatch, realising that they had committed the racketeering
felony crime of planting false evidence in a US federal court case,
continued to support the attacks on Sachs and the banning of Sachs'
freedom of speech, to help hide their own criminal acts with Patricia
Cornwell's lawyers. The Times-Dispatch was glad to see Sachs be
destroyed and have his freedom of speech banned for the rest of his
life, although they knew the truth about what Cornwell's lawyers had
done.

It seems that several years later, Patricia Cornwell finally figured
out, that she was originally pushed into the attacks on Sachs, by the
manipulations of her lawyers Rudell and Shumadine. But by then it was
too late - Sachs was already a political refugee in Europe, telling
the whole story to the world, on websites that would eventually be
blocked by the US government as the scheme continued.

For Cornwell herself, she realises that the scheme begun by Michael
Rudell's letter for her, demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books,
has now led to multiple criminal acts by Cornwell herself, as US
Department of Justice sources confirm - committing felony perjury and
joining with others in court fraud, paying Virginia lawyers to
threaten to torture Sachs to death, and so on.

As angry as Cornwell might be at her lawyers Rudell and Shumadine,
Cornwell knows there is no going back now. She certainly can't 'sue'
her lawyers, without exposing her own crimes. Patricia Cornwell feels
she has no choice but to continue the efforts to attack Sachs.
Cornwell feels that she must continue funding attacks on Sachs, paying
more hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and bribes, to try
to get Sachs' writing banned and blocked from Google and the internet,
spreading the hoax 'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' stories, and also
the hoax 'it was about plagiarism' stories about Sachs, trying to
enable Sachs can be murdered and silenced forever. - It is only when
Dr Les Sachs, the major witness to her crimes, is finally dead and
murdered, that Cornwell can finally breathe a little easier.

But for Michael Rudell, perhaps he yet has no regrets, recalling how,
with one good extortion letter sent by fax, this directly resulted to
several hundred thousand extra dollars in his own pocket and the
pockets of his lawyer amigos. Even for the greediest Manhattan lawyer,
that's a pretty good return for one nasty letter.

Notes on the actual letter:

This is a scan of the actual letter as in US courthouse and FBI-DOJ
files. You see on the letter the fax identifier from Rudell's law
firm, on that fateful day that begun the process whereby, a few weeks
later, Sachs would suffer instant banning of freedom of speech and
freedom of the press from a federal judge on the telephone, and then
be forced under what DOJ sources confirm are threats of extortion and
murder, to become a political refugee in Europe.

In the text of the letter, Rudell and Cornwell refer to a letter of 24
January, which they actually did not fax to Sachs until 1 February,
the same day as this letter. Rudell and Cornwell accuse Sachs of
"alleging that [Cornwell] has plagiarized" but this is a hoax and a
deception.

There is absolutely zero evidence that Sachs ever used the word
'plagiarism' in any accusations against Cornwell, whether public or
private, and Cornwell's lawyers do not deny now that the 'plagiarism'
story is a hoax. Sachs had been conducting a private inquiry about
evidence of idea mis-appropriation with regard to an announced
Cornwell new book, and his own previously published novel, but he
never accused Cornwell of 'plagiarism'.

After Sachs began investigating Cornwell, Cornwell delayed the
publication of her upcoming book by several months, and re-wrote much
of it. However, this did not make the lawyers happy, who wanted to
create a big legal case between Sachs and Cornwell.

The court and DOJ records show the Cornwell lawyers consistently
trying to shove these 'plagiarism' accusations into Sachs' mouth, and
Sachs consistently rejecting those attempts, even allowing for how
Cornwell had been re-writing her own book to minimise whatever
'inspiration' she had taken from a novel by Sachs.

Cornwell's lawyers, desperate to try and sell the 'plagiarism' hoax to
distract from the threats they had made demanding book-burning of a
Jew's books. The 'plagiarism' hoax was one of the main thrusts of the
fake 'interview' article planted by Patricia Cornwell's lawyers, as
described above, an article immediately denounced by Sachs as a fraud,
and not reflecting his own views. The court and DOJ records show Sachs
immediately denouncing the fake 'interview'.

A few days later, the Cornwell lawyers surprised Sachs with a thick
packet of legal papers, and minutes afterwards, US federal Judge
Robert Payne - who is financially linked to Patricia Cornwell via the
Bush family - called Sachs to impose instant banning of Sachs' freedom
of speech and freedom of the press.

Shortly afterwards, DOJ records show friends of the judge threatening
to torture Sachs to death, and the ban on Sachs' freedom of speech was
extended to the rest of his life, along with a demand that Sachs pay
large sums of money for the rest of his life to the friends of the
judge. - No US lawyer would ever dare help Sachs, due to Cornwell's
political connections as a friend of the President Bush family and
even more importantly, a 'friend of the federal judges'.

With Sachs not paying the extortion money to the judge's friends, and
finding no lawyer to protect him, he was forced to escape to Europe.

Ever since the instant banning of Sachs' freedom of speech, the
Cornwell hoax that this case was about accusations of 'plagiarism' has
continued to be blasted around the world by media companies, by
Cornwell's staff on Wikipedia, and many other means. But it was always
a hoax.

This extortion letter of Michael Rudell gave Sachs a ten-day deadline
to submit to book-burning and to keeping quiet about Cornwell, and not
pointing out the literary similarities between the announced plot of
Cornwell's upcoming book, and the past novel that Sachs had published.
Rudell was trying to inflame a reaction from a Jewish victim who could
not help be insulted by this kind of neo-Nazi-leaning threat, and of
course he got it, leading to hundreds of thousands of dollars in
profits for Rudell and the other Cornwell lawyers.

When he received this neo-Nazi-type threatening letter, is the moment
when Sachs went public, not with any accusations of 'plagiarism', but
with the actual fact that he had received an extortion letter from
Cornwell and her lawyers.

Sachs faxed and sent communications to Cornwell's lawyers and
publishers a number of times, verifying that Cornwell herself was
involved in the threats of book-burning, but the Cornwell lawyers had
no interest in responding. Their interest was not in dialogue, but in
filing a federal lawsuit and instantly banning Sachs' freedom of
speech, and above all, in earning several hundred thousand dollars in
fees from Cornwell.

Patricia Cornwell's original extortion letter, threatening to destroy
the books of the Jewish Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, can be found here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/plcmoapyo8/2985/cornwell-threatens-1.jpg

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/z3lg1iu18v/2986/cornwell-threatens-2.jpg

6. Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs instantly reacts to book-burning threats by
Patricia Cornwell - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice,
European police files

by Dan Hajidah

Here is another piece of evidence, from US federal courthouse, US Dept
of Justice, and European police files, showing that the real beginning
of the controversy between Patricia Cornwell and Dr Les (Leslie)
Sachs, was about Patricia Cornwell's threats to burn the books of a
Jew, and her extortion demanding silence from Sachs, and not the
'plagiarism' hoax as has been continually broadcast for several years
by the Cornwell media operation.

This scan is of a letter faxed by Dr Les Sachs to Patricia Cornwell's
main US publisher, Penguin Putnam, part of the British corporation
Pearson plc, which has been directly involved with Patricia Cornwell
in the attacks on Sachs, and in spreading hoaxes and lies about Sachs.

Penguin Putnam Pearson is not only the major US publisher of Patricia
Cornwell, it is also the publisher of the best-selling book by Dr Les
Sachs himself, his exposé of US auto industry corruption, "How to Buy
Your New Car for a Rock-Bottom Price", which was in continuous sales
from 1987-2000, until the book was cancelled under the influence of
Patricia Cornwell's hatred for Sachs.

With regard to this letter complaining about Patricia Cornwell's neo-
Nazi-style threats of book-burning, Sachs faxed this letter to the CEO
of US Penguin Pearson, David Wan, on the very same day that he
received the fax of the extortion letter from Patricia Cornwell.

(See post on, "Patricia Cornwell threatens in writing to destroy the
books of a Jew - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice,
European police files" for a copy of that letter.)

As Sachs directly says in this brief letter to Cornwell's publisher,
what is disturbing him above all about the threats from Patricia
Cornwell, is that, "Most shockingly, the lawyers are menacing to
attempt the physical burning and destruction of books ..."

Sachs goes on to us the CEO of his and Cornwell's publishing company,
"Do you support Patsy Cornwell's attempt to extort my silence, and are
you an accomplice of the famous Ms. Cornwell in her threat to engage
in Nazi-Germany-style destruction of my books? What an amazing ethical
downfall for one of America's famous writers, misusing her millions to
menace the destruction of another writer's books because she is
embarrassed by her own foolishness. ... You can evidence your guilt
and complicity in these monstrous evils by your mafia-style
stonewalling and your refusal to answer this query."

Indeed, throughout the nine years since Patricia Cornwell and Pearson
plc began the attacks upon Sachs, Pearson plc, under the leadership of
global head Marjorie Scardino, has taken a very active role in seeking
to have Sachs banned, destroyed and silenced, with a particularly
active role by US Penguin Putnam Pearson counsel Alexander Gigante,
who appears to be a part of the New York Gigante mafia crime family.

Over the past years, Pearson plc has taken a very active role in
spreading lies about Dr Les Sachs. For most of the decade, the
'Pearson education' division has published a completely dishonest
article telling lies about the crimes against Sachs. The article was
authored by a US law professor working for Pearson, Pace Law School
Professor Rosario 'Roy' Girasa, who does not deny that he accepted
money from Pearson, in order to tell lies about the crimes involved in
threatening to torture Sachs to death and banning his freedom of
speech.

For several years, as Wikipedia and Answers-com published lies about
Sachs on the internet in support of having Sachs banned and murdered,
their main 'reference' source was often this planted Pearson-Girasa
article, while of course Wikipedia hid the fact that Girasa was
working directly for Cornwell's publisher, and the article was itself
placed online by Cornwell's own publishing company.

Thus it is very clear, from the first hours after Dr Les Sachs
received the fax of the extortion letter from Patricia Cornwell, that
the major issues for Sachs are Patricia Cornwell's threats to burn a
Jew's books, and to extort his silence and the banning of his freedom
of speech. - It was always a hoax of Patricia Cornwell, her lawyers
and allies and media team, as they tried to pretend the controversy
was about 'plagiarism', a word Sachs never even used against Cornwell.

Here is the scan of the letter of Sachs, written on the same day as
receiving Cornwell's extortion letter threatening to burn the books of
a Jew:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/03bkr5tq46/2989/sachs-refuses-bookburning.jpg

7. Sticker on book, protesting Patricia Cornwell threats to destroy
the books of a Jew - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice,
European police files

by Dan Hajidah

Upon the instant banning of Dr Les Sachs' freedom of speech by the US
government, there has been no shortage of absolutely spectacular lies
told by Patricia Cornwell and her media team, about what Sachs has
been saying and doing.

One of the most blatant falsehoods that keeps getting told by Patricia
Cornwell and the stooges she has paid to slander Dr Les Sachs, is the
lie that Sachs had put a sticker on the cover of his novel, "The
Virginia Ghost Murders", making complaints of 'plagiarism' about
Patricia Cornwell.

This lie gets told over and over again, and has circulated all over
the internet and world corporate media, media who have been helping
Cornwell to attack and slander Sachs. As US Department of Justice
sources confirm, lawyers in the Patricia Cornwell cases, even go to
the point of lying under court oath and committing felony perjury
about this 'sticker'. For example, there is a US court transcript of 8
May 2003, when Cornwell case lawyer Thomas 'Tom' Roberts, directly
commits perjury about this sticker, and tells the lie in court that
this sticker had complained about 'plagiarism'.

Well, here is the official US courthouse copy of the cover of Sachs'
book with the famous 'sticker' banned by the US government, the
official copy of the book cover which can be viewed and copied by
anyone at the US federal courthouse in Richmond, Virginia, USA, and
which is also held in US Dept of Justice files, and in European police
agency files.

From the scan, you will see a second small 'sticker' which is the US
federal courthouse 'official exhibit' designation as authentication.
Moreover, there are still copies of the book on the used book
marketplace, with the original 'banned' sticker on it, for those who
would like to obtain a copy of this banned-in-the-USA collectible.

Lo and behold, the sticker says nothing about 'plagiarism' at all, nor
about imitating ideas, nor about anything else, which even hints at
such topics. The sticker makes one, and only one, complaint about
Patricia Cornwell, and that is pertaining to Patricia Cornwell's
threats of book-burning of a Jew's books. The sticker directly quotes
from Cornwell's extortion letter that she had faxed to Sachs, where
Cornwell had used the word 'destroy' relative to Sachs' books.

The sticker says:

"The book that famous PATRICIA CORNWELL threatened to destroy! Read
about the scandal at: www[dot]vaghost[com]"
(Note - the vaghost-com web address is no longer owned by Sachs)

The sticker is of course completely true, as Patricia Cornwell did
indeed demand and threaten to "destroy" the books of Sachs, in the
extortion letter she and her lawyers faxed to Sachs on 1 February
2000.

(See post on, "Patricia Cornwell threatens in writing to destroy the
books of a Jew - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice,
European police files" for a copy of that letter.)

When Cornwell's friend and protector, US Federal Judge Robert Payne
(appointed to office by Cornwell's very dear long-time personal
friend, the first President Bush), when Payne imposed instant banning
of freedom of speech upon Dr Les Sachs, he gave no reasons whatsoever.

However, later on, as US Judge Payne begun to spin out reasons for
banning Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the press, Payne laid
out a thoroughly neo-Nazi point of view. US Judge Robert Payne is
quoted in US federal court filings as an admirer of Nazi leader Adolf
Hitler, and as personally being fed up with Jews.

Judge Robert Payne gave his ruling that there is nothing wrong with
book-burning and destroying the books of a Jew, and that, despite the
Holocaust, if a Jew like Sachs dares to complain about book-burning,
such a Jew must be doing so for purposes of 'marketing', not for any
other reason.

Judge Payne fully endorsed Patricia Cornwell's threats to burn the
books of a Jew, and said that a Jew would only object to book-burning
for the motive of 'marketing', therefore the Jew Dr Les Sachs must
have his freedom of speech banned for the rest of his life, so that he
can never again make public complaints about the book-burning threats
of Patricia Cornwell.

Under direct threat of jailing, and, according to Dept of Justice
sources, with Judge Payne's friends threatening to torture Sachs to
death, Judge Payne ordered the destruction of Sachs' publishing
company, and, rather like a Nazi thug himself, Judge Payne began
defacing and destroying the cover of Sachs' book with his own fingers,
to remove the sticker on Sachs' book talking about the threats of
Judge Payne's friend Patricia Cornwell.

For her part, Patricia Cornwell has continued to take a great sadistic
pleasure in the combination of threatening to burn a Jew's books, and
then have her friends the US federal judges, instantly ban the Jewish
victim from talking about it.

Patricia Cornwell continues to savour the pleasure of saying it is
good thing to engage in banning of freedom of speech, and that a
Jewish victim is only engaged in 'marketing' if he dares to complain
about such things as banning of speech and book-burning.

Since the initial attacks on Sachs, and the banning of his freedom of
speech under what DOJ sources confirm are threats of being tortured
and murdered, it is noteworthy how casually that the US and UK
corporate media have supported the burning of books, the banning of
freedom of the press, the destruction of independent publishers and
journalists.

Serving the interests of Patricia Cornwell, corporate media - some of
whom are themselves financially involved as publishers of her books -
have continued to broadcast the lies that the complaints of Sachs and
his sticker were about 'plagiarism', and they spin out the
'plagiarism' story in very advanced forms.

One of the ways that they elaborate this 'plagiarism' hoax in false
media and Wikipedia articles, is by telling readers to compare Sachs'
novel "The Virginia Ghost Murders" with a published book of Patricia
Cornwell's, "The Last Precinct." The media articles and Wikipedia,
repeatedly tell lies suggesting that Sachs made 'plagiarism'
accusations about a book by Cornwell after it was published.

This is all a lie and a fraud. For one thing, the banning of Sachs'
freedom of speech and the destruction of Sachs' publishing company,
took place months before the Cornwell novel was published.

For another thing, Patricia Cornwell herself delayed the publication
of "The Last Precinct" for many months after receiving private
complaints by Sachs, and Cornwell completely re-wrote the book after
Sachs' complaints, leaving only a tiny residue of some apparent
similarities to the novel that Sachs had published two years earlier.

But the false media articles and Wikipedia don't want to tell you
these facts, as they try to spread the 'plagiarism' hoax, to hide the
real story of book-burning threats, banning of freedom of speech,
perjury and court fraud, and threats of extortion and murder, as
confirmed by sources within the US Department of Justice who have
tried to fight an uphill battle against the Bush appointees, but
getting no support from corporate media.

Some other interesting things about this scanned book cover you can
note. "The Virginia Ghost Murders" was quite well reviewed and
received, until Sachs' publishing company was destroyed and shut down
under the malicious orders of US federal judge Robert Payne. Though
Sachs himself has not sold the book since his publishing company was
destroyed, the book is still available on the used book market, on
sites like Amazon-com or Amazon-co-uk, or Half-com within North
America.

Patricia Cornwell's computer trolls have been trying to post articles
slandering Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs on the 'book review' sections of
Amazon, although letters within the court records show that many
readers quite loved the book before Sachs become a target of hatred
for the US judges and government. "Better than that crap by Patricia
Cornwell," said one reader, unaware of the looming controversy that
was to come.

Somewhat hilariously, although Judge Robert Payne was willing to
instantly ban the freedom of speech of Sachs to benefit his friends
Patricia Cornwell and the President Bush family, federal Judge Payne
is also quoted in US court filings, and Department of Justice records,
as giving his opinion that Cornwell's writing was a "load of crap",
though Payne felt it is his duty to ban the freedom of speech of
Cornwell's victims, given Cornwell's role as a major Bush financial
contributor.

Many readers have asked for the sequels to Sachs' book. But after
having his freedom of speech banned by Cornwell's friends the US
federal judges, Sachs is now 'blacklisted' by the entire US and UK
publishing industry, and no publisher has been brave enough to publish
any further books by Sachs after he was publicly attacked by Cornwell.

One of the positive reviews of "The Virginia Ghost Murders" came from
the Norfolk Virginian-Pilot, saying of Sachs' book that, "It's Jack
the Ripper does Dixie!" - This quote was placed on the front cover of
the book, and it seems that from seeing this quote, Patricia Cornwell
developed her own interest in the Jack the Ripper case.

The scan you find here, also shows the back cover of the book, with a
brief description of the plot. This is also significant for those who
are researching more deeply into the case of Sachs and Cornwell. In
December of 1999, Patricia Cornwell announced the plot of an upcoming
book which sounded rather like "The Virginia Ghost Murders".

Cornwell and Sachs had the same publisher, Penguin Putnam, and
multiple documents prove that "The Virginia Ghost Murders" was
directly in the hands of Patricia Cornwell's personal editors and
agents, as far back as 1998.

Moreover, in the 1990s, Cornwell had a long documented history of
copying things, stealing things and imitating things, right from the
beginning of her career of publishing novels. "Not 'based on', but
'inspired by'!" is Cornwell's standard response when she asks about
why so many things in her books are copied from somewhere else.

There is a whole string of controversies and legal cases from the
1990s about Cornwell being essentially a thief of outside material.
Many articles were done in print journalism about Cornwell being a
dishonest thief. Much of this material has been banned and suppressed
from the internet now, partly under US court orders, trying to benefit
Cornwell and hide the facts about her life.

Dr Les Sachs has summarised much of material, and supplied a
bibliography of 1990s articles from the print media, but the US judges
have ordered this material to be blocked from the internet, suppressed
and exterminated from Google and the search engines.

It was an announcement in late 1999, with Patricia Cornwell announcing
a "new novel" with a plot sounding like Sachs' already-published
novel, that led Sachs to conduct a private investigation, as to
whether he was about to become another victim of Cornwell.

A few weeks later, Sachs received the extortion letter from Cornwell
threatening book-burning and demanding his silence, and the banning of
speech and threats to jail and murder Sachs followed shortly
afterwards.

So here is the scan of the actual book cover of Sachs' destroyed
novel, "The Virginia Ghost Murders", with the sticker showing clearly,
that Sachs is only complaining about Cornwell's threats of book-
burning of a Jew's books, and not about any so-called accusations of
'plagiarism', a story spread via the hoaxes and lies of the Patricia
Cornwell media operation.

The cover of Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs' book, "The Virginia Ghost
Murders", with the famous 'sticker', can be found here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/z60n8i9gg5/2990/sticker-sachs-book.jpg

8. Patricia Cornwell files US federal court legal action, demanding
that US federal judge order the book-burning of the books of a Jewish
author - from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice, European
police files

by Dan Hajidah

Here is yet further evidence from United States Courthouse, US
Department of Justice, and European police agency files, that the
author Patricia Cornwell is indeed, as some people have said,
"America's book-burning bitch", and that Patricia Cornwell is guilty
of both lies and perjury in claiming that she never menaced to destroy
the books of the Jew Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs.

Here is Patricia Cornwell, actually filing written US federal court
legal papers, demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books.

This is a scan of the relevant pages of the original lawsuit papers,
served on Dr Les Sachs on the afternoon of Wednesday, 12 April 2000,
as Sachs was being watched at his apartment home by grinning agents of
Patricia Cornwell. They were delaying serving the legal papers on
Sachs, to time the delivery just a few minutes before Sachs would
receive a secretly pre-arranged phone call from Federal Judge Robert
Payne, and Cornwell's lawyer Conrad Shumadine of Willcox & Savage.

Judge Robert Payne is directly financially linked to Cornwell,
appointed to office by Cornwell's good friend the first President
Bush, and US Department of Justice sources describe Payne as clearly
involved in court fraud and bribery with Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox
& Savage, including Judge Payne being a salesman for a fraudulent
'Foundation' as part of the equally fraudulent Patricia Cornwell
'legal proceeding' against Sachs.

Quite unlawfully, according to US Department of Justice sources,
Patricia Cornwell's lawyer Conrad Shumadine, had secretly pre-arranged
with his friend Judge Payne, to telephone Dr Les Sachs with an instant
banning of his freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The idea
was to serve Sachs with the legal papers, and then Judge Payne called
Sachs to instantly ban his freedom of speech before Sachs could finish
reading those papers, before Sachs could meet with any lawyers or
independent media.

According to US Department of Justice sources, and court filings and
evidence documents, this instant ban on Sachs' freedom of speech, was
then used to make Sachs helpless, while Cornwell's allies pumped the
national media with false articles about Sachs, and while friends of
Judge Payne and Shumadine then threatened to have Sachs tortured to
death in a jail cell.

The carefully-delayed serving of the legal papers, just before Federal
Judge Payne telephoned him to ban his freedom of speech, occurred at
the small apartment that Dr Les Sachs shared with his beloved cat Miss
Kitty. This home that also served as the office of his publishing
company, the 'Pussycat Press', named in honour of his cat. For a photo
of this apartment, where Cornwell's hired agents were waiting to
spring the trap on Sachs, see here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/cmks280fjd/2992/sachs-flat-richmond-va-usa.jpg

There is an extremely heart-breaking story about Dr Les Sachs' cat,
Miss Kitty, whom Sachs had met many years before, as a wounded and
bleeding stray cat, whom Sachs had found near the swimming pool at
this same apartment complex in suburban Richmond, Virginia, where
Sachs had lived since 1988.

Some months after Patricia Cornwell had begun the attacks on Sachs,
Miss Kitty went blind.

US Justice Dept sources acknowledge that Dr Les Sachs was later forced
to go into hiding, with Cornwell case lawyers threatening to have
Sachs tortured to death in jail, in revenge for Sachs not paying them
extortion money, and in revenge for Sachs trying to hire a lawyer to
fight Patricia Cornwell and her gang.

As Sachs made his escape, driving away from the men threatening to
kill him, Sachs took Miss Kitty northwards, to join Canadians who
would help Sachs escape over the border. Eventually, with North
American borders locking down by US Homeland Security authorities, and
Canada not safe for him, Sachs was forced to leave for Europe, leaving
his elderly blind cat Miss Kitty in a private home with Canadian
friends and other cats.

Miss Kitty waited for many months for Sachs to return, and then almost
exactly one year after Sachs saw her for the last time, the little cat
died without him, as Sachs says, "Without hearing one last word from
me, Without one last touch of my hand upon her fur."

Today, when you interview Dr Les Sachs, this is the one subject that
consistently brings tears to Sachs' eyes about his ordeal, when he
talks about this little blind cat whom he was never allowed to see
again, because of the US lawyers and judges threatening to kill him,
and forcing him to leave North America and be a political refugee in
Europe.

For Dr Les Sachs, this is the greatest tragedy of his whole experience
as a political refugee from the USA. Sachs still grieves immensely for
his "little blind girl", though she has now been dead for several
years.

When you listen to Dr Les Sachs speak of the love of animals, and of
the importance of animals in the eyes of God, you realise you are
hearing the core of who Sachs really is. The learned Sachs even
reminded this journalist of how the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is also
said to have been a great admirer of cats as well, welcoming cats into
his own life.

Sachs has written a moving story of how he was forced to escape from
the USA as a political refugee, and his tragic departure from Miss
Kitty after more than ten years of life together, but of course the US
government has ordered Google and the search engines to block this
important story, to hide from the world how brutally the USA treats
its dissidents.

For a photo of Miss Kitty, when she was blind but still in Virginia
with Sachs, as he was under menace by the Cornwell group, see here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/vxfcpttkwr/3001/les-sachs-cat-miss-kitty.jpg

These scans here are from the first of the two US federal 'legal
proceedings' to ban the journalism of Dr Sachs, proceedings which US
Department of Justice sources acknowledge to both be a fraud. - In the
first 'proceeding', Dr Sachs actually received the legal papers, only
to have Cornwell's friend the federal judge instantly ban Sachs'
freedom of speech, preventing him from organising any resources to
help him fight the Cornwell group.

In the second proceeding, in 2007, several years after Dr Les Sachs
became a political refugee in Europe, the US judges and Cornwell's
lawyers didn't even bother with serving Sachs with legal papers at
all. They have no address for him, as Sachs lives in secret locations
under European government protection. So the US judges and Cornwell's
lawyers simply harass Sachs with e-mails, telling him how they are
ordering Google to block Sachs' website, so that he can finally be
murdered and silenced once and for all.

There are three scanned pages here, from that first legal case against
Sachs when he was in the USA and first being targeted by Patricia
Cornwell. The first is the front page of the lawsuit package, naming
Patricia D. Cornwell, and her lawyers Gary A. Bryant and Conrad M.
Shumadine of Willcox & Savage, and also Michael C. Davis, a lawyer who
had been with Willcox & Savage but is now at the Venable law firm.
Mike David does not deny that he has changed law firms, partly to try
to escape his past involvement in the crimes of Willcox & Savage to
have the Jewish writer Sachs banned, tortured and murdered.

Willcox & Savage, for its part, does not deny it remains a law firm
still supporting the practice of book-burning, banning of freedom of
speech and freedom of the press, and the silencing and intimidation of
bloggers and independent journalists.

Willcox & Savage seemed to take great relish in the threats of book-
burning and the neo-Nazi nature of the attacks upon Sachs. Patricia
Cornwell's lawyer Gary Bryant from Willcox & Savage, even made a VHS
video of himself, screaming at Dr Sachs like a psychopath, at exactly
the same time that US Dept of Justice sources say Bryant and his
partners were threatening to have Sachs tortured to death in a jail
cell.

After the scan of the front page, you see page 18 and 19 of the
lawsuit papers, where Cornwell explicitly demands court orders to ban
Dr Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and claims she
should get US $1,350,000 from Sachs. - Some days later, when Cornwell
was asked why thought Sachs should owe her a million dollars, Cornwell
responded that she had to miss a helicopter ride one day, in order to
take the trouble to be filing a lawsuit against Sachs and banning his
freedom of speech, so she was owed a million for missing her
helicopter ride.

As you see in the scans, at the bottom of page 18 and the top of page
19, Patricia Cornwell explicitly demands the book-burning of a Jew's
books. Patricia Cornwell demands of her friend Judge Payne:

"6. That Sachs be required to deliver up for destruction, any books,
inventory, literature, brochures, flyers, advertising materials and
other items ... which material includes any reference to Ms.
Cornwell ..."

Patricia Cornwell, having previously made threats to destroy the books
of the Jew Sachs, and to try and extort his silence about her, now
goes on to demand full Nazi-style book-burning and banning of freedom
of the press in US federal court papers.

This is highly significant, not only for the proof of Patricia
Cornwell as a neo-Nazi-type book-burner, but also because it is part
of the proof that Cornwell later committed felony perjury, when she
denied she ever menaced to 'destroy' any books of Sachs. (See related
post, "Official court transcript of Patricia Cornwell perjury -
Cornwell lies under oath on a federal court witness stand, Cornwell's
felony perjury as she denies threatening to destroy the books of a Jew
- from US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice, European police
files".)

And this is also yet another piece of proof, that the key issue of the
initial Cornwell controversy with Sachs, was about Cornwell's threats
of book-burning and her efforts to extort an illegal banning of
freedom of speech, and not the deceptive hoax about 'accusations of
plagiarism' that has been spread for many years by Cornwell's media
allies, and by Cornwell's hired trolls telling lies on Wikipedia.

For the relevant scans of Patricia Cornwell's demands of book-burning
of a Jew's books, directly out of Cornwell's US federal court filing,
see here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/3sx0xd4lxl/2981/cornwell-lawsuit-p-1.jpg

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/sxct8d6n5f/2978/cornwell-bookburning-1.jpg

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/3etnjlbpv3/2979/cornwell-bookburning-2.jpg

9. Official court transcript of Patricia Cornwell perjury - Cornwell
lies under oath in US federal courtroom, Cornwell's felony perjury as
she denies threatening to destroy the books of a Jew - from US Federal
courthouse, US Dept of Justice, European police files

by Dan Hajidah

Here is the relevant page from the official transcript at the United
States federal courthouse in Richmond, Virginia, a document which US
Department of Justice sources say is sufficient evidence to send the
author Patricia Cornwell to prison for many years, and possibly for
the rest of her life.

The transcript shows Patricia Cornwell lying under oath - in other
words, committing the serious crime of felony perjury - in a US
federal courtroom. The topic about which Patricia Cornwell is lying
and committing perjury, is precisely her past threats of book-burning,
Cornwell's previously written threats to destroy the books of Dr Les
(Leslie) Sachs.

See the previous post showing the original threatening extortion
letter of Patricia Cornwell, where she makes threats of book-burning
against Dr Les Sachs, with Cornwell and her lawyers actually using the
words 'destroy' and 'book', as quoted by Sachs.

According to the US Department of Justice and to legal observers,
Patricia Cornwell's criminal offence of felony perjury is completely
clear, unmistakable, and absolutely certain to lead to the criminal
conviction of Cornwell on felony charges, should the US government
finally (perhaps under President Obama) begins the criminal
prosecution of Cornwell and her lawyers and allies.

According to the Dept of Justice sources, Patricia Cornwell's felony
perjury is part of what are technically crimes of 'terrorism' -
Cornwell threatening to have a Jewish journalist tortured to death,
and then funding and committing multiple additional criminal acts
across international borders - so Patricia Cornwell faces jailing for
the rest of her life when prosecuted.

None of Patricia Cornwell's lawyers deny that Patricia Cornwell has
committed felony perjury here, none of her lawyers deny that Patricia
Cornwell is a liar and perjurer under oath in US federal courtrooms.

The issue of Patricia Cornwell's apparently well-proven perjury, is
highly significant not only for the potential lifelong jailing for
Cornwell, but also for the context of the many other lies told by
Patricia Cornwell.

For example, there were Patricia Cornwell's lies in media interviews
in 2007, when Cornwell was trying to spread the false stories of
'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' against Dr Les Sachs. These lies of
Patricia Cornwell, even though spread via CNN and other media (CNN is
a branch of one of Cornwell's publishing companies, Time-Warner
Books), have already been exploded as impossible hoaxes.

Patricia Cornwell, as if on drugs (Cornwell is a frequent drug-and
alcohol-abuser), began to make weird claims that Dr Les Sachs - who
has been a political refugee in Europe since 2004, subject to instant
arrest and jailing at US borders - Cornwell began to claim that Sachs
was somehow, avoiding all the Homeland Security border controls, and
sneaking back into the USA to 'stalk' Cornwell near her house, and
then with only Cornwell noticing and no police able to see or catch
Sachs, and Cornwell not even calling police, then Sachs would sneak
back to Europe. - Or so Patricia Cornwell claimed.

Clearly, these weird Patricia Cornwell 'stalking stories' about Sachs
were lies and absurd fabrications, Cornwell just trying to smear and
slander Sachs via media willing to repeat her lies. - Corporate media,
of course, didn't mention how Cornwell herself had been a documented
lesbian stalker of the actress Jodie Foster back in the 1990s, as
recounted in Esquire magazine.

With Patricia Cornwell a proven perjurer under oath in US federal
courtrooms, the question then is, why should anyone in the world
believe anything at all that Patricia Cornwell says, given that
Cornwell is a proven liar and perjurer in a courtroom?

Patricia Cornwell's lawyers have no answer to this question.

On the day when she committed perjury in the courtrooms of Virginia,
Cornwell was directly asked:

"Have you threatened in any way to destroy Mr. Sachs' books?"

"No" replies Patricia Cornwell, directly telling this lie and perjury
in front of a US federal judge and a roomful of witnesses, and with
the very documents proving that Patricia Cornwell made her threats of
book-burning, right there in the courtroom, and one of these documents
even being read aloud during the course of the proceedings.

It is significant that the question was asked if Cornwell had
threatened her victim "in any way", because this deprives Cornwell of
making the possible excuse that while her lawyers working for her had
clearly threatened to destroy her victims books, and Cornwell had
filed legal papers clearly threatening to destroy her victim's books,
Cornwell herself had merely hired other people to make these threats
for her, instead of doing the dirty deed herself.

No one cross-examined Patricia Cornwell, because there are no lawyers
in the courtroom working for Cornwell's victim Dr Les Sachs. (As
Department of Justice sources confirm, two friends of Judge Payne were
fraudulent 'posing' as lawyers for Sachs, but they were working for
Cornwell, not for Sachs.)

And Dr Les Sachs was unable to announce or call attention to
Cornwell's lies and perjury, because Cornwell's friend and protector,
US Federal Judge Robert Payne, had already illegally and instantly
banned Sachs' freedom of speech.

The instant banning of Dr Les Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of
the press, prevented him from all contact with the media. The federal
judge allowed Patricia Cornwell's allies to publish articles attacking
Sachs in the national news media and all over the internet, but Sachs
was ordered not to respond, on pain of instant jailing by Judge Payne.

The judge's order preventing Sachs from responding to the media lies
about him, also prevented Sachs from getting large-scale public
support, or lawyers who would help him, as the lawyers were
discouraged by all the media stories smearing and attacking Sachs, and
mis-representing the case.

Sachs was ordered not to try to organise any independent news media
favourable to his cause, who might tell the truth about Cornwell, or
who might show up to report on this stacked 'hearing' where, according
the US Department of Justice, all the lawyers and the federal judge
himself, were receiving bribes and payments from Patricia Cornwell.

There was never any 'trial' in that original Patricia Cornwell case
where she had Dr Les Sachs' freedom of speech instantly banned. Dr
Sachs was simply given the legal papers, and US federal judge Payne
immediately telephoned Sachs to ban his freedom of speech. Then, a few
weeks later, Judge Payne held not an actual trial, but a one-day
'preliminary hearing', on Tuesday the 16th of May, 2000, for the
purpose of putting the ban on Dr Sachs' freedom of speech in writing,
and expanding the ban on Dr Sachs freedom of speech even further, so
that Dr Sachs had to close down his website material, so there was
almost nothing on the internet to contradict the false media articles.

Judge Payne also ordered the mailing out of letters which destroyed Dr
Sachs' publishing company and his reputation. According to DOJ
sources, Cornwell's media allies were encouraged to produce a
continuing set of false national 'news stories' attacking Sachs and
telling lies about him, while Sachs was told he faced instant jailing
- and being tortured to death in a jail cell - if he did not stay
silent and submit.

The one-day 'hearing', with no lawyers or anyone else representing Dr
Les Sachs, ended with Judge Payne issuing on-the-spot direct expanded
orders, which banned Sachs from speaking or writing about what was
happening to him. Judge Payne made it angrily clear he was ready to
take full rapid revenge on Sachs, if Sachs dared to breathe a word
about Patricia Cornwell's felony perjury that had just taken place, or
any other criticism of Patricia Cornwell, whom Judge Payne was
determined to 'protect' by all his power to instantly jail people for
'violation of court orders'.

In the scans here, you see not just the page where Cornwell commits
perjury, but also the first page of the official court transcript
record, which lists not just two of Patricia Cornwell's lawyers as
representing her, but also lists two lawyers as claiming to
'represent' Dr Les Sachs. According to US Department of Justice
sources, US Appeals Court filings, and other court transcripts and
documents, these two Virginia lawyers, Thomas H. Roberts and Tim
Schulte, were in fact also working for Patricia Cornwell, being paid
via bribery cash from Cornwell's Willcox & Savage law firm, which DOJ
sources describe as also paying bribery cash to US Federal Judge
Robert Payne.

DOJ sources point out how it is indeed quite clear that Thomas H.
Roberts and Tim Schulte were working for Patricia Cornwell, and not
for Cornwell's victim Dr Les Sachs. According to the DOJ sources and
the proof files, Roberts and Schulte had been appointed by Judge
Robert Payne to pose as lawyers for Sachs, using the cover of the ban
on Sachs' freedom of speech, to threaten Sachs with instant jailing
and being murdered, if he tried to fire them, or if Sachs tried to say
anything about how they were frauds working for Cornwell.

According to DOJ sources and written proof documents, Thomas H.
Roberts and Tim Schulte not only were fraudulently posing as lawyers
for Dr Les Sachs, they were also fraudulently posing as lawyers
working with a fraudulent 'Freedom Foundation' which does not exist,
and they and Judge Payne all used this fraudulent 'Foundation' as part
of this court fraud of staging a fraudulent 'legal proceeding' with
Patricia Cornwell.

The crimes of Roberts and Schulte in posing as lawyers for Dr Les
Sachs, were more fully exposed in a Virginia court transcript of 8 May
2003, and in a US Appeals Court filing of 3 April 2004, later filed
with the US Supreme Court (see other postings for these documents).

One of the many items pointing to how Thomas Roberts and Tim Schulte
were really working for Patricia Cornwell and not her victim Dr Sachs,
is how Roberts and Schulte did not dare cross-examine Patricia
Cornwell on the felony perjury that she committed right there in a US
federal court hearing.

The federal judge witnessing Cornwell's perjury, 4th Circuit federal
Judge Robert Payne, did not request Cornwell's indictment for perjury,
according to US Department of Justice sources, because Payne was
receiving bribes from Patricia Cornwell, via Patricia Cornwell's
lawyers, Conrad Shumadine and Gary Bryant of Willcox & Savage.

One of the remarkable things as well about Cornwell's felony perjury
here, as Dr Les Sachs has pointed out, is that it shows how utterly
weak the whole Cornwell case against Sachs really was, right from the
beginning.

The perjury is striking, given all the weapons that Patricia Cornwell
had on her side: According to US Department of Justice sources, these
included a bribed federal judge who had already banned her victim's
freedom of speech, and a crew of extortionists willing to jail and
murder Dr Les Sachs as well. Here is a one-day court-hearing, with a
federal judge willing to do unlimited favours for Cornwell, anything
that Cornwell wants, and there are no lawyers in the courtroom working
for the victim, with all lawyers and the judge are all working totally
for Cornwell, according to DOJ.

And yet, with everything stacked in her favour, her victim's freedom
of speech banned, no one to defend him or speak for him, everyone
apparently ready to jail and murder him - Patricia Cornwell yet still
finds it necessary to commit perjury about the threats of book-burning
that she had authorised via her lawyer Michael Rudell.

It is truly regrettable that no US lawyer has ever yet been brave
enough to be willing to confront Patricia Cornwell in a US courtroom,
and cross-examine her about her perjury and other crimes involved
here.

An additional curiosity of this page 141 of the court hearing
transcript, is that it also provides proof that Patricia Cornwell was
writing and re-writing her book that she published later that year,
"The Last Precinct", AFTER she had received private complaints from
Sachs about her possibly imitating the ideas of Sachs' previously-
published 1998 novel, "The Virginia Ghost Murders".

(To summarise what has been published elsewhere: Dr Les Sachs had
never made any accusations of "plagiarism" against Patricia Cornwell,
there is zero evidence he ever used that word. In December of 1999,
Cornwell announced a future upcoming book, with a plot that sounded
like Sachs' novel published the previous year. Documents prove that
Sachs' book had been reviewed by both Patricia Cornwell's editor, and
Patricia Cornwell's literary agents.

Sachs investigated and protested, and received boasts from their
mutual publisher, that Cornwell could borrow other people's ideas, and
any victim would be helpless to oppose it. Sachs pressed the question,
and then received the extortion letter from Cornwell's lawyers, giving
Sachs a ten-day deadline ordering him to be silent, and to agree to a
book-burning of his own books. The apparent goal of the letter was to
create controversy, and enable Cornwell's lawyers to start a legal
case where they could earn hundreds of thousands of dollars from
Cornwell.

The lawyers' scheme worked; Patricia Cornwell agreed to spend hundreds
of thousands of dollars to have Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs banned and
destroyed, and Sachs' freedom of speech was instantly banned a few
weeks later. Cornwell's money that she has spent to have Sachs banned
and destroyed, including bribes to the President Bush family to ensure
she would not be prosecuted, have now totalled an estimated
approximate US $2 million.)

For the documents from US government and courthouse files, proving
that Patricia Cornwell committed felony perjury, see here:

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/f4wsdabw7b/2984/cornwell-testimony-p-1.jpg

http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/caev0lgnoh/2982/cornwell-perjury.jpg

10. Dissident Dr Les Sachs risks his life to make one last brave stand
inside the USA - Transcript of Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs in a Virginia
courtroom, 8 May 2003, confronting Patricia Cornwell case lawyer
Thomas 'Tom' H. Roberts, friend of US Federal Judge Robert Payne -
from US Virginia and Federal courthouses, US Dept of Justice, European
police files:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05

11. United States Federal Appeals Court and US Supreme Court filings,
detailing criminal acts among author Patricia Cornwell, US Federal
Judge Robert Payne and others, in attacks upon dissident Jewish-
heritage journalist and political refugee Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs - from
US Federal courthouse, US Dept of Justice, and European police files:

Standing Appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth
(4th) Circuit,
and to the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act Study Committee of the
Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court Justice Stephen G.
Breyer, Chairperson; Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III managing case for
both bodies

Case Numbers (United States Federal Fourth [4th] Circuit):
Civ. Action No. 3:00CV229, Civ. Action No. 3:07CV236
Re: Patricia D. (Daniels) Cornwell, Dr Les (Leslie Raymond) Sachs,
Judge Robert E. Payne, and other named parties:

http://mytinyurl.net/ccf8ce

For more background details, see recent articles:

Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les
Sachs

http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581

Also at: http://mytinyurl.net/10e98

Patricia Cornwell buys US courts to block websites to help murder
author of Cornwell biography

http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259

Also at: http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e

Dan Hajidah

Abdan "Dan" Hajidah is a researcher who has supplied documented source
material to journalists at leading news outlets in Europe. He spreads
his time among several northern European countries.

Dan can be reached by e-mail at: dh-...@europe.com

This is published with a maximally open Creative Commons Licence:
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0"
src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/80x15.png"/></a><br/>This
work is licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>.