On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:41:14 -0400, brendan welch <
w1...@uml.edu>
wrote:
>Details below, but I now suspect that I have found a "new" starting
>problem relating to the ignition key. One of the reasons is that this
>was the only time in 5 years that I have left the key in the ignition
>switch (at OFF) for several hours, just before trying to start.
>
>The car is a 2007 Camry LE, 50K miles, with never any problems.
>Battery is the original, but seems in good condition.
Posted on alt.autos.toyota.camry
If it can crank the engine long enough for the car to start, the
battery is sufficiently charged (but of course you did the right thing
at the end, letting it run to recharge the battery from what it used
when you were trying to start it.)
Weather was a
>perfect shirt-sleeve day.
>
>1)I started the car, but it ran for only a few seconds, and died.
>2)I immediately tried starting again, but now it would not start.
But it cranked? The engine turned over at a normal speed?
If not, it could be a sign of a battery problem, unrelated to how well
charged the battery is. I had a battery with a short or an open..
In my case the battery worked fine until it got quite hot, when the
voltage dropped a lot and the car would not crank at all. It took
maybe 45 minutes to cool off and then it started fine. It took me
about 5 starts over 3 days to figure out it was t he battery. .
Thatt's probaqbly not your problem since it didnt' have time to get
hot, but if the car doesn't turn over at normal speed, I'd measure
the voltage at the two battery posts. Even though they were good only
2 minutes earrlier. Lots of wierd things happen and what gets one out
of trouble is having an organized attack on the problme. Should be
12.6 volts or so when sitting idle, not trying to start.
Another diistictiion betwwen your car and mine that time is that your
car stalls after it is running. Mine didn't do that, but otoh, you
could have two problems. One the stalling and the other a bad battery
IF your car doesn't crank at your number 2.
>3)I waited a while and tried again; results same as 1)
>4)I let the car roll back a few feet in the driveway and tried again.
> Same results as 1)
That's got to be because of elapsed time. I don't think rolling the
car a few feet can do anything.
>5)I tried pumping the gas as soon as possible after it started, but to
>no effect. It died again.
I don't think pumping is so effective since cars had fuel injection.
When cars had carburetors, pumping the gas moved what was called an
accelerator pump within the carburetor. One pump stroke for every
down stroke of the accelerator pedial. You could actually look down
the throat of the carburetor and see a jet of gasoline going into the
carb when you moved the metal rod connected to the accelerator pedal.
That doesn't happen anymore, And aiui there is no point at all to
pumping the accelerator when the car isn't running. However, now,
pushing the pedal down farther when the car is running should cause
more gas to be injected in the cycllinders for as long as the pedal is
farther down. If the pedal is farther down when the car starts, also
more gas wiill be injected than if the pedal were higher.
Of course ;-) you should do this in neutral or park, or on the
highway when no one is in front of you.
>6)Finally the car started, stayed running, and correctly responded to my
>pumping the gas. I kept it running for a minute or so, just in case the
>battery needed charging from the earlier attempts (none of which was
>longer that about 6 seconds).
>
>So I borrowed an OBDC tool from my neighbor. But since the check-engine
>light never came on, there never was a code set.
It was still a good idea to check the codes. IIRC, there are
sometimes pending codes, when the computer senses a bad value but
doesn't rush to turn the light on.
>This is consistent
>with my guess that the ignition key simply disconnected.
Do you mean the ignition switch that is controlled by the key?
> The tool
>responds to show that the engine speed increases when I pump the gas.
That's because the average location of the pedal is farther down when
you put it farther down and lift it up. You could get the same
result by putting the pedal half-way between where you would normally
have the pedal and where your maximum down pump position is.
>
>I got some books from the library, but they are talking about things
>like no gas, loose connections, air leak between intake manifold and
>throttle body, none of which seem applicable.
>
>There has never been a problem before, or since (the car was driven
>several hundred miles, some of it on unpaved roads in poor weather, on
I don't think the roads or t he weather at another time make any
difference. Spark plug wires can absorb humidity and not work well,
but your car runs okay until it stallss, right.
>the next day). I would be perfectly happy, but I hate to drive around
>thinking I might be stuck in the boondocks with a dead car, all because
>of strange problems in my driveway, on just one day out of 5 years.
I agree. You should fix it.
>any ideas?
IF you're getting a manual, there are several possibile factory
manuals. I think you woululd want the 2007 Toyota Camry Electrical
Wiring Manual. That's a separate manual for my 2000, so I suppose it
is for you too. You can buy new but you can also often find them on
ebay, for less money. I find the Toryota electrical manual a lot
harder to read than Ford, GM, or Chrysler manuals, so I guarantee it
will take you quite a while to understand a lot of it.
From your second post:
>
>I was a little disappointed in the instrument panel junction box (which
>the book calls the engine room j/b). That year, the fuse layout is not
>exactly the same as even pictured on the underside of the cover.
That's a shame but not reall surprising.
>Some
>of the hoped for fuse locations are empty.
>
>
>At the fuses near the drivers knee, there is only one labelled IGN (I
>don't know if it is supposed to be IGN1 or IGN2, if it matters). And I
>could not find the ignition relay.
If there are supposed to be two ign fuses they should both be good.
You could sit with the manual for a hal hour trying to follow the
wires and figure out which does what, but basically both fuses should
be good. All your fuses should be good, and if not you should know
what doesn't work because of that. (My rear window defogger isn't
working.)
>
>The bottom line is that the fuses looked so clean that I hesitated to
>even pull and immediately replace amy fuse. Especially since the car
>has run OK for several days and several hundred miles, I figure, "if it
>aint broke, don't fix".
You can also use a voltmeter to see if both ends of the fuse are
hot,** about the same as a measurement taken right at the two battery
posts. You need to find a good ground in the passenger compartment.
IIRC, I still havent' found one in my 2000 Camry Solara. but if worst
comes to worst, I'll run a wire outsiide of the car from an engine
compartment ground. Still there must be better places near the
fusebox. I didn't have much time last fall.
**If your probes are too big to get into the little holes at each end
of the plastic top of the fuse, you can use a hat pin, corsage pin, or
the kind of straight pin that new shirts have in them, and you can
attach a piece of wire with an alligator clip to the pin head, and the
other end of the wire to one of the voltmeter (mulitmeter) probles.
Radio Shack sells a bag of 10 in five different colers for 3 or 4
dollars. They have loads of uses.
>
>I still suspect the problem is something with the way the key affected
>some contacts,
So jiiggle the key when the car is running to see if it stops, and
when it is about to stop to see if it starts up again. That might
show something. Although I still don't know why you suspect the
ignition switch. Did you ever say?
Heavy keyrings have been known to cause ignition switch problems in
some cars, not especially toyotas, but that's very heavy and after
years.
>but you alerted me to concentrate on the different
>selector positions. For example, what if it STARTED in drive, and the
You mean started in Start.
>selector returned to RUN, but then vibrated a little toward ACC?
>Unlikely, but I should keep an open mind.
>
>Also, it brought to mind a problem a friend had years ago, with the car
>starting but not running. That was in the days before computers, when
>the START position gave the full 12 volts, but the RUN position had a
>resistor in series,
Ah, you do know things. That was called the ballast resistor, and it
was out of the ignition primary circuit for Start and in the circuit
for Run.