Nostradamus' 20 + Two-Times-Six Prophecy (year 2012)
gu...@hotmail.com
of sickness/disease and a new beginning for Science.
As DVD has gone from red to smaller blue laser beams (blu-ray),
science has presently gone from the micro (10e-6 ...microscope) to
nano (10e-9) scale technology (and soon pico 10e-12).
They will figure out the full building blocks of the human body.
Although we dream of tiny batteries that will power up cars and may
even win a Nobel Peace Prize; it is still far away, and far from peace
since it is the only missing ingredient that will bring to life the
present science fiction horror of robotic warfare between countries.
Likewise same as a person can talk, while "simulataneously"
puppeteering with his hands, DNA manipulation can bring forward from
science fiction, one being with two or more talking heads. Even
manipulation of the DNA to create multiple individual memory cells so
that this "one" being doesn't even recognize he is one and the same,
talking through the multiple heads.
DNA are strands of organic transistors that can be randomly switched
on and off (masking) to build the different parts of the human body.
Pastor Dave
<gu...@hotmail.com> spake thusly:
>Nostradamus' 20 + Two-Times-Six Prophecy (year 2012) predicts the end
>of sickness/disease and a new beginning for Science.
Ah, the Futurist! They get to claim it says
whatever works for them, to promote whatever
they want to say! :)
--
Pastor Dave
The following is part of my auto-rotating
sig file and not part of the message body.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself,
but talent instantly recognizes genius."
- Sir Arthur Doyle
JTEM
Pastor Dave <ananias917_@_gmail.com> wrote:
> "gu...@hotmail.com"
> <gu...@hotmail.com> spake thusly:
>
> > Nostradamus' 20 + Two-Times-Six Prophecy (year 2012)
> > predicts the end of sickness/disease and a new
> > beginning for Science.
>
> Ah, the Futurist! They get to claim it says
> whatever works for them, to promote whatever
> they want to say! :)
This would be opposed to so-called bible "Prophecy,"
more accurately referred to as "postecy" as it is
only AFTER something happens when it is "shown" to
have been predicted.
Seriously, douche bag, give the guy a break. All other
so-called "prophecy" we see really __is__ postecy,
including bible "prophecy."
--
Check out my friend's lame ass show:
Ike E 11/16/09
<gu...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44018406-06f1-4768...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> Nostradamus' 20 + Two-Times-Six Prophecy (year 2012) predicts the end
> of sickness/disease and a new beginning for Science.
Paleeese.
This is alt.bible.prophecy.
Alt.nostradamus.lunatic is down the hall.
[snip]
Ike
Werewolfy
wrote:
> Paleeese.
>
> This is alt.bible.prophecy.
Is they a difference? Guessing is, well, guessing...isn't it?
Nostradamus guessed and wrote in a way to confuse. The Bible guesses
and writes in a way to confuse.
Every prophet and astrologer (ho ho) guesses and writes in a way to
confuse.
Silly little prophet.
Werewolfy
Ike E 11/23/9
"Werewolfy" <Werew...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:83b34999-b15f-47ea...@p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
> On 23 Nov, 08:35, "Ike E 11/16/09" <xhermaneicklebe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Paleeese.
>>
>> This is alt.bible.prophecy.
>
> Is they a difference?
Yes. God's prophecies have, do, and will come true--all three times they
come around.
"That which has been is now, and that which is to be has already become, and
God requires that which is past."
[snip]
Ike
Werewolfy
wrote:
> Yes. God's prophecies have, do, and will come true--all three times they
> come around.
>
> "That which has been is now, and that which is to be has already become, and
> God requires that which is past."
Try translating that into English. Are you saying 'God's' wonderful
'prophecy' is that 'now' is really the past, the future is in fact
now, and Mr God wants things that have gone by?
Daft..Daft as a brush.
Werewolfy
Ike E 11/23/9
> On 24 Nov, 00:36, "Ike E 11/23/9" <xhermaneicklebe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes. God's prophecies have, do, and will come true--all three times they
>> come around.
>>
>> "That which has been is now, and that which is to be has already become,
>> and
>> God requires that which is past."
>
> Try translating that into English.
Sure. "What is past is prologue."
> Are you saying 'God's' wonderful
> 'prophecy' is that 'now' is really the past, the future is in fact
> now, and Mr God wants things that have gone by?
>
> Daft..Daft as a brush.
Yes, you do seem to be.
Nevertheless, the fact of prophecy future is written into history past, as
"what goes around comes around."
Ike
Werewolfy
wrote:
> Nevertheless, the fact of prophecy future is written into history past, as
> "what goes around comes around."
Ike, You are a simpleton. You quote nonsense..no one understands such
rubbish..it just 'sounds pretty'.
It's all cliches and metaphors. Tell me FACTS. Oh..and tell them in
ENGLISH
Werewolfy
Ike E 11/23/9
I gave you the facts.
I gave you metaphors so you could understand the facts.
You couldn't get it either way.
It's not my fault you're dumb.
Ike
Werewolfy
wrote:
> I gave you the facts.
>
> I gave you metaphors so you could understand the facts.
>
> You couldn't get it either way.
>
> It's not my fault you're dumb.
I see...a malignant Christian then. You gave NO facts..and failed to
write down in plain English your odd ideas.
Same old story, talk in parables and never say anything. No wonder
people in the Street laugh and point at you, holding their sides as
they giggle.
Religious/astrological.prophetic NONSENSE.
Don't 'give me' fucking metaphors, nonsense from your cult. Give me
FACTS.
Werewolfy
Ike E 11/23/9
Mt 13:10-11
And the disciples came, and said unto [Jesus], Why speakest thou unto
them in parables?
He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the
mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
Ike
Werewolfy
wrote:
> Mt 13:10-11
>
> � � And the disciples came, and said unto [Jesus], Why speakest thou unto
> them in parables?
> � � He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the
> mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
Ah..Of course. God descended to Earth to 'spread his message', but did
so in a way that all those who listened to him, could not understand
what he was saying.
How very sensible.
But, he chose a few dedicated followers, to whom his messages were
made more understandable. Lucky little followers. So, they 'knew' what
his gibberish all meant, and no-one else. They then were charged with
'spreading the word of God', and did so using the same nonsense
metaphors and parables instead of the more direct normal speech that
they had been lucky enough to be allowed to understand.
How very odd.
Why did they not use normal speech to 'spread the message?' They
didn't do a very good job of informing the World of their
understanding..did they?
Neither are you.
Werewolfy
Ike E 11/23/9
>> Mt 13:10-11
>>
>> And the disciples came, and said unto [Jesus], Why speakest thou unto
>> them in parables?
>> He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the
>> mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
> Ah..Of course. God descended to Earth to 'spread his message', but did
> so in a way that all those who listened to him, could not understand what
> he was saying.
There is "listening," and there is "hearing," but not everyone can "hear,"
mostly because THEY DON'T WANT TO...
Joh 8:47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not,
because ye are not of God.
[snippeth]
Ike
Werewolfy
wrote:
> There is "listening," and there is "hearing," but not everyone can "hear,"
> mostly because THEY DON'T WANT TO...
>
> Joh 8:47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not,
> because ye are not of God.
Ricky 1.1 He that is mad, heareth mad words; Ye therefore hear them
not, because you are not in madness.
Werewolfy
Woodswun
> On 25 Nov, 09:10, "Ike E 11/23/9" <xhermaneicklebe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Mt 13:10-11
>
> > And the disciples came, and said unto [Jesus], Why speakest thou unto
> > them in parables?
> > He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the
> > mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
>
> Ah..Of course. God descended to Earth to 'spread his message', but did
> so in a way that all those who listened to him, could not understand
> what he was saying.
No, those who heard wouldn't "get" it until they were ready. That's
the same with most things, I've found. You can explain something
until you're blue in the face, but until the person you're explaining
it to has sufficient background and experience to grasp the concept,
they just are not going to get it.
For example, if you've never been betrayed by someone you completely
and utterly trusted, only someone who has experienced the same will
really understand what you mean when you tell them you got sucker
punched in your soul. To those who have never experienced it, it is
not given to them to understand it - see?
> How very sensible.
> But, he chose a few dedicated followers, to whom his messages were
> made more understandable. Lucky little followers. So, they 'knew' what
> his gibberish all meant, and no-one else. They then were charged with
> 'spreading the word of God', and did so using the same nonsense
> metaphors and parables instead of the more direct normal speech that
> they had been lucky enough to be allowed to understand.
> How very odd.
It makes perfect sense to me. :-)
>
> Why did they not use normal speech to 'spread the message?' They
> didn't do a very good job of informing the World of their
> understanding..did they?
Because people take things literally and go off the deep end and use
teaching to justify all manner of inhumane actions. Take a look at
how judgemental modern day Christians are, for example, when Jesus'
most prominant teaching was NOT to judge. I think He had a pretty
good handle on human nature.
>
> Neither are you.
You have to experience it yourself, nobody can "spread" it to you.
It's not like jam.
Woods
>
> Werewolfy
Werewolfy
> You have to experience it yourself, nobody can "spread" it to you.
> It's not like jam.
Then all of those Missionaries over the Centuries were wasting their
time. All of the Religious 'spreaders of the word' are also wasting
them time.
No amount of 'sermons', or of speaking in unintelligible parables will
inform you...because you have to experience it yourself.
And jolly old God came down to 'spread his message', yet only allowed
12 people to understand him. Those 12 then went on repeating the
incomprehensible 'message' to everyone they met.
Daft....Daft as brushes.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
> No, those who heard wouldn't "get" it until they were ready. �That's
> the same with most things, I've found. �You can explain something
> until you're blue in the face, but until the person you're explaining
> it to has sufficient background and experience to grasp the concept,
> they just are not going to get it.
If you choose to use language filled with parables and metaphors, the
reason no-one can understand you, is because you cannot explain
yourself correctly....not because the listener has to have some sort
of magic 'experience'.
Werewolfy
Woodswun
> On 25 Nov, 17:47, Woodswun <woods...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You have to experience it yourself, nobody can "spread" it to you.
> > It's not like jam.
>
> Then all of those Missionaries over the Centuries were wasting their
> time. All of the Religious 'spreaders of the word' are also wasting
> them time.
>
> No amount of 'sermons', or of speaking in unintelligible parables will
> inform you...because you have to experience it yourself.
Exactly! However, just experiencing it is not necessarily enough - it
depends on the person. Some people just become jaded or bitter,
others develop compassion. The goal, of course, is to develop
compassion and tolerance.
>
> And jolly old God came down to 'spread his message', yet only allowed
> 12 people to understand him. Those 12 then went on repeating the
> incomprehensible 'message' to everyone they met.
It's kind of like the game "Telephone" (I seem to recall someone said
in the UK it's called "Chinese Whispers"). One person teaches another
person, who mostly "gets" it, who in turn teaches what s/he "gets" to
someone else, and you go a few more iterations ... then the original
message bears little resemblance to the original.
Woods
>
> Daft....Daft as brushes.
>
> Werewolfy
Werewolfy
> > And jolly old God came down to 'spread his message', yet only allowed
> > 12 people to understand him. Those 12 then went on repeating the
> > incomprehensible 'message' to everyone they met.
>
> It's kind of like the game "Telephone" (I seem to recall someone said
> in the UK it's called "Chinese Whispers"). �One person teaches another
> person, who mostly "gets" it, who in turn teaches what s/he "gets" to
> someone else, and you go a few more iterations ... then the original
> message bears little resemblance to the original.
Ah..glad you said that. Yes, I know about the 'Chinese whispers'...but
didn't know the phenomena was called 'telephone' in America.
So..to return to my 'friend';
When young, did eagerly frequent,
Doctor and Saint, and heard great arguement.
About IT and about, but evermore,
Came out of that same door, as in I went.
Werewolfy
Ike E 11/23/9
Well, yeah, that pretty much explains you...
Ike
Ike E 11/23/9
> On 25 Nov, 17:47, Woodswun <woods...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You have to experience it yourself, nobody can "spread" it to you.
>> It's not like jam.
>
> Then all of those Missionaries over the Centuries were wasting their
> time. All of the Religious 'spreaders of the word' are also wasting
> them time.
Not at all: The Word has two results, either death or life.
The dead chose death; and the living chosing life.
[snip]
Ike
Ike E 11/23/9
> If you choose to use language filled with parables and metaphors, the
> reason no-one can understand you, is because you cannot explain
> yourself correctly....not because the listener has to have some sort
> of magic 'experience'.
I gave you both.
It didn't work either way.
Not my problem
Your problem.
Ike
Werewolfy
wrote:
> Not at all: The Word has two results, either death or life.
>
> The dead chose death; and the living chosing life.
HO HO HO
Been dancing around your Totem Pole? Been sacrificing Lambs?
Tell me all about your wonderful 'choice' when you are wheezing your
last breath, and the undertaker is sharpening his shovel.
Werewolfy