Marlow <
patr...@protonmail.com> wrote in
news:umqlil$1jis6$
1...@dont-email.me:
> San Francisco will remain a dying drug-infected shithole suitable for
> queers only. Let's see how that tax revenue base works out.
So much has happened in the last two years, it’s hard to separate the
events of 2022 from this year. We fought back against rogue officials by
recalling four of them: Chesa Boudin and three SFUSD board
commissioners. At the polls we fought back insane district attorney
candidate John Hamasaki, who was trying to return San Francisco to a
non-prosecution town void of cops altogether. We finally have a real,
competent and respected DA with Brooke Jenkins. We fought off far-Left
wing Alpha “Honey Mahogany” Mulugeta running for District 6 Supervisor.
In the early part of this current year, we saw the sudden rise of the
San Francisco Reparations Plan, even though it was actually developing
behind the scenes and in stealth mode since 2021.
We saw fierce debate at city hall over the need to secure funding for
our police department, all while shops continue getting burglarized and
looted, and carjackings brazenly occur at gunpoint.
We saw the abhorrent, renegade, so-called “Socialist” Dean Preston
defending Hamas’ actions committing sub-human, grotesque atrocities,
perpetrated against innocent Israelis and then Preston further
shamefully just introduced a Resolution to the Board of Supervisors
while exploiting his Jewish roots, mostly condemning Israel in the
current war. Debate on this terrible legislation begins early 2024.
San Franciscans now see a wave of money organizing into Leftists vs.
Moderate camps, referring to Democrats of course, all readying for the
March 5th, 2024 primaries. The stage has been set for a showdown over
control of the local twenty-four member San Francisco’s Democratic Party
leadership, the SF DCCC. Two competing slates of delegate-candidates
have emerged: the Labor & Working Families slate, and the SF Democrats
for Change slate. (Guess which is the socialist, anti-recall, anti-cop,
group?).
And we continue to feel further momentum building against Mayor London
Breed, who’s failings across much of her last 5 years in office make it
increasingly hard to justify her re-election next November. She holds
frequent press conferences and televised statements touting some alleged
accomplishments, while avoiding comment on controversies and
administrations failures. The APEC international leaders conference last
month may have been a success for the twenty-one nations’ visitors, but
San Francisco itself saw little benefit, and many business owners
tallied up meager to zero net profits from the week-long private
spectacle. The sparkling sidewalks prepped for global visitors went
right back to drug tents and homeless shortly after the conference
concluded. Just announced is Breed’s additional demand for city hall’s
departments to cut spending further back, as we are seeing a major
budget shortfall. Many voters and business owners have asked, why wasn’t
Mayor Breed recalled along with Chesa Boudin?
San Franciscans will also notice a reshuffling of the deck of local
politicians. Catherine Stefani is candidate for state Assembly, AD19 as
successor to Phil Ting, and she’ll most likely win the primary for that
race in March. She just won reelection last year for local Board of
Supervisors representing District 2 for a four-year term, so she’ll bail
early and move up to Sacramento after her victory. Matt Haney will
cruise to re-election for his AD17 seat in the capital too.
Good news on law enforcement and criminal justice efforts: In the puzzle
of local players affecting prosecution, along with ousting Chesa Boudin
last year, we now have two superior court judges with records of
dubious, pro-criminal stances, and are being challenged at the polls.
With local judges, they retain their seat on the bench, unless
“challenged”. San Francisco voters are tired of repeat criminals with
repeat arrests being let out by activists-as-judges. Michael Begert and
Patrick Thompson are poised to become the rare accessories to a failure
to prosecute, and they are being held accountable. Spikes in drug and
crime saw shocking high numbers of arrested individuals released by
these two specific judges, who often repeat their crimes. Surprisingly
as well, city hall officials are pushing back, actually denouncing our
democratic election of superior court judges, calling election
challenges “dangerous and politically motivated.”
I’m personally surprised more judges of the fourteen-seat superior court
were not challenged this time around.
Who else is on the San Francisco’s ballot this coming March? Nancy
Pelosi and Scott Weiner who will easily, and obviously, win re-election.
Like them or not, there have been no serious, viable organized
challengers to these legislator/powerhouses in a long time.
A victory by the more “moderate” democrats for control of the local SF
DCCC Democratic Party committee mentioned above will indeed send a
much-needed signal to the hardest Left of the city – that their garbage
policies and garbage elected officials we’ve had to contend with over
the last few years deserve to be placed in the trash. Progressives of
their ilk should have no place in city leadership, as well-attested by
conditions right here on the street.
Happy New Year and here’s to hoping for a great March, 2024 election
outcome.
https://californiaglobe.com/fr/the-greenberg-brief-san-francisco-reflecti
ons-failures-and-predictions/