{OT} why is this?

[badgolferman]

Fox News Dominates Cable News Election Night Coverage

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/11/03/fox-news-dominates-cable-news-election-night-coverage/70725

[FatterDumber& Happier Moe]

badgolferman wrote:
> Fox News Dominates Cable News Election Night Coverage
>
> http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/11/03/fox-news-dominates-cable-news-election-night-coverage/70725

Rich republicans are the only ones that can afford cable tv ?

[Jeff Strickland]

"FatterDumber& Happier Moe" <"WheresMyCheck"@UncleSamLoves.Mee> wrote in
message news:4cd31154$0$14791$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...

Fox News is in a package that I have to pay extra for, but CNN and PMSNBC
are offered free with the basic package. Assuming my experience is the norm,
one has to wonder why Fox dominates the cable news. I mean, if they are
included in for-fee programming and still beat the free program offerings,
there must be something there...

[Mike]

There is, Fox is the only place were viewers get fair and balanced news.
Those that believe otherwise obviously do not watch Fox News.

"Jeff Strickland" <crwl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iavb4b$ui7$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

[FatterDumber& Happier Moe]

dbu, wrote:
> In article <dL2dnR4OQ_W1qE7R...@ptd.net>,

> "Mike" <mike...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>> There is, Fox is the only place were viewers get fair and balanced news.
>> Those that believe otherwise obviously do not watch Fox News.
>

> Watching MSNBC and the father mathews hardballs is enough to make a
> maggot regurgitate.

>
>
>>
>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:iavb4b$ui7$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> "FatterDumber& Happier Moe" <"WheresMyCheck"@UncleSamLoves.Mee> wrote in
>>> message news:4cd31154$0$14791$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...
>>>> badgolferman wrote:
>>>>> Fox News Dominates Cable News Election Night Coverage
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/11/03/fox-news-dominates-cable-news-electio
>>>>> n-night-coverage/70725
>>>> Rich republicans are the only ones that can afford cable tv ?
>>>
>>> Fox News is in a package that I have to pay extra for, but CNN and PMSNBC
>>> are offered free with the basic package. Assuming my experience is the
>>> norm, one has to wonder why Fox dominates the cable news. I mean, if they
>>> are included in for-fee programming and still beat the free program
>>> offerings, there must be something there...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

I watched some of Glenn Beck's show this afternoon. If half of what
he is saying could happen does happen I'm heading for the bat cellar and
not coming out for 10 or 15 years.

[Mike]

Perhaps that is why MSNBC is at the bottom of ratings totem pole.

"dbu," <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:qLGdnQRqNaiT2U7R...@giganews.com...

> In article <dL2dnR4OQ_W1qE7R...@ptd.net>,
> "Mike" <mike...@lycos.com> wrote:
>

>> There is, Fox is the only place were viewers get fair and balanced news.
>> Those that believe otherwise obviously do not watch Fox News.
>

> Watching MSNBC and the father mathews hardballs is enough to make a
> maggot regurgitate.
>
>
>>
>>

>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:iavb4b$ui7$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> >
>> > "FatterDumber& Happier Moe" <"WheresMyCheck"@UncleSamLoves.Mee> wrote
>> > in
>> > message news:4cd31154$0$14791$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...
>> >> badgolferman wrote:
>> >>> Fox News Dominates Cable News Election Night Coverage
>> >>>
>> >>> http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/11/03/fox-news-dominates-cable-news-electio
>> >>> n-night-coverage/70725
>> >>
>> >> Rich republicans are the only ones that can afford cable tv ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Fox News is in a package that I have to pay extra for, but CNN and
>> > PMSNBC
>> > are offered free with the basic package. Assuming my experience is the
>> > norm, one has to wonder why Fox dominates the cable news. I mean, if
>> > they
>> > are included in for-fee programming and still beat the free program
>> > offerings, there must be something there...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >

> --
>

[Mike]

If we continue on the current path that scenario may not be far off. The
nuts have been running the asylum, that is Washington DC, since 2006. The
only hope we have is the fact spending legislation begins in the House and
when the Republican take over in January they can simply not fund some of
the goofy government Healthcare, EPA, SEC, Fanny and Freddy regulatory
bureaucratic crap that has been enacted and perhaps save the county for our
grandchildren.

I always found it odd, that for all of President Bush's time in office the
Dims kept telling us that everything he was doing was wrong, but never ONCE
did they even try to cut the funding for the war or the Patriot Act, but
actually INCREASED the funding over what the President had requested when
they controlled the Congress.

The railed about the tax RATE cuts for all Americans yet they voted for the
tax rate cuts, then said they were ONLY cuts for the rich when in fact the
highest RATE cut was to the poorest, the 15% rate was cut to 10%, a 33.3%
cut while the rate for the richest was cut only 3%, curious.

"FatterDumber& Happier Moe" <"WheresMyCheck"@UncleSamLoves.Mee> wrote in

message news:4cd35b87$0$14826$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...