Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
So . . .
2 views
Skip to first unread message
HRM Resident
Mar 5, 2013, 2:37:44 PM3/5/13
to
We are here . . . a real Usenet group. How do we advertise it
without the RWAs showing up? We can announce it on
"Talkinandar...@yahoogroups.com" and that will get us about 18
members if they all come.
Thing is, we still don't have the critical mass to really discuss
things, so are we just switching here to provide a more familiar
interface? I understand the rationale that Lurker and others won't
likely look any more after 6 months of futile searching, but we still
need to get the "good people" here. I don't know how many of the
existing ones will play musical chairs, either.
Am I missing something?
without the RWAs showing up? We can announce it on
"Talkinandar...@yahoogroups.com" and that will get us about 18
members if they all come.
Thing is, we still don't have the critical mass to really discuss
things, so are we just switching here to provide a more familiar
interface? I understand the rationale that Lurker and others won't
likely look any more after 6 months of futile searching, but we still
need to get the "good people" here. I don't know how many of the
existing ones will play musical chairs, either.
Am I missing something?
James Warren
Mar 5, 2013, 3:01:19 PM3/5/13
to
Message has been deleted
James Warren
Mar 5, 2013, 3:21:21 PM3/5/13
to
On 3/5/2013 4:09 PM, lucreti...@fl.it wrote:
> i'm trying to think how we can have the benefits of usenet and not the
> rwa's.
>
So you really are against the anarchy.rules newsgroup. :)
If they discovered us there would they be amused by the
contradiction? Would they consent to moving to anarchy.rules?
> rwa's.
>
So you really are against the anarchy.rules newsgroup. :)
If they discovered us there would they be amused by the
contradiction? Would they consent to moving to anarchy.rules?
0 new messages