You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
I was in front seat as passenger, so I could compare these 2 readings. Driver must watch road so could not. Tyre size was standard ( original ). Has any1 here noticed this difference ? I think Mitsubishi exaggerates this Pajero's speedo by 10%.
Kev
unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 12:12:18 PM6/19/10
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
did you not read my response to your last post?????
Kev
TE Cheah
unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 8:21:34 AM6/20/10
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
> did you not read my response to your last post?????
10% is too much ; most users want to drive @ speed limits & not below. Odometer is likely wrong too, so km per litre calculation too. My '90 accord & saga 's speedos seem ( gps bought after fitting taller tyres, so can't compare readings ) correct.
Kev
unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 2:21:31 PM6/20/10
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
TE Cheah wrote: >> did you not read my response to your last post????? > 10% is too much ; most users want to drive @ speed limits& > not below. Odometer is likely wrong too, so km per litre > calculation too.
> My '90 accord& saga 's speedos seem ( gps bought after fitting