Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Can This Forum Make A Comeback?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

DEEPNHOCK

unread,
Sep 5, 2009, 12:02:41 PM9/5/09
to
I think so.....

While this place is a free for all anything goes forum......
I am finding that the recent influx of people on the 'other ' forum is
showing a trend that might make this place popular all over again...

So. Ga. Cruiser

unread,
Sep 5, 2009, 12:07:38 PM9/5/09
to
The masses await your leadership. Jeffy!

Dave Miller


R W Hughes

unread,
Sep 5, 2009, 12:17:02 PM9/5/09
to
But will anybody be able to post or read? It seems like all of the ISPs
are stampeding to drop Usenet, mine just joined in.

bobj

unread,
Sep 5, 2009, 2:05:44 PM9/5/09
to

Right now it has the stage, as the other one is in the
toilet again...

JeffDeWitt

unread,
Sep 5, 2009, 10:22:43 PM9/5/09
to

Sadly it can't ever be what it once was because so few ISP's support
Usenet anymore, so pretty much the only access most of us have is
through Google, and that means no pictures.

But it can be a lot more than it is.

mbstude

unread,
Sep 5, 2009, 10:31:34 PM9/5/09
to
I'm in, Jeff.

MB

Message has been deleted

SeaWoe

unread,
Sep 6, 2009, 1:45:51 AM9/6/09
to
On Sep 5, 8:54 pm, m...@notanywhere.net wrote:
>  OK, you tightwads..
>
>  is it WORTH $3-4 for you to get on HERE?
>
>  a ONE TIME cost, and yes there is a DAILY download limit- 50 meg
> total?- you provide the software to read the groups.
>
>  free.teranews.com
>  the $ fee is a ONE TIME thing, BTW
>
> --Shiva--

I'm a member of five or six Google Groups and see some drop off, but
still enough posted to make a daily visit worthwhile

Studebaker George

unread,
Sep 6, 2009, 8:16:01 AM9/6/09
to
I miss the good 'ol days here...cussin' and fussin'...
Jeffy, you feeling especially politically incorrect?..<G>
Shame that the archives here appear to be gone. What a TON of great
info that is now lost.
Lenghty discussions here about light bulbs and Ford 289's will be
sabotaged....
StudebakerGeorge

r1lark

unread,
Sep 6, 2009, 9:37:41 AM9/6/09
to
On Sep 5, 12:02�pm, DEEPNHOCK <deepnh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am finding that the recent influx of people on the 'other ' forum is
> showing a trend that might make this place popular all over again...

<GRIN>

Paul

r1lark

unread,
Sep 6, 2009, 1:13:44 PM9/6/09
to

George,

I thought the archives were gone too. However, after playing around it
appears as tho they just changed the search function. I was able to
make it work by hitting the "search groups" button, then clicking on
the "advanced groups search" in the upper right hand corner. Besides
entering in your search 'words', you will also have to set the
"message dates" (I use the 'return messages posted anytime') and put
"alt.autos.studebaker" in the "Group" field.

For example, I searched this way on 'Jet Thrust' and returned 450
hits.

Hope this helps. I'm kinda 'puter slow, so it took me a while to
figure all this out <G>!

Paul

r1lark

unread,
Sep 6, 2009, 1:15:11 PM9/6/09
to
Oops, forgot to mention this is the search function on "Google
Groups"......

Paul

mbstude

unread,
Sep 6, 2009, 8:20:25 PM9/6/09
to
Thanks Paul! I was afraid it was all gone forever...

MB

Grumpy AuContraire

unread,
Sep 6, 2009, 10:06:44 PM9/6/09
to
DEEPNHOCK wrote:

Well git yo' butt back in online!

This group is for "real" men though!

<G>

JT

Studebaker George

unread,
Sep 7, 2009, 7:40:16 AM9/7/09
to
Thanks about the archives, Paul...more of a pain in the ass to use but
still there.
StudebakerGeorge

JeffDeWitt

unread,
Sep 7, 2009, 11:51:18 AM9/7/09
to

This place in it's heyday was like the Hangtown of Studebakerdom...
rough and ready but a lot of fun and it got the job done better than
anything before or since.

Studebaker George

unread,
Sep 7, 2009, 7:25:17 PM9/7/09
to
Yeah, even after all the shit slingin' when there was a tech issue it
was like all the bad was put aside (well...at least most of the
times..) and the knowledge flowed... it could be funny as hell or
bring tears to your eyes...


OK Jeffy, you started it...
Where is my lighter...<G>
Studebaker George

Rick Courtier

unread,
Sep 8, 2009, 11:40:20 AM9/8/09
to
Now, wait just a gosh darn minute. . .don't all you trouble makers from
the other forum be coming in here shaking things up and just when it was
getting to be very peaceful around here even with the spam. <G>


Rick

Jerry Kaiser@teranews.com

unread,
Sep 8, 2009, 12:39:45 PM9/8/09
to
I sure hope it can make a come back! Never could get used to the other one.I
looked in here and see all these post about this group making a come back It
just does my old heart good.
Jerry
"Rick Courtier" <microbre...@laketarpon.com> wrote in message
news:h85tt...@news2.newsguy.com...

SeaWoe

unread,
Sep 8, 2009, 1:31:06 PM9/8/09
to
On Sep 8, 9:39 am, "Jerry Kai...@teranews.com" <stude...@triconet.org>
wrote:

> I sure hope it can make a come back! Never could get used to the other one.I
> looked in here and see all these post about this group making a come back It
> just does my old heart good.
> Jerry"Rick Courtier" <microbrewerys...@laketarpon.com> wrote in message

>
> news:h85tt...@news2.newsguy.com...
>
>
>
> > Now, wait just a gosh darn minute. . .don't all you trouble makers from
> > the other forum be coming in here shaking things up and just when it was
> > getting to be very peaceful around here even with the spam. <G>
>
> > Rick- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dareingly, I submit a Studebaker message.
What is the overall length and width (less mirrors) of a 1964 Comander
4-door sedan?

Karl

Chris

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 12:18:12 PM9/9/09
to

"Rick Courtier" <microbre...@laketarpon.com> wrote in message
news:h85tt...@news2.newsguy.com...

You know, it's been a long, long time since I've read a post by "He who's
name may not be spoken" here, you know, the guy who knew everything about
turbo-charging Studes.
Chris H.
'52 2R5 (next bring back to life project)
'55 Champion 16G6
'59 Lark VI (may be soon scrapped)

Keith Brooks

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:21:37 AM11/7/09
to
It would be nice but I keep getting those hints at better fuel economy over
and over and over.

Brooksie


On 09-09-05 9:02 AM, in article
88b7035b-f22b-4c90...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com,

Grumpy AuContraire

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 9:27:36 PM11/7/09
to
Fuel economy... Bah!

We in central Texas are the latest victims of 10% ethanol
content gas. Fuel economy decreased by a like amount so that amounts to
a 10% increase in cost.

Thank You EPA!

Grrrrrrrr


JT

0 new messages