Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I am getting a 'Reimagined Galactica 1980' TBP.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
The Saltex Brujo
May 17, 2012, 6:00:48 PM5/17/12
to
THAT should be interesting.
_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' Fuck /' ')
\ You' /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \
DON'T TAZE MY GRANNY!
BEWARE OF OL' JEEZL PETE.
MAY 2012: MONTH OF THE ROBBY.
INDY SAYS: "KISS MY BRICKS!"
_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' Fuck /' ')
\ You' /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \
DON'T TAZE MY GRANNY!
BEWARE OF OL' JEEZL PETE.
MAY 2012: MONTH OF THE ROBBY.
INDY SAYS: "KISS MY BRICKS!"
RT
May 25, 2012, 5:17:34 PM5/25/12
to
The Saltex Brujo wrote:
>
> THAT should be interesting.
Is this where it's completely done and is actually watchable?
>
> THAT should be interesting.
Is this where it's completely done and is actually watchable?
The Saltex Brujo
May 29, 2012, 2:52:56 PM5/29/12
to
traRvE...@hotmail.com (RT)
it would definitely a more 'realistic' take on events and has some
anomalous, but interesting, nods to the New BSG.
The Saltex Brujo wrote:
THAT should be interesting.
>Is this where it's completely done and is actually watchable?
kind of.
THAT should be interesting.
>Is this where it's completely done and is actually watchable?
it would definitely a more 'realistic' take on events and has some
anomalous, but interesting, nods to the New BSG.
RT
Jun 1, 2012, 10:16:50 AM6/1/12
to
The Saltex Brujo wrote:
>
> traRvE...@hotmail.com (RT)
> The Saltex Brujo wrote:
>
> THAT should be interesting.
>
> >Is this where it's completely done and is actually watchable?
>
> kind of.
> it would definitely a more 'realistic' take on events and has some
> anomalous, but interesting, nods to the New BSG.
>
So it's a remake, minus all the bad partsd. Which would be the entire original...
>
> traRvE...@hotmail.com (RT)
> The Saltex Brujo wrote:
>
> THAT should be interesting.
>
> >Is this where it's completely done and is actually watchable?
>
> kind of.
> it would definitely a more 'realistic' take on events and has some
> anomalous, but interesting, nods to the New BSG.
>
Your Name
Jun 1, 2012, 6:34:37 PM6/1/12
to
In article <4FC8CED2...@hotmail.com>, RT <traRvE...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Not quite the entire Gallactica 1980 ... the external FX shots of the
flying Galactica and Vipers were okay. It 's just all the bits with actors
involved that were bad. ;-)
wrote:
flying Galactica and Vipers were okay. It 's just all the bits with actors
involved that were bad. ;-)
The Saltex Brujo
Jun 1, 2012, 6:30:32 PM6/1/12
to
Jun 1, 2012, 8:16am (EDT-2) From: traRvE...@hotmail.com (RT)
back of the TPB 'to be continued in Galactica 1981' whether that is
cheeky chutzpah or reality, i dont know.
_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' Fuck /' ')
\ You' /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS DA DEVIL!
DON'T TAZE MY GRANNY!
BEWARE OF OL' JEEZL PETE.
2012: YEAR OF THE ROBBY.
>So it's a remake, minus all the bad partsd. Which would be the entire
original...
it keeps the original characters, but redefines them. it says in the
original...
back of the TPB 'to be continued in Galactica 1981' whether that is
cheeky chutzpah or reality, i dont know.
_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' Fuck /' ')
\ You' /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \
DON'T TAZE MY GRANNY!
BEWARE OF OL' JEEZL PETE.
The Saltex Brujo
Jun 2, 2012, 7:57:26 PM6/2/12
to
Your...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
the SFX shots vwere mostly rreused from REAL BSG.
fUnNy!
>Not quite the entire Gallactica 1980 ... the external FX shots of the
flying Galactica and Vipers were okay. It 's just all the bits with
actors involved that were bad. ;-)
heh.
flying Galactica and Vipers were okay. It 's just all the bits with
actors involved that were bad. ;-)
the SFX shots vwere mostly rreused from REAL BSG.
fUnNy!
Your Name
Jun 2, 2012, 10:44:26 PM6/2/12
to
In article <23105-4FC...@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net>,
Bill...@webtv.net (The Saltex Brujo) wrote:
> Your...@YourISP.com (Your=A0Name)
sure which one came first - I always get them around the wrong way).
Bill...@webtv.net (The Saltex Brujo) wrote:
> Your...@YourISP.com (Your=A0Name)
> >Not quite the entire Gallactica 1980 ... the external FX shots of the
> flying Galactica and Vipers were okay. It 's just all the bits with
> actors involved that were bad. ;-)
>
> heh.
> the SFX shots vwere mostly rreused from REAL BSG.
> fUnNy!
Yep, and some FX shots were also recycled in / from Buck Rogers (I'm not
> flying Galactica and Vipers were okay. It 's just all the bits with
> actors involved that were bad. ;-)
>
> heh.
> the SFX shots vwere mostly rreused from REAL BSG.
> fUnNy!
sure which one came first - I always get them around the wrong way).
Clu
Jul 6, 2012, 6:30:19 PM7/6/12
to
If we are talking about the comic, the art was good, the story was
garbage. To me worst that the original Galactica 1980.
The biggest problem I had with the writing was when Baltar calls Adama
"Bill" out of disrespect. Well, hate to break it to them, but wrong
universe. Classic series Adama was never "Bill".
Doc Clu
garbage. To me worst that the original Galactica 1980.
The biggest problem I had with the writing was when Baltar calls Adama
"Bill" out of disrespect. Well, hate to break it to them, but wrong
universe. Classic series Adama was never "Bill".
Doc Clu
The Saltex Brujo
Jul 8, 2012, 3:01:25 AM7/8/12
to
Re: I am getting a 'Reimagined Galactica 1980' TBP.
Group: alt.battlestar-galactica Date: Sat, Jul 7, 2012, 2:30am (EDT+8)
From: dr...@swbell.net (Clu)
0 new messages