The Jason Gortician Drug Test Challenge

[Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III]

"subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
news:a92dnRTg7IC...@rogers.com:

> "Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com>
> wrote in message news:Xns972BD8004...@207.14.113.17...
>> "subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
>> news:7t2dnUSsRsN...@rogers.com:
>>
>> > "Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote in message news:Xns972BBC3D8...@207.14.113.17...
>> >> "subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
>> >> news:a5udnZN2pOC3zALe...@rogers.com:
>> >>
>> >> > "...You're on drugs!" Is that the best
>> >> > you can do?
>> >>
>> >> PKB.
>> >
>> > Unlikely.
>>
>>
>> 5 years, is it? You still don't know what those three letters mean?
>>
>> Saying "You're on drugs" is the best you can do, James. That's a PKB
>> when you say someone else is lame for doing the same thing you do.
>
> I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.

Care to put your money where your mouth is? I'll wager anything you'd
like, against anything you'd care to lose.

All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.

> Therefore no PKB.

No, dildo. This has nothing to do with doing drugs. It has to do with you
calling someone lame for saying the same thing you say.

Maybe you can Google the phrase "Pot-kettle-black" and do a little
reading on the subject?

Hint: it doesn't have anything to do with pot.

--
People think I'm a snob, but it's just because I'm better than they are.

http://www.bedoper.com
http://beosnews.com/

[The U.S. Constitution]

"Sir Terrance N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com>
wrote in news:Xns972CCDAB...@207.14.113.17:

> "subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
> news:3th1q1prah6lbmst4...@4ax.com:
>
>> On 15 Dec 2005 00:51:01 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance
>> N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...] Jason does drugs and admits to doing drugs among other criminal
>> activities.
>>
>>:>:>:>:>:>> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.

>>:>:>:>:>:>>
>>:>:>:>:>:>> Care to put your money where your mouth is?
>>:>:>:>:

>>:>:>:>:I take it that's a "no".
>>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:> Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know
>>:>:>:> how attribs work?
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
>>:>
>>:> Why did you stop talking to yourself? Because I pointed out how
>>:> stupid it made you look? :)
>>:
>>:Talking to you is probably stupid, so you're close to correct.
>>
>> And you're an autospank commando. :)
>
> Am I an award-winning autospank commando?
>
> Bear in mind, James, that any "stupidity" on my part stems from
> interacting with you.
>
> Keep a little perspective when claiming "autospank".
>
>>:>:> Tsk. Tsk. You're guilty of a cowardly post edit, I already
>>:>:> responded to this drek before you rearranged the post to suit
>>:>:> your cowardly ways, thusly...
>>:>:>
>>:>:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
>>:>:>
>>:>:> <_v6dnf3DF5S...@rogers.com>
>>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
>>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>>:>:>
>>:>:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
>>:>:
>>:>:
>>:>:What's it like to be so stupid, James?
>>:>
>>:> Well let's see, since I'm so smart I wouldn't know. How's that for
>>:> a conundrum?
>>:
>>:Masterful.
>>
>> Gracias, bendeco.
>>
>>:>:There was no question of "You have done drugs in the past". You
>>:>:claim I do drugs, in the present.
>>:>
>>:> To which I already answered:
>>:>
>>:> Queues soundbyte:
>>:>
>>:> "Once a junkie always a junkie. Never trust a junkie." -- Chloe
>>:> Webb as Nancy Spungen.
>>:>
>>:> If you're not satisfied with that answer then I'm afraid you have a
>>:> problem. And unfortunately for you, it's my final answer.
>>:
>>:Sure it is.
>>:
>>:I do drugs, currently, because you saw "Sid and Nancy".
>>:
>>:Priceless.
>>
>> Actually it's an ancient proverb quoted from the movie, dingbat.
>
>
> And how did this movie teach you that I now do drugs?
>
>
>>:>:And, in typical Koput fashion, you claim immediate victory. While
>>:>:running. Away.
>>:>
>>:> When did I run away? I'm right here laughing at your current
>>:> humiliation.
>>:
>>:Is that your final answer?
>>
>> I'll take "Autospanking Snuhtard" for $200, Alex.
>
> Your final answer seems to go on and on.
>
>>:>:>:>:>:>> I'll wager anything

>>:>:>:>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.

>>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:Scared.
>>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by
>>:>:>:> chattering nervously aloud to himself.
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
>>:>:>
>>:>:> See restored text you cowardly post editor.
>>:>:
>>:>:Your restored text doesn't answer the question, James.
>>:>
>>:> Sure it does, it says quite plainly that since you've already
>>:> admitted to drug use and molesting skanky ho's, you've already
>>:> autospanked on a point that has previously been decided and
>>:> settled.
>>:
>>:Ah, so I do drugs. Because you say so.
>>
>> You do drugs because you admit to taking addictive narcotics.
>
> No, James. I admit that I have done drugs in the past. I do not do
> drugs now.
>
> Are you really this thick?
>
> Aside from being prissy and prudish, I mean?
>
>
>>:But you won't actually back up your words.
>>
>> Here we go again; please see "reposting Jason's autospank again"
>> below for further information.
>
> Again, thicky. How does an admission that I've (gasp!) done drugs
> somehow prove that I currently do drugs, and am a "junkie"?
>
>
>
>
>
>>:You, on the other hand, have claimed to have banged 1000 women. All
>>:virgins, apparently.
>>
>> I never said anything about virgins...post proof.
>
> None of them were "skanky", right?
>
> How about you post a shred of proof of your now legendary claim that
> you've had over 1000 women?
>
> How many have you had this month, James?
>
> ; )
>
>>:>:>:>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
>>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
>>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
>>:>:>:> conversation for a little while longer...
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
>>:>:>
>>:>:> Refer back to article
>>:>:> <kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com>, before you made the
>>:>:> cowardly post edit rearrangement.
>>:>:
>>:>:Refer back to your two previous referrals.
>>:>
>>:> What for? I'm not the one clumsily rearranging text.
>>:
>>:No, you're just writing it. Clumsily.
>>
>> Poor Jason, reduced to IKYABWAI's.
>
> How is it that you don't know what word mean, after five, and some say
> ten years on Usenet?
>
>
>
>>:>:>:>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
>>:>:>:>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>>:>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> Are you fucking blind?
>>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old
>>:>:>:>:stuff, and claiming I "do drugs".
>>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
>>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind,
>>:>:>:>:and you're merely stupid.
>>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you
>>:>:>:> fucking flake?
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:I'm talking to you, cornflake.
>>:>:>
>>:>:> And I'm trying to ignore the hilarious bit where you were caught
>>:>:> chattering nervously aloud to yourself. But it's too funny.
>>:>:> HAHAHAHA.
>>:>:
>>:>:This is why you're the resident mascot.
>>:>
>>:> What a.f. thinks of me in their current vote for their 2005 Special
>>:> O-lame-pics, is an excellent demonstration of the effect my flames
>>:> have had on these voters.
>>:
>>:Clearly, they have always feared you.
>>
>> Actually whatever they think is not my problem.
>
> ...said the laughingstock.
>
>
>>:>:>:>:> -----reposting Jason's autospank again-----
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> From: Tupac Chopra <mas...@mason.snuh>
>>:>:>:>:> <Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
>>:>:>:>:> I heard a good one about Gibby of the Surfers, after he cut
>>:>:>:>:> that track with Ministry. As several people have noted, when
>>:>:>:>:> Gibby came back from Chicago, he was doing every drug he
>>:>:>:>:> could get his hands on, all the time.
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> So, the kid says he went to some dope house or another, I
>>:>:>:>:> guess in Texas. As he was coming in, he says, someone stood
>>:>:>:>:> up and blew the biggest cloud of crack smoke he had ever seen
>>:>:>:>:> in his life and walked out. And this kid has probably seen a
>>:>:>:>:> few. The exhaler was of course, Gibby.
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> I had a pot and acid dealer I worked with in Baton Rouge. He
>>:>:>:>:> was bi, and he sold to skinheads. He was a weird chap.
>>:>:>:>:> Anyway, he gets a call "HR from Bad Brains is in town, and he
>>:>:>:>:> wants some pot."
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> Well, send him over...
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> So HR comes, and, we'll call him "Bob", puts down a QP or
>>:>:>:>:> whatever in front of him. "Help yourself, man".
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> HR rolled grabbed a huge handful and threw it into a piece of
>>:>:>:>:> newspaper. Rolled it up into a cone, and smoked the whole
>>:>:>:>:> thing. Then he left without ever saying a word.
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> A few years later, I saw HR in New Orleans, so I related the
>>:>:>:>:> tale to him and asked him about it.
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> He STILL didn't say a single word. I still don't know if he
>>:>:>:>:> doesn't talk to white people, or if he was on acid.
>>:>:>:>:> ---------------------------------------------
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> <Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
>>:>:>:>:> "Everyone who's anyone knows I was a rather notorious acid
>>:>:>:>:> and pot dealer myself, at one time. I had a good deal of
>>:>:>:>:> Baton Rouge tripping their asses off. But that was nearly 20
>>:>:>:>:> years ago."
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> --------------------------------------------
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> "King of Brawl Hall" <mas...@mason.snuh>
>>:>:>:>:> <Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
>>:>:>:>:> "I've only done coke with an escort I had in L.A. that did
>>:>:>:>:> couples. She tittered "Someone just gave me an ounce of
>>:>:>:>:> coke", and dumped about 5 grams on the coffee table."
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> --------------------------------------------
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:>:> [...] Loopy loops
>>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:Very good James. You've worked out 'past tense'.
>>:>:>:>:
>>:>:>:>:Now, please explain how that translates into 'present tense',
>>:>:>:>:and why you're so scared to make a simple bet with me?
>>:>:>:>
>>:>:>:> "Once a junkie always a junkie. Never trust a junkie." -- Cloe
>>:>:>:> Webb as Nancy Spungen
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:So you're scared to take a bet because you're sure you'll win?
>>:>:>
>>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
>>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>>:>:
>>:>:In what sense does that mean I do drugs?
>>:>
>>:> In the same sense that you take them for recreational use.
>>:
>>:I do?
>>:
>>:Then how can I pass any drug test?
>>
>> I recommend you either take the piss out of your mom, or maybe a
>> pregnant sister. :)
>
> Ah, yes. Modern drug testing requires identification, in a
> tamper-proof environment. But, seeing that you're extremely ignorant,
> and seem to have acquired the sum total of your knowledge from "Cheech
> and Chong" movies, I suppose I can't expect you to know how drug tests
> are conducted.
>
> In summation, you're either brain-dead, or just manking excuses. Sort
> of...running away from your claims. While, at the same time, claiming
> victory.
>
> Which is it?
>
>
>>:>:Here's an example, since you have real trouble with simple things.
>>:>:
>>:>:You get spanked. That doesn't mean you have been spanked in the
>>:>:past. It means you currently get spanked.
>>:>:
>>:>:
>>:>:>:In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
>>:>:>
>>:>:> <Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
>>:>:> <Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
>>:>:> <Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
>>:>:
>>:>:In other words, never.
>>:>
>>:> Denial is not just a river
>>:
>>:Care to make a bet with me, then?
>>
>> You've already autospanked on a point that has previously been
>> decided and settled. So pay up now.
>
> So I've taken a drug test and failed?
>
> Or "James said so"?
>
>
>
>>:; )
>>:
>>:
>>:>:> Idiot.
>>:>:
>>:>:What's a junkie, James?
>>:>
>>:> A narcotics addict, you silly git. Look it up in the dictionary.
>>:>
>>:> n 1: a narcotics addict [syn: drug addict, junky] 2: someone who is
>>:> so ardently devoted to something that it resembles an addiction;
>>:>
>>:> Twat.
>>:
>>:Ah, I'm a "narcotics addict", but you're scared to prove it.
>>:
>>:Interesting route you're taking, here.
>>
>> Narcotics addict and junkie is the same thing, you dolt.
>
> Correct, Koput. I'm neither. If I am, accept my challenge and claim
> any prize you wish.
>
> But we both know you don't have any balls, right?

I guess the fact that you snipped and ran really underscores this point,
eh?

--
I'm just a goddamned piece of paper.

http://beosnews.com/
http://www.bedoper.com
http://www.cafepress.com/angeldevil