Remember
Ernie
asshole farrel's www.hairlosshelp.com snake oil site worked, hair
transplants would not be needed. Ernie
Marcus
them instead of babble about Farrel. Marcus
I'm not Farrel you retard
> if any of the crap sold and promoted at the snake oil sites like
> transplants would not be needed. Ernie
Your point makes no sense. Some people prefer to avoid hair transplant
surgery due to the costs and potential risks so they "need" treatments
like minoxidil and finasteride. Some people prefer to avoid a product
that requires daily use and has potential side effects and may only
work modestly or partially in some users, so they "need" a hair
transplant.
Each approach has costs and benefits to individual users which is why
hair transplants, minoxidil, and finasteride are all "needed."
Why do I keep responding to your repeated nonsense like you're going
to hear me? You're just going to keep pretending that no one has given
your delusional ravings a rational response.
Ernie
> if ernie had any results to show us from her snake oil, she would post
> them instead of babble about Farrel. Marcus
The best way for people to see results from my method is for them to
use it and regrow their hair, after all, asshole farrel posted that
nutrients are needed to grow hair, and that scalp hair regrows when
body hair stops growing. That is what my method is based on. Ernie
Ernie
wrote:
> On Jan 9, 10:48 am, Ernie <eprimea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > if any of the crap sold and promoted at the snake oil sites like
> > transplants would not be needed. Ernie
>
> Your point makes no sense. Some people prefer to avoid hair transplant
> surgery due to the costs and potential risks so they "need" treatments
> like minoxidil and finasteride. Some people prefer to avoid a product
> that requires daily use and has potential side effects and may only
> work modestly or partially in some users, so they "need" a hair
> transplant.
>
> Each approach has costs and benefits to individual users which is why
> hair transplants, minoxidil, and finasteride are all "needed."
>
> Why do I keep responding to your repeated nonsense like you're going
> to hear me? You're just going to keep pretending that no one has given
> your delusional ravings a rational response.
Except that Minox works in a very limited way, and for those just
starting to bald. As we all know, Finas causes more hair loss in the
long term. Ernie
Marcus
Why would anybody waste their time and money on a snake oil method
that you can not show has worked for even one person?
Crazier and craizer. Marcus
Marcus
> On Jan 9, 3:25 pm, "I'm not Farrel you retard" <ernstpri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 10:48 am, Ernie <eprimea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > if any of the crap sold and promoted at the snake oil sites like
> > > transplants would not be needed. Ernie
>
> > Your point makes no sense. Some people prefer to avoid hair transplant
> > surgery due to the costs and potential risks so they "need" treatments
> > like minoxidil and finasteride. Some people prefer to avoid a product
> > that requires daily use and has potential side effects and may only
> > work modestly or partially in some users, so they "need" a hair
> > transplant.
>
> > Each approach has costs and benefits to individual users which is why
> > hair transplants, minoxidil, and finasteride are all "needed."
>
> > Why do I keep responding to your repeated nonsense like you're going
> > to hear me? You're just going to keep pretending that no one has given
> > your delusional ravings a rational response.
>
> Except that Minox works in a very limited way, and for those just
> starting to bald. As we all know, Finas causes more hair loss in the
> long term. Ernie
Why do you keep trying to tell us what "we" know when you don`t know
anything yourself?
Crazier and crazier. Marcus
I'm not Farrel you retard
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 10:48 am, Ernie <eprimea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > if any of the crap sold and promoted at the snake oil sites like
> > > transplants would not be needed. Ernie
>
> > Your point makes no sense. Some people prefer to avoid hair transplant
> > surgery due to the costs and potential risks so they "need" treatments
> > like minoxidil and finasteride. Some people prefer to avoid a product
> > that requires daily use and has potential side effects and may only
> > work modestly or partially in some users, so they "need" a hair
> > transplant.
>
> > Each approach has costs and benefits to individual users which is why
> > hair transplants, minoxidil, and finasteride are all "needed."
>
> > Why do I keep responding to your repeated nonsense like you're going
> > to hear me? You're just going to keep pretending that no one has given
> > your delusional ravings a rational response.
>
> Except that Minox works in a very limited way, and for those just
> starting to bald. As we all know, Finas causes more hair loss in the
> long term. Ernie
That's your opinion. Everyone else accepts the published research that
shows that minoxidil and finasteride are moderately successful
treatments. So, next time you say "if any of the crap (at) www.hairlosshelp.com
snakeoilsite worked, hair transplants would not be needed," you can
know that you've had it explained why that is not true.
Ernie
Because there is more and more evidence proving that I am right. In
fact asshole farrel herself posted that nutrients are needed to grow
hair and that scalp hair regrows when body hair stops growing. Ernie
Ernie
<ernstpri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 3:05 pm, Ernie <eprimea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 3:25 pm, "I'm not Farrel you retard" <ernstpri...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 9, 10:48 am, Ernie <eprimea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > if any of the crap sold and promoted at the snake oil sites like
> > > > transplants would not be needed. Ernie
>
> > > Your point makes no sense. Some people prefer to avoid hair transplant
> > > surgery due to the costs and potential risks so they "need" treatments
> > > like minoxidil and finasteride. Some people prefer to avoid a product
> > > that requires daily use and has potential side effects and may only
> > > work modestly or partially in some users, so they "need" a hair
> > > transplant.
>
> > > Each approach has costs and benefits to individual users which is why
> > > hair transplants, minoxidil, and finasteride are all "needed."
>
> > > Why do I keep responding to your repeated nonsense like you're going
> > > to hear me? You're just going to keep pretending that no one has given
> > > your delusional ravings a rational response.
>
> > Except that Minox works in a very limited way, and for those just
> > starting to bald. As we all know, Finas causes more hair loss in the
> > long term. Ernie
>
> That's your opinion. Everyone else accepts the published research that
> shows that minoxidil and finasteride are moderately successful
> treatments. So, next time you say "if any of the crap (at)www.hairlosshelp.com
> snakeoilsite worked, hair transplants would not be needed," you can
>
> - Show quoted text -
Explained by a lying asshole, not likely. Ernie
I'm not Farrel you retard
You said "if...." the treatments worked "hair transplants would not be
needed."
Obviously, again, the major difference between drug treatments like
finas and minox and hair transplant surgery are that drug treatments
are 1) cheaper, 2) don't require surgery and 3) require continual use
to achieve the results claimed by manufacturers. Hair transplants 1)
only require a single 'use,' are 2) much more expensive, and 3)
require surgery.
So, given that some people have lots of money and some don't, some
people prefer drugs to surgery, etc., both types of treatments are
"needed."
You can bleat or pant about how Farrel is a liar, or run from what I
posted with your "babbling" line, but the fact is your opening comment
in this thread is illogical, like most of the things you say.
Ernie
>
> - Show quoted text -
And they don't work. Ernie
I'm not Farrel you retard
Not relevant to your initial post in this thread. If minox or
finasteride work (I know you say they don't), hair transplants still
are needed, for the reasons I laid out. You're just wrong. Again.
Marcus
There is no evidence proving you are right about anything. Just your
worn out bullshit. Marcus
Ernie
>
> - Show quoted text -
Babble on asshole. Ernie
Ernie
>
> - Show quoted text -
That is a strange post from asshole farrel who posted that nutrients
are needed to grow hair, and that scalp hair regrows when body hair
stops growing. I have been saying that for decades. Ernie
I'm not Farrel you retard
>
> - Show quoted text -
The formal definition of the word "babble" is "utter meaningless
sounds, like a baby, or utter in an incoherent way."
On the contrary, I just laid out exactly why your initial post in this
thread is illogical and nonsensical, and you refuse to recognize it -
which everyone else can see.
Ernie
>
> - Show quoted text -
I would like to thank asshole farel for posting the definition of her
posts. Ernie
I'm not Farrel you retard
Ah! You understand the post, which proves it's not "babble." Your
"babble" line is just the Ernie equivalent of sticking your fingers in
your ears and saying "la la la I'm not listening." You know I just
beat you in debate, yet again - you're just too much of a little woman
to acknowledge when you're beat.
Ernie
I'm not Farrel you retard
beat you in debate, again.
Ernie
>
> - Show quoted text -
Babble on idiot. Ernie
I'm not Farrel you retard
You know I beat you in debate, again. You just keep repeating yourself
like a moron and keep hoping no one notices.