Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: a sex question

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Go Go Goblin!

unread,
May 17, 2004, 10:45:21 PM5/17/04
to
In alt.punk, Ralf Sandner said:
> On 05 May 2004 18:01:33 GMT, park...@aol.com (Park Luck) wrote about
> "Re: a sex question" :
>
> >>But that's irrelevant unless the guys are having sex with each other!
> >>Then the entire group is participating, not just fucking in progression.
> >
> >But they're not fucking in progression. They're going all at once. Well,
> >almost, there's usually two or three left out.
>
> technically she could do 5 at once
>
> np: Winamp stopped
>
>

unless she's missing an arm or two.


--
BFG

goblin at iglou dot com

{ http://members.iglou.com/lyons }

Go Go Goblin!

unread,
May 17, 2004, 10:45:52 PM5/17/04
to
In alt.punk, Brian Baird said:
> In article <20040505140133...@mb-m24.aol.com>,
> park...@aol.com says...

> > >But that's irrelevant unless the guys are having sex with each other!
> > >Then the entire group is participating, not just fucking in progression.
> >
> > But they're not fucking in progression. They're going all at once. Well,
> > almost, there's usually two or three left out.
> >
> > evan
>
> I think only Miss Manners can answer this question.
>


that would be alt.fan.miss-manners

0 new messages