Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Matthew Desmond Strikes Back and Chadpuppets are in denial

7 views
Skip to first unread message

A dead horse

unread,
Feb 19, 2023, 6:49:25 PM2/19/23
to
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadwe...@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFA76B14384...@88.198.57.247:

> Laz Mann <laz...@protonmail.com> wrote in
> news:828aa582-3b5d-4c28...@googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 9:55:49 AM UTC-8, Davey Zimmerman
>> #274 wrote:
>>> Laz Mann <laz...@protonmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:0cb1ffea-58ff-4959...@googlegroups.com:
>>> > On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 5:26:49 PM UTC-8, Davey Zimmerman
>>> > #274 wrote:
>>> >> Laz Mann <laz...@protonmail.com> wrote in
>>> >> news:8935dc51-1f64-441b...@googlegroups.com:
>>> >> > On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 1:24:54 PM UTC-8, Davey
>>> >> > Zimmerman #274 wrote:
>>> >> >> Laz Mann <laz...@protonmail.com> wrote in
>>> >> >> news:8abfc34e-5d41-4399...@googlegroups.com:
>>> >> >> > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:19:29 PM UTC-8, Tony Connor
>>> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 01:55:19 -0000 (UTC), Davey Zimmerman
>>> >> >> >> #274 wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> > Laz Mann <laz...@protonmail.com> wrote in
>>> >> >> >> > news:3d1d422c-4282-4a87...@googlegroups.com:
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >> As predictably as a sunset, Desmond and his army of
>>> >> >> >> >> trolls have descended on the comment section of one of
>>> >> >> >> >> JH's fund-raising videos.
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoQIHaO5wSU
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Living in his head for 13 years? Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > The fearsome Alex Cain too! It's Rent Free Day for John.
>>> >> >> >> > Too bad the hotel wants money. Get grifting, John! There
>>> >> >> >> > are sheep to be sheared!
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > PS: I called it with Desmond. Never fuck with the
>>> >> >> >> > Zimmermen.
>>> >> >> >> LOL, DeFuckpuppet actually thinks that's Matthew Desmond.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > The Matthew Desmond account commenting on JH's YouTube
>>> >> >> > video is from 2012. What makes you think it isn't Matt
>>> >> >> > Desmond?
>>> >> >> It's always fun to watch the Chadpuppets have a fight. But it's
>>> >> >> Matt, all right. I warned you F'losers that Matt was on the
>>> >> >> case. I see he invited some new friends of mine too.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Calling on Matt Desmond to kick JH while he's down is low.
>>> >> > Desmond calling on his blind, deluded followers to join in
>>> >> > the John-bashing is even lower.
>>> >> Silly Chadpuppet! You have it backwards. Matt called me. John
>>> >> likes to demonize people without even having the guts to do it to
>>> >> their face. He also appears to have blocked Matt from the Facebook
>>> >> page. So much for honesty and transparency.
>>> >>
>>> >> But it appears JH is still mouthing off, albeit in his usual
>>> >> incoherent way that gets the sheep bleating.
>>> >>
>>> >> John Henry
>>> >> "Daniel Jager That dude wouldn't dare face me life, I'd hand him
>>> >> his ass and he know it."
>>> >
>>> > So, a challenge for debate has been called, and all Matt Desmond
>>> > has to say in response is... inaccurate disparagement of JH on
>>> > a YouTube comment thread where he can't be fact-checked or
>>> > otherwise moderated.
>>> Where is John proposing to debate?
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>> How about in the middle of a f'n ring? This isn't a game. Matthew
>> Desmond, from one account, ruined John's entire life. Some have
>> speculated that he recently cut the brake lines on John's Jeep.
>> Words alone aren't going to settle it - though with a 150 (give or
>> take) IQ, John, who was a gifted child, would clearly trounce him
>> in a straightforward meeting of minds.
>>
>>> He blocked him on Facebook. He can't
>>> do that on youtube but he won't debate there. Fact checking is simply
>>> providing evidence. John has none because he's lying, delusional and
>>> a grifter. Moderation? John moderates by blocking people and deleting
>>> what people said. He even deletes what he said.
>>>
>>> John will not meet where he doesn't control the medium. He runs away
>>> instead. Look what happened to him 4 years ago here in RSPW. He
>>> hasn't been back since.
>>
>> He was recently invited back, in the YouTube comments. You had
>> best pray that he does not return. It wasn't pretty last time, and it
>> will be even uglier next.
>
> It was so ugly, John ran off like the coward that he is. He won't come
> here, people will laugh at him again. It's not like they ever stopped
> laughing at the pathetic mooch.
>
>>>
>>> > John is correct. QED.
>>>
>>> John is a liar. QED.
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>>> >> He mouthed off about Alex Cain for decades even though Alex had
>>> >> nothing to do with him, the same went for Mr. Desmond. I guess he
>>> >> feels a need for attention so he can play the victim for the next
>>> >> "fundraiser".
>>> >
>>> > JH is *on the streets* thanks to the actions of a sex offender, a
>>> > spiteful fake-leftist blogger, and a cruel landlord. He *is* a
>>> > victim. He doesn't need to play one.
>>> Evidence of those claims is expected to be provided. Where is it?
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>>> >> >> > JH knows it's Matt Desmond, the real one, and his friends,
>>> >> >> > poverty shaming, stigmatizing mental illness, and dogpiling
>>> >> >> > him to prove that they're real progressives who would never
>>> >> >> > do something as dumb and fascist as poverty shame,
>>> >> >> > stigmatize mental illness, or herd attacks...
>>> >> >> He's laughing at Johm blaming everyone but himself and his own
>>> >> >> bad decisions for being a mooching scumbag that rips off
>>> >> >> gullible sheep.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > John isn't a scumbag. Most of the things that have gone wrong
>>> >> > in his life can be attributed to either bad luck or malfeasance
>>> >> > on the part of others with bad motives.
>>> >> It's so hard to believe bad decisions, beating women and being an
>>> >> asshole had no small part in that. How is it that Matt Desmond has
>>> >> such power over John? How about Alex Cain?
>>> >
>>> > Constant invocation of JH's past - which he has evolved from - is
>>> > disrespectful to those women.
>>> What evidence is there for that?
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>>> >> But let's hear about the "bad luck or malfeasance on the part of
>>> >> others with bad motives".
>>> >>
>>> >> Evidence, please?
>>> >
>>> > Feel free to watch the video.
>>> I laughed at it. It's all baseless claims without substance.
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>>> >> >> > Desmond still hasn't figured it out. He thinks because he's
>>> >> >> > too stupid to understand the damage he's doing (or he's
>>> >> >> > dishonest enough to pretend to be that stupid) that it
>>> >> >> > magically makes the damage someone else's fault. Never mind
>>> >> >> > that he's not even capable of putting up a believable
>>> >> >> > pretense of leftist thinking and behavior in the first place.
>>> >> >> There is no pretense. Conover is a very accomplished writer
>>> >> >> too. It must really chap his ass that Conover gets paid for her
>>> >> >> work legitimately and doesn't have to beg suckers.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Licking plutocrat boot under the guise of being a leftist isn't
>>> >> > what JH ever wanted to do, so I doubt he's bothered by her or
>>> >> > her artificial, fascist-enabling "career".
>>> >> So you have evidence of that?
>>> >>
>>> >> It goes here:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > [Her work and her associations speak for themselves. My posts
>>> > aren't really intended for people who are too stupid to understand
>>> > a simple sentence or idea, like the concept of cause and effect.]
>>> Particularly when John doesn't explain it and instead insults the
>>> person.
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>>> >> > Did you even watch the video? In it, John explains why he lacks
>>> >> > the fame, reach, stability, and security of vultures like
>>> >> > Conover and Desmond - and it has nothing to do with "bad
>>> >> > decisions," unless voluntarily choosing to step away from the
>>> >> > fetters of capitalism is a "bad decision".
>>> >> It starts from a bad premise and the usual claims that can't be
>>> >> backed up with evidence. From there it devolved into more nonsense
>>> >> that has no basis in a sane reality.
>>> >
>>> > So you really didn't watch it, then. Here is a transcript:
>>> Evidence isn't "Because John says so". HTH.
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>>> > "Hey there folks John Henry from JohnHenry.us and the founder
>>> > of custode. We are here in the middle of the uh ten thousand dollar
>>> > fundraiser to start the year 2023 because I am just about on the
>>> > streets I am almost homeless and I have very very little to work
>>> > with um there are more details about that in some of the other
>>> > videos there is uh information links uh in the lower third and in
>>> > the picture and picture that are on the screen here throughout
>>> > these videos and I appreciate all the help that you can give
>>> > whether it's five dollars or five thousand thank you thank you
>>> > thank you you are saving my life and helping me assure that I can
>>> > continue doing the work that I do for the rest of my life so uh I
>>> > wanted to talk a little bit about why you may not have seen me even
>>> > though I've been out here for you know well over a decade doing
>>> > this on a pretty steady basis back in 2010 I ran across this
>>> > website called addictinginfo who was looking for writers and I
>>> > went to check them out and came across the story about Michelle
>>> > Bachmann's uh fans editing Wikipedia blah blah I looked at it and
>>> > something caught my eye about it and I went and dug through it and
>>> > realized that it wasn't quite uh is is as it was portrayed and so I
>>> > left a comment it was polite it was you know decent was really hey
>>> > this uh thing and the guy who owned the place Matt Desmond just
>>> > went ballistic and it turned into this whole big drama thing where
>>> > him and a bunch of these other big people you know Americans
>>> > against the tea party and the Everlasting this and occupy that and
>>> > uh the the Rivero Brothers there at occupyDemocrats were were
>>> > involved in this and uh that uh American News accident that clown
>>> > and a whole bunch of other people uh and they basically all got
>>> > together in a little cool kids table in the back smoke-filled rooms
>>> > of Facebook and decided that they weren't going to share my work
>>> > and if anybody else did then they were you know basically they
>>> > blacklisted me uh and they told smaller pages that if they shared
>>> > my work then their work would not be shared on the larger pages and
>>> > these are pages that have you know millions of followers and
>>> > readers uh and so uh now it's becoming entrenched thing and you
>>> > know they've sent you know dozens and hundreds of trolls after
>>> > me uh and you know to to pollute uh the comments sections and erase
>>> > hell every time I try to raise any money or do anything to support
>>> > myself or or get ahead with anything uh in my work and so that is
>>> > uh the short story of why you probably have not heard of me uh and
>>> > fundamentally it comes down to uh once I started getting involved
>>> > with these people I realize that they're not leftists they're not
>>> > progressive they're not uh any of that stuff what they are is
>>> > grifters what they are is uh pandering to biases so that they can
>>> > make a big bunch of money and shuffle it around and hide it behind
>>> > uh you know paperwork and so on and so forth and pretend that
>>> > they're doing something when what they're really doing is copying
>>> > and pasting tweets into templates all day and working off other
>>> > people's work and manufacturing a lot of nonsense to keep traffic
>>> > flowing to their sites so they roll in money without caring about
>>> > the damage that they're doing to the political and social situation
>>> > in the country and into the end analysis they are partially
>>> > responsible for Donald Trump uh because of what they did and they
>>> > did not do in the 2016 race and they are very much also partially
>>> > responsible for the situation that we are in now with
>>> > disinformation and misinformation and our entire political process
>>> > being turned into this uh you know advertisement marketing exercise
>>> > where everybody's out to make a buck and nobody really cares
>>> > whether anything happens or whether we stay alive um I hold my
>>> > folks in my band of the spectrum to uh to standards and I believe
>>> > that Integrity is absolutely critical to you know the success of
>>> > progressive missions and human evolution uh and uh that makes me a
>>> > direct threat to people who profit by manipulation and by pushing
>>> > bumper sticker slogan earring and uh you know Meme of politics and
>>> > so on and so forth and that's not there's nothing wrong with a meme
>>> > I use them myself but when that's the substance of what you do and
>>> > you don't even use your own work to do it uh you're not
>>> > contributing anything to the conversation what you're doing is
>>> > sucking all the air out of room for other people and I am other
>>> > people and that is why you have not heard of me and that is one of
>>> > the machines that I've been fighting against for the last 12 years
>>> > uh as I try to continue doing what I do and that is why I need your
>>> > help to do it so please like share get engaged let people know I'm
>>> > out here you've got the website information I'm all over the place
>>> > I'm constantly kicking out new work as well uh please do get
>>> > engaged please do let people know bring them onto my social media
>>> > platforms uh tell them about me and if you can of course contribute
>>> > using one of these links that are floating around the screen thank
>>> > you very much for watching we will be back with a more short video
>>> > goes very very soon have a great day."
>>> >
>>> > Cite one piece of "nonsense" or claim without evidence.
>>> What evidence? It's all his hearsay and claims without a single bit
>>> of tangible facts. The ramen comment was a side-splitter though. John
>>> is one great big rerun. Same old recycled shit and "Paypal me now".
>
> Lack of response noted.
>
>>> >> >> as you'll see, John is so disrespectul to the wimmenfolks like
>>> >> >> the lovely and charming Conover. I'll bet he was super nice to
>>> >> >> Beth Aultman until she ran out of money too.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Beth has nothing to do with this, and your constant references
>>> >> > to her are demeaning, misogynistic, and disrespectful.
>>> >> John opened that door. But your claims are more pot banging and
>>> >> distraction from how John used her for tens of thousands of
>>> >> dollars and never repaid her with anything but treachery and
>>> >> demonization to the people he fleeces. Pointing that out has
>>> >> nothing to do with your bullshit about anyone else but John being
>>> >> "demeaning, misogynistic, and disrespectful".
>>> >
>>> > Conover and Beth have nothing in common besides the fact that
>>> > they are women. To mention Beth in that comparison is misogyny.
>>> Here's another woman John demonized. See a pattern yet?
>>>
>>> Kara Mac - 5 hours ago
>>> "Funny what the public opinion is when he can't block and rage in a
>>> vacuum. Hey John- I most certainly did donate to you. You claim to
>>> search lists and I was not there. Newsflash- people have partners,
>>> accounts have different names. Glad to know it was so appreciated"
>>> > [snip copyrighted content not posted in accordance with fair use
>>> > provisions]
>>
>> That account was created yesterday, solely for the purpose of
>> commenting on JH's video.
>
> Given how John accuses people and threatens to stalk them and lies about
> police reports (see Alex Cain), I can't blame a person for wanting to
> not give him a chance to go RL on them. So how does this make her
> comments any less legitimate?
>
>> I didn't respond to several of your interjections because my
>> Internet connection is too unreliable right now.
>
> Admission of defeat noted.
>
>> We'll discuss
>> specific proofs at a later date, when my Internet connection
>> is working better.
>
> Run away, Chadpuppet!
>
>> It really, it comes down to this: either you
>> believe John Henry is an honourable, ethical, trustworthy, loyal,
>> helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty,
>> brave, clean, and reverent individual, and his first-hand accounts of
>> abuse at the hands of Mr. Desmond & cabal are believable, and his
>> position on the Beth story is the truth, and his stated motives for
>> fund raising are factual, et cetera, or you find him to be a liar, and
>> nothing he says can be trusted.
>
> I believe John when he says he needs money, but not for the reasons he
> claims. Other than that, he's a proven liar.
>
> Beth Aultman is likely only the most well known of the people he's
> mooched from. Kara Mac also mentions donating to the mooching ingrate.
>
>> Let's remember that with 78.9% of the total vote, RSPW elected
>> for John Henry to be the very first inductee into the RSPW Hall
>> of Fame. To RSPWers, he'll always be remembered as a legend.
>>
>> It's safe to say: RSPW believes John Henry.
>
> Who is here defending that scumbag other than you?
>
> Let's put back the content you snipped.
>
> Kara Mac - 5 hours ago
> "Funny what the public opinion is when he can't block and rage in a
> vacuum. Hey John- I most certainly did donate to you. You claim to
> search lists and I was not there. Newsflash- people have partners,
> accounts have different names. Glad to know it was so appreciated"
>
>
>> [snip copyrighted content not posted in accordance with fair use
>> provisions]
>
> Fair use in a public forum is protected speech, Chadpuppet.
>
> Here's my favorite!
>
> lledoux1 - "Nonstop talk big about "kicking out content" that always,
> always, always had some complication that is someone else's fault for
> why he can't get it done. The begging videos always seem to get done
> though."
>
> Let's put it right back!
>
> Enjoy!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoQIHaO5wSU
>
> Let's see what she (and Matt and others too) have to say about that
> unethical scumbag.
>
> Conover Kennard - 2 days ago
> "Matthew Desmond is "responsible for Donald Trump" because of an
> article on Michelle Bachman? ????"
>
> John Henry - 2 days ago
> "Hi. My material isn't really intended for people who are too stupid to
> understand a simple sentence or idea, like the concept of cause and
> effect."
>
> Conover Kennard - 2 days ago
> "@John Henry If you don't want people to see it, then don't put it on
> YouTube."
>
> Matthew Desmond - 2 days ago
> "Wow, 13 years of living in your head rent free now. That’s pretty
> generous in this economy. Imagine how many grifting campaigns you could
> have avoided if you actually charged for all that unused space I’ve been
> taking up. Thanks for the giggle though! Out of all the people who have
> stalked and failed at doxxing me you’re by far the goofiest ?"
>
> Matthew Desmond - 2 days ago
> "Also if I’m an all powerful wizard who is single handedly preventing
> you from doing what you do using my troll army and cabal of page owners
> wouldn’t it be a bad idea to make videos that draw me to your account
> and give me and my friends the opportunity to downvote your shit? You’re
> really committed to putting the “low” in lowgenius. I hope your next
> begathon is a smashing success! "
>
> Matthew Desmond - 2 days ago
> "@Conover Kennard that’s not even the craziest thing he’s ever blamed
> me for. He blames me for him being homeless. Because he refuses to work
> and just begs for money on the internet. He thinks he’s God’s gift to
> podcasting but in reality his content is cringey and unhinged which is
> why no one ever shares it. He did make a video once though years ago, a
> different time when he was blaming me for being homeless, where he
> smashed his own computer monitor wrestler style and cut his hand hella
> bad. Ranting about how everything that happens to him is my fault. I
> gotta find you some of those old videos, they’re WILD."
>
> "Conover Kennard - 1 day ago
> @Matthew Desmond I'm just curious. Has he ever thought of, I don't
> know, getting a job?"
>
> Matthew Desmond - 1 day ago
> "@Conover Kennard he looks down on people who do actual jobs. I can’t
> remember the term he uses for them but it’s wild he doesn’t have any
> self awareness."
>
> Matthew Desmond - 1 day ago
> "@Conover Kennard he’s a scam artist. He constantly accuses people of
> being scam artists and tells people he’s the only voice they can
> actually trust, like a cult leader. Then he tells his followers it’s all
> my fault and all their fault for not supporting him."
>
> Evgenia George - 1 day ago
> "He does buy ethica1 gyros"
>
> Conover Kennard - 1 day ago
> " @Matthew Desmond Holy fuckballs. And I thought I had weird trolls. "
>
> Kara Mac - 1 day ago
> "He drips jealousy of you out of every pore as he plays that he is so
> above all he craves. Sort of pitiful."
>
> Gale Sayers - 20 hours ago
> "@Matthew Desmond Have you ever seen his Toilet videos though?"
>
> Gale Sayers - 20 hours ago
> "He wants people who do "scut work" to pay him to do what he does with
> their hard earned cash...because it's not like EVERYONE doesn't have
> things they enjoy doing more than their jobs...most of the time at
> least. And he firmly believes that the people out here busting our asses
> instead of playing music full-time, or writing, or whatever else we
> love to do, because we need to survive! And he thinks WE should pay HIM
> our money so he can live out his narcissistic messiah fantasy, year
> after year. I've never seen anything else like it."
>
> lledoux1 - 19 hours ago
> "It's so crazy. "Work" mmmmmm-okay ??
> The arrogance and condescension are infuriating. He is the most
> Trump-like anti-Trumper ever. Nonstop talk big about "kicking out
> content" that always, always, always had some complication that is
> someone else's fault for why he can't get it done. The begging videos
> always seem to get done though."
>
> Matthew Desmond - 1 hour ago
> "@Gale Sayers “scut work.” That was the derogatory term he uses for
> people who aren’t lazy grifters. The people he actively steals money
> from."
>
> Matthew Desmond - 1 hour ago
> "@lledoux1 even his begging videos are subpar like this guy literally
> can’t do anything right."
>
> Matthew Desmond - 1 hour ago
> " @Conover Kennard he calls getting a job “doing scut work” and
> derogatorily refers to people with real jobs, the people he cons out of
> their money, as “scut workers.” He also brags about the fact he hasn’t
> been laid in over a decade and about how he used to do coke and beat
> women. 13 years this guy has been trying to get my attention and he’s
> gotten more on this post than in the previous 13 years combined ??"
>
> Matthew Desmond - 51 minutes ago
> " @Conover Kennard with how much he rants about me to strangers online
> about how I’m responsible for his 60+ year old self failing at life I
> can’t imagine what he subjects people to irl. Like eventually he’s just
> gonna be on a corner begging for change ranting about Matthew Desmond
> ruining his life. Fun fact- dude was already failing at life before I
> was even born. But somehow it’s all my fault he never developed a work
> ethic or the ability to entertain people."
>
> Conover Kennard - 18 hours ago
> " @Matthew Desmond I'm gonna start blaming you for random shit, too, so
> I don't have to be held responsible for my mistakes in life."
>
> Matthew Desmond - 14 hours ago
> " @WHM / Tony DiBern you seem gullible if you think this dude is a
> victim"
>
> WHM / Tony DiBern - 13 hours ago
> " @Matthew Desmond why are you trying to convince me? you have your
> mind made up."
>
>
> WHM / Tony DiBern - 10 hours ago
> @Matthew Desmond sounds like a you problem. I'd have done a whole lot
> worse to you, tbh."
>
> Kara Mac - 5 hours ago
> "Funny what the public opinion is when he can't block and rage in a
> vacuum. Hey John- I most certainly did donate to you. You claim to
> search lists and I was not there. Newsflash- people have partners,
> accounts have different names. Glad to know it was so appreciated"

Some interesting new comments:

Kara Mac
4 days ago
So he got about $2800 out of people in the last 30 days. $420 on hotel, maybe $100
on van rental ( generous guesstimate)
Now he is broke again.
WTF did the other $2000 go!?!?!?
4
Reply

John Henry
·

5 replies
Matthew Desmond
Matthew Desmond
4 days ago
How dare you question his ethical grifting! This man is a saint who only used 100%
of other people’s money for his hotel rooms and nothing else! He definitely
didn’t admit to paying for an auto publisher he couldn’t even use for a week.
2
Reply
Kara Mac
Kara Mac
4 days ago
I did read he bought some card for computer because hotel wifi wasn't strong
enough. And he paid for autoposter or whatever. But $2k??
He could have paid landlord up- the guy was clearly patient! You might hate it
but is homeless better?? He could have been restarted at zero only needing $500/
month.
Now he needs $1600/ month ??
You have to feel pity at some point. He couldn't make worse choices. No one does
that on PURPOSE.
3
Reply
John Henry
John Henry
4 days ago
@Kara Mac If you were paying attention you'd have answers. You don't want
answers. You want me ended.

You're shit out of luck.
Reply
Kara Mac
Kara Mac
4 days ago
@John Henry no, I don't want you "ended" there is no glee. I don't know you, yet
feel a panic for you. You need to snap out of the paranoia and find reality.
Total strangers are not out to get you.
You want the world to watch you. Some are. You just don't like what we see.
Those cheerleading your impossible plans? THEY are not being kind. You need a
reality check. I am glad you are saved for a week. And maybe it will happen again!
But I am 100% sure that rather than spend this week seeking employment, and a way
to help yourself, there will be yet on more "this is it! The end of JH!"
Stop with the unemployable. You are not. Walmart greeters do just fine.
Sooner or later those who have been kind won't be able to keep bailing you out.
4
Reply


Matthew Desmond
8 days ago (edited)
@Kara Mac it’s not his own fault he’s a failure it’s successful people who have
only gotten successful by perpetually keeping their boot on his neck and it has
absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he’s never produced anything of any
value and the only things he posts that people are interested in is when he
creates conspiracy theories about why he’s failed at life. That must be it!
2
Reply
Matthew Desmond
Matthew Desmond
7 days ago
@Gale Sayers the fact I’ve heard him say “there’s a suck born every minute” and
how he rants about how he could never be a televangelist or anything like that
because ETHICS, without even a hint of self awareness of how he uses people to
fund his lazy lifestyle, is just mind boggling to me. Like if I was failing that
badly I’d have a long hard look in the mirror and ask what I was doing wrong but
this guy looks in the mirror and says “you’re perfect, it’s them that are making
you fail.” Like there’s a reason his own family wrote him off, and they know him
better than anyone. It doesn’t take a low genius to figure this out.
2
Reply
Kara Mac
Kara Mac
4 days ago
@Matt Desmond just had a ten year old video of his pop up. Living in a car,
bitching about the value of stereos in people's car. Pissy they spent money on
that instead of saving him with their money.
I give up. This is nothing new, it isn't a real crisis, it's just long term
choices.
But I'll bet you already knew that. It would be sad but the angry entitlement
makes it infuriating.
4
Reply
Matthew Desmond
Matthew Desmond
4 days ago
@Kara Mac there is no one he won’t blame for his own failures. His narcissistic
ego is too big to accept he’s failed at everything he’s done except that one
brief job he had.
1
Reply
Kara Mac
Kara Mac
3 days ago
@Matthew Desmond head over to live videos- maybe 4 or 5 down titled Finally back.
He's on a roll of insults and big indignant words.
1
Reply
Matthew Desmond
Matthew Desmond
3 days ago
@Kara Mac I watched that one and it’s goofy af but who did he con into giving
him another $800? ??
Reply
Kara Mac
Kara Mac
3 days ago
@Matthew Desmond no idea. Not me ??
But predictably the $10k fundraiser isn't enough now. Oh man who could have seen
THAT coming.
And he had a great "work" day- shared a bunch of 11 year old videos. We should
all work so hard ??
2
Reply
Matthew Desmond
Matthew Desmond
3 days ago
@Kara Mac we’re just scuts who don’t understand the ethics of republishing old
content to beg for money because we’re too lazy to do real work.
3
Reply
lledoux1
lledoux1
2 days ago
@Matthew Desmond it is amazing. He posted this:
"Hey if all this is such a big scam why do I spend so much time pointing out how
to avoid scams and scammers and manipulators and predators?"
Ummmmm.......... seriously??
????????
Oldest trick in the book!!! Watch out for them, I will tell you the truth, I am
on your side, I am selflessly saving you at my own expense........ so give me
money. I love you.
2
Reply
Kara Mac
Kara Mac
1 day ago
Kara Mac
1 second ago
@Gale Sayers I was scrolling back wondering how long he has been playing this
game and came across the toilet one. I can't unsee it, so have started drinking
early to try to forget ??
12 years ago way down the video list. Same whining- literally the same words,
same complaints, same poor me. 12 years and he still can't figure out how to get
it together.
3
Reply
Conover Kennard
Conover Kennard
1 day ago
@Kara Mac Cheers! I'm having a drink right now.
1
Reply
Kara Mac
Kara Mac
1 day ago
@Conover Kennard if you watch that toilet video you're gonna need a few ??
2
Reply
Gale Sayers
Gale Sayers
1 day ago
@Kara Mac Did he tell us what he did that he's being extorted for? I figure it
must be really bad for him to come out the way he has and announce it.
There's always more to the story. And I found it pretty disturbing, he said in
one of his recent videos that he acknowledged he's never going to be attracted to
women his own age.
It sounds bad.
Reply

0 new messages