Re: Way off topic, but it has do to with the French
Bertie the Bunyip
news:4ZKyj.6120$TT4.1637@attbi_s22:
>> Perhaps your minor in history didn't cover The Great War, the
>> Napoleonic Wars, or the Seven Year's War.
>>
>> Look those up and then come back and discuss France's place in world
>> history.
>
> Wow, that's really impressive. Not.
>
> Try to keep up, please? We weren't talking about France's "place in
> history" -- we're talking about their national behavior in World War
> II, their current status as a former world power, and their current
> role as the butt of much disparaging humor in America.
All of which says you're an asshole.
Bertie
mariposas rand mair fheal
why exactly am i suppose to be disparaging france?
this seems to have started after they said they were not going to fight in iraq
without real evidence that iraq was making nbc weapons
it sounds to me like i supposed to flush two hundred years
of friendship and mutual struggle down the toilet
because they were right about iraq
does that sum it up correctly
arf meow arf - everything thing i know i learned
from the collective unconscience of odd bodkins
nobody could do that much decoupage
without calling on the powers of darkness
Aratzio
alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> got double secret
probation for writing:
Can I be the fuckhead?
--
Miguel, once again stating the obvious:
Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9l...@4ax.com>
"Yes, I must be impotent."
Aratzio
mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_...@yahoo.com> got double secret
probation for writing:
>In article <fqfu5t$e6f$6...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> wrote:
>
>> "Jay Honeck" <jjho...@NOSPAMmchsi.com> wrote in
>> news:4ZKyj.6120$TT4.1637@attbi_s22:
>>
>> >> Perhaps your minor in history didn't cover The Great War, the
>> >> Napoleonic Wars, or the Seven Year's War.
>> >>
>> >> Look those up and then come back and discuss France's place in world
>> >> history.
>> >
>> > Wow, that's really impressive. Not.
>> >
>> > Try to keep up, please? We weren't talking about France's "place in
>> > history" -- we're talking about their national behavior in World War
>> > II, their current status as a former world power, and their current
>> > role as the butt of much disparaging humor in America.
>
>why exactly am i suppose to be disparaging france?
>this seems to have started after they said they were not going to fight in iraq
>without real evidence that iraq was making nbc weapons
>
>it sounds to me like i supposed to flush two hundred years
>of friendship and mutual struggle down the toilet
>because they were right about iraq
>
>does that sum it up correctly
>
Pretty much.
Nothing like having a handy French Fleet to bottle up Cornwallis on a
penninsula.
How would things have turned out if the French were not on our side in
the revolution?
miguel
wrote:
We'd still be speaking english, I reckon.
Bertie the Bunyip
news:d31ns3tb2rk4kqgf7...@4ax.com:
We'd probably be speaking English right now if they hadn;t!
Oh wait.
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip
news:mair_fheal-8E882...@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net:
> In article <fqfu5t$e6f$6...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> wrote:
>
>> "Jay Honeck" <jjho...@NOSPAMmchsi.com> wrote in
>> news:4ZKyj.6120$TT4.1637@attbi_s22:
>>
>> >> Perhaps your minor in history didn't cover The Great War, the
>> >> Napoleonic Wars, or the Seven Year's War.
>> >>
>> >> Look those up and then come back and discuss France's place in
>> >> world history.
>> >
>> > Wow, that's really impressive. Not.
>> >
>> > Try to keep up, please? We weren't talking about France's "place
>> > in history" -- we're talking about their national behavior in World
>> > War II, their current status as a former world power, and their
>> > current role as the butt of much disparaging humor in America.
>
> why exactly am i suppose to be disparaging france?
> this seems to have started after they said they were not going to
> fight in iraq without real evidence that iraq was making nbc weapons
>
> it sounds to me like i supposed to flush two hundred years
> of friendship and mutual struggle down the toilet
> because they were right about iraq
>
> does that sum it up correctly
>
Apparently, This is what Jay's telling us and he seems to think he knows
what he's talking about.
He's minored in History at Wisconsin, you know.
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip
Bertie the Bunyip
news:uv0ns3h3b4d1m7l60...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 04:18:06 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
> alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> got double secret
> probation for writing:
>
>>"Jay Honeck" <jjho...@NOSPAMmchsi.com> wrote in
>>news:4ZKyj.6120$TT4.1637@attbi_s22:
>>
>>>> Perhaps your minor in history didn't cover The Great War, the
>>>> Napoleonic Wars, or the Seven Year's War.
>>>>
>>>> Look those up and then come back and discuss France's place in world
>>>> history.
>>>
>>> Wow, that's really impressive. Not.
>>>
>>> Try to keep up, please? We weren't talking about France's "place in
>>> history" -- we're talking about their national behavior in World War
>>> II, their current status as a former world power, and their current
>>> role as the butt of much disparaging humor in America.
>>
>>
>>All of which says you're an asshole.
>>
>>
>>Bertie
>
> Can I be the fuckhead?
>
If you like. We have a few already, but there's always room for another.
Bertie
Aratzio
the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> bloviated:
The word yer lokin fer is "commonwealth"
Aratzio
the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> bloviated:
YAY!!!!!!
Royalist trash.
Daedalus
wrote:
>"Jay Honeck" <jjho...@NOSPAMmchsi.com> wrote in
Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?
Jade
miguel
wrote:
Probably because they speak poopytalk.
dan...@gmail.com
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 04:18:06 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >news:4ZKyj.6120$TT4.1637@attbi_s22:
>
> >>> Perhaps your minor in history didn't cover The Great War, the
> >>> Napoleonic Wars, or the Seven Year's War.
>
> >>> Look those up and then come back and discuss France's place in world
> >>> history.
>
> >> Wow, that's really impressive. Not.
>
> >> Try to keep up, please? We weren't talking about France's "place in
> >> history" -- we're talking about their national behavior in World War
> >> II, their current status as a former world power, and their current
> >> role as the butt of much disparaging humor in America.
>
> >All of which says you're an asshole.
>
> >Bertie
>
> Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?
>
> Jade
They were.
Les gens d'Iowa sont des idiots.
Dan
miguel
Please observe the "No Poopytalk" rule on usenet.
Bertie the Bunyip
news:o11os3lgno6lmb222...@4ax.com:
As i the imperial power raping the other country?
Sounds better than "chattel" I suppose.
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip
Kali
a6ah...@sneakemail.com said:
: On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 04:18:06 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
: alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> got double secret
: probation for writing:
:
: >"Jay Honeck" <jjho...@NOSPAMmchsi.com> wrote in
: >news:4ZKyj.6120$TT4.1637@attbi_s22:
: >
: >>> Perhaps your minor in history didn't cover The Great War, the
: >>> Napoleonic Wars, or the Seven Year's War.
: >>>
: >>> Look those up and then come back and discuss France's place in world
: >>> history.
: >>
: >> Wow, that's really impressive. Not.
: >>
: >> Try to keep up, please? We weren't talking about France's "place in
: >> history" -- we're talking about their national behavior in World War
: >> II, their current status as a former world power, and their current
: >> role as the butt of much disparaging humor in America.
: >
: >
: >All of which says you're an asshole.
: >
: >
: >Bertie
:
: Can I be the fuckhead?
Please. If you weren't, then the sun wouldn't shine no more.
Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein
dan...@gmail.com
> In <uv0ns3h3b4d1m7l60708e0p6j6ch6he...@4ax.com>, Aratzio
> a6ahly...@sneakemail.com said:
> : On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 04:18:06 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
> : alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> got double secret
> : probation for writing:
> :
> : >news:4ZKyj.6120$TT4.1637@attbi_s22:
> : >
> : >>> Perhaps your minor in history didn't cover The Great War, the
> : >>> Napoleonic Wars, or the Seven Year's War.
> : >>>
> : >>> Look those up and then come back and discuss France's place in world
> : >>> history.
> : >>
> : >> Wow, that's really impressive. Not.
> : >>
> : >> Try to keep up, please? We weren't talking about France's "place in
> : >> history" -- we're talking about their national behavior in World War
> : >> II, their current status as a former world power, and their current
> : >> role as the butt of much disparaging humor in America.
> : >
> : >
> : >All of which says you're an asshole.
> : >
> : >
> : >Bertie
> :
> : Can I be the fuckhead?
>
> Please. If you weren't, then the sun wouldn't shine no more.
>
> Kali
> --
> "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
> research, would it?"
> - Albert Einstein
Right.
What he said.
Off topic: Are you from Nigeria?
Dan
Bertie the Bunyip
Aratzio
the Bunyip <A...@AA.AA> bloviated:
Are ya saying the uglies in britain coulda stopped shrub?
Bertie the Bunyip
news:jljos3dpggmjftem9...@4ax.com:
Dunno, If he'd tried to invade Mawr-bay-uh, they'd have had a real fight
on their hands, though.
Bertie
John of Aix
Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.
C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
d'être une bonne chose.
dan...@gmail.com
> > Probably because they speak poopytalk.
>
> Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
> que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
> 'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
> avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.
>
> C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
> d'être une bonne chose.
Bravo!
miguel
Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.
miguel
Translation: Excellent Poopytalk There!
Why would anybody post in a dead language, anyway?
Sovereign
Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
sleep..!!!
miguel
>miguel a écrit :
NO POOPYTALK!
>> "John of Aix" wrote:
>>> miguel wrote:
>>>> Daedalus wrote:
>>>>> Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?
>>>> Probably because they speak poopytalk.
>>> Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
>>> que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
>>> 'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
>>> avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.
>>> C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
>>> d'être une bonne chose.
>> Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
>> Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.
>Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
>to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
>sleep..!!!
I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
from Usenet Altogether.
miguel
miguel
PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.
Dan
That would be Hebrew and Greek, miguel.
That's an English name, isn't it -- miguel?
Dan
miguel
>miguel wrote:
>> miguel wrote:
>Some poopytalker:
>> >>miguel a écrit :
>> >NO POOPYTALK!
>> >>> "John of Aix" wrote:
>> >>>> miguel wrote:
>> >>>>> Daedalus wrote:
>> >>>>>> Why weren't the French involved in this conversation?
>> >>>>> Probably because they speak poopytalk.
>> >>>> Pauvre con avec ton langage enfantin. Toi, évidemment, tu ne piges rien
>> >>>> que l'amerloque et, sans doute, t'exprime comme un crétin dans cette
>> >>>> 'langue', ainsi tu te sens obligé de montrer à quel point tu es inculte
>> >>>> avec l'utilisation des mots qu'on laisse tomber après la crèche.
>> >>>> C'est un anglais qui te parle, car ici on Europe on considère la culture
>> >>>> d'être une bonne chose.
>> >>> Usenet would be generally improved if all poopytalkers like John of
>> >>> Aix would Remove Themselves Altogether.
>> >>Usenet would improve if assholes like you would fade away..!!! Go back
>> >>to your trailers park, don't forget to get your meds and have a good
>> >>sleep..!!!
>> >I'd sleep a lot better of you poopytalkers would Remove Your Poopytalk
>> >from Usenet Altogether.
>> PS: I don't suppose you poopytalking morons have ever figured out why
>> the BIBLE is in ENGLISH, not French Poopytalk.
>That would be Hebrew and Greek, miguel.
It's good it was translated from its original English into Hebrew and
Greek. The Hebrewers and Greeks ought to know about God too.
>That's an English name, isn't it -- miguel?
100% american, thank you.
Jim Stewart
Well, it was in Latin long before it was in
English and Latin is way closer to French
than English...
miguel
>miguel wrote:
>> miguel wrote:
>>> NO POOPYTALK!
I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
version of the Bible was the King James Version.
miguel
Dan
>
> I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
> version of the Bible was the King James Version.
>
> miguel
Wrong.
There were at least six English versions of the Bible before the KJV:
Anglo-Saxon manuscript -- 995 AD
Wycliff -- 1380 AD
Tyndale --1534 AD
Great Bible -- 1539 AD
Geneva -- 1557 AD
Rheims -- 1582 AD
And then the 1st Edition of the King James, published in 1611.
Anything else you need to be corrected on?
Dan
Dan
>
> It's good it was translated from its original English into Hebrew and
> Greek. The Hebrewers and Greeks ought to know about God too.
You mean the Jews? They wrote the books of the Law and the Prophets
which were included in the Bible as the Old Testament.
The common language of the Roman world was Greek, thus the language of
choice for most writers of the New Testament.
Only much later was this entire collection translated into other
languages (since they did not exist at the time of the original
manuscripts), such as English.
Dan
miguel
wrote:
Obviously somebody has fed you some very bad information (probably
Satan).
Jim Stewart
Google Vulgate
Dan
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:27:28 -0800 (PST), Dan <danm...@gmail.com>
Must be so. I'll ask him...
Miguel? Is it so??
miguel
Why would I want to look at masturbation pictures?
miguel
wrote:
>On Mar 4, 7:51 pm, miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:27:28 -0800 (PST), Dan <danm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Mar 4, 7:18 pm, miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> I don't know where you get your information, but the very first
>> >> version of the Bible was the King James Version.
>>
>> >> miguel
>>
>> >Wrong.
>>
>> >There were at least six English versions of the Bible before the KJV:
>>
>> >Anglo-Saxon manuscript -- 995 AD
>> >Wycliff -- 1380 AD
>> >Tyndale --1534 AD
>> >Great Bible -- 1539 AD
>> >Geneva -- 1557 AD
>> >Rheims -- 1582 AD
>> >And then the 1st Edition of the King James, published in 1611.
>> >Anything else you need to be corrected on?
>> Obviously somebody has fed you some very bad information (probably
>> Satan).
>Must be so. I'll ask him...
>Miguel? Is it so??
No, man. I exorcise regularly.
Dan
> >Must be so. I'll ask him...
> >Miguel? Is it so??
>
> No, man. I exorcise regularly.
That's cool, man.
You any kin to Cheech and Chong?
Jes wonderin'
Dan
dizzy
>You any kin to Cheech and Chong?
>
>Jes wonderin'
Chong is asian, dorky.
Dan
I was covering all the bases, dizzy.