Re: James the Porn Webmaster
Kyle Hitler
news:f0lgp11aje50rorec...@4ax.com:
> On 8 Dec 2005 12:24:42 GMT, in alt.flame Kyle Hitler
> <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:"subRoutinč@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
>:news:75jfp1t42nbqeujov...@4ax.com:
>:
>:> On 8 Dec 2005 00:12:35 GMT, in alt.flame Kyle Hitler
>:> <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>:>
>:>:"subRoutinč@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
>:>:news:sq6ep1hab2aek1j9q...@4ax.com:
>:>:
>:>:> On 7 Dec 2005 12:28:40 GMT, in alt.flame Kyle Hitler
>:>:> <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>:>:>
>:>:>:"subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
>:>:>:news:oeydnRg3go-...@rogers.com:
>:>:>:
>:>:>:> "Kyle Hitler" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>:>:>:> news:Xns9724E50B...@207.14.113.17...
>:>:>:>> "subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
>:>:>:>> news:V-CdnXzKTKd...@rogers.com:
>:>:>:>>
>:>:>:>> > "Kyle Hitler" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>:>:>:>> > news:Xns9724E0BF8...@207.14.113.17...
>:>:>:>> >> "subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
>:>:>:>> >> news:U6edndt4fLs...@rogers.com:
>:>:>:>> >>
>:>:>:>> >> > "Kyle Hitler" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>:>:>:>> >> > news:Xns9724D9D5D...@207.14.113.17...
>
> [...] Jason kisses my arse to get my attention again and follows me
> around right
> to my website and all the client sites I've created:
>
> "The Rukkaj page was nice and tastefully done."
>
> "You have an obvious eye for design."
>
> Creepy huh? And yet another stalker tries to kook his way into my life
> with incessant inanities. What's next? A flaming bag of poop on my
> doorstep? My garden gnomes repainted or dissolved in lime? Fan
> email!?? Offers for a bj?
Some tards just can't take a compliment.
Why does your site look so shitty, again?
>:>:> And Bedoper is prettier? Looks like a bulimic hooker with herpes
>:>:> from LA puked all over it after having sex with a death metal
>:>:> poseur and his "life partner" while snorting a tainted eight ball
>:>:> of cocaine.
>:>:
>:>:Sure it does. Give me a full critique, and include how your site
>:>:"looks better" and why.
>:>
>:> I have a strict non-interference policy that I adhere to when it
>:> comes to first contact with White Trash cultures which prevents me
>:> from going in depth about your crappy amateurish "website".
>:
>:Spankard.
>
> A belated IKY, I called you a spankard first.
You make false spank claims daily.
>:> Ask Billboi to throw you another favour.
>:>
>:>:; )
>:>
>:> Who you winkin' at, faggot?
>:
>:No more whining about "faglames", James?
>
> Prove that I'm whining, faglamer.
It's like a cuckoo clock inside your head, isn't it?
>:>:>:> I've been changing my own site for
>:>:>:> eons and am never satisfied with the results.
>:>:>:
>:>:>:With good reason. It blows.
>:>:>
>:>:> This is _so_ original: It's not like any other lamer before you
>:>:> went there under their own volition and already tried to raz me
>:>:> about it. Like it really just upsets me, yeah - boo hoo and all
>:>:> that.
>:>:
>:>:So lots of people tell you how ugly it is?
>:>
>:> Do you actually consider yourself a person, you hairless monkey?
>:
>:Said the rapidly balding musclehead who shaves his chest.
>
> I don't shave my chest, Jason. That was one of your weird fantasies.
So you're naturally hairless?
I think everyone here knows I'm far from hairless, Spazzy Jeff.
>:>:You might want to take a hint, then.
>:>
>:> "Criticism" from a.f. morons is likely to get shitcanned along with
>:> your other idiotic comments.
>:
>:"Shitcanned" = James has hurt feelings.
>
> Shitcanned actually means flushed: as in flushing your shit down the
> toilet.
Don't forget to do the floorboards.
> [...] Jason poorly deals with sexuality.
>
>:>:Yes, that's at least as convincing as your "1000 women" claim.
>:>
>:> Too bad you're having such a hard time disproving it, eh?
>:
>:Not nearly as hard of a time as you'd have proving it.
>
> Why should I prove anything
You can't. That's what makes you so amusing.
> to you when the current situation has your
> panties in a twist?
What situation is that, James?
>:>:>:Otherwise, you'd just link them.
>:>:>
>:>:> You don't link porn to a comics network where 7-15 yr old kids
>:>:> from all over the world are streaming through, dumbass.
>:>:
>:>:Sorry, James.
>:> ^^^^^
>:> An apology is a sign of weakness, weakling.
>:
>:Did your grandma also teach you that?
>
> It's common sense. Please try not to lack backbone.
Only one of us is a man, James.
Do you think it's you?
>:>:Is this a comics network? Or is this Usenet? What I should
>:>:have said is, "You'd provide the links".
>:>
>:> You weren't clear on where I should link them. Perhaps you should be
>:> more careful next time?
>:
>:I clarified. You keep running from another of your claims.
>
> I was talking about linking them on my site, and you have no clue what
> you're yakking about.
Still no URLs to these many porn sites you've produced, eh?
>:>:>:Canada is home of the porn stars, eh?
>:>:>
>:>:> Never said that. Most of them live in Las Vegas but want to live
>:>:> elsewhere.
>:>:
>:>:Las Vegas is the porn capital of the world, suddenly?
>:>
>:> Is it?
>:
>:No. And it never was.
>
> So you're the porn expert? Tell us where we'll find them.
Common knowledge.
>:>:>:And they can't get web design in the San Fernando Valley, eh?
>:>:>
>:>:> It's cheaper for US buyers to pay in Canadian dollars. Your
>:>:> country has been outsourced.
>:>:
>:>:And your tall tales seem to have gotten the best of you again.
>:>
>:> "Seem" is such a subjective word, especially used by a snuhtard who
>:> believes it's deluded blather is making a proper impression.
>:
>:It has you on the ropes once again.
>
> If I have the ropes, then there's an obvious noose around your neck.
Claiming victory, as usual.
>:>:Hey, prove me wrong.
>:>
>:> Actually it's _your_ job to prove _me_ wrong, seeing that you have a
>:> problem with it.
>:
>:Spankard.
>
> Another belated IKY.
Just an honest fact.
>:>:I'll be the first to say "Wow, James. I was wrong. You are a
>:>:pornmaster".
>:>
>:> And what, pray tell, do you suggest I do with your epiphany should
>:> it suddenly hit you? I realize it's a longshot, but a personal
>:> snuhtard affirmation is about as useless to me as tits on a male
>:> marmoset.
>:
>:You could claim spank truthfully, for once in your sad life.
>
> Didn't I mention before you're like a dirty dish rag to me? I have no
> use for a Jason-spank when you outdo yourself with so many autospanks
> on your own.
Yes. The last time, you spanked me so hard you had to killfile me, and
people were saying you were my bitch.
>:>:>:> So it doesn't matter. But mind you, every web developer I
>:>:>:> know has a few porn star sites under their belt. (No puns
>:>:>:> intended here, please.) Ask anyone who's paid to do this.
>:>:>:
>:>:>:You pay to design porn websites?
>:>:>
>:>:> When did I say that?
>:>:
>:>:Look up, James. It's a play on words that hinges on "who is" vs "who
>:>:has". Oh, forget it.
>:>
>:> I never said I paid anyone for any type of porn web design. But I
>:> can see why you'd want me to forget your poor reading comprehension
>:> skillz.
>:
>:I forget, wordplay is over your head.
>
> "Wordplay" a thinly disguised strawman for "typo pounce".
What typo, fucky?
>:>:> [...] Jason's typical idiocy shitcanned.
>:>:
>:>:You wear your emotions on your sleeve, each time you snip something
>:>:you don't like. It just makes you an even softer target next time.
>:>
>:> Didn't you know that telling everyone you visited my site is an
>:> autospank?
>:
>:Even you have a low opinion of your ugly page, eh?
>
> Where will you follow me around to next, fanboi??
Have I ever "followed you" outside of this group?
>:> On top of that, this is .sig worthy material:
>:
>:For a fan boy, I guess.
>
> Good boy. Now go play in a
Yes?
>:> "The Rukkaj page was nice and tastefully done."
>:>
>:> "You have an obvious eye for design."
>:>
>:> Spnak.
>:
>:Indeed.
>
> See? What use do I have for a dirty dish rag?
A substitute for the 1000 women you've never had?
--
I was given an unfortunate name: Kyle.