Reason for this post: I have a 1996 850 turbo with about 33,000 miles and 6
years on the clock - should I have the timing belt and/or water pump
changed? How am I to know what to do? Who are the real experts here - any
Volvo technicians in this group have experience based advice?
And, at what time and/or mileage should I change the water pump? One of the
service managers at my dealer say the bearings (which would give a
catestrophic failure of timing belt and thus valve damage) almost never
fail - pump usually just leaks. Any opinions on this would also be
appreciated.
I am a believer in changing timing belts on interference engines (like
yours) when either the distance or time is reached. The cost of putting
it off can be just too high.
Absolutely change the water pump at the same time. One of our brothers
in this group was recently an exception to the "almost never fail" rule,
and with less than 100K miles on the engine paid $6000 when his water
pump let the timing belt go. It sounds like the Dirty Harry line, "Do
you feel lucky?"
Mike
Terry
89 740
"Michael Pardee" <mich...@cybertrails.com> wrote in message
news:3C041638...@cybertrails.com...
I don't have the owner's manual handy, but the Haynes manual says 48K
miles / 4 years. Fortunately, if yours is a US model, it (and mine!) is
non-interference so the stakes aren't so high. European and Australian
models may be interference.
Mike
Thanks for all your help,. Terry
89 740
"Michael Pardee" <mich...@cybertrails.com> wrote in message
news:3C04225B...@cybertrails.com...
I believe the North American models are the same in that respect, but
I'll defer to the experts on that.
I let mine go way too long, and I saw hundreds of small cracks in the
outer surface of the belt where it went over the cam gear. When I took
it off, I could pick teeth off the belt with my thumbnail! If the
surface shows no sign of cracks, you are probably OK - but I wouldn't be
that bold with an interference engine.
If the water pump isn't misbehaving (wobbling, making noise or leaking),
there isn't much point disturbing it until it does or until the belt is
changed. On the B230, the pump is driven by an accessory belt, so it
won't even affect the timing belt if the shaft does fail. I don't know
why they made interference engines dependent on the water pump shaft
holding up... but I wasn't consulted ;-)
Mike
Bob
"Michael Pardee" <mich...@cybertrails.com> wrote in message
news:3C0453B1...@cybertrails.com...
"Michael Pardee" <mich...@cybertrails.com> wrote in message
news:3C04225B...@cybertrails.com...
I all I have a UK 1994 850 will 164k on the clock. I have changed my cambelt
twice if memory serves me and the aux belt with it. The interval specs here
in the UK are 80k but I go for around 60k for a safe margin.
mark
auk voc rhd 850glt 2l 20v 164k.
"Peter Milnes" <Peter.K....@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9u3u7u$oos$1...@plutonium.btinternet.com...
Cheers, Peter.
"Mark A Sovereign" <&Mark*Sove...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9u8n9t$lr7$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...
: Hi all,
: >
:
:
I went through the same confusion.
The engine is a valve crusher, I'd invest in a 50K timing belt interval,
as well as synthetic lubes and tranny flushes. Cheap insurance.
Cheers, Peter.
"Peter Z. Lega" <newsr...@tractor-internet.com> wrote in message
news:9ugsnu$fdq$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
:
: My 1995 books all say 70K but my dealer insisted volvo now says 50K
:
:
:
:
:
: