> It does not seem like a Kerouac poem to me.
>
> Can anyone prove me wrong?
>
> Dave Moore
I just brought home Jack Kerouac's Wake Up, which I've never read but always
seem to think the style is not the average Kerouac, more of a "biographer"
atyle, so I figured that Kerouac could write in a style with no continuity
to his previous writing.
But now this review describes it that even Wake Up could be included on the
side of the Dulouz Myrthos, iow unmistakable wild old Jack:
http://thedailybeatblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/review-jack-kerouacs-wake-up-life-of.html
"...Instead, it was spontaneous prose meets esoteric obtusity. This book is
neither for the faint of heart nor the Buddhist beginner [...] While I'm
glad I read Wake Up, I'll stick with The Dharma Bums, my favorite Kerouac
novel, which Thurman describes as "the most accurate, poetic, and expansive
evocation of the heart of Buddhism that was available at that time" (p.
viii). In an "Author's Note," Kerouac describes Wake Up as "a handbook for
Western understanding of the ancient Law" (p. 5). At least for me, he partly
failed on that score, but it's good to read something challenging from time
to time and Wake Up certainly fits that bill..."
That still doesn't much make me think that the J. Edgar Hoover poem is
really written by Jack Kerouac, it reads more like something one of the
latter-day Beats would have written, in the later, a bit more swinging
times.
> "Will Dockery" wrote in message news:kh0r3m$rg7$1...@dont-email.me...